HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Bishop and/or Anderson. Ottawa goaltender firesale!!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-22-2013, 11:23 PM
  #1
mikey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 364
vCash: 500
Bishop and/or Anderson. Ottawa goaltender firesale!!

Make us an offer. Both are available.

Our needs are scoring wingers, top 4 D.

We don't need bottom 6, can include some roster players to facilitate a trade.

Untouchables are anyone in the top 6 currently barring Latendresse and any D.

Zbad is available if we get equivalent value back.

mikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-22-2013, 11:34 PM
  #2
IranCondraAffair
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,241
vCash: 500
Anderson will not be traded.

Ottawa just sent Lehner down so there's no rush on Bishop either.

Also Ottawa doesn't really need scoring wingers either since we just signed Latendresse. Michalek/Alfredsson are both locks otherwise. Silfverberg is also going to get a long look on Spezza's line and unless he completely ***** the bed (and he's playing great so far) he's not going anywhere.

A temp D partner for Gonchar is the only real need

IranCondraAffair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-22-2013, 11:40 PM
  #3
BonkTastic
"Small Sample Size!"
 
BonkTastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, IDN
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,540
vCash: 500
Why do we need to have a "firesale"?

Just shop Bishop until you get the right offer. I don't imagine he'll be moved until the Trade Deadline, anyways.

Lehner just got sent back to the AHL, because he's the only one of Ottawa's 3 goalies who is waiver exempt. A victim of the "contract game" at the moment. We're in no rush to move Bishop, at least not in the next month or two.

BonkTastic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-22-2013, 11:46 PM
  #4
Lehner
Registered User
 
Lehner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,430
vCash: 500
looks like Oilers need a goalie

Lehner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-22-2013, 11:46 PM
  #5
HavlatMach9
Registered User
 
HavlatMach9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,173
vCash: 500
Bishop to highest bidder
or
Anderson to whoever pays through their nose (1st line forward (or fringe 1st liner) or first pairing dman)

HavlatMach9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 12:09 AM
  #6
Christmas Izzy
Moderator
FollowmeonInstagram!
 
Christmas Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Posts: 50,927
vCash: 500
I don't see Anderson going anywhere...

Christmas Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 12:10 AM
  #7
Pilgore88
Registered User
 
Pilgore88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 4,421
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by fst6 View Post
I don't see Anderson going anywhere...
He won't, if he was to be traded it would be when we KNOW for certain Lehner is the clear cut number one i.e not this year. Sens want to make the playoffs, and Anderson is a huge component to that.

Pilgore88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 02:04 AM
  #8
deytookerjaabs
Registered Smut User
 
deytookerjaabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,833
vCash: 500
Looking at the list of UFA and RFA goalies that are likely to hit the market this summer I can't say I'd offer too much at this point, rather wait and see what happens.

deytookerjaabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 02:06 AM
  #9
saskriders
ColinGreening's#1fan
 
saskriders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary/Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,207
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by fst6 View Post
I don't see Anderson going anywhere...
Would only be moved for a big overpayment

saskriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 02:25 AM
  #10
danishh
Dat Stache
 
danishh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: mtl/ott/somewhere
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,693
vCash: 500
i would think calling andy available is a gross mistake right now.

danishh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 02:32 AM
  #11
senators101
Registered User
 
senators101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: T.O.
Posts: 4,478
vCash: 500
Way too many people on the Sens board proposing Anderson trades before the season starts. It's like they completely forgot how good he was for us last year. We finally have a solid GK, Lehner can wait.

senators101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 02:51 AM
  #12
danishh
Dat Stache
 
danishh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: mtl/ott/somewhere
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,693
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by senators101 View Post
Way too many people on the Sens board proposing Anderson trades before the season starts. It's like they completely forgot how good he was for us last year. We finally have a solid GK, Lehner can wait.
not to mention does any team really want to go with two inexperienced goaltenders? The obvious path here is an anderson/lehner tandem for 2013-14. That would be the second-last year on andy's contract, and if lehner surpasses him, he will be very tradeable but also affordable to keep as a backup.

Bishop will be traded by the start of 2013-14. There is no rush at the moment. I'd imagine it would be quite easy to cash him in for the 2nd we traded for him last year (keep in mind the sens traded a 2013 2nd for him, so we could easily recover it now and effectively have had him for free for a year).

danishh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 03:00 AM
  #13
EpicNeilTime
Registered User
 
EpicNeilTime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,259
vCash: 500
I think by the way Anderson has played over the last season and his seasons with Colorado, his name should be in the conversation as a legit #1 goalie and a decent one at that. During the playoffs against the Rangers, he stole a couple games the Sens shouldn't have won. Anderson's value would likely be a first and a good prospect.

Bishop will get moved eventually, Lehner has shown he is capable of playing in the NHL and likely to be a starter. Bryan Murray will play Bishop a lot down the stretch to raise his value and trade him to a team that desperately needs goal-tending depth (Oilers, Hawks).
Bishop's value right now is probably a good D prospect or draft pick.

Lehner is likely untouchable, and would cost an arm and a leg because of his high value to the Sens.

EpicNeilTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 03:09 AM
  #14
CoachBadkitten
Matt Hunwick
 
CoachBadkitten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 4,331
vCash: 500
Why would OTT trade Andy?

CoachBadkitten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 08:07 AM
  #15
dan1el
Registered User
 
dan1el's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: Sweden
Posts: 2,737
vCash: 500
I really do not want Ottawa to move a goalie right now. Wait till the deadline until a team gets desperate and severely overpays, or wait until all three of our goalies are legit starters-which I don't think is too far in the future-and then make a trade.

But for the spirit of the thread, here's a not-so-serious proposal:

To Edmonton:
Craig Anderson, Mark Borowiecki, Guillaume Latendresse, Conditional First if the Sens make the playoffs, Second if not

To Ottawa:
Yakupov

Starting goalie problem for Edmonton is fixed. Latendresse brings a decent amount of experience to the Oil top 6 while not being too much of a downgrade, except in age. Boro isn't the best D prospect ever but is mid-level and could probably go to the NHL right now. The pick is just icing. Am I too far off?

dan1el is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 08:35 AM
  #16
Cujomi
YNWA
 
Cujomi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,239
vCash: 500
Anderson isn't going anywhere. Why would you even consider moving him? The guy has to be the most underrated goalie in the league.

Cujomi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 08:38 AM
  #17
White Goodman
smell that fitness?
 
White Goodman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB
Country: England
Posts: 6,640
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by dan1el View Post
Am I too far off?
Yes. Edmonton says lolololol.

White Goodman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 08:55 AM
  #18
ResilientBeast
MLFH Edmonton Titans
 
ResilientBeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,286
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dan1el View Post
I really do not want Ottawa to move a goalie right now. Wait till the deadline until a team gets desperate and severely overpays, or wait until all three of our goalies are legit starters-which I don't think is too far in the future-and then make a trade.

But for the spirit of the thread, here's a not-so-serious proposal:

To Edmonton:
Craig Anderson, Mark Borowiecki, Guillaume Latendresse, Conditional First if the Sens make the playoffs, Second if not

To Ottawa:
Yakupov

Starting goalie problem for Edmonton is fixed. Latendresse brings a decent amount of experience to the Oil top 6 while not being too much of a downgrade, except in age. Boro isn't the best D prospect ever but is mid-level and could probably go to the NHL right now. The pick is just icing. Am I too far off?
Yes you are far off. While that will help our goaltending now, we give up a blue chip prospect. Quality > quantity. Our d just had a bad game Dubnyk can only be blamed for 1-2 of those goals. We'll keep our blue chip forward.

ResilientBeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 08:56 AM
  #19
krazyhawk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Montreal/Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Posts: 628
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to krazyhawk
Quote:
Originally Posted by HavlatMach9 View Post
Bishop to highest bidder
or
Anderson to whoever pays through their nose (1st line forward (or fringe 1st liner) or first pairing dman)
Yeah good luck with that.No one's paying anything good for Anderson.In fact I bet he'll garner the worst offers of any of your goalies.Decide which of Bishop or Lehner to keep and field offers for the other.

krazyhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 08:57 AM
  #20
Indy on the Road
From the ground up
 
Indy on the Road's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,855
vCash: 500
Firesale? Oh boy...

Indy on the Road is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 09:03 AM
  #21
TSA0402
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,235
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dan1el View Post

But for the spirit of the thread, here's a not-so-serious proposal:

To Edmonton:
Craig Anderson, Mark Borowiecki, Guillaume Latendresse, Conditional First if the Sens make the playoffs, Second if not

To Ottawa:
Yakupov
Replace Cowen with Boro, make it a non-conditional first and I think they still say no.

TSA0402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 09:04 AM
  #22
krazyhawk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Montreal/Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Posts: 628
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to krazyhawk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cujomi View Post
Anderson isn't going anywhere. Why would you even consider moving him? The guy has to be the most underrated goalie in the league.
You cant be serious!! Been watching this guy since jrs,he's good,not great and not the long-term answer for the Sens.Underrated ? Not by many,most know exactly what he is.Overrated ? Yes by homer fans who want to believe he's the man.(he's not)

krazyhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 09:09 AM
  #23
SNES
Registered User
 
SNES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Manotick
Country: Canada
Posts: 462
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by danishh View Post
i would think calling andy available is a gross mistake right now.
+1

Firesale bah ridiculous

SNES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 09:42 AM
  #24
SlapJack
Scum bag Sens
 
SlapJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 741
vCash: 500
I'll apologize on behalf of Sens fans for all the Bishop/Anderson trade proposals. We've never had this strange thing you call goaltending depth and we don't know what to do with it. Unless you can say over and over again for 20 years that having one guy with question marks is depth.

Doesn't make any sense to trade anybody right now. Murray can sit back for a bit and evaluate the season. No one wants Lehner to be stuck in the AHL but you don't unseat a guy that has proven to be a good #1 starter, especially when you've never had one. I don't hear a lot of chatter about the problem Florida has with Markstrom waiting impatiently for Theodore to falter. Instead it's the opposite, there's rumors of bringing in someone else with a ridiculous contact? I swear that 99% of trade rumors are figments of journalists imaginations or they read them here.

SlapJack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 09:54 AM
  #25
MoreGore
Registered User
 
MoreGore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,197
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lehner View Post
looks like Oilers need a goalie
They could use depth as well.

Bishop, Boroweicki and Peumple for their first in 2013?

MoreGore is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.