HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk > Polls - (hockey-related only)

prime vs prime.Lindros vs Sakic

View Poll Results: better prime
Lindros 74 55.64%
Sakic 59 44.36%
Voters: 133. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-22-2013, 04:19 PM
  #1
marty 4 hart*
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 612
vCash: 500
prime vs prime.Lindros vs Sakic

Who had the better prime?

marty 4 hart* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-22-2013, 05:00 PM
  #2
Ohashi_Jouzu
Registered User
 
Ohashi_Jouzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Halifax
Country: Japan
Posts: 20,824
vCash: 500
Interesting phrasing of the question. I'd say Lindros was "better" in his prime, but because of everything we know in hindsight, Sakic had the better prime. Multiple, "full", 100 point seasons, Cups, etc.

Ohashi_Jouzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-22-2013, 05:15 PM
  #3
Pie Man
A-Pie
 
Pie Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Im the guy next door
Country: Sweden
Posts: 2,459
vCash: 500
Lindros without thinking twice when it come down to prime. At his prime Lindros was an hart trophy winner, lead the league in points, build one of the best line of the 90s in Legion of Doom, took his team to the final, he was feared around the league and some team drafted big defenseman just in hope to be able to defend against Lindros.

Except for the few legendary players there is not many players I would take over a prime Lindros. Im only 28 years old but I have not seen a similar player to Lindros before and after, he is truly unique and I hope in my lifetime to see a similar player like Lindros on the ice.

Pie Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-22-2013, 05:38 PM
  #4
Regal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,257
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohashi_Jouzu View Post
Interesting phrasing of the question. I'd say Lindros was "better" in his prime, but because of everything we know in hindsight, Sakic had the better prime. Multiple, "full", 100 point seasons, Cups, etc.
Pretty much this. For one healthy game in their primes, it would be Lindros, but Sakic was able to stay healthy. Also, the sheer length of his prime is ridiculous. Top 10 in points as early as 1990 and as late as 2007.

Regal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-22-2013, 08:09 PM
  #5
fly4apuckguy
Mr. Old School
 
fly4apuckguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,998
vCash: 500
Anyone picking Sakic is doing so because he was a great guy, well respected, and won championships.

In terms of greatest at the peak of their skill, Lindros. By a lot. In fact, Lindros by a lot over almost anyone not named Lemieux or Gretzky.

Too bad his prime didn't last very long.

fly4apuckguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-22-2013, 08:29 PM
  #6
PoolChamp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,770
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by fly4apuckguy View Post
Anyone picking Sakic is doing so because he was a great guy, well respected, and won championships.

In terms of greatest at the peak of their skill, Lindros. By a lot. In fact, Lindros by a lot over almost anyone not named Lemieux or Gretzky.

Too bad his prime didn't last very long.
here we go again

PoolChamp is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-22-2013, 08:35 PM
  #7
Hardyvan123
tweet@HardyintheWack
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,396
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regal View Post
Pretty much this. For one healthy game in their primes, it would be Lindros, but Sakic was able to stay healthy. Also, the sheer length of his prime is ridiculous. Top 10 in points as early as 1990 and as late as 2007.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fly4apuckguy View Post
Anyone picking Sakic is doing so because he was a great guy, well respected, and won championships.

In terms of greatest at the peak of their skill, Lindros. By a lot. In fact, Lindros by a lot over almost anyone not named Lemieux or Gretzky.

Too bad his prime didn't last very long.
I would tend to agree with this on a per game basis but in his Prime Lindros misses too many games.

No player can have any impact when they are not playing.

Lindros has a great prime (same as his peak) in his 1st 7 years, but Joe's is longer and healthier even if it might not be "as great" on a per game basis.

Like Regal points out the sheer length of Joe's prime has to count for something here right?

Hardyvan123 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-22-2013, 10:22 PM
  #8
Habs 4 Life
No Excuses
 
Habs 4 Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montreal
Country: Italy
Posts: 32,367
vCash: 500
Lindros

Habs 4 Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-22-2013, 10:37 PM
  #9
Ohashi_Jouzu
Registered User
 
Ohashi_Jouzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Halifax
Country: Japan
Posts: 20,824
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hardyvan123 View Post
Like Regal points out the sheer length of Joe's prime has to count for something here right?
In this particular poll, yes, as the question asked was who had the best prime, not who was the best in their prime. Like I posted earlier, it's not exactly what the "usual" poll asks. I'd say it's pretty definitively Sakic for the former, and Lindros for the latter.

Ohashi_Jouzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 06:20 AM
  #10
I Hate Chris Butler
Backlund Fan Club
 
I Hate Chris Butler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,691
vCash: 50
Sakic's prime lasted longer than Lindros' career. Give me Joe; he was healthier and a better goal scorer.

I Hate Chris Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 07:10 AM
  #11
416Leafer
Registered User
 
416Leafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 5,080
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by I Hate Jay Feaster View Post
Sakic's prime lasted longer than Lindros' career. Give me Joe; he was healthier and a better goal scorer.
I interpreted the question as which was better when playing at their very best, aka ignoring Lindros' injury problems, which one would you want on your team for one game or for one playoff series if both were at their best.

Under that definition I went with Lindros. Though Sakic obviously had the better career.

416Leafer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 07:11 AM
  #12
Krishna
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Krishna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Country: Canada
Posts: 81,744
vCash: 50
Lindros

__________________
Krishna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 07:13 AM
  #13
BROOKLYnKNIGHTS
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,767
vCash: 500
Lindros was the complete package and a more dominant goal scorer in his prime

BROOKLYnKNIGHTS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 09:01 AM
  #14
tony d
The man
 
tony d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind A Tree
Country: Canada
Posts: 32,487
vCash: 500
Lindros

__________________
People got to learn how to use punctuation. On our radio ads the other day a black man's wallet was reported as missing. Instead of a man's wallet black in colour missing a black man's wallet is missing.
tony d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 09:02 AM
  #15
I Hate Chris Butler
Backlund Fan Club
 
I Hate Chris Butler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,691
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by 416Leafer View Post
I interpreted the question as which was better when playing at their very best, aka ignoring Lindros' injury problems, which one would you want on your team for one game or for one playoff series if both were at their best.

Under that definition I went with Lindros. Though Sakic obviously had the better career.
I just went by the exact wording of the poll. To me that's Sakic pretty easily.

I Hate Chris Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 11:22 AM
  #16
McNuts
Registered User
 
McNuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,821
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BROOKLYnKNIGHTS View Post
Lindros was (...) a more dominant goal scorer in his prime
That's not true. If there's one thing Sakic was better at than Lindros in his prime, it's scoring goals.

McNuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 12:07 PM
  #17
BleedinBlueSince1972
More Cowbell!!!
 
BleedinBlueSince1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: St. Louis MO
Country: United States
Posts: 2,880
vCash: 1010
Lindros was a beast ( when healthy ) in his prime. However, that wasn't the case very often, and I was a huge Sakic fan.

BleedinBlueSince1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 02:18 PM
  #18
Oscar Acosta
Bat Country
 
Oscar Acosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 3,377
vCash: 738
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoolChamp View Post
here we go again
It's true though.

Oscar Acosta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 02:34 PM
  #19
sansabri
like a docent's lisp
 
sansabri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Montréal, QC
Posts: 5,424
vCash: 500
i think a lot of people have forgotten ( or simply have never witnessed ) what a monster Lindros was.

he had size, speed and one hell of a mean streak. he could make finesse passes and score with the best of them - but he could also throw devastating hits and drop the gloves against anyone.

there was no player like him before in the NHL.

sansabri is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 02:35 PM
  #20
I Hate Chris Butler
Backlund Fan Club
 
I Hate Chris Butler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,691
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oscar Acosta View Post
It's true though.
No, it's not. Lindros wasn't even the best of his era.

I Hate Chris Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 02:44 PM
  #21
Ohashi_Jouzu
Registered User
 
Ohashi_Jouzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Halifax
Country: Japan
Posts: 20,824
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by I Hate Jay Feaster View Post
No, it's not. Lindros wasn't even the best of his era.
That statement doesn't mean as much when the comparison is obviously to Gretzky, Lemieux, and Jagr. There are, like, 8 decades of hockey where the "best of the era" couldn't compare to the best of Lindros' prime years in the NHL.

Ohashi_Jouzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 02:51 PM
  #22
gifted88
Dante the poet
 
gifted88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Guelph, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,271
vCash: 500
If I had to choose one player for one game when they are at their peak I'd go with Lindros.

I'm a huge Sakic fan, so if anything I have a slight bias to Sakic.

gifted88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 03:02 PM
  #23
Regal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,257
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by McNuts View Post
That's not true. If there's one thing Sakic was better at than Lindros in his prime, it's scoring goals.
I thought this too, but looking at it, it's not really the case. Sakic may have had better goalscoring peaks, and better full seasons because he was healthy, but he had more valleys too.

Lindros' GPG finishes: 3, 4, 6, 6, 6, 6, 8, 10
Sakic's GPG finishes: 3, 5, 6, 6, 10

Lindros with an advantage despite Sakic's longevity advantage.

Sakic has an advantage in actual finishes, but not by as much as one would think:

Lindros' goal finishes: 6, 7, 9, 9
Sakic's goal finishes: 2, 5, 6, 6, 10

We can compare them season to season too:

92-93
Sakic: 78 GP, 48 G
Lindros: 61 GP, 41 G

Lindros with a slight GPG advantage, but less GP. Maybe slight advantage Sakic due to actually doing it.

93-94
Sakic: 84 GP, 28G
Lindros: 65GP, 44G

Big advantage Lindros, 16 more goals in 19 less games.

94-95
Sakic: 47 GP, 19 G
Lindros: 46 GP, 29 G

Advantage Lindros

95-96
Sakic: 82 GP, 51 G
Lindros: 73GP, 47 G

Slight edge to Lindros in GPG, 9 more games for Sakic. I'd say even.

96-97
Sakic: 65GP, 22 G
Lindros: 52 GP, 32 G

Lindros with 10 more goals in 13 less games. Big advantage.

97-98
Sakic: 64 GP, 27 G
Lindros: 63 GP, 30 G

Slight edge to Lindros.

98-99
Sakic: 73 GP, 41 G
Lindros: 71 GP, 40 G

Pretty even here.

99-00
Sakic: 60 GP, 28 G
Lindros: 55 Gp, 27 G

Pretty even here as well.

00-01
Sakic: 82 GP, 54 G
Lindros: 0 GP

Lindros missed the season, but Sakic was the league's best player, and had his best goalscoring season. Big edge Sakic.

01-02
Sakic: 82 GP, 26 G
Lindros: 73 GP, 37 G

Fairly big edge to Lindros, as Sakic started to tail off in his goalscoring.

Of course, Sakic was much more productive outside of those seasons, but it only really eliminates one big goal season, when he scored 48 in '91 to finish 6th in the league. Most of Sakic's best coincided with Lindros' best, and Lindros was generally as good or better at goalscoring during that time. At least, on a per game basis.

From 92-93 to 01-02, Lindros scored 327 goals in 558 games to finish 13th in total goals and third to Lemieux and Bure in GPG, whereas Sakic scored 344 goals in 717 games to finish 8th in total goals and 13th in GPG.

Regal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 04:10 PM
  #24
86Habs
Registered User
 
86Habs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,171
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gifted88 View Post
If I had to choose one player for one game when they are at their peak I'd go with Lindros.
See, I don't understand that particular line of reasoning. Based on what they actually did in their most significant games, I'd take Sakic in a heartbeat. While Lindros was undoubtedly the more talented and naturally-gifted of the two, rising to the occasion and playing your best hockey at the most important moments should also be considered part of someone's skillset.

86Habs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-23-2013, 04:17 PM
  #25
MakeTheGoalsLarger
Registered User
 
MakeTheGoalsLarger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: QC
Country: Canada
Posts: 801
vCash: 500
what time length is considered for prime ? a season? 2-3 seasons? half a season ? ...a single game ?

personally, i think sakic in the 2002 olympics was better than Lindros ever was.

MakeTheGoalsLarger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.