HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Clowe, Murray, and Greiss at the deadline

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-25-2013, 03:36 PM
  #101
The Architect
When weasels fly...
 
The Architect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cali
Country: United States
Posts: 3,617
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaasa View Post
Well, Winnik was useless (as predicted) and so far Galliardi couldn't hold McGinn's jock. I would take McGinn back in a heartbeat. A 3rd line of McGinn-Sheppard-Wingels would be fantastic. Between the 2 of them, Wingels and McGinn could put way more of the fear into opposition players than Clowe ever could, just by playing the opposition "hard". And while McGinn is a borderline Top-6 at the moment, he's still a better option than anyone else in the Sharks org.

I said it at the time, and I'll say it again, the McGinn trade was one of DW's MANY stupid trades. It was just one of the more recent ones.
McGinn trade was terrible, absolutely terrible. I don't know what DW was thinking. Errr makes me angry just thinking about it. He would have been IDEAL on our third line this year - we'd actual have some of the depth we want.

The Architect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2013, 03:43 PM
  #102
Juxtaposer
Window: Closed
 
Juxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bay Area
Country: United States
Posts: 33,454
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaasa View Post
Well, Winnik was useless (as predicted) and so far Galliardi couldn't hold McGinn's jock. I would take McGinn back in a heartbeat. A 3rd line of McGinn-Sheppard-Wingels would be fantastic. Between the 2 of them, Wingels and McGinn could put way more of the fear into opposition players than Clowe ever could, just by playing the opposition "hard". And while McGinn is a borderline Top-6 at the moment, he's still a better option than anyone else in the Sharks org.
I mean, I would take McGinn back in a heartbeat, but I wouldn't trade Clowe for him.

Juxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2013, 03:49 PM
  #103
Gilligans Island
Registered User
 
Gilligans Island's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF/Bay Area
Posts: 10,083
vCash: 500
Could you imagine a McGinn - Gomez - Wingels line? That'd be nuts.

Oh well.

Gilligans Island is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2013, 04:02 PM
  #104
WTFetus
Moderator
Marlov
 
WTFetus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 13,083
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaasa View Post
Well, Winnik was useless (as predicted) and so far Galliardi couldn't hold McGinn's jock.
Have you watched Galiardi this season? In my opinion, he's been better this season than McGinn has been last. He's a better possession player, an underrated passer, a lot better defensively, a better forechecker, and he actually PKs. The only thing McGinn has over him is physicality and his shot.
Don't get me wrong, the trade was still bad since we probably could have got Galiardi for scraps, but he's better than McGinn in my opinion.

WTFetus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.