HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Phi-ana

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
01-26-2013, 03:11 AM
  #51
Snotbubbles
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,859
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducks DVM View Post
We're you even born the last time Bryzgalov was the reason for winning a playoff series?
Pittsburgh 2012?

Oh wait, I forgot. When his team wins, it's in spite of him. When they lose, it's because of him. Gotcha.

Snotbubbles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-26-2013, 04:07 AM
  #52
mightyquack
*insert witty title*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Perth, WA
Country: Germany
Posts: 11,592
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to mightyquack
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snotbubbles View Post
If the Ducks plan on keeping Hiller after his contract is up next season, then the money still owed to Bryz and the money that will be owed Hiller will be in the same ballpark. You'd have to think Hiller will be looking for a 4-5 year contract around 6M per. So you're talking about a 5-6 year committment (next year at 4.5 and then an extension) at around 29-35M total compensation. Compared to Bryz's 7 years, 34.5M remaining after this year.

I fully understand the argument that you have Gibson in the wings, but the counter is, if you want to keep Hiller, you have to make a committment to him. He's not gonna sign a 2 year deal to be a placeholder for Gibson.
Hiller could have those demands, I don't think he'd be likely to get them though. Giguere only got 4 years @ 24m total, at age 30, off the back of winning a Cup. Hiller would have to put up some really stellar numbers to justify a bigger contract then that, specially at age 32.

I like Bryz, I don't think he's been as bad as some say in Philly, but I just don't think it's a wise decision (for Anaheim) to commit that much money to a goalie, without even seeing what their current #1's potential contract demands would be. I'd think Anaheim would rather try and get Hiller on around a 3 year deal, instead of acquiring Bryz currently, specially with Gibson in the wings, who hopefully would be ready by 2015/2016-ish.

mightyquack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-26-2013, 04:10 AM
  #53
Ducks DVM
Moderator
There is no grunion
 
Ducks DVM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Long Beach, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,665
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snotbubbles View Post
Pittsburgh 2012?

Oh wait, I forgot. When his team wins, it's in spite of him. When they lose, it's because of him. Gotcha.
Being the less horrible of two horrible goaltenders doesn't equal being the reason they won that series. If your goalie is giving up 3-5 goals and the team still wins, yes, they won in spite of him.

Ducks DVM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:48 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.