Jason Arnott fails physical; Deal with NYR off
01-26-2013, 04:48 PM
#26
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC
Country:
Posts: 13,823
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ecemleafs
who cares how steep it is for 1 year. we got a ton of cap space right now.
Exactly. 1 year deals have no effect on our cap issues.
01-26-2013, 04:48 PM
#27
Unsatisfied
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,917
vCash: 500
At least it gets Rupp off the 3rd line.
01-26-2013, 04:48 PM
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: South Koster, Sweden
Country:
Posts: 4,677
vCash: 1481
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Loffen
For 1.7? Man, that's a bit steep.
It is only money. We got plenty of cap space (prorated 4,125 times at deadline) to take on a piece or two at the deadline still. Good move
01-26-2013, 04:49 PM
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Country:
Posts: 7,098
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BBKers
Knew something like this was coming
Something like this should have happened in August, but whatever.
01-26-2013, 04:49 PM
#30
Change is good.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn of course
Country:
Posts: 8,185
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ecemleafs
who cares how steep it is for 1 year. we got a ton of cap space right now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fire Sather
contract is basically meaningless as its only for one year
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tawnos
I've been talking about doing something like this for months and Arnott's name always comes to mind first. I know some guys are going to roll their eyes and say he's done, but I think he can contribute to our bottom-6. Not expecting a ton out of him.
He did put up 17 goals and 34 points (14 on the PP) on 14 minutes of ice time over 72 games last season. Tertiary penalty killer.
We will see if he has anything left in the tank. If not? He rides the pine. No big deal.
Exactly. No risk move that can only help - and in particular addresses one of the team's biggest weaknesses (faceoffs).
01-26-2013, 04:49 PM
#31
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 1,240
vCash: 500
An old Arnott is better at 3rd line center than Brian Boyle. What happens to Halpren now?
01-26-2013, 04:50 PM
#32
Pete Hearts Volch
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Rocky Point
Country:
Posts: 24,126
vCash: 500
It's a solid move. He's very slow but he'll help out on the PP and could be a great mentor for Kreider.
01-26-2013, 04:50 PM
#33
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Soft euro
Posts: 15,541
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thewaitingisover
Would you guys rather have Arnott on the 3rd line or Mike Rupp?
My man Rupp gets the job done.
Not really. lawl
01-26-2013, 04:51 PM
#34
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 7,323
vCash: 500
will we see arnott as a 3rd line winger?
01-26-2013, 04:51 PM
#35
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Country:
Posts: 2,879
vCash: 500
Excellent addition.
01-26-2013, 04:51 PM
#36
I like Kreider
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York
Country:
Posts: 4,049
vCash: 500
Gaborik-Richards-Nash
Pyatt-Stepan-Callahan
Kreider-Arnott-Hagelin
Rupp-Boyle-Asham
looks alot better if Kreider can get back on track and if Arnott works out.
__________________
01-26-2013, 04:52 PM
#37
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Country:
Posts: 7,098
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Khris Creider
Gaborik-Richards-Nash
Pyatt-Stepan-Callahan
Kreider-Arnott-Hagelin
Rupp-Boyle-Asham
looks alot better if Kreider can get back on track and if Arnott works out.
I think Pyatt's ultimate spot is on the third line. I also don't think we're going to see a ton of games with Rupp and Asham both in the lineup.
01-26-2013, 04:52 PM
#38
Unregistered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middletown
Country:
Posts: 591
vCash: 500
1.7 is a bit high, but for one year, there isn't too much to complain about. I like Arnott on the 3rd line, especially since Miller isn't NHL ready yet. With Arnott on the 3rd line I wouldn't mind seeing any of the wingers on this team playing alongside him. I always had a problem seeing Callahan, Hagelin, Kreider or really anyone besides Pyatt playing with Boyle.
01-26-2013, 04:52 PM
#39
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country:
Posts: 235
vCash: 500
nvm got fixed
01-26-2013, 04:53 PM
#40
10 Minute Misconduct
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NJ & FL
Country:
Posts: 11,860
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tawnos
Pyatt twice? :wow:
I assume you're putting Hagelin on the 2nd.
He's that good.
01-26-2013, 04:54 PM
#41
Torts the Terrified
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Stockholm
Country:
Posts: 1,073
vCash: 406
Not a fan of this move.
I didn't watch the Blues at all last year, but the Blues fans here on HF all say that Arnott is DONE.
He can't skate any more and needs sheltered minutes to have any semblance of effectiveness. The only thing I can see him contribute is a good shot on the PP.
01-26-2013, 04:54 PM
#42
Unregistered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middletown
Country:
Posts: 591
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Baby Punisher
An old Arnott is better at 3rd line center than Brian Boyle. What happens to Halpren now?
Halpern was a healthy scratch a lot with the Caps. It's not like the guy is a 4th line option every night. He just adds a little depth.
01-26-2013, 04:54 PM
#43
I like Kreider
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York
Country:
Posts: 4,049
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tawnos
I think Pyatt's ultimate spot is on the third line. I also don't think we're going to see a ton of games with Rupp and Asham both in the lineup.
I believe Pyatt should be on a line with Callahan.
01-26-2013, 04:54 PM
#44
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Country:
Posts: 14,417
vCash: 500
I am not a fan...
01-26-2013, 04:54 PM
#45
Global Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Nutley, NJ
Country:
Posts: 32,851
vCash: 1716
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Loffen
For 1.7? Man, that's a bit steep.
Under a $70M cap? Nah.
I like this move for the bottom-6. Adds NHL depth.
01-26-2013, 04:54 PM
#46
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PEI Canada
Country:
Posts: 1,017
vCash: 500
What would Arnott be like on a PP unit ? Can't be much worse then what we have now . Big guy for the crease on the 2nd unit ?
01-26-2013, 04:55 PM
#47
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Country:
Posts: 7,098
vCash: 500
I think the most important part about Arnott is that, assuming he's got gas left in the tank, he isn't going to look horribly out of place on the 2nd line if we have injury issues. Not ideal, but more ideal than Boyle being up there (again, not a bash on Boyle).
01-26-2013, 04:56 PM
#48
Global Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Nutley, NJ
Country:
Posts: 32,851
vCash: 1716
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Leetch66
What would Arnott be like on a PP unit ? Can't be much worse then what we have now . Big guy for the crease on the 2nd unit ?
Triggerman. He's still got a rocket of a shot. Would like to see to see him at the point. Especially on the 5 on 3.
01-26-2013, 04:58 PM
#49
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Soft euro
Posts: 15,541
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zenith
Under a $70M cap? Nah.
I like this move for the bottom-6. Adds NHL depth.
I thought Arnott was done... But he scored 17 goals last year, so it ain't that bad afterall. Hope he dosen't come here to just dog it, though.
01-26-2013, 04:58 PM
#50
Pete Hearts Volch
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Rocky Point
Country:
Posts: 24,126
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zenith
Triggerman. He's still got a rocket of a shot. Would like to see to see him at the point. Especially on the 5 on 3.
Him playing the point is a risky move. He's REALLY slow now. It could spell a bunch of shorthanded breakaways for the other team. I'd put him on the wall down low where he can still use his rocket of a shot.
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 AM .
monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"