Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.
Leafs/Flames
01-27-2013, 01:00 AM
#1
FOREVER a Flame!
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Country:
Posts: 1,673
vCash: 500
Leafs/Flames
Tim Connolly
Conditional 3rd round pick, depending on how many games Connolly plays. Leafs also retain a portion of Connolly's salary.
Flames need a center that can play in the top-6.
01-27-2013, 01:05 AM
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country:
Posts: 12,580
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
flameaholic
Tim Connolly
Conditional 3rd round pick, depending on how many games Connolly plays. Leafs also retain a portion of Connolly's salary.
Flames need a center that can play in the top-6.
Why we have Stajan and Backlund both can handle the top 6, Tanguay has been fine and Cervenka may well be an viable center option and all are cheaper then Connolly and won't cost us a pick.
01-27-2013, 01:06 AM
#3
Kule+Mcclement=heart
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,085
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TheGleninator
Why we have Stajan .
lol...
01-27-2013, 01:09 AM
#4
Backlund Fan Club
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Country:
Posts: 12,039
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bozak
lol...
Connolly sucks.
Stajan isn't useless when he doesn't have the puck like Connolly is, and has a sweet heart contract in comparison.
01-27-2013, 01:10 AM
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country:
Posts: 12,580
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bozak
lol...
Would rather play Stajan then trade for Connolly atleast Stajan can play defense like we need him.
01-27-2013, 01:11 AM
#6
Kule+Mcclement=heart
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,085
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TheGleninator
Would rather play Stajan then trade for Connolly atleast Stajan can play defense like we need him.
i'm not gonna argue who sucks more man. I'm just being a dick though
01-27-2013, 01:13 AM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country:
Posts: 12,580
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bozak
i'm not gonna argue who sucks more man. I'm just being a dick though
I know but if I respond then we end up getting in a ***** fest about which team that hasn't made the playoffs sucks slightly less.
01-27-2013, 01:17 AM
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,651
vCash: 500
If the Leafs don't want him then we don't want him either.
01-27-2013, 02:43 AM
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto
Country:
Posts: 722
vCash: 500
go ahead and take him
01-27-2013, 03:30 AM
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,011
vCash: 500
The Flames would probably not want that contract based on his performance.
No matter what the price.
01-27-2013, 03:46 AM
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fenton, MO
Country:
Posts: 3,355
vCash: 500
They've also got a station wagon with only 3 wheels and a huffy bike for sale... in fact anything in the front lawn is negotiable.
01-27-2013, 12:01 PM
#12
17 CLARK 17
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: BARRY'S BAY
Country:
Posts: 1,243
vCash: 848
Quote:
Originally Posted by
flameaholic
Tim Connolly
Conditional 3rd round pick, depending on how many games Connolly plays. Leafs also retain a portion of Connolly's salary.
Flames need a center that can play in the top-6.
Sold
01-27-2013, 12:03 PM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,932
vCash: 500
AHAHAHAAHA leafs would be all over this!
TIMMMMMMYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
01-27-2013, 12:20 PM
#14
DUI_DBU
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Calgary
Country:
Posts: 8,689
vCash: 774
Erm no
01-28-2013, 07:00 AM
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,670
vCash: 500
I would consider picking up Connolly, but it would have to be this specific deal or I wouldn't do it.
Leafs get - Babchuk
Flames get - Connolly (Leafs eat 1/2), 2nd round pick
01-28-2013, 07:12 AM
#16
Top Dawg Ent.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vaughan, Ontario
Country:
Posts: 24,276
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Abbotsford Heat
I would consider picking up Connolly, but it would have to be this specific deal or I wouldn't do it.
Leafs get - Babchuk
Flames get - Connolly (Leafs eat 1/2), 2nd round pick
Lol why?
Leafs have Connolly in the minors. Why are we giving up an early 2nd for?
01-28-2013, 07:16 AM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,670
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Phion Keneuf
Lol why?
Leafs have Connolly in the minors. Why are we giving up an early 2nd for?
I never suggested there was motivation for the Leafs to do it, just saying this is the only way I would consider acquiring him.
01-28-2013, 07:46 AM
#18
Gary says it's A-OK
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: the Prior
Country:
Posts: 2,948
vCash: 500
They are called the Toronto Maple Leafs Hockey Club LLC not the Toronto Maple Leafs Benevolent Society
to the OP, why do you think the Leafs would even consider something like this
01-28-2013, 08:15 AM
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 38
vCash: 500
As a leafs fan I would do this in a heartbeat, but as an intelligent hockey fan I dont see why Calgary would, even if the leafs retained half his salary I just dont think he is enough of an upgrade for them to justify giving anything up for him.
01-28-2013, 08:18 AM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,154
vCash: 500
Being a fan of both teams I can tell you Tim Connolly has no business in anyone's top 6. This would be a bad trade for the Flames.
Cervenka and Backlund are both better options.
01-28-2013, 08:23 AM
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,427
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
I Hate Jay Feaster
Connolly sucks.
Stajan isn't useless when he doesn't have the puck like Connolly is, and has a sweet heart contract in comparison.
you can't lie to us about stajan
01-28-2013, 08:27 AM
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,154
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LEAFANFORLIFE23
you can't lie to us about stajan
Stajan was bad value, but he is actually a useful player as a bottom 6 guy who can slide up to a top 6 role if injuries are a factor or things need to be mixed up.
He is pretty responsible defensively which is more than you can say for Connolly.
01-28-2013, 08:42 AM
#23
Gary says it's A-OK
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: the Prior
Country:
Posts: 2,948
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LEAFMAN99
As a leafs fan I would do this in a heartbeat, but as an intelligent hockey fan I dont see why Calgary would, even if the leafs retained half his salary I just dont think he is enough of an upgrade for them to justify giving anything up for him.
so let me get this straight as a Leafs fan
you hand Calgary TC AND eat up a bunch of his salary TO GET a
possible 3RD RND pick if he plays X number of games
and why as a Leafs fan would you do something this kind and charitable for the Calgary Flames
unless of course you were thinking of flipping that "conditional 3RD RND pick for a conditional 1ST RND pick"
then it would make sense
01-28-2013, 09:22 AM
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,346
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
flameaholic
Tim Connolly
Conditional 3rd round pick, depending on how many games Connolly plays. Leafs also retain a portion of Connolly's salary.
Flames need a center that can play in the top-6.
no no no no no, just no...... he was on waivers no Way we pay to have this guy on our roster
01-28-2013, 09:23 AM
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,346
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TheGleninator
Would rather play Stajan then trade for Connolly atleast Stajan can play defense like we need him.
thes + he palyed solid with Hudler and Cervenka
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM .
monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"