HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

3 way deal at Deadline: Schneider+ for Perry: Call to Schneider Interested Fan Bases.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-29-2013, 05:32 PM
  #51
mapes
Registered User
 
mapes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Halifax
Posts: 22,024
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phion Keneuf View Post
Nope. Don't agree
Franchise goalie for scraps and an underachieving borderline second liner with injury issues? I'd do it

mapes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 05:38 PM
  #52
Ducksgo*
#EtemUp
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lakewood CA
Country: United States
Posts: 7,898
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Ducksgo*
Quote:
Originally Posted by jferguson View Post
did we just trade Bobby Ryan for RJ "cant keep his head up" Umburger?
Pretty much and we take on a inflated contract that serves no purpose in Anaheim.

Ducksgo* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 05:55 PM
  #53
Phion Keneuf
Top Dawg Ent.
 
Phion Keneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vaughan, Ontario
Country: Italy
Posts: 28,210
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mapes View Post
Franchise goalie for scraps and an underachieving borderline second liner with injury issues? I'd do it
Well if you put it in that fantasy world perspective, then yea.

Schneider is not a franchise goalie.

JvR is not an underachieving borderline second liner ... Maybe in Philly, but he's been our best winger this year and is only 23 he's our only forward who isn't afraid to get in front of goalies

Phion Keneuf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 08:12 PM
  #54
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
To Anaheim:

Schneider + Luongo + Kassian

to Vancouver:

Perry + Getzlav + Hiller

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 08:36 PM
  #55
Vankiller Whale
And so it begins
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,716
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
To Anaheim:

Schneider + Luongo + Kassian

to Vancouver:

Perry + Getzlav + Hiller
Apart from there being no reason for Anaheim to do this, there's no way we can afford to re-sign Getzlaf + Perry with the salary cap.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 08:39 PM
  #56
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
Apart from there being no reason for Anaheim to do this, there's no way we can afford to re-sign Getzlaf + Perry with the salary cap.
its about going all-in for the cup this year.

And why Anaheim would not want to do that?

With Luongo and Schneider, they would acquire the reason why Vancouver was one of the best team in the league in the past few year.


Last edited by palindrom: 01-29-2013 at 08:44 PM.
palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 08:48 PM
  #57
Vankiller Whale
And so it begins
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,716
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
its about going all-in for the cup this year.

And why Anaheim would not want to do that?

With Luongo and Schneider, they would acquire the reason why Vancouver was one of the best team in the league in the past few year.
Your post seems to contradict itself...

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 08:51 PM
  #58
StringerBell
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10,000
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
its about going all-in for the cup this year.

And why Anaheim would not want to do that?

With Luongo and Schneider, they would acquire the reason why Vancouver was one of the best team in the league in the past few year.
Schneider and Luongo don't want to share the crease in the future. Anaheim has no reason to trade their two best players to create a situation that neither player they're bringing in wants to be in.

StringerBell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 08:53 PM
  #59
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
Your post seems to contradict itself...
i was hoping someone would notice. Its part of my subtle humor.

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 08:54 PM
  #60
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by StringerBell View Post
Schneider and Luongo don't want to share the crease in the future. Anaheim has no reason to trade their two best players to create a situation that neither player they're bringing in wants to be in.
Its not a problem, they could then trade one of the two goalies. There are many teams desperate for an elite starter.


Last edited by palindrom: 01-29-2013 at 09:00 PM.
palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 09:02 PM
  #61
Vankiller Whale
And so it begins
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,716
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
Its not a problem, they could then trade one of the two goalies. There are many teams desperate for an elite starter.
I get you're being facetitious, but how often does a team trade for a player they don't need with intent to flip him?

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 09:07 PM
  #62
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
I get you're being facetitious, but how often does a team trade for a player they don't need with intent to flip him?
First its hard to imagine any teams in the league who would not need a Luongo or a Schneider. Part of the reason both are still with Vancouver is because Vancouver need them.

We have seen players acquired then flipped to another team in the past, the problem is proving that the intend was to flip them when they did acquire the players.

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 09:10 PM
  #63
Vankiller Whale
And so it begins
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,716
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
First its hard to imagine any teams in the league who would not need a Luongo or a Schneider. Part of the reason both are still with Vancouver is because Vancouver need them.

We have seen players acquired then flipped to another team in the past, the problem is proving that the intend was to flip them when they did acquire the players.
It's simple: Find a time when a team traded for a player that they didn't need(ex the Penguins for a top-6 centre) that was traded shortly afterwards.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 09:17 PM
  #64
Money Baer
COYS
 
Money Baer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Moose Jaw, SK
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,834
vCash: 907
Why don't you just trade Schneider to the highest bidder and do an individual trade with Anaheim? Simplifies things.

VAN:
Perry

ANA:
Hansen
Jensen
2013 1st & 2nd

Money Baer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 09:18 PM
  #65
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
It's simple: Find a time when a team traded for a player that they didn't need(ex the Penguins for a top-6 centre) that was traded shortly afterwards.
i remember NYI acquired Wisniewski for a 3th summer 2011 then traded in December for a 2nd to Montreal.

Obviously NYI needed a draft pick more than Wisniewski or else why did they made the trade with Montreal?

I remember Alexandre Picard in 2008 being acquired then traded 20 game later by Tampa Bay.

Kyle Quincey to Tampa bay for steve downie, then to Detroit for a 1st.


Last edited by palindrom: 01-29-2013 at 09:27 PM.
palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 09:33 PM
  #66
Vankiller Whale
And so it begins
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,716
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wally31 View Post
Why don't you just trade Schneider to the highest bidder and do an individual trade with Anaheim? Simplifies things.

VAN:
Perry

ANA:
Hansen
Jensen
2013 1st & 2nd
We'd rather trade someone else's prospects/young players than our own.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 09:34 PM
  #67
Vankiller Whale
And so it begins
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,716
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
i remember NYI acquired Wisniewski for a 3th summer 2011 then traded in December for a 2nd to Montreal.

Obviously NYI needed a draft pick more than Wisniewski or else why did they made the trade with Montreal?

I remember Alexandre Picard in 2008 being acquired then traded 20 game later by Tampa Bay.

Kyle Quincey to Tampa bay for steve downie, then to Detroit for a 1st.
But at the time of the original trade, Tampa/NYI did need a defenseman?

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-02-2013, 12:13 AM
  #68
Todds Chiropractory
Registered User
 
Todds Chiropractory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver Island
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,348
vCash: 500
Bumping for further discussion

Todds Chiropractory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-02-2013, 12:19 AM
  #69
CanucksSayEh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,598
vCash: 500
Schnieder is gonna be a stud when he reclaims the net, there is a reason this whole debacle started in the first place.

CanucksSayEh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 01:05 AM
  #70
Water Knight
Registered User
 
Water Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,467
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wally31 View Post
Why don't you just trade Schneider to the highest bidder and do an individual trade with Anaheim? Simplifies things.

VAN:
Perry

ANA:
Hansen
Jensen
2013 1st & 2nd
Ducks say no thank you.

Water Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 01:09 AM
  #71
crt
Registered User
 
crt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Country: Antarctica
Posts: 380
vCash: 500
I see Perry is the new Weber.

crt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 01:10 AM
  #72
roach9
Registered User
 
roach9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,613
vCash: 500
**** these trades.

Perry is a pending UFA, no way do we give up anyone of significance for him.
I'd trade a 1st, and a mid-level prospect, no way anything more.

roach9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.