HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Washington Capitals
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Snow north vs Swamp south. 7:30pm

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-29-2013, 10:17 PM
  #351
smithy
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 296
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by IkeaMonkey View Post
Kanata is a suburb, Kanata is not Ottawa. If you live in Kanata, do you address your mail that you live in Ottawa? By that accord you might as well just write.

123 Main Street
Canada, Canada

I mean, it's all the same right? Canada is just some massive ****ing blob.

However, the New York Rangers play in the state of New York. Your comparison is about as terrible as Kyle Turris' opinion of Scandanavia.
Your knowledge of geography is about as terrible as your knowledge of everything else.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanata,_Ontario#History

"It remained a city until 2001, when the province created a new (amalgamated) City of Ottawa that included the City of Kanata (pop. 59,700)."

Yes, people who live in Kanata do address their mail that they live in Ottawa.

smithy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:17 PM
  #352
LetsGoBears
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,453
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by alcoraces View Post
It was the right call. As much as that pains me to say.....

Rule 60.1 High-sticking - A “high stick” is one which is carried above the height of the opponent’s shoulders. Players and goalkeepers must be in control and responsible for their stick. However, a player is permitted accidental contact on an opponent if the act is committed as a normal windup or follow through of a shooting motion. A wild swing at a bouncing puck would not be considered a normal windup or follow through and any contact to an opponent above the height of the shoulders shall be penalized accordingly.
So the bouncing puck was where?

LetsGoBears is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:19 PM
  #353
alcoraces
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 966
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGoBears View Post
Looks like Sens fans have a very poor grasp on the rules...
Actually it is Caps fans who are getting the rule wrong. Most of us anyhow.....die hard Caps fan.....but that was the right call.


60.1 High-sticking - A “high stick” is one which is carried above the height of the opponent’s shoulders. Players and goalkeepers must be in control and responsible for their stick. However, a player is permitted accidental contact on an opponent if the act is committed as a normal windup or follow through of a shooting motion. A wild swing at a bouncing puck would not be considered a normal windup or follow through and any contact to an opponent above the height of the shoulders shall be penalized accordingly.

alcoraces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:19 PM
  #354
Carlzner
Registered User
 
Carlzner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Country: United States
Posts: 11,100
vCash: 500
Honestly, where would this team be right now without Ribeiro?
He's been our best player BY FAR this season... it's scary to think about where we would be now if McPhee didn't make that trade...

Carlzner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:20 PM
  #355
Carlzner
Registered User
 
Carlzner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Country: United States
Posts: 11,100
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by smithy View Post
Your knowledge of geography is about as terrible as your knowledge of everything else.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanata,_Ontario#History

"It remained a city until 2001, when the province created a new (amalgamated) City of Ottawa that included the City of Kanata (pop. 59,700)."

Yes, people who live in Kanata do address their mail that they live in Ottawa.
He was trolling.

Carlzner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:20 PM
  #356
CapitalsCupFantasy
HFBoards Sponsor
 
CapitalsCupFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 28,265
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capitlols View Post
Backstrom was good, Ovechkin got steadily worse.
To me Backstrom looks like the same guy, minus the world class winger who used to net 50 regularly.

CapitalsCupFantasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:21 PM
  #357
SimplySensational
Heard of Hough
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: VA
Country: United States
Posts: 18,027
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by alcoraces View Post
Actually it is Caps fans who are getting the rule wrong. Most of us anyhow.....die hard Caps fan.....but that was the right call.


60.1 High-sticking - A “high stick” is one which is carried above the height of the opponent’s shoulders. Players and goalkeepers must be in control and responsible for their stick. However, a player is permitted accidental contact on an opponent if the act is committed as a normal windup or follow through of a shooting motion. A wild swing at a bouncing puck would not be considered a normal windup or follow through and any contact to an opponent above the height of the shoulders shall be penalized accordingly.
GTFO.

The puck was along the boards and he got it.

Lets talk about the uncalled highstick on Brouwer. Hendricks. Oh yeah and then the 2nd one hook on the delayed call by Karlsson. Then the slew foot on Brouwer during the PP.

SimplySensational is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:22 PM
  #358
troyerlaw
Life is party again
 
troyerlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 2,906
vCash: 500
That loss is on the Caps, not the ref. We had a 2-goal lead and were dominating, but could not finish them off. And at the end of the game, they scored on their PP and we didn't score on ours.

That's a bad loss. We needed a win there.

troyerlaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:22 PM
  #359
alcoraces
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 966
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGoBears View Post
So the bouncing puck was where?
Right in front of the Molson Canadian sign. Watch it again if you have the chance. He never even actually touched the puck, it simply bounced past his stick, he swung at it and missed (maybe he got a piece of it, if he did it wasn't much), and then his stick came up. Textbook high sticking call.

alcoraces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:23 PM
  #360
LetsGoBears
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,453
vCash: 500
Because the back official is going to see that better then the ref two feet away. Now did he actually touch the puck or not? Not going to take someones word that says watch the replay and still can't decided what actually happened.

LetsGoBears is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:23 PM
  #361
NobodyBeatsTheWiz
Happy now?
 
NobodyBeatsTheWiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Old Town
Posts: 20,180
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by alcoraces View Post
Right in front of the Molson Canadian sign. Watch it again if you have the chance. He never even actually touched the puck, it simply bounced past his stick, he swung at it and missed (maybe he got a piece of it, if he did it wasn't much), and then his stick came up. Textbook high sticking call.
Far from textbook. GTFO.

NobodyBeatsTheWiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:24 PM
  #362
CapitalsCupFantasy
HFBoards Sponsor
 
CapitalsCupFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 28,265
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by alcoraces View Post
Actually it is Caps fans who are getting the rule wrong. Most of us anyhow.....die hard Caps fan.....but that was the right call.


60.1 High-sticking - A “high stick” is one which is carried above the height of the opponent’s shoulders. Players and goalkeepers must be in control and responsible for their stick. However, a player is permitted accidental contact on an opponent if the act is committed as a normal windup or follow through of a shooting motion. A wild swing at a bouncing puck would not be considered a normal windup or follow through and any contact to an opponent above the height of the shoulders shall be penalized accordingly.

Sorry, but that was a simple shot back around the boards not some wild swing at a bouncing puck...ruling denied.

CapitalsCupFantasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:24 PM
  #363
Capitlols
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 11,607
vCash: 500
Was anyone else left saying old OV scores there?

Capitlols is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:24 PM
  #364
alcoraces
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 966
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SimplySensational View Post
GTFO.

The puck was along the boards and he got it.

Lets talk about the uncalled highstick on Brouwer. Hendricks. Oh yeah and then the 2nd one hook on the delayed call by Karlsson. Then the slew foot on Brouwer during the PP.
The puck was bouncing along the boards, he never actually touched it, and the right call was made on this one. I don't know what happened the rest of the game, I only watched the final 5 minutes. All I can say is that this was the right call.

alcoraces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:28 PM
  #365
CapitalsCupFantasy
HFBoards Sponsor
 
CapitalsCupFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 28,265
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by alcoraces View Post
Right in front of the Molson Canadian sign. Watch it again if you have the chance. He never even actually touched the puck, it simply bounced past his stick, he swung at it and missed (maybe he got a piece of it, if he did it wasn't much), and then his stick came up. Textbook high sticking call.
I agree with you...doesn't look like he even touched the puck, but is a shot attempt where a player misses the puck no longer a player attempting a shot? If a guy coming down the slot attempts to shoot, whiffs and high sticks the D, he's not getting penalized...

This was a normal shot attempt/shooting motion for that play, back around the boards with normal follow through...

CapitalsCupFantasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:31 PM
  #366
alcoraces
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 966
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGoBears View Post
Once again, where was the bouncing puck? Stop ignoring my question and blindly pasting the rule.
The puck is kept in at the point, hits the Ottawa stick, bounces towards the corner, Ward skates over and takes a swipe at it and misses (may have made slight contact but it doesn't matter if he did or not) and then he hits the guy in the face with his stick. Believe it or not Caps fans, that is a high sticking penalty in this league, and every single league in the world.

Maybe I'd be irrational too if I had watched the entire game, it sounds like we got the bad end of the officiating again, as we usually seem to have happen to us. But not on this play.

alcoraces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:32 PM
  #367
BTCG
Registered User
 
BTCG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,447
vCash: 500
Idea: If we're only gonna play 2 of the 3 periods... how bout making em the last 2?

BTCG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:32 PM
  #368
capitalsrock
Registered User
 
capitalsrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 1,997
vCash: 500
lol FRUIT NINJA

capitalsrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:32 PM
  #369
alcoraces
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 966
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapitalsCupFantasy View Post
I agree with you...doesn't look like he even touched the puck, but is a shot attempt where a player misses the puck no longer a player attempting a shot? If a guy coming down the slot attempts to shoot, whiffs and high sticks the D, he's not getting penalized...

This was a normal shot attempt/shooting motion for that play, back around the boards with normal follow through...
He didn't attempt a shot, he didn't attempt a pass. He was merely swiping at the puck and his stick came up. If you read the rule, that is a penalty. Rule 60.1

alcoraces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:34 PM
  #370
CapitalsCupFantasy
HFBoards Sponsor
 
CapitalsCupFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 28,265
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by alcoraces View Post
He didn't attempt a shot, he didn't attempt a pass. He was merely swiping at the puck and his stick came up. If you read the rule, that is a penalty. Rule 60.1
Shooting motion dude....you're wrong...

CapitalsCupFantasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:36 PM
  #371
NobodyBeatsTheWiz
Happy now?
 
NobodyBeatsTheWiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Old Town
Posts: 20,180
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by alcoraces View Post
He didn't attempt a shot, he didn't attempt a pass. He was merely swiping at the puck and his stick came up. If you read the rule, that is a penalty. Rule 60.1
He doesn't need to attempt a shot or attempt a pass per the rule. He only has to make a shooting motion, which he did.

The ref judged the motion to be 'wild'. That's the only out he's got in the rule book. Complete BS to consider that 'wild'.

NobodyBeatsTheWiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:36 PM
  #372
BTCG
Registered User
 
BTCG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,447
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by alcoraces View Post
The puck is kept in at the point, hits the Ottawa stick, bounces towards the corner, Ward skates over and takes a swipe at it and misses (may have made slight contact but it doesn't matter if he did or not) and then he hits the guy in the face with his stick. Believe it or not Caps fans, that is a high sticking penalty in this league, and every single league in the world.

Maybe I'd be irrational too if I had watched the entire game, it sounds like we got the bad end of the officiating again, as we usually seem to have happen to us. But not on this play.
Makes no dif... when one play makes you lose, that's on you, or us, in this case.

What's wrong with AO? What's wrong with Carlson... behind the play most of the night... AGAIN. This guy is becoming Nolan Yonkman 2.

BTCG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:37 PM
  #373
JurassicIce
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 12
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by IkeaMonkey View Post
Kanata is a suburb, Kanata is not Ottawa. If you live in Kanata, do you address your mail that you live in Ottawa? By that accord you might as well just write.

123 Main Street
Canada, Canada

I mean, it's all the same right? Canada is just some massive ****ing blob.

However, the New York Rangers play in the state of New York. Your comparison is about as terrible as Kyle Turris' opinion of Scandanavia.
Your ignorance is hilarious. Kanata is part of Ottawa, get your facts straight or use the internet like a normal person before posting false information that makes you look like a noob.

JurassicIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:38 PM
  #374
EroCaps
Registered User
 
EroCaps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Virginia
Country: United States
Posts: 15,104
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capitlols View Post
Was anyone else left saying old OV scores there?
He used to dominate the leaugue in shots and now can't even match his own
Blue-line. A really uninspired, limp-dick player at this point and has been since the Olympic season when he started floating the **** around and ceding achievements.

EroCaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-29-2013, 10:38 PM
  #375
alcoraces
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 966
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGoBears View Post
Because the back official is going to see that better then the ref two feet away. Now did he actually touch the puck or not? Not going to take someones word that says watch the replay and still can't decided what actually happened.
It does not matter if he touched the puck or not. He swung at a bouncing puck, he was not attempting a shot, he was not attempting a pass, he did not have control of the puck, and his stick hit an opposing player in the face. That is a penalty in this league, and maybe if it had happened against us it would not have been called, but the right call was made by those officials on that one play.

Do I need to type slower??

alcoraces is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2015 All Rights Reserved.