HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Ryan O'Reilly to Anaheim

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-30-2013, 05:11 PM
  #76
Exit Dose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cerritos, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 17,965
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avsare1 View Post
Sbisa + DSP/Holland is a pretty good trade for both sides. But the Avs wouldn't do it unless they knew for sure Oreilly wasn't coming back.

Sbisa + Etem for Oreilly+ would also be interesting from both sides.
Just in case there has been a misunderstanding here, I don't think any of us Ducks fans think that you would do that if you think you can sign him. We understand that the best case scenario here is keeping O'Reilly.

Exit Dose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 05:15 PM
  #77
Bender
TheHockeyProspector
 
Bender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,936
vCash: 7658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Dose View Post
For that kind of certainty, I think that you need to get him signed, but if you have him signed it's not like you'd be looking to move him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OccupySheen View Post
I don't think you're going to get a top 2 dman for an unsigned 2nd line center
I don't know which team would even want to give up anything significant in trading for RoR without having talks with the agent and basically coming to a contract agreement FIRST.

Who the hell is going to trade good assets for a "maybe we'll be able to get him signed" type of scenario???

I don't believe the deal exists in just trading his 'rights' because in that case, the return wouldn't justify trading him.

Bender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 05:16 PM
  #78
Exit Dose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cerritos, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 17,965
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bender View Post
I don't know which team would even want to give up anything significant in trading for RoR without having talks with the agent and basically coming to a contract agreement FIRST.

Who the hell is going to trade good assets for a "maybe we'll be able to get him signed?"

I don't believe the deal exists, in just trading his 'rights' because the return wouldn't justify trading him.
Already addressed.

Exit Dose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 05:33 PM
  #79
CobraAcesS
Registered User
 
CobraAcesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Seattle
Country: United States
Posts: 4,057
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Dose View Post
Boston got two first round picks and a 2nd. Those picks weren't the 2nd, 9th, and 32nd overall at the time of that trade. Do you want draft picks? Because that seems like an even bigger gamble to me. Maybe you'll get as lucky as they did, but I wouldn't count on it.

Toronto knew the deal Kessel wanted and they knew that he would sign with them. They had those assurances already.
I still don't get where there is an argument here... I agree on the assurances and what your saying about the non-contract not being an issue. I think maybe we differ on what we see as O'Reilly's actual value (Regardless of contract, as long as it's a reasonable contract that is worked out of course.).

As far as the value of those picks goes... Pretty much EVERYONE was like omg, Boston just got two lottery picks out of that trade. Oh and pretty much another 1st rounder.

Yes I would take two 1st round picks for O'Reilly, if they are coming from a lottery team. For me to consider a trade of potential based players for O'Reilly from ANA. It would need to be Sbisa + Etem/Palmeiri for O'Reilly + (Something SMALL) 2nd round pick small...

Agree with that value or not, that's how much value he has IMO.

CobraAcesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 05:37 PM
  #80
Exit Dose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cerritos, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 17,965
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CobraAcesS View Post
I still don't get where there is an argument here... I agree on the assurances and what your saying about the non-contract not being an issue. I think maybe we differ on what we see as O'Reilly's actual value (Regardless of contract, as long as it's a reasonable contract that is worked out of course.).

As far as the value of those picks goes... Pretty much EVERYONE was like omg, Boston just got two lottery picks out of that trade.

Yes I would take two top 10 picks for O'Reilly. For me to consider a trade of potential based players for O'Reilly from ANA. It would need to be Sbisa + Etem/Palmeiri for O'Reilly + (Something SMALL) 2nd round pick small...

Agree with that value or not, that's how much value he has IMO.
Do you think Toronto thought they were giving up two lottery picks for Kessel? There's some serious revisionism going on with your take on that trade.

Also, I have no idea why you seem to think Holland is unacceptable, even though he outplayed the two wingers that you're okay with.

Exit Dose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 05:41 PM
  #81
MikeC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 708
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Dose View Post
Do you think Toronto thought they were giving up two lottery picks for Kessel? There's some serious revisionism going on with your take on that trade.

Also, I have no idea why you seem to think Holland is unacceptable, even though he outplayed the two wingers that you're okay with.
The only person in Toronto that was thinking he could make the playoff was Burke and he is gone.

MikeC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 05:44 PM
  #82
Pierce Hawthorne
Formerly Avsare1
 
Pierce Hawthorne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Caverns of Draconis
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,487
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Dose View Post
Just in case there has been a misunderstanding here, I don't think any of us Ducks fans think that you would do that if you think you can sign him. We understand that the best case scenario here is keeping O'Reilly.
Yea I figured you guys knew that, was just pointing out the Avs point of view in it.

Like you said best case scenario for the Avs would easily be just to sign him to a solid 3.5-4M bridge contract now and see what he can bring over those 2-3 years for us.

But if that just absolutely cant happen, and the two sides just wont agree to anything, then trading him would be the only option.

And like both sides seem to agree upno, Something around Sbisa + Forward prospect would be a good basis for a deal. Now who that prospect is has varied from many fans of both ANA and COL, but generally it seems to be DSP/Holland/Etem.

Pierce Hawthorne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 05:46 PM
  #83
Crisp Breakout
Registered User
 
Crisp Breakout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 4,760
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CobraAcesS View Post
I still don't get where there is an argument here... I agree on the assurances and what your saying about the non-contract not being an issue. I think maybe we differ on what we see as O'Reilly's actual value (Regardless of contract, as long as it's a reasonable contract that is worked out of course.).

As far as the value of those picks goes... Pretty much EVERYONE was like omg, Boston just got two lottery picks out of that trade. Oh and pretty much another 1st rounder.

Yes I would take two 1st round picks for O'Reilly, if they are coming from a lottery team. For me to consider a trade of potential based players for O'Reilly from ANA. It would need to be Sbisa + Etem/Palmeiri for O'Reilly + (Something SMALL) 2nd round pick small...

Agree with that value or not, that's how much value he has IMO.
Come on, I'm with Exit Dose; that's revisionist history.

Read up:
http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh...=682236&page=3

Crisp Breakout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 05:46 PM
  #84
Pete Mitchell
"Watch the canopy!!"
 
Pete Mitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Frederick, CO
Country: United States
Posts: 89
vCash: 500
Ryan and Sbisa to the Avs, O'Reilly and Barrie/Elliot to the Ducks. Possibly throw in a 2nd/3rd from the Avs.

Pete Mitchell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 05:50 PM
  #85
Bender
TheHockeyProspector
 
Bender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,936
vCash: 7658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Mitchell View Post
Ryan and Sbisa to the Avs, O'Reilly and Barrie/Elliot to the Ducks. Possibly throw in a 2nd/3rd from the Avs.
Doubtful the Ducks do that trade. Colorado would though.

Bender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 05:51 PM
  #86
skip2mybordeleau
Sign O'Reilly
 
skip2mybordeleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,820
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Mitchell View Post
Ryan and Sbisa to the Avs, O'Reilly and Barrie/Elliot to the Ducks. Possibly throw in a 2nd/3rd from the Avs.
don't, don't be silly.

skip2mybordeleau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 06:01 PM
  #87
Getz2perry
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,953
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Mitchell View Post
Ryan and Sbisa to the Avs, O'Reilly and Barrie/Elliot to the Ducks. Possibly throw in a 2nd/3rd from the Avs.
I dont feel like going through the reasons why ryan isnt going to be traded unless perry is signed.

But if we were trading ryan id think wed trade him straight up for a 2c and just keep sbisa.

Getz2perry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 06:45 PM
  #88
CobraAcesS
Registered User
 
CobraAcesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Seattle
Country: United States
Posts: 4,057
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Dose View Post
Do you think Toronto thought they were giving up two lottery picks for Kessel? There's some serious revisionism going on with your take on that trade.

Also, I have no idea why you seem to think Holland is unacceptable, even though he outplayed the two wingers that you're okay with.
Holland vs Etem, I like Etem's scoring upside better. It's a lot harder to break into the league as a center than as a wing.

I just view Etem as a bit more valuable, especially when it comes to our needs.

As for revisionism... yeah it may not have been as strong as I made it out to be but there were plenty of people skeptical as to how competitive Toronto was going to be. I'll take the hit on that one...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Getz2perry View Post
I dont feel like going through the reasons why ryan isnt going to be traded unless perry is signed.

But if we were trading ryan id think wed trade him straight up for a 2c and just keep sbisa.
I don't think many people actually believe ANA will trade Ryan for a #2C anyways, but yeah Ryan is more than enough without adding for a #2 center.

CobraAcesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 07:17 PM
  #89
caliamad
Registered User
 
caliamad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,631
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sojourn View Post
I'm not so willing to call Sbisa a top 4 defenseman yet. He's been in that role at times, and even done well there, but there hasn't been enough consistency for me to say that, yes, he's actually a top 4 defenseman. The potential is absolutely there though, and he could be one by the time this season is over.

To be honest, I'm not quite as unwilling to move Etem either. Don't get me wrong, I'd think long and hard about it, but the Ducks have been searching for a young #2 center for some time. If Etem was the deal breaker for Colorado, I'd probably do it. ...but, I'm not sure I'd do Sbisa and Etem. I think Anaheim is giving up a lot of cap flexibility there, not to mention a lot of talent, and to do it for an unsigned player, I'm just not sure about that.
/agree

caliamad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 07:26 PM
  #90
JohnnyDuck93
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 473
vCash: 500
do you guys have any interest in vatanen?

JohnnyDuck93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 07:53 PM
  #91
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 10,849
vCash: 239
I'd hold out for Sbisa and Palmieri even though I know it wouldn't happen. O'Reilly is too important to our team to make a trade which didn't address more than one need.

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-30-2013, 10:19 PM
  #92
Gliff
Nick Bonino
 
Gliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 8,737
vCash: 500
Sbisa+Holland

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Mitchell View Post
Ryan and Sbisa to the Avs, O'Reilly and Barrie/Elliot to the Ducks. Possibly throw in a 2nd/3rd from the Avs.
Wow that is bad.

Gliff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-31-2013, 12:28 AM
  #93
Ducksgo*
#EtemUp
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lakewood CA
Country: United States
Posts: 7,898
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Ducksgo*
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyDuck93 View Post
do you guys have any interest in vatanen?
We're not letting go of Vatanen. I want to see him throw bombs off the pt with Souray. And we're not trading Etem or Rakell. We finally have speed on the 4th line. I don't think the ducks need to make a move unless its a 2nd line center. We have **** gelling here. I am pretty stoked to what BB and BM called up.

The management is finally doing its job for scouting lines. Finding speed and offensive presence in a fourth line role. Well we found it. Even if its a rookie line.


Last edited by Ducksgo*: 01-31-2013 at 12:35 AM.
Ducksgo* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-31-2013, 01:01 AM
  #94
Duck Off
HF needs an App
 
Duck Off's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Country: United States
Posts: 10,034
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducksgo View Post
We're not letting go of Vatanen. I want to see him throw bombs off the pt with Souray. And we're not trading Etem or Rakell. We finally have speed on the 4th line. I don't think the ducks need to make a move unless its a 2nd line center. We have **** gelling here. I am pretty stoked to what BB and BM called up.

The management is finally doing its job for scouting lines. Finding speed and offensive presence in a fourth line role. Well we found it. Even if its a rookie line.
Yeah Vatanen wouldn't be moved, as he'd be Sbisa's likely replacement in the lineup. If the Ducks do make a move for RoR, I think the final deal would be:

To Anaheim: RoR + 4th rounder
To Colorado: Sbisa + Holland

Duck Off is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-31-2013, 02:14 AM
  #95
DavidBL
Registered User
 
DavidBL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 406
vCash: 500
What are we supposed to do with Bonino if we get ROR? Do we send Rakell down? Move him for a pick? Include him in the trade to Col? He had 18 points in 50 games which is a pace for just under 30 which is reasonable 3rd line points and he did it as a rookie. What is his value at as far as Col is concerned? Bonino, Palmieri and a 3rd? There could be an argument for their pre-existing chemistry. Just curious.

J. Staal got the 8th overall a 3rd line center and another prospect. ROR isn't nearly as established as Staal was so the price in my mind goes down from there. Obviously Pamlieri isn't 8th overall and Bonino isn't Sutter but I don't think you can expect value near what Pit got for Staal for ROR.

DavidBL is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.