In there primes these two were unbelievable, of course Pronger being the first Dman since Orr to win the Hart in 200, and Leetch put up amazing offensive numbers while being steady in his zone. So i ask, who was more dominant during there prime, Pronger or Leetch?
My point is that 1 Conn Smythe win is better than none. Are you going to try and prove me wrong with that?
Kind of an ignoramous viewpoint
Leetch gets a slight hand by my vote but the fact is, every time Pronger joins a team; they make the cup finals. He is the guy who sets a team over the edge and even got one of them a cup. However! Leetch stuck with one team and was the key component (As well as Messier) to obtaining a cup. Leetch didn't just join a team and get them a cup, he helped the rangers win from day one and got them to their pinnacle. The rangers were a team that had no buisness winning a cup but they did it.
I saw Leetch and I saw Pronger. Leetch was awesome, but this one is Pronger without a second thought. Of skaters I've seen play, after only Lemieux and Gretzky, Pronger exerted the most impressive level of control over the ice during his best seasons.
As a large fan of both, I can't go against Pronger. He had everything and then always had a bit extra when he needed it.
__________________ ďItís embarrassing. Iím embarrassed to be here right now. Itís not even funny. And itís just embarrassing, the way we, you know, the energy we have in the room and the way we approach practices and the way we approach this game. Itís not how youíre going to win any games in this league." - Jean-Sebastien Giguere, April 8 2013