HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Montreal Canadiens
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Realistic expectations for next season?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-02-2006, 08:38 PM
  #1
Miller Time
Registered User
 
Miller Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,167
vCash: 500
Realistic expectations for next season?

So the bulk of the FA big names are gone, and barring a big trade it looks like Gainey is content to sit on the same team that squeezed into the playoffs in the last week of the season, on the back of an incredible stretch run.

The 05-06 team relied heavily on the play of some young/unproven players (higgins, perez, pleks, komi, cube, huet) to end up 8th in the eastern conference and give the eventual stanley cup champs a serious run for their money in the first round.

With Gainey apperently confident in this squad to reach the goals he has for the team for the 06-07 season (which are what, i don't know? ... another 7-8 finish I would imagine), what do we, the fans, reasonably expect with this line-up.

Personally, I'll be backing the team the whole way, but I find it hard to see us in the top 8 in the east...
Yes we have young players getting better, but so do Atlanta and Florida (not to mention Pittsburg, though unless malkin has crosbyesque/ovenchkinlike impact, they are still probably a year or two away).
Florida, Boston and Toronto have all made significant upgrades to their line up (even though flo is minus luongo), and Tampa will likely be better (they underachieved last year and Denis should make up for the loss of Kubina/Modin)

None of the teams ahead of us have lost enough to make us think that we are better equiped to contend then they are... IMO Ott will still contend even without chara/pothier, NY, NJ, Buffalo, Carolina, and Philly, will all ice similar teams to the ones that outpaced us last year.

So, realistically, without being a homer and clinging to a belief that our young guys are somehow more likely to shine than other teams young guys, I think that next year will be a step backwards for the team.

I will hold on to the hope that injuries/inspired play/dumb luck work in our favor to keep us in the top 8, but the logical side of my brain says that we don't have the "horses" to keep us in the eastern conference playoff race this year.

Anyone care to differ?
(and please, no "in bob we trust" rhetoric... he has not done much thus far to indicate that he is nay more schrewd than his peers when it comes to managing his roster... IMO Darryl Sutter is a great example of a GM with a plan that is working, even with the flames suprise 1st round exit this year)

Miller Time is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2006, 09:01 PM
  #2
J-D
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: the dizzle!
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,030
vCash: 500
I see the Montreal Canadiens battling for a playoff spot until the end, as usual.

J-D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2006, 09:05 PM
  #3
davey999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 457
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D View Post
I see the Montreal Canadiens battling for a playoff spot until the end, as usual.
Agreed, although I think there is a better than 50/50 chance they don't make it.

Carolina, Ottawa, Buffalo, Philly, NJ and NYR I would consider locks. Boston, Toronto, TB and Atlanta will be better.

davey999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2006, 09:16 PM
  #4
SOLR
Registered User
 
SOLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto / North York
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,708
vCash: 500
Ottawa lost some assets, and they sign our favorite piece of cheese to be their goal tender.

-Buffalo lost some assets.
-Boston and Toronto, will still be beatable.
-Washington and Pittsburgh will still be bad.
-Philadelphia didnt improved
-New Jersey will likely have to deal one big player
-Carolina will have Stanley cup blues?(all the location players gone!)
-Lightning might still be doing sideways, and the players may be trying to push Torto out.
-Thrashers loose some assets.
-NYI - Still bad.
-NY Rangers - Big Team.
-Panthers, the jury is out, will probably be better, but will make the south competitive, witch might cost some precious pts to the other 3 teams.

On our side:

Kostitsyn, chapter 1.
Higgins, chapter 2
Pleckanec, chapter 2, playing with a healthier knee.
Perezhogin, chapter 2
Ryder without an hernia(even if I dont like him)
Ribeiro playing his career(even if I dont like him)
Still possible trades or UFA.
Huet all year hopefully.(last year with him all year we are 4-5 in the conference)

We will fight for 6-8 playoffs spots.

SOLR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2006, 09:17 PM
  #5
henri2014
Registered User
 
henri2014's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 692
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by davey999 View Post
Agreed, although I think there is a better than 50/50 chance they don't make it.

Carolina, Ottawa, Buffalo, Philly, NJ and NYR I would consider locks. Boston, Toronto, TB and Atlanta will be better.
I dont think NYR and Philly are locks for the playoffs, with the lost of desjardins and Johnsson Philly's D doesnt look really good.

Toronto and Boston are still under us, Atlanta still doesnt have any defensmen.

henri2014 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2006, 09:19 PM
  #6
davey999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 457
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOLR View Post
Ottawa lost some assets, and they sign our favorite piece of cheese to be their goal tender.

-Buffalo lost some assets.
-Boston and Toronto, will still be beatable.
-Washington and Pittsburgh will still be bad.
-Philadelphia didnt improved
-New Jersey will likely have to deal one big player
-Carolina will have Stanley cup blues?(all the location players gone!)
-Lightning might still be doing sideways, and the players may be trying to push Torto out.
-Thrashers loose some assets.
-NYI - Still bad.
-NY Rangers - Big Team.
-Panthers, the jury is out, will probably be better, but will make the south competitive, witch might cost some precious pts to the other 3 teams.

On our side:

Kostitsyn, chapter 1.
Higgins, chapter 2
Pleckanec, chapter 2, playing with a healthier knee.
Perezhogin, chapter 2
Ryder without an hernia(even if I dont like him)
Ribeiro playing his career(even if I dont like him)
Still possible trades or UFA.
Huet all year hopefully.(last year with him all year we are 4-5 in the conference)

We will fight for 6-8 playoffs spots.
All the other teams can point to new players coming up or players improving, not just Montreal.

How about Buffalo with an improved Vanek? Philly with Carter and Richards having another year? Ottawa with Meszaros and Eaves?

The league isn't run in a vacuum.

davey999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2006, 09:20 PM
  #7
Team_Spirit
Tinordi-Subban
 
Team_Spirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 20,549
vCash: 700
The deadwood is almost all gone , i think the Habs will surprise and compete with Buffalo for 4th-6th. Huet will be there all year and won't hand out points to the others teams like Theo did all year , sometimes twice in a row... Carbo will coach the team giving ice time to our youngsters and turn them into impact players ( Higgins,Komi,Pleky are almost lock to perform with our wingers Perez and Kosty as wildcards )

Team_Spirit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2006, 09:25 PM
  #8
davey999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 457
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jozeph_Balej View Post
The deadwood is almost all gone , i think the Habs will surprise and compete with Buffalo for 4th-6th. Huet will be there all year and won't hand out points to the others teams like Theo did all year , sometimes twice in a row... Carbo will coach the team giving ice time to our youngsters and turn them into impact players ( Higgins,Komi,Pleky are almost lock to perform with our wingers Perez and Kosty as wildcards )
How can you be confident in Huet after one good half season? He was great last year, but IMO the jury is still out.

davey999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2006, 09:27 PM
  #9
Sports1131
Registered User
 
Sports1131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Boston/Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,169
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Sports1131 Send a message via MSN to Sports1131
It's too early to set our expectations for next season, but I am very afraid that management's goal remains the same - build for 2009. I'd be very surprised if Gainey's goal for the season isn't to merely make the playoffs, as usual.

I'll be at every home game again, but it's so disappointing to know going in that the people that run the team don't have any hope of winning the Stanley Cup this year.

Sports1131 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2006, 09:28 PM
  #10
davey999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 457
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sports1131 View Post
It's too early to set our expectations for next season, but I am very afraid that management's goal remains the same - build for 2009. I'd be very surprised if Gainey's goal for the season is to merely make the playoffs, as usual.

I'll be at every home game again, but it's so disappointing to know going in that the people that run the team don't have any hope of winning the Stanley Cup this year.
I agree. This 2009 stuff is total crap.

davey999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2006, 09:43 PM
  #11
ForsbergForever
Red Rocket
 
ForsbergForever's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,675
vCash: 500
Am I the only one who doesn't think that Gainey has some fantastic plan that is far too clever and far-reaching in vision for us mere fans to comprehend? He bid for some UFAs (supposedly) and lost out, he decided not to resign some of the team's free agents (Sundstrom, Bulis, Simpson) and has not made any trades so far. I don't see any genius at work, only a man playing it safe and slowly eliminating weak spots as they present themself.

ForsbergForever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2006, 10:36 PM
  #12
davey999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 457
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forsberg4ever View Post
Am I the only one who doesn't think that Gainey has some fantastic plan that is far too clever and far-reaching in vision for us mere fans to comprehend? He bid for some UFAs (supposedly) and lost out, he decided not to resign some of the team's free agents (Sundstrom, Bulis, Simpson) and has not made any trades so far. I don't see any genius at work, only a man playing it safe and slowly eliminating weak spots as they present themself.
You're not the only one. He hasn't earned this blind faith that most people on this board have for him.

davey999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2006, 10:39 PM
  #13
Darz
Registered User
 
Darz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Where's the ANY key?
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,422
vCash: 500
Most people a year ago didn't expect much from Carolina or Buffalo, but one year later, and one is a Stanley Cup champ and the other is considered one of the best teams in the East.

For Mnotreal to have alot of success this upcoming year, alot of things are going to have to happen. The more of these things that happen, the more success the team will have. If all the things fall into place, we finish first in the conference and win the Cup.

Remember if everything was decided on paper before the season started we wouldn't need to go through the whole thing...right????

__________________
Hey look, it's Duffman; the guy in a costume that creates awareness of Duff!
Darz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2006, 10:39 PM
  #14
Sports1131
Registered User
 
Sports1131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Boston/Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,169
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Sports1131 Send a message via MSN to Sports1131
I like Gainey; he's just been too cautious for my liking thus far as GM of the Habs. I will admit that it's too early to judge his performance this offseason. Although I am not optimistic that we'll make any substantial improvements, who knows.

Sports1131 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2006, 12:43 AM
  #15
Sthabs
Registered User
 
Sthabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,783
vCash: 500
the way i see it
considering we lost some dead woods, also considering the fact that some of our rookies made huge improvement, and lookin forward to continue next year
i expect somethin between 45-50 wins, over 100 points, and IN the playoffs

I mean seriously, at this same point last year, everybody tought the pens were going to be awesome....

Sthabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2006, 01:06 AM
  #16
Kue
Interviewing for GM
 
Kue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland OR
Country: United States
Posts: 466
vCash: 500
I can't see us make any big move up. I'd predict playoffs, but nothing higher than 6.

Kue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2006, 01:13 AM
  #17
Freaky Habs Fan
Registered User
 
Freaky Habs Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New-Brunswick
Posts: 9,503
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by davey999 View Post
How can you be confident in Huet after one good half season? He was great last year, but IMO the jury is still out.
We still have Aebischer...

One of those two will do the job for sure...

Freaky Habs Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2006, 02:34 AM
  #18
Kirk Muller*
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 3,061
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOLR View Post
On our side:

Kostitsyn, chapter 1.
Higgins, chapter 2
Pleckanec, chapter 2, playing with a healthier knee.
Perezhogin, chapter 2
Ryder without an hernia(even if I dont like him)
Ribeiro playing his career(even if I dont like him)
Still possible trades or UFA.
Huet all year hopefully.(last year with him all year we are 4-5 in the conference)

We will fight for 6-8 playoffs spots.
All of this is predicated on young guys like Higgins, Plekanec, Perezhogin, Ryder and Ribeiro improving (and Kostitsyn playing, but I don't see how that's an improvement; he didn't play last year). I can accept that.

But what about all the other teams who have young players? Are they all just going to stall completely? What about Buffalo? Sure they lost McKee, but aren't Vanek, Pominville, Roy, Tallinder, Kotalik, Gaustad, Pyatt, Kalinin and Novotny going to improve? Aren't Stajan, Steen, Welwood, Ponikarovsky and Colaiacovo going to improve for the Leafs? Aren't Pitkanen, Umberger, Carter, Meyer and Eager going to improve for the Flyers? You act as if only the Habs have young, up and coming players.

Another point is that getting rid of the so-called deadwood will have little impact. These players were deadwood because of various circumstances (free agency, go back to sweden, etc.), not because of their actual play. There is no realistic reason to believe that replacing Bulis and Sundstrom with Perezhogin and Kostitsyn will improve the team this year.

Kirk Muller* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2006, 04:05 AM
  #19
NewHabsEra*
 
NewHabsEra*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,695
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirk Muller View Post
All of this is predicated on young guys like Higgins, Plekanec, Perezhogin, Ryder and Ribeiro improving (and Kostitsyn playing, but I don't see how that's an improvement; he didn't play last year). I can accept that.

But what about all the other teams who have young players? Are they all just going to stall completely? What about Buffalo? Sure they lost McKee, but aren't Vanek, Pominville, Roy, Tallinder, Kotalik, Gaustad, Pyatt, Kalinin and Novotny going to improve? Aren't Stajan, Steen, Welwood, Ponikarovsky and Colaiacovo going to improve for the Leafs? Aren't Pitkanen, Umberger, Carter, Meyer and Eager going to improve for the Flyers? You act as if only the Habs have young, up and coming players.

Another point is that getting rid of the so-called deadwood will have little impact. These players were deadwood because of various circumstances (free agency, go back to sweden, etc.), not because of their actual play. There is no realistic reason to believe that replacing Bulis and Sundstrom with Perezhogin and Kostitsyn will improve the team this year.
We all seen what a guy like Higgins can do last season, Plekanec played solid too but we didnt see half of what Perezhogin can do on the ice.. This kid is something special but he took longer than I expected to adjust... His play late in the season as well as in the playoffs let me think he will come back confident for the next season.. A confident Perezhogin = something you just cant imagine, something the youngest CH fans didnt had the chance too see in the past 10 years or so... And you know what? Kostitsyn is possibly even more purely skilled....What the Habs suffered the most in the last 10 years was the poor quality of their offensive players, now we have guys like Kovalev, Perezhogin, Kostitsyn and some other highly skilled prospects that improve our team a big deal... Guys like Koivu Higgins Plekanec arent as skilled as the guys stated above but they are top 6 material that play a great 2-way game with a high level of intensity... In our kids you have to believe, they are the key!

NewHabsEra* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2006, 04:20 AM
  #20
FinnHab
Registered User
 
FinnHab's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: overseas...
Country: Finland
Posts: 1,220
vCash: 500
7th or 8th place is ours if Huet plays solid goaltending all season. And of course coaching is still one questionmark, how will Carbo/Muller succeeded..?

FinnHab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2006, 04:41 AM
  #21
eddy
Registered User
 
eddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,673
vCash: 500
Well the offseason is FAR from over Gainey can still make a signing or two or trade to improve the club. If not we still have a decent and team nice thing about the Habs is that were so young rather then most of are players getting older and less productive for the most part they will be improving and becomming more useful. Guys like Komisarek, Plekanec, Perezhogin, Higgins, and possible rookies like Kostitsyn and Grabovsky could all possibly break out. Even younger guys like Ribs and Ryder may not have hit their prime yet.

eddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2006, 04:48 AM
  #22
Marksman
Registered User
 
Marksman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Country: Finland
Posts: 3,627
vCash: 500
In my opinion its *way* too early to make any kind of assessment after two days into free agent season. Most of the teams have plenty of their rfa's unsigned - there is a good chance power balance shifts again if some teams are forced to make trades with their players to keep some cap room.

I would loved to see Arnott or someone else added, but next seasons Habs should be still improved over last years edition - one strength not mentioned is Gainey has kept our unit intact instead of ripping team apart and bringing in hockey mercenaries - which is good for team spirit.

Marksman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2006, 04:57 AM
  #23
tinyzombies
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calif via Montreal
Posts: 11,462
vCash: 500
Depends on how healthy we can stay. I think this team is improved from last summer even with no moves and everyone was saying middle of the pack. That's probably where we would have ended up.

With Carbo behind the bench and with Gainey slowly putting size in the lineup (I expect more size before the summer is over), and with Huet there a full season, I expect middle of the pack again, if we stay healthy.

We could be a second round team this time around, but our lack of transition puck movement and size/grit/scoring in the top 6 are what is holding us back, unless some of our kids take big strides and Souray plays like he did a couple years ago.

tinyzombies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2006, 09:17 AM
  #24
Kirk Muller*
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 3,061
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewHabsArea View Post
We all seen what a guy like Higgins can do last season, Plekanec played solid too but we didnt see half of what Perezhogin can do on the ice.. This kid is something special but he took longer than I expected to adjust... His play late in the season as well as in the playoffs let me think he will come back confident for the next season.. A confident Perezhogin = something you just cant imagine, something the youngest CH fans didnt had the chance too see in the past 10 years or so... And you know what? Kostitsyn is possibly even more purely skilled....What the Habs suffered the most in the last 10 years was the poor quality of their offensive players, now we have guys like Kovalev, Perezhogin, Kostitsyn and some other highly skilled prospects that improve our team a big deal... Guys like Koivu Higgins Plekanec arent as skilled as the guys stated above but they are top 6 material that play a great 2-way game with a high level of intensity... In our kids you have to believe, they are the key!
I DO believe in them. I think they will do well.

But if we're assuming good performances from our youngsters, there's no reason to assume that Toronto or Philadelphia or Buffalo or Ottawa's youngsters won't do the same.

Kirk Muller* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2006, 09:25 AM
  #25
davey999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 457
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirk Muller View Post
All of this is predicated on young guys like Higgins, Plekanec, Perezhogin, Ryder and Ribeiro improving (and Kostitsyn playing, but I don't see how that's an improvement; he didn't play last year). I can accept that.

But what about all the other teams who have young players? Are they all just going to stall completely? What about Buffalo? Sure they lost McKee, but aren't Vanek, Pominville, Roy, Tallinder, Kotalik, Gaustad, Pyatt, Kalinin and Novotny going to improve? Aren't Stajan, Steen, Welwood, Ponikarovsky and Colaiacovo going to improve for the Leafs? Aren't Pitkanen, Umberger, Carter, Meyer and Eager going to improve for the Flyers? You act as if only the Habs have young, up and coming players.

Another point is that getting rid of the so-called deadwood will have little impact. These players were deadwood because of various circumstances (free agency, go back to sweden, etc.), not because of their actual play. There is no realistic reason to believe that replacing Bulis and Sundstrom with Perezhogin and Kostitsyn will improve the team this year.
Well said. Exactly.

davey999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.