HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Green to Dallas

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-07-2013, 11:11 PM
  #1
LatvianTwist
Global Moderator
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston
Country: Tibet
Posts: 17,901
vCash: 157
Green to Dallas

Was wondering what it would take. Seems like GMGM is on the hotseat and with the way the team has been playing lately, I think they could really use a shake-up. Just don't see Ovechkin or Backstrom being moved, and Carlson and Alzner are too young to give up just to change up the roster.

Was wondering if Goligoski would be a good base, and what we'd have to add to snag Green.

Benn, Eriksson, and Lehtonen are obviously off the table, and we won't be moving Oleksiak anytime soon either.

Was thinking something like Goligoski + Chiasson/Ritchie/Stransky + 2nd for Green.

Am I way off?

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-07-2013, 11:33 PM
  #2
SonicSpeedDash
20% Cooler
 
SonicSpeedDash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Amarillo, TX
Country: United States
Posts: 3,012
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
Was wondering what it would take. Seems like GMGM is on the hotseat and with the way the team has been playing lately, I think they could really use a shake-up. Just don't see Ovechkin or Backstrom being moved, and Carlson and Alzner are too young to give up just to change up the roster.

Was wondering if Goligoski would be a good base, and what we'd have to add to snag Green.

Benn, Eriksson, and Lehtonen are obviously off the table, and we won't be moving Oleksiak anytime soon either.

Was thinking something like Goligoski + Chiasson/Ritchie/Stransky + 2nd for Green.

Am I way off?
Goligoski + 2013 2nd for Green. I wouldn't up Chiasson.

SonicSpeedDash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-07-2013, 11:44 PM
  #3
Halpysback
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 7,842
vCash: 500
Way off, Green is playing very good

Halpysback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-08-2013, 12:19 AM
  #4
Pohlow
Registered User
 
Pohlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Frisco, Tx
Posts: 1,175
vCash: 500
I wouldn't add Ritchie/Chiasson to that, no. But Goligoski + 2nd + mid prospect would get Green.

Pohlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-08-2013, 02:02 AM
  #5
Capathetic
Registered User
 
Capathetic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,224
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pohlow View Post
I wouldn't add Ritchie/Chiasson to that, no. But Goligoski + 2nd + mid prospect would get Green.
Matt Green(e) maybe.

Capathetic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-08-2013, 07:17 AM
  #6
Mystlyfe
We're Touched
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 12,271
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
Was thinking something like Goligoski + Chiasson/Ritchie/Stransky + 2nd for Green.

Am I way off?
Yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pohlow View Post
I wouldn't add Ritchie/Chiasson to that, no. But Goligoski + 2nd + mid prospect would get Green.
No it wouldn't. Caps don't need mid-prospects or 2nd round picks. Caps don't really need Goligoski, either. If the Caps go full-on rebuild, then we may move Green for futures. But it would be quality futures, like 1st round picks and/or prospects like Oleksiak. Not B prospects and 2nd rounders.

Mystlyfe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-08-2013, 03:46 PM
  #7
LatvianTwist
Global Moderator
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston
Country: Tibet
Posts: 17,901
vCash: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystlyfe View Post
No it wouldn't. Caps don't need mid-prospects or 2nd round picks. Caps don't really need Goligoski, either. If the Caps go full-on rebuild, then we may move Green for futures. But it would be quality futures, like 1st round picks and/or prospects like Oleksiak. Not B prospects and 2nd rounders.
Those wingers aren't B prospects.

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-08-2013, 04:03 PM
  #8
SDBondra
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 734
vCash: 500
Green's one of the only Capitals playing well right now. I don't think he's the droid you're looking for.

SDBondra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-08-2013, 04:03 PM
  #9
fedfed
Moderator
@FedFedRMNB
 
fedfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Moscow City
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 3,528
vCash: 500
Goligoski + 1st at least.
If the prospects you're talking about are that good, then I think prospect + 2nd should be > 1st, no? Otherwise they're bad.

fedfed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-08-2013, 04:05 PM
  #10
Mystlyfe
We're Touched
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 12,271
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
Those wingers aren't B prospects.
Yes they are. Guys like Kuznetsov, Strome, Scheifele, etc are A prospects. Ritchie/Chiasson/Stransky are not on the same tier.

Beyond that, the Caps are loaded with winger prospects. Kuznetsov, Forsberg, Wilson, Barber, Galiev, Stephenson, etc.

Mystlyfe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-08-2013, 04:05 PM
  #11
SimplySensational
Heard of Hough
 
SimplySensational's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: VA
Country: United States
Posts: 16,474
vCash: 888
Green is doing okay... He's maybe not 6 million a year offensive defense man, but he is 6 million all around defense man right now.

SimplySensational is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-08-2013, 05:14 PM
  #12
Ampersand
Dallas Stars Fan
 
Ampersand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Country: Sweden
Posts: 1,507
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystlyfe View Post
Yes they are. Guys like Kuznetsov, Strome, Scheifele, etc are A prospects. Ritchie/Chiasson/Stransky are not on the same tier.

Beyond that, the Caps are loaded with winger prospects. Kuznetsov, Forsberg, Wilson, Barber, Galiev, Stephenson, etc.
I would put Ritchie right up there with Sheifele, but you're right, the other 2 would be considered B level. That being said, both Chaisson, and Stransky have shown a lot of potential to play beyond their level description.

Ampersand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-08-2013, 06:53 PM
  #13
Fly Like a C5
Registered User
 
Fly Like a C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 897
vCash: 500
I don't know why Washington would do this. Golgoski is a significant downgrade from Green (and only 1.5 million less of a cap hit) and the prospects being offered are decent but not outstanding.

Fly Like a C5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-08-2013, 11:51 PM
  #14
MW6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Halland
Country: Sweden
Posts: 759
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fly Like a C5 View Post
I don't know why Washington would do this. Golgoski is a significant downgrade from Green (and only 1.5 million less of a cap hit) and the prospects being offered are decent but not outstanding.
The only thing that entices me is that the Caps finally get a left shooting PPQB.

MW6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-08-2013, 11:54 PM
  #15
StarsFan74
Registered User
 
StarsFan74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Country: India
Posts: 2,278
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
Was wondering what it would take. Seems like GMGM is on the hotseat and with the way the team has been playing lately, I think they could really use a shake-up. Just don't see Ovechkin or Backstrom being moved, and Carlson and Alzner are too young to give up just to change up the roster.

Was wondering if Goligoski would be a good base, and what we'd have to add to snag Green.

Benn, Eriksson, and Lehtonen are obviously off the table, and we won't be moving Oleksiak anytime soon either.

Was thinking something like Goligoski + Chiasson/Ritchie/Stransky + 2nd for Green.

Am I way off?
I'd add Eakin and Dillon to that list too.

But I have to say that if a Goose+ or Goose++ doesn't entice them, then that's it. We don't have anything else that they want. As someone pointed out, they have a plethora of prospects at wing and arguably much better than ours.

StarsFan74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-08-2013, 11:59 PM
  #16
msrulo
Registered User
 
msrulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: 류경6
Country: North Korea
Posts: 2,565
vCash: 500
Green is one of the best offensive defenseman in the league and he's back in shape, untradeable imo.

msrulo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-09-2013, 12:38 AM
  #17
Phil Connors*
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 2,627
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by msrulo View Post
Green is one of the best offensive defenseman in the league and he's back in shape, untradeable imo.
He hasn't been that since 09-10. But I think Washington will give him a chance to get back there, now that he's healthy.

Phil Connors* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-09-2013, 01:04 AM
  #18
glovesave_35
Name
 
glovesave_35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Korea
Country: United States
Posts: 14,675
vCash: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by MW6 View Post
The only thing that entices me is that the Caps finally get a left shooting PPQB.
I hope you're not talking about Goligoski.

glovesave_35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-09-2013, 01:36 AM
  #19
Capathetic
Registered User
 
Capathetic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,224
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaallMunson18 View Post
He hasn't been that since 09-10. But I think Washington will give him a chance to get back there, now that he's healthy.
7 pts in 11 games I think...not too bad. Imagine what those numbers look like once the caps get better in the new system and improve the power play. No where to go but up right?

Besides hes been above average on defense. Caps need more players like him not less.

Capathetic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-09-2013, 06:47 AM
  #20
donpaulo
Capt Barry Beck
 
donpaulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: nihon
Country: Japan
Posts: 1,602
vCash: 500
Highly unlikely

I think Green stays in a Cap uniform and they build around him Carlson and Alzner

Further that Big D went and sent James Neal and Niskanen for Goligoski to be their go to guy I doubt he is going anywhere either. All due respect for Robidas who has been very effective for the stars, he is 35 years old now.

The deal I couldn't understand was the Grossmann deal. I guess it was a salary dump in a similar manner to the Goligoski deal ?

anyway Green has the potential to return to monster status. I think washington wants to keep him around in case that happens again.

donpaulo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-09-2013, 09:28 AM
  #21
Faidh ar Rud Eigin
Modhnóirí Claonta
 
Faidh ar Rud Eigin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Transcendent
Country: Guernsey
Posts: 15,949
vCash: 500
The problem with giving up a lot is his health. I don't know if he's healthy, he's pretty awesome when he is though.

We need a real number one defensemen, and giving up Goligoski is perfectly fine with that.

Goligoski + Alex Chiasson + Devin Shore (Dallas 2nd rounder from 2012) + Tom Wandell + 2nd 2014 + 3rd 2013 for Mike Green + Jay Beagle.

Would also be willing to take on one of Washingtons bad contracts.

So a top 4 defensemen, one of Dallas' top prospects, one of Dallas' "B" center prospects, a 4th lier, and two draft picks for a top 2 defensemen, a 4th liner and possibly a bad contract. I'm not saying that's a lot but this is what I would pay for Green that looks to be healthy but still has the possibility of injury again.

That's more than Dallas gave for Brad Richards (A top 6 forward, a top young goalie a 4th liner for a number one center and a medicore backup).
Quote:
Originally Posted by glovesave_35 View Post
I hope you're not talking about Goligoski.
Yes in reality Goligoski is more of a "shoot it or pass it into the others teams players kind of guy on the powerplay.

Although at times this has not been the case. Last season and the season before. He's only 1 1/2 years removed from a 14 goal 46 point season.

Faidh ar Rud Eigin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-09-2013, 09:41 AM
  #22
tjcurrie
Registered User
 
tjcurrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gibbons, Alberta
Posts: 3,180
vCash: 500
No way I include Ritchie in there.

Im not a fan of Green myself, but I could see a use for him on our offense-lacking blueline. I just think Washington would want a lot for him and I dont think hes worth it.

tjcurrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-09-2013, 10:12 AM
  #23
fedfed
Moderator
@FedFedRMNB
 
fedfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Moscow City
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 3,528
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faidh ar Rud Eigin View Post
The problem with giving up a lot is his health. I don't know if he's healthy, he's pretty awesome when he is though.

We need a real number one defensemen, and giving up Goligoski is perfectly fine with that.

Goligoski + Alex Chiasson + Devin Shore (Dallas 2nd rounder from 2012) + Tom Wandell + 2nd 2014 + 3rd 2013 for Mike Green + Jay Beagle.

Would also be willing to take on one of Washingtons bad contracts.

So a top 4 defensemen, one of Dallas' top prospects, one of Dallas' "B" center prospects, a 4th lier, and two draft picks for a top 2 defensemen, a 4th liner and possibly a bad contract. I'm not saying that's a lot but this is what I would pay for Green that looks to be healthy but still has the possibility of injury again.

That's more than Dallas gave for Brad Richards (A top 6 forward, a top young goalie a 4th liner for a number one center and a medicore backup).


Yes in reality Goligoski is more of a "shoot it or pass it into the others teams players kind of guy on the powerplay.

Although at times this has not been the case. Last season and the season before. He's only 1 1/2 years removed from a 14 goal 46 point season.
We are not interested in quantity for quality. We need quality, just younger. Every trade for Gren must begin with (for some reason unsettled) top-4 RD then 1st rounder or quality center prospect. Not much interest in trading him.

fedfed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-09-2013, 10:38 AM
  #24
Faidh ar Rud Eigin
Modhnóirí Claonta
 
Faidh ar Rud Eigin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Transcendent
Country: Guernsey
Posts: 15,949
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by fedfed View Post
We are not interested in quantity for quality. We need quality, just younger. Every trade for Gren must begin with (for some reason unsettled) top-4 RD then 1st rounder or quality center prospect. Not much interest in trading him.
I'm always weary about trading first rounders because you never know how bad you'll fail. Would you rather have Goligoski and a 2014 1st for Green than the package I put together?

I'd do Goligoski and a 1st if the 1st was conditional. If Dallas finishes 1-14, it becomes a 2014 1st rounder that you get as long as Dallas does not finish in the bottom 5, if they do then Washington gets the 2015 first rounder.

Faidh ar Rud Eigin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-09-2013, 10:41 AM
  #25
StarsFan74
Registered User
 
StarsFan74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Country: India
Posts: 2,278
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by fedfed View Post
We are not interested in quantity for quality. We need quality, just younger. Every trade for Gren must begin with (for some reason unsettled) top-4 RD then 1st rounder or quality center prospect. Not much interest in trading him.
And that's why I think a trade wouldn't work. Goligoski is the only piece we can realistically give away in terms of quality and add to that piece. He's only 3 months older than Green and while I agree he has been snake-bit since 2010-11, that could be a result of having to play 1/2D minutes and he doesn't have the size for that. He is a good 3D should he find his offensive spark. Maybe a change of scene to an offensive-minded unit in WSH where "Carlzner" can handle the #1D and #2D positions and he is paired with a shutdown guy like Hamrlik, is the panacea for his ills.

I perfectly understand your not wanting to trade Green, however.

StarsFan74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.