Rangers beat the Bruins twice. Rangers > Bruins. I dont see how being ahead of them 3-1 almost the entire game only to allow 2 goals in the last minute is the bruins "tremendously outplaying" them. But whatever. The Bruins still lost.
If the Bruins won that shootout, would you still suggest Rangers > Bruins? I'm guessing no. The Rangers kept trying to get the puck out by chipping it out on the sideboards, which the Bruins read constantly and hemmed the Rangers in for long periods of time. I can't think of many scoring chances the Rangers had that game, they were just fortunate to cash in.
LA is 5-5 and dead last in their own division. How are they an elite team?
lol. Look at their SA, SF ratio, best fenwick rating in the leauge. They'll win the division this year as law of averages progress. 3rd best fenwick rating in the league.
You are seriously off base if you think the Bruins "tremendously" outplayed the Rangers. Yes they had better puck possession. However, they had few good chances. This was not the Islanders game where every time they came into our zone for a stretch in the game it was an amazing change. BTW, I wonder what you'd say if the Rangers averaged 5 goals against in a 6 game losing streak like the Blues. If you read the posts of Blues fans it wasn't just Elliott either. Yet they're better than the Rangers.
Elliot is clearly a sieve and deserves the blame. Absolutely inexcusable that he allowed 4 goals on 11 shots against. lol.