HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Boston-Calgary

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-17-2013, 07:16 PM
  #1
The Dangley One
Dangle dangle goal
 
The Dangley One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,684
vCash: 500
Boston-Calgary

Krejci
2nd
Knight

For

Iginla
Glencross
Sarich

The Dangley One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 07:19 PM
  #2
Haatley
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,138
vCash: 681
Calgary says no.

Haatley is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 07:28 PM
  #3
The Dangley One
Dangle dangle goal
 
The Dangley One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,684
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haatley View Post
Calgary says no.
I don't think so

The Dangley One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 07:45 PM
  #4
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,837
vCash: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dangley One View Post
I don't think so
Yes we do, Iginla can return a first and a prospect, as can Glencross, Sarich can get us a 2nd or 3rd. If we rebuild (which this move starts)
2 1st, 2 good prospects, 2nd/3rd > Krejci, Knight, 2nd.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 07:45 PM
  #5
Devilspuppet666
Registered User
 
Devilspuppet666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,549
vCash: 250
yeah, no.....

Devilspuppet666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 07:46 PM
  #6
Baddkarma
Registered User
 
Baddkarma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Midland TX
Country: United States
Posts: 3,061
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Baddkarma
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dangley One View Post
I don't think so
I think your right, but Boston does indeed say no dealing their best offensive pivot for a guy who will be gone in two months.

Baddkarma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 07:46 PM
  #7
Gary83*
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,287
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dangley One View Post
I don't think so
Easily.

Gary83* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 07:46 PM
  #8
topcat986*
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,028
vCash: 500
No from both sides

topcat986* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 07:53 PM
  #9
nmbr_24
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,544
vCash: 500
I don't see the Bruins dealing Krejci at all.

nmbr_24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 07:54 PM
  #10
The Dangley One
Dangle dangle goal
 
The Dangley One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,684
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHudlinator View Post
Yes we do, Iginla can return a first and a prospect, as can Glencross, Sarich can get us a 2nd or 3rd. If we rebuild (which this move starts)
2 1st, 2 good prospects, 2nd/3rd > Krejci, Knight, 2nd.
You forgot the Krejci > Iginla part

But honestly you want a bunch of futures then fine lol

1st
3rd
Koko
Subban

The Dangley One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 07:59 PM
  #11
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,837
vCash: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dangley One View Post
You forgot the Krejci > Iginla part

But honestly you want a bunch of futures then fine lol

1st
3rd
Koko
Subban
If you truely believe that then why even post this trade?

And we have been over this we don't want Subban, we need offensive prospects not goalies. It just isn't the type of return we would be looking for not that is a bad package.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:00 PM
  #12
Gary83*
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,287
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dangley One View Post
You forgot the Krejci > Iginla part

But honestly you want a bunch of futures then fine lol

1st
3rd
Koko
Subban
Subban sucks. You can keep him.

Gary83* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:07 PM
  #13
The Dangley One
Dangle dangle goal
 
The Dangley One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,684
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHudlinator View Post
If you truely believe that then why even post this trade?

And we have been over this we don't want Subban, we need offensive prospects not goalies. It just isn't the type of return we would be looking for not that is a bad package.
Cause it fills some needs on the bruins and brings the flames an excellent player

The Dangley One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:12 PM
  #14
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,837
vCash: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dangley One View Post
Cause it fills some needs on the bruins and brings the flames an excellent player
That's fine but you aren't filling our needs, we don't want a 27 year old to be the core piece coming back in a rebuild we want 1sts and good prospects.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:12 PM
  #15
MillarWithASave
HUBY DOOBY SHUTUP
 
MillarWithASave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Melbourne, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 4,157
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHudlinator View Post
Yes we do, Iginla can return a first and a prospect, as can Glencross, Sarich can get us a 2nd or 3rd. If we rebuild (which this move starts)
2 1st, 2 good prospects, 2nd/3rd > Krejci, Knight, 2nd.
Glencross can not fetch a 1st and a prospect. That's crazy talk.

MillarWithASave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:12 PM
  #16
MarchandMadness 63*
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 150
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary83 View Post
Subban sucks. You can keep him.
Thank you. More than happy to keep Subban,the kids only 19 years old and the Bruins are in no rush to develop him too quickly. Within two or three years Malcolm Subban will be an NHL ready goalie as the back up to Tuukka Rask.

MarchandMadness 63* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:13 PM
  #17
Ashasx
Registered User
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,737
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillarWithASave View Post
Glencross can not fetch a 1st and a prospect. That's crazy talk.
He can fetch a 1st +, easily.

Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:13 PM
  #18
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,837
vCash: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillarWithASave View Post
Glencross can not fetch a 1st and a prospect. That's crazy talk.
A 20+ goal scorer, good pker making 2.5 million a season could very well get a 1st + prospect.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:15 PM
  #19
MillarWithASave
HUBY DOOBY SHUTUP
 
MillarWithASave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Melbourne, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 4,157
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHudlinator View Post
A 20+ goal scorer, good pker making 2.5 million a season could very well get a 1st + prospect.
I disagree, I don't see him even being able to fetch a first.

MillarWithASave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:17 PM
  #20
InfinityIggy
Inflammatory Poster
 
InfinityIggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,085
vCash: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dangley One View Post
Krejci
2nd
Knight

For

Iginla
Glencross
Sarich
Lol nope. I probably wouldn't even move Iginla for that.

InfinityIggy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:21 PM
  #21
CaptainCrunch67
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,866
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillarWithASave View Post
I disagree, I don't see him even being able to fetch a first.
And that's why your posting on a message board and not working in the NHL

CaptainCrunch67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:31 PM
  #22
nogger
#wemissyoubutler
 
nogger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,344
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillarWithASave View Post
I disagree, I don't see him even being able to fetch a first.
Would you say Gaustad is better than Glencross?

nogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:50 PM
  #23
Flamester
Registered User
 
Flamester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: calgary
Posts: 455
vCash: 500
Switch Hamilton for knight and we gotta deal

Flamester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:53 PM
  #24
MuffinMerc
Registered User
 
MuffinMerc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,000
vCash: 291
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dangley One View Post
I don't think so
Calgary laughs then says no.

MuffinMerc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2013, 08:55 PM
  #25
inthewings
Registered User
 
inthewings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,072
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nogger View Post
Would you say Gaustad is better than Glencross?
Not that I don't think Glencross could return a first in the right situation, but I hate how that silly Gaustad trade has become the benchmark for the value of a 1st at the deadline. UFA 3rd/4th linr centers have never had that kind of value, and I don't think a single egregious trade is going to change that going forward.

inthewings is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.