HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Bruins-Flyers talking trade?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-24-2013, 12:55 PM
  #101
Sasso09
Registered User
 
Sasso09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 8,626
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackhawkswincup View Post
Briere is not worth a 1st rounder
Briere is the best playoff performer in the NHL currently ( in terms of elevating his game) he's easily worth a late 1st + something small for a contending favorite like Boston.

Sasso09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 01:02 PM
  #102
Sasso09
Registered User
 
Sasso09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 8,626
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zaYG View Post
Not fair at all, but Seids is arguably our most important player come playoffs.
Oh... You were serious..... Wow

Sasso09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 01:33 PM
  #103
Dellstrom
Pastrnasty
 
Dellstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Boston
Country: United States
Posts: 22,622
vCash: 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasso09 View Post
Oh... You were serious..... Wow
I don't think he's our most important, but I very much agree that he's up there... He was easily our best player in the playoffs last year and was one of the best in 2011.

Dellstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 01:59 PM
  #104
Sasso09
Registered User
 
Sasso09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 8,626
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dellstrom View Post
I don't think he's our most important, but I very much agree that he's up there... He was easily our best player in the playoffs last year and was one of the best in 2011.
Still... Scidenberg can be had for Schenn, Couturier, Voracek, Simmonds, Hartnell... No need to even mention Giroux. ( value wise, maybe team needs makes it a bit more complex)

Sasso09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 02:19 PM
  #105
tmccune44
Registered User
 
tmccune44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 19
vCash: 500
3 mins Tim Panaccio ‏@tpanotchCSN
Al Morgant: if Flyers become "sellers" BOS would take Danny Briere. Flyers finally have 8th seed;teams behind them have lots games in hand

tmccune44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 02:22 PM
  #106
The Dangly One
Dangle dangle goal
 
The Dangly One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,528
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasso09 View Post
Still... Scidenberg can be had for Schenn, Couturier, Voracek, Simmonds, Hartnell... No need to even mention Giroux. ( value wise, maybe team needs makes it a bit more complex)
Bruins need Seidenberg. And wouldn't be traded unless an equal or better defenseman was coming back or they got a severe overpayment. So you're assessment that he can be had for player A, B, Or C is incorrect

The Dangly One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 02:23 PM
  #107
SolidSnakeUS
Registered User
 
SolidSnakeUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pipersville, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 38,931
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmccune44 View Post
3 mins Tim Panaccio ‏@tpanotchCSN
Al Morgant: if Flyers become "sellers" BOS would take Danny Briere. Flyers finally have 8th seed;teams behind them have lots games in hand
So I guess Briere for a 1st plus possibly something else would be in store for the Flyers if things don't go well?

SolidSnakeUS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 02:35 PM
  #108
Sasso09
Registered User
 
Sasso09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 8,626
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dangley One View Post
Bruins need Seidenberg. And wouldn't be traded unless an equal or better defenseman was coming back or they got a severe overpayment. So you're assessment that he can be had for player A, B, Or C is incorrect
Someone didn't read the Parentheses

Sasso09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 03:03 PM
  #109
The Dangly One
Dangle dangle goal
 
The Dangly One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,528
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasso09 View Post
Someone didn't read the Parentheses
Value wise or not. The bruins aren't trading Seidenberg for some of those players. So I'm not sure what the point is here

The Dangly One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 03:12 PM
  #110
King Forsberg
16 21 28 44 68 88 93
 
King Forsberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 6,138
vCash: 200
This could actually work out very well for the Flyers and Briere. If the Flyers are looking out of it then Briere could go to Boston and have a better chance in the playoffs. If he gets bought out then he can sign for more money in than his current contract in terms of real dollars. But with a pay cut from 6.5 mil he could return to the Flyers if both sides are into it.

King Forsberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 03:25 PM
  #111
orange is better
Lattelepjandi lopatr
 
orange is better's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Reykjavík
Country: Iceland
Posts: 11,071
vCash: 500
1st from Boston for Briere would be fine with me if we're out of it.

orange is better is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 04:35 PM
  #112
The Dangly One
Dangle dangle goal
 
The Dangly One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,528
vCash: 500
I'm not sure the league or hfboards could handle a lucic briere Marchand line

The Dangly One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 06:37 PM
  #113
BostonBruins92
Closer to the Sun
 
BostonBruins92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brookline, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,779
vCash: 500
This will never happen, and I'm terrible at evaluating trade values but how's:

Boychuk and Peverley (+ a 1st/2nd?) for Simmonds?

BostonBruins92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 06:41 PM
  #114
Schalkenullvier*
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: tief im westen
Country: Germany
Posts: 4,581
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmccune44 View Post
3 mins Tim Panaccio ‏@tpanotchCSN
Al Morgant: if Flyers become "sellers" BOS would take Danny Briere. Flyers finally have 8th seed;teams behind them have lots games in hand
always liked Bričre, the question is what do we do with his contract... would be goodbye Horton after this season and that might not even cover it

Schalkenullvier* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 06:42 PM
  #115
agreen23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 441
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by crapeze11 View Post
This will never happen, and I'm terrible at evaluating trade values but how's:

Boychuk and Peverley (+ a 1st/2nd?) for Simmonds?
Good value but we cant ship out a top 4 D unless we're getting one back. Little depth in the A other than sub 6 ft puck movers who we will not want on the ice in the playoffs.

agreen23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 06:42 PM
  #116
mich25
Registered User
 
mich25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 741
vCash: 500
I don't understand this Briere speculation at all. Boston doesn't need another center especially a 34 year old one with a 6.5 mil cap hit. We don't need centers. Makes no sense. We need a good 3rd line winger or a struggling 2nd line one. Someone we can put on our 3rd line and/or switch and move up to the 2nd if need be.

mich25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 06:51 PM
  #117
BostonBruins92
Closer to the Sun
 
BostonBruins92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brookline, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,779
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by agreen23 View Post
Good value but we cant ship out a top 4 D unless we're getting one back. Little depth in the A other than sub 6 ft puck movers who we will not want on the ice in the playoffs.
I agree with that although Aaron Johnson looked decent early in the year. I guess if Philly wants to add to their D from us, it'll either be from our bottom 2, prospects, or draft picks if we don't feel comfortable trading Boychuk.

BostonBruins92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 08:07 PM
  #118
NitHeel
Kimmo Forever
 
NitHeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Reading, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,501
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by C77 View Post
To me Briere hasn't looked very good this year for the Flyers.

As a Bruins fan I completely understand how lethal he has been in the playoffs. His ability to get into the right positions around the goal area has burned the Bruins and a lot of other teams.

I just don't know how much more he has left in the tank. Bears watching I guess.
Briere has looked exactly like he has the last several regular seasons. Now I suppose one of these years he's not going to ignite come playoff time but he's not showing anything deficient right now either.

NitHeel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 08:09 PM
  #119
NitHeel
Kimmo Forever
 
NitHeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Reading, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,501
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by crapeze11 View Post
This will never happen, and I'm terrible at evaluating trade values but how's:

Boychuk and Peverley (+ a 1st/2nd?) for Simmonds?
If the Flyers traded Simmonds, they'd have a hole on their wing exactly the size/age of Wayne Simmonds. He'd only get moved for very significant D help, which is unlikely to be a price anyone's going to want to meet.

NitHeel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 08:20 PM
  #120
healthyscratch
Registered User
 
healthyscratch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philly
Posts: 6,728
vCash: 633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jtown View Post
I just dont think boston has anything the flyers could use. obviously hamilton is overpayment. A first? that really doesnt excite me and im sure another team would offer a first as well.
We should be absolutely giddy if we get a first rounder for Briere.

healthyscratch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 09:08 PM
  #121
Sevren
Registered User
 
Sevren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,375
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mich25 View Post
I don't understand this Briere speculation at all. Boston doesn't need another center especially a 34 year old one with a 6.5 mil cap hit. We don't need centers. Makes no sense. We need a good 3rd line winger or a struggling 2nd line one. Someone we can put on our 3rd line and/or switch and move up to the 2nd if need be.
I agree with everything you just said.

Sevren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 10:01 PM
  #122
sa cyred
No Tanking for #2
 
sa cyred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJ
Country: Cuba
Posts: 18,378
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sevren View Post
I agree with everything you just said.
Well except Briere hasnt played center all season. He has been on wing. He actually hasnt been too impressive but is still about a ppg (11 points in 17 games or something like that.) He looks better offensively when at center but is terrible defensively. When on the wing he isnt as flashy but gets points and isnt a trainwreck defensively.

A first and something small for one of the current nhlers best playoff performers is not to bad to ask. Bruins dont want to keep him they amnesty him. I dont know if you guys have anyone to use on both of the amnesties

sa cyred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 11:04 PM
  #123
dredeye
BJ Elitist/Hipster
 
dredeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,008
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dangley One View Post
I'm not sure the league or hfboards could handle a lucic briere Marchand line
and they wouldn't have to as Lucic and Marchand have yet to play together.

dredeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 11:07 PM
  #124
dredeye
BJ Elitist/Hipster
 
dredeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,008
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa cyred View Post
Well except Briere hasnt played center all season. He has been on wing. He actually hasnt been too impressive but is still about a ppg (11 points in 17 games or something like that.) He looks better offensively when at center but is terrible defensively. When on the wing he isnt as flashy but gets points and isnt a trainwreck defensively.

A first and something small for one of the current nhlers best playoff performers is not to bad to ask. Bruins dont want to keep him they amnesty him. I dont know if you guys have anyone to use on both of the amnesties
Why wouldn't they just trade him in the off season. Why do we have to amnesty him if we pick him up? I'm pretty sure his ntc becomes void if he agrees to a trade.

dredeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-25-2013, 12:33 AM
  #125
unifiedtheory
Twitter: @ut_pez
 
unifiedtheory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Burnaby, B.C.
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,378
vCash: 500
I don't think the teams are good trade partners to be honest. Unless Chiarelli wants to blow it up a little, then I think things could happen.

unifiedtheory is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. @2017 All Rights Reserved.