HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Philly/Calgary (Jarome)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-24-2013, 05:09 PM
  #26
PALE PWNR
Registered User
 
PALE PWNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 3,792
vCash: 1050
I would of traded for Iginla about 3 years ago. Not anymore

PALE PWNR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:15 PM
  #27
Tripod
Registered User
 
Tripod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,776
vCash: 500
It's funny that some Flames fans think a 34 year old Iginla...coming off a 67 point year, will get more in a trade than a 25 year old Kovalchuk did when coming off of a 91 point season. And as far as Philly goes, don't you think they would be better off to offer this kind of deal for a #1 D-man? Or at least use these assets as PART of an offer for one.

Tripod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:16 PM
  #28
JMcLeaf
(╯□)╯︵ ┻━┻
 
JMcLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: ♫d(-_-)b♫
Country: Antarctica
Posts: 17,401
vCash: 500
Flyers would be stupid to trade Simmonds straight up for Iginla

JMcLeaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:32 PM
  #29
Deen
Registered User
 
Deen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,280
vCash: 129
No from Calgary. Iginla for Voracek.

Deen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:37 PM
  #30
Stizzle
Registered User
 
Stizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,873
vCash: 500
I wouldn't even trade Laughton straight up for Iginla.

Stizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:40 PM
  #31
orange is better
than other colors...
 
orange is better's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 7,691
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deen View Post
No from Calgary. Iginla for Voracek.
This is hilarious. If the flyers offered that package for iginla right now, the flames would take it and have a party every day for a week.

orange is better is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:45 PM
  #32
Stizzle
Registered User
 
Stizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,873
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deen View Post
No from Calgary. Iginla for Voracek.
It's scary how out of touch with reality some of you posters are. If that trade happened, the Flyers would be the laughing stock of the league.

Stizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:49 PM
  #33
Mota
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 988
vCash: 500
I would love for Iginla to be a Flyer. Even at 35, he brings so much to the table and could really give their offense a boost and a bigger veteran presence.

That being said, I would only want him for the right price.

Cousins+2nd+Wellwood (or Mcginn)

Would consider Laughton too (instead of Cousins) if the rest of the package was reasonable.

Mota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:49 PM
  #34
Pekka Rinne
Registered User
 
Pekka Rinne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Red Deer
Country: Canada
Posts: 722
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGoFlyers1825 View Post
I wouldn't give up even one of those pieces for Iginla
HAHA ok then. If Philly wouldn't trade a conditional 1st and/or Laughton for Iggy they would be idiots.

They wouldn't trade that package for him, but to say you wouldn't any single of those pieces is asinine.

Pekka Rinne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 06:24 PM
  #35
BobbyClarkeFan16
Registered User
 
BobbyClarkeFan16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,870
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pekka Rinne View Post
HAHA ok then. If Philly wouldn't trade a conditional 1st and/or Laughton for Iggy they would be idiots.

They wouldn't trade that package for him, but to say you wouldn't any single of those pieces is asinine.
No, what would be idiotic is Philadelphia giving up those assets for Iginla when they are more than an Iginla away from being a Stanley Cup contender. Get Iginla into the lineup and they barely make the playoffs. Giving up that haul for Iginla would be incredibly stupid on the Flyers part. And I agree with others, at this point in Iginla's career, I wouldn't give up any of those players or picks for him. It's called asset management and giving up those assets for Jarome would be a bad, bad, bad idea.

BobbyClarkeFan16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 06:37 PM
  #36
LetsGoFlyers1825
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 758
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pekka Rinne View Post
HAHA ok then. If Philly wouldn't trade a conditional 1st and/or Laughton for Iggy they would be idiots.

They wouldn't trade that package for him, but to say you wouldn't any single of those pieces is asinine.
I clarified that if we win the Cup then, yeah, I'd give a conditional 1st.

At this point I'd rather get a solid prospect in this draft than have Iginla re-sign with us and put the Flyers in cap hell. I love Iggy, but it makes zero sense.

LetsGoFlyers1825 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 06:41 PM
  #37
Petes2424
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,797
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keenan87 View Post
To Philly:
Jarome Iginla


To Calgary:
Wayne Simmonds
Scott Laughton
1st 2013 (Conditional on Iginla signing or Philly winning the cup)

I think this is a fair offer as Simmonds has done very well but Voracek and Read can cover for his loss (as well Iggy himself). Laughton is a good prospect and the first rounder is only if you guys can sign Iginla or win the cup.
He's going to land more than people think but this is over the top. More like Cousins and a #1

Petes2424 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 06:53 PM
  #38
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyClarkeFan16 View Post
No, what would be idiotic is Philadelphia giving up those assets for Iginla when they are more than an Iginla away from being a Stanley Cup contender. Get Iginla into the lineup and they barely make the playoffs. Giving up that haul for Iginla would be incredibly stupid on the Flyers part. And I agree with others, at this point in Iginla's career, I wouldn't give up any of those players or picks for him. It's called asset management and giving up those assets for Jarome would be a bad, bad, bad idea.
But its a conditional 1st, if the flyers doesn't win the cup, they dont have to give anything....

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 07:14 PM
  #39
Philadelphia Ducks
#BringBackBob
 
Philadelphia Ducks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,249
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
But its a conditional 1st, if the flyers doesn't win the cup, they dont have to give anything....
They'd still be giving up Simmonds and Laughton wouldn't they? Which is still more than I'd give up for Iggy.

Philadelphia Ducks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 07:19 PM
  #40
Devonator
Registered User
 
Devonator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Proud Darul Harbian
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,074
vCash: 500
The Flyers do not remotely need Iggy at this point...we need a young stud defence man...Iggy and his declining play is not going to help us get a Cup....

Granted , if you were offering Iggy from a couple of seasons ago, then this trade would be palatable...as it stands now, the most I would give up for Iggy is a 1st and a prospect like Cousins...and even at that, I am not very interested....

If the Flames have a young stud defense man...then I am interested...

Devonator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 07:20 PM
  #41
Deen
Registered User
 
Deen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,280
vCash: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange is better View Post
This is hilarious. If the flyers offered that package for iginla right now, the flames would take it and have a party every day for a week.
If I would have proposed this as a straight up deal before the season started I think your opinion would be different. Voracek is hot right now like Hansel, he's realistically a 60 point player per year long term if he stays healthy. If you want a shot at a cup I think having a line of Hartnell and Giroux is just dirty with Iginla in there.

Deen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 07:25 PM
  #42
orange is better
than other colors...
 
orange is better's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 7,691
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deen View Post
If I would have proposed this as a straight up deal before the season started I think your opinion would be different. Voracek is hot right now like Hansel, he's realistically a 60 point player per year long term if he stays healthy. If you want a shot at a cup I think having a line of Hartnell and Giroux is just dirty with Iginla in there.
First of all. I was speaking of the original proposal.

Second of all, I absolutely would not have a different opinion. Voracek was a high draft pick, is still extremely young and still has an enormous ceiling. And Voracek is not just "hot right now". He has 46 points in his last 45 games including the playoffs. That's becoming more than just a sample size. If you think his ceiling is 60 points then Idk what to tell you except that you're wrong.

orange is better is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 07:43 PM
  #43
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philadelphia Ducks View Post
They'd still be giving up Simmonds and Laughton wouldn't they? Which is still more than I'd give up for Iggy.
We was talking about Iginla for only a conditional 1st. (if they win the cup).

would you do it?

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 08:13 PM
  #44
NitHeel
Mucker/Grinder
 
NitHeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Reading, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,127
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keenan87 View Post
http://www.csnphilly.com/flyers/nhl-...6307377878-711

There are rumours out there that the Flyers want him and don't want to move Schenn or Couturier for him so I thought maybe this would work.

This is more for value than salary cap.

If you read the article, there's nothing in there that's a rumor. That's just a writer speculating on a player coming available and then explaining that the Flyers need help there, but aren't really in any position in the standings to acquire that player.

NitHeel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 08:16 PM
  #45
MAK19
FreeWierciochBanAndy
 
MAK19's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Madrid
Posts: 13,263
vCash: 500
Lol @ this proposal

Simmonds > Iginla

MAK19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 08:18 PM
  #46
Deen
Registered User
 
Deen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,280
vCash: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange is better View Post
First of all. I was speaking of the original proposal.

Second of all, I absolutely would not have a different opinion. Voracek was a high draft pick, is still extremely young and still has an enormous ceiling. And Voracek is not just "hot right now". He has 46 points in his last 45 games including the playoffs. That's becoming more than just a sample size. If you think his ceiling is 60 points then Idk what to tell you except that you're wrong.
I will eat my computer if Voracek finishes the year at a ppg

Deen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 08:24 PM
  #47
rockinghockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,368
vCash: 500
At this point of their careers I would take Simmonds because of the age.

rockinghockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 10:30 PM
  #48
Remember2004
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 799
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MandyAlwaysKnows View Post
Lol @ this proposal

Simmonds > Iginla
Lol at your logic. Just because Simmonds has more points then Iginla for this ONE season for now... you think hes better? Oh and his age right? Simmonds would be lucky to get to where Iginla is in his career or even achieve half of what he has accomplished. He just needs a ring.

Remember2004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 11:05 PM
  #49
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Remember2004 View Post
Lol at your logic. Just because Simmonds has more points then Iginla for this ONE season for now... you think hes better? Oh and his age right? Simmonds would be lucky to get to where Iginla is in his career or even achieve half of what he has accomplished. He just needs a ring.
its irrelevant

Teams doesn't acquire players for what they did in the past, they are looking at what they can do for them in the future.

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-25-2013, 12:20 AM
  #50
cheesesteak
Registered User
 
cheesesteak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,021
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deen View Post
No from Calgary. Iginla for Voracek.
23 year old player starting to break out and who's in the top 20 for points right now for a 35 year old looks to be declining Iginla rental.

cheesesteak is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.