HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Notices

Logjam at Center: Solution?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-07-2013, 10:06 PM
  #1
mm6492
Registered User
 
mm6492's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,509
vCash: 500
Logjam at Center: Solution?

With Giroux, Schenn, and Coots, plus Laughton coming up eventually, what do you guys propose we do at center?

The easy thing I have seen thrown around is Schenn to wing, but he has looked FAR better at center.

Coots isn't gonna get moved in all likely hood cause of his defensive ability.

And I can't see Giroux getting moved (though it'd be interesting...) from center.




So what does everyone see happening? Clearly pure speculation at this point.

mm6492 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2013, 10:10 PM
  #2
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 107,615
vCash: 6115
I think it's clear they want Schenn to be a winger

GKJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2013, 10:12 PM
  #3
RoDu
Registered User
 
RoDu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,378
vCash: 500
I don't see Schenn moving to wing until Couts offensive game advances

RoDu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2013, 10:14 PM
  #4
TheLegendkiller
Registered User
 
TheLegendkiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,273
vCash: 500
Make them centers 1-4. That'll work for a few years.

TheLegendkiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2013, 10:25 PM
  #5
Norm MacDonald
Registered User
 
Norm MacDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 4,049
vCash: 500
It's not really a log jam. At this point, Schenn is a good second line center and Couturier is a great third line center. Holmgren can reevaluate the situation if it ever becomes a cap problem, but there's no reason to worry about having too many talented centers at this point.

Norm MacDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2013, 10:27 PM
  #6
flyersfan187
Registered User
 
flyersfan187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Morrisdale, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,674
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to flyersfan187 Send a message via Skype™ to flyersfan187
It is never a bad thing to have a lot of capable centers.

flyersfan187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2013, 10:47 PM
  #7
mm6492
Registered User
 
mm6492's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,509
vCash: 500
Ok I clearly knew its not a bad thing. But if Laughton comes up next year or the year after, we need an end plan. Is it making Schenn a winger?

mm6492 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2013, 10:51 PM
  #8
Jtown
Registered User
 
Jtown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Posts: 9,026
vCash: 539
it could be as simple as laughton playing the wing.

Jtown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2013, 11:20 PM
  #9
Prongo
Beer
 
Prongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 12,672
vCash: 500
I think we have to wait a few before deciding this. Laughton should get another year in juniors IMO. Two years from now nobody knows what this team will look like, but we don't need to worry about this right now. Also if Laughton does make the team next year, he will get coots treatment or even convert to wing if need be. It seems like schenn is most suitable for the wing though. But like I said something that really doesn't worry me right now

Prongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 12:39 AM
  #10
dats81
Registered User
 
dats81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Carinthia
Country: Austria
Posts: 1,735
vCash: 500
Besides Giroux noone can win a faceoff if his life was depending on it.

They need to bring in a Veteran 4th line Center. Laughton stays in Junior or is traded in a package for a first pairing defenseman or a shoot first Veteran winger. And even if this doesn't materialize, convert Laughton into a shutdown winger.

Just my two cents...

dats81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 01:07 AM
  #11
TheLegendkiller
Registered User
 
TheLegendkiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,273
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dats81 View Post
Besides Giroux noone can win a faceoff if his life was depending on it.

They need to bring in a Veteran 4th line Center. Laughton stays in Junior or is traded in a package for a first pairing defenseman or a shoot first Veteran winger. And even if this doesn't materialize, convert Laughton into a shutdown winger.

Just my two cents...
They cant win faceoffs cause they're rookies and second year players. You don't get good at faceoffs for a few years.

TheLegendkiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 03:17 AM
  #12
dats81
Registered User
 
dats81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Carinthia
Country: Austria
Posts: 1,735
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLegendkiller View Post
They cant win faceoffs cause they're rookies and second year players. You don't get good at faceoffs for a few years.
And that's why the 4th line center spot needs to be filled with a capable Veteran next season, and not S. Laughton imho.

dats81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 06:45 AM
  #13
JXC
#LaviPondHockeyFail
 
JXC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Country: United States
Posts: 13,868
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dats81 View Post
And that's why the 4th line center spot needs to be filled with a capable Veteran next season, and not S. Laughton imho.
Indeed, they really do miss that veteran specialist.

JXC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 07:22 AM
  #14
DrinkFightFlyers
Grave Before Shave
 
DrinkFightFlyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 11,720
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to DrinkFightFlyers
Quote:
Originally Posted by JXC View Post
Indeed, they really do miss that veteran specialist.
Is Konopka a UFA? Love that guy.

DrinkFightFlyers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 07:42 AM
  #15
Protest
C`est La Vie
 
Protest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Deptford, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 4,069
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrinkFightFlyers View Post
Is Konopka a UFA? Love that guy.
Is he still crazy though lol?

Protest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 08:32 AM
  #16
McNasty
Registered User
 
McNasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rutgers
Country: United States
Posts: 5,490
vCash: 500
Couturier isn't playing well enough for this to really be a log jam atm, let them cross that bridge when they get there.

McNasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 08:44 AM
  #17
Tripod
Registered User
 
Tripod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,418
vCash: 500
I just hope Couts is signed to a nice bridge contract...not a JVR type one.

Tripod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 09:45 AM
  #18
DrHamburg
Registered User
 
DrHamburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 1,078
vCash: 500
you have time to figure it out. Next season are big years for Schenn and Couts. Maybe Couts doesn't develop offensively and is going to be just a shutdown 3rd line center? Schenn right now in a 82 game season would be on pace for about 60 points. Schenn could be a 65 point, two center next season. With Laughton being called up next season, you are going to be able to have him 3 years in a 4th line and injury move up role.

Another thing though is the FO%. Schenn and Couts are both really bad. around 42%. Those numbers have to improve. What if Couts just turns into a really good shutdown player and is moved to wing? There are a lot of options right now and that is a good thing.

DrHamburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 10:08 AM
  #19
JackStraw
Moving much too slow
 
JackStraw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,425
vCash: 500
Trade someone. Maybe two someones. I personally am sick of this "you can never have too many centers" philosophy. The Flyers have had an excess of centers going back to when Briere arrived, and what has it gotten them. They've tried pretty much everyone at wing at some point, and has anyone actually looked good there? Not as far as I can see. Our best wingers are... actual wingers: Hartnell, Simmonds, Read, Voracek, and Gagne (still).

Trade from a position of strength (center) to address a position of weakness (defense). Please, Homer.

JackStraw is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 10:12 AM
  #20
SnS
Mod Supervisor
 
SnS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 11,608
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackStraw View Post
Trade someone. Maybe two someones. I personally am sick of this "you can never have too many centers" philosophy. The Flyers have had an excess of centers going back to when Briere arrived, and what has it gotten them. They've tried pretty much everyone at wing at some point, and has anyone actually looked good there? Not as far as I can see. Our best wingers are... actual wingers: Hartnell, Simmonds, Read, Voracek, and Gagne (still).

Trade from a position of strength (center) to address a position of weakness (defense). Please, Homer.
Problem is if right value in deals don't happen, a trade can't be made.

__________________
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v200/nemesis15/SnS-Sig.gif

Props to Nemesis for the signature and avatar.
SnS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 10:29 AM
  #21
DrHamburg
Registered User
 
DrHamburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 1,078
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackStraw View Post
Trade someone. Maybe two someones. I personally am sick of this "you can never have too many centers" philosophy. The Flyers have had an excess of centers going back to when Briere arrived, and what has it gotten them. They've tried pretty much everyone at wing at some point, and has anyone actually looked good there? Not as far as I can see. Our best wingers are... actual wingers: Hartnell, Simmonds, Read, Voracek, and Gagne (still).

Trade from a position of strength (center) to address a position of weakness (defense). Please, Homer.
The only center that would land us a legimate #1 defensemen is Couts.
No one will give us a #1 D man for Laughton.
Brayden Schenn could be packaged for a #1 D man but with what you would have to add is probably not worth it. Besides if you trade Brayden I'd slightly worry about Luke, I know its a business but playing with your brother in the NHL is a dream come true. Trading your brother because you aren't the #1 dman the team wants could be a problem.
Giroux can get you a #1 D Man, but then you go from strong at center to very young and all potential based.
So basically Couts is the only one. You can probably get Myers straight up. Not sure I want him. Who else would move a #1? It is always a great idea in theory, but what teams are like "Cannot wait to trade our #1 Defensemen"

DrHamburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 10:40 AM
  #22
JackStraw
Moving much too slow
 
JackStraw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,425
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrHamburg View Post
The only center that would land us a legimate #1 defensemen is Couts.
No one will give us a #1 D man for Laughton.
Brayden Schenn could be packaged for a #1 D man but with what you would have to add is probably not worth it. Besides if you trade Brayden I'd slightly worry about Luke, I know its a business but playing with your brother in the NHL is a dream come true. Trading your brother because you aren't the #1 dman the team wants could be a problem.
Giroux can get you a #1 D Man, but then you go from strong at center to very young and all potential based.
So basically Couts is the only one. You can probably get Myers straight up. Not sure I want him. Who else would move a #1? It is always a great idea in theory, but what teams are like "Cannot wait to trade our #1 Defensemen"
Well, this is why Homer gets the big money. I expect that the Flyers would have to give up Couts+ to get a bona-fide #1, if one is somehow available. I would be ok with that, though it would hurt. If you can't get a real #1 type guy, you can still try to get someone with mobility and the ability to move the puck and create some offense. Even that might mean losing a player we'd rather not lose, but there is a real need on the blue line and it will only get worse when Timonen retires.

JackStraw is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 12:36 PM
  #23
Homeland Security
Mod Supervisor
#beLIeve
 
Homeland Security's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY/FL
Country: United States
Posts: 13,838
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrinkFightFlyers View Post
Is Konopka a UFA? Love that guy.
He signed a 2 year deal I believe in the off season.

__________________
Homeland Security is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 12:51 PM
  #24
Prongo
Beer
 
Prongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 12,672
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrinkFightFlyers View Post
Is Konopka a UFA? Love that guy.
Konopka is a horrible player. He knows how to do one thing, win draws. Anything else is embarrassing.

Prongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 12:54 PM
  #25
TheLegendkiller
Registered User
 
TheLegendkiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,273
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrHamburg View Post
The only center that would land us a legimate #1 defensemen is Couts.
No one will give us a #1 D man for Laughton.
Brayden Schenn could be packaged for a #1 D man but with what you would have to add is probably not worth it. Besides if you trade Brayden I'd slightly worry about Luke, I know its a business but playing with your brother in the NHL is a dream come true. Trading your brother because you aren't the #1 dman the team wants could be a problem.
Giroux can get you a #1 D Man, but then you go from strong at center to very young and all potential based.
So basically Couts is the only one. You can probably get Myers straight up. Not sure I want him. Who else would move a #1? It is always a great idea in theory, but what teams are like "Cannot wait to trade our #1 Defensemen"
Not going to get a no. 1 D. Probably have to go the Devils, Canucks, Rangers route, and create a competent group 1-6.

TheLegendkiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.