HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The History of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
The History of Hockey Relive great moments in hockey history and discuss how the game has changed over time.

Greater dynasty: Gretzky's Oilers vs Trottier's Islanders

View Poll Results: Who are greater?
Gretzky's Oilers 61 50.41%
Trottier's Islanders 44 36.36%
Even 16 13.22%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-12-2013, 05:41 PM
  #26
Cursed Lemon
Registered Bruiser
 
Cursed Lemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Nashville, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 3,357
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Cursed Lemon Send a message via MSN to Cursed Lemon Send a message via Yahoo to Cursed Lemon
The fact that there is an "even" option and it's NOT the far-and-away winner right now is rather ridiculous.

Cursed Lemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-12-2013, 05:48 PM
  #27
Dennis Bonvie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Connecticut
Country: United States
Posts: 7,759
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cursed Lemon View Post
The fact that there is an "even" option and it's NOT the far-and-away winner right now is rather ridiculous.
Must be the first poll ever where "even" is clearly the correct repsonse.

Dennis Bonvie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-12-2013, 06:15 PM
  #28
Malefic74
Registered User
 
Malefic74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halfway between Nothing and Not Much Else
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,752
vCash: 500
I went with even as well.

The Isles are more balanced up and down the line up.

The Oilers are all offense, so much so it outweighs their defensive deficiencies which is rare.

This comparison is one of the most fun "what if" exercises, but ultimately that it was it is. If you choose one over the other it would be for largely subjective reasons. My best objective opinion is they are even.

Malefic74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-12-2013, 06:21 PM
  #29
Cursed Lemon
Registered Bruiser
 
Cursed Lemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Nashville, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 3,357
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Cursed Lemon Send a message via MSN to Cursed Lemon Send a message via Yahoo to Cursed Lemon
Quote:
Originally Posted by dennis bonvie View Post
must be the first poll ever where "even" is clearly the correct repsonse.
hurr durr opinions

Cursed Lemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-13-2013, 12:04 PM
  #30
Yamaguchi
Registered User
 
Yamaguchi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 676
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDevilMadeMe View Post
Were you looking forward to seeing "Trottier's Islanders" win, so you could then argue that this poll is proof that Gretzky is overrated?

I voted "even" by the way.


All superstars are slightly overrated.

Yamaguchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-13-2013, 12:15 PM
  #31
Mickaleen
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 20
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bickel41 View Post
Being a Rangers fan living on Long Island during my HS Years (graduated 1983) the Islanders were hated by me. That being said I would go Islanders all the way over the Oilers.
Same here (graduated in 87 though). I would go with Edmonton though.

Mickaleen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-13-2013, 12:39 PM
  #32
OrrNumber4
Registered User
 
OrrNumber4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Country: Switzerland
Posts: 7,422
vCash: 500
I like the narratives that is provided.

The Islanders were the typical team that could beat you in so many ways. It seemed like anyway that you played, the Islanders would beat you at your own game.

The Oilers were the typical team that forces everyone to play how they play...and nobody but the Oilers could win playing like that.

OrrNumber4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-13-2013, 02:10 PM
  #33
Morgoth Bauglir
Master Of The Fates
 
Morgoth Bauglir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,067
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamaguchi View Post
All superstars are slightly overrated.
You mean like Sergei Federov?

Morgoth Bauglir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-13-2013, 02:32 PM
  #34
BamBamCam*
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Seattle/Boston
Country: Ireland
Posts: 1,395
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintPatrick33 View Post
You mean like Sergei Federov?
Za Za Za Zing

BamBamCam* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-13-2013, 02:46 PM
  #35
quoipourquoi
Goaltender
 
quoipourquoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 3,118
vCash: 500
The format of the 1980 and 1981 playoffs made it easier for high seeds to advance through the playoffs. 1980 was tough, but 1981 was a breeze for the Islanders, as they rolled through the 9th, 13th, 14th, and 16th placed teams. The Oilers wouldn't have been forced to play the second-best team in the West in the second-round of 1986 like they did had the format still been #1 vs. #16 instead of divisional. Instead, the Smythe Division was like a minefield of teams better than those in the Norris Division - though it made for an anticlimactic Western Conference Final with the Smythe winner taking it eight consecutive years.

Even when the Oilers didn't win the Stanley Cup, they were the best team in the Conference six-straight times to the Islanders' five over seven, and still won another Stanley Cup after Gretzky left, so for me, that's the tie-breaker. If we're strictly looking at 1984-1988, then probably the Islanders, because of the novelty of five-straight finals.

quoipourquoi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-13-2013, 04:48 PM
  #36
blogofmike
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 542
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by quoipourquoi View Post
The format of the 1980 and 1981 playoffs made it easier for high seeds to advance through the playoffs. 1980 was tough, but 1981 was a breeze for the Islanders, as they rolled through the 9th, 13th, 14th, and 16th placed teams. The Oilers wouldn't have been forced to play the second-best team in the West in the second-round of 1986 like they did had the format still been #1 vs. #16 instead of divisional. Instead, the Smythe Division was like a minefield of teams better than those in the Norris Division - though it made for an anticlimactic Western Conference Final with the Smythe winner taking it eight consecutive years.
Good point about playoff structure. In 1988 Edmonton went 16-2 against Winnipeg (4th in conference, 14th in NHL), Calgary (1st in both), Detroit (3rd in conference, 5th in NHL) and Boston (2nd in conference, 4th in NHL).

Voted Oilers. Quality of opposition was higher, they also won 4 Cups, and they did much better in the years where they didn't win a Cup.

Regular Season's been covered. Here's playoffs:

Isles 1980-84 72-27 (.727) - 1st
Oilers 1980-84 33-19 (.635) - 2nd

Oilers 1985-88 53-14-1 (.779) - 1st
Isles 1985-88 13-20 (.394) - 15th

blogofmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-14-2013, 05:12 AM
  #37
Yamaguchi
Registered User
 
Yamaguchi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 676
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by blogofmike View Post
Good point about playoff structure. In 1988 Edmonton went 16-2 against Winnipeg (4th in conference, 14th in NHL), Calgary (1st in both), Detroit (3rd in conference, 5th in NHL) and Boston (2nd in conference, 4th in NHL).

Voted Oilers. Quality of opposition was higher, they also won 4 Cups, and they did much better in the years where they didn't win a Cup.

Regular Season's been covered. Here's playoffs:

Isles 1980-84 72-27 (.727) - 1st
Oilers 1980-84 33-19 (.635) - 2nd

Oilers 1985-88 53-14-1 (.779) - 1st
Isles 1985-88 13-20 (.394) - 15th


I think we need to make it clear:

the Trottier's Islanders dynasty - 1980-83

the Gretzky's Oilers dynasty - 1984-88

Yamaguchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-14-2013, 05:54 AM
  #38
No Team Needed
Registered User
 
No Team Needed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: essex
Posts: 3,132
vCash: 500
Islanders in the 80s was one of the greatest TEAMS ever assembled.

Oilers in the 80s was one of the greatest set of INDIVIDUALS placed on one team in their prime.

I'm biased though, I saw two of the Islanders Cups live.

No Team Needed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-14-2013, 06:17 AM
  #40
patnyrnyg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,640
vCash: 500
I say the Oilers based on the fact they won a 5th cup 2 years later WITHOUT their best player from the other 4 championships. The Isles had the great run, lost to the Oilers and that was it.

patnyrnyg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-14-2013, 06:19 AM
  #41
patnyrnyg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,640
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by No Team Needed View Post
Islanders in the 80s was one of the greatest TEAMS ever assembled.

Oilers in the 80s was one of the greatest set of INDIVIDUALS placed on one team in their prime.

I'm biased though, I saw two of the Islanders Cups live.
Are you saying the Oilers were not a TEAM?

patnyrnyg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-14-2013, 06:26 AM
  #42
Yamaguchi
Registered User
 
Yamaguchi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 676
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by patnyrnyg View Post
I say the Oilers based on the fact they won a 5th cup 2 years later WITHOUT their best player from the other 4 championships. The Isles had the great run, lost to the Oilers and that was it.

Please note that we are discussing the Gretzky's Oilers (1984-1988). Therefore, that great Edmonton team of 1990 does not count.

Yamaguchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-14-2013, 06:57 AM
  #43
No Team Needed
Registered User
 
No Team Needed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: essex
Posts: 3,132
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by patnyrnyg View Post
Are you saying the Oilers were not a TEAM?
Probably sounded like that but no. Islanders were greater per average player. More depth. Oilers had higher ceilings but lower floors.

No Team Needed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-14-2013, 07:08 AM
  #44
patnyrnyg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,640
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamaguchi View Post
Please note that we are discussing the Gretzky's Oilers (1984-1988). Therefore, that great Edmonton team of 1990 does not count.
Considering it was many of the same players, in my eyes it does.

patnyrnyg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-14-2013, 08:00 AM
  #45
Yamaguchi
Registered User
 
Yamaguchi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 676
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by patnyrnyg View Post
Considering it was many of the same players, in my eyes it does.
I understand your point. But I am sorry it doesn not. Only the Gretzky's Oilers can be considered.

Yamaguchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-14-2013, 08:47 AM
  #46
patnyrnyg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,640
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamaguchi View Post
I understand your point. But I am sorry it doesn not. Only the Gretzky's Oilers can be considered.
whatever you say pal.

patnyrnyg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-14-2013, 09:19 AM
  #47
Ohashi_Jouzu
Registered User
 
Ohashi_Jouzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Halifax
Country: Japan
Posts: 21,637
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamaguchi View Post
I understand your point. But I am sorry it doesn not. Only the Gretzky's Oilers can be considered.
Well, considering the '88 Oilers won the Cup without Gretzky, that there wasn't much roster turnover from the '87 Champs to the '88 Champs (essentially Gretzky and Coffey replaced by Simpson, Carson, Gelinas) and that the '90 Oilers still had 16 "core" players from the '88 championship squad (most of whom were also there in '87, mind you)...

Your opinion that the Oilers' '90 Cup tells us little/nothing about the strength of depth on Gretzky's Oilers is not only a minority opinion, it's also on weak footing, imo.

Ohashi_Jouzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-14-2013, 09:22 AM
  #48
patnyrnyg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,640
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohashi_Jouzu View Post
Well, considering the '88 Oilers won the Cup without Gretzky, that there wasn't much roster turnover from the '87 Champs to the '88 Champs (essentially Gretzky and Coffey replaced by Simpson, Carson, Gelinas) and that the '90 Oilers still had 16 "core" players from the '88 championship squad (most of whom were also there in '87, mind you)...

Your opinion that the Oilers' '90 Cup tells us little/nothing about the strength of depth on Gretzky's Oilers is not only a minority opinion, it's also on weak footing, imo.
Gretzky was on the Oilers in 88.

patnyrnyg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-14-2013, 09:26 AM
  #49
Ohashi_Jouzu
Registered User
 
Ohashi_Jouzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Halifax
Country: Japan
Posts: 21,637
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by patnyrnyg View Post
Gretzky was on the Oilers in 88.
Oh yeah, lol. Always have brain farts when it comes to '88 playoffs vs traded in '88 offseason. Beaten by Gretzky's Kings in the '89 playoffs. The point about roster turnover (or lack thereof) is even stronger, then.


Last edited by Ohashi_Jouzu: 03-14-2013 at 09:32 AM.
Ohashi_Jouzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-14-2013, 09:44 AM
  #50
Mats86
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,188
vCash: 500
I voted Oilers because they blew Isles away in '84 Finals

Mats86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.