HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumor Thread Part VI: Gaborik for Peanuts

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-16-2013, 11:40 AM
  #926
Vitto79
Registered User
 
Vitto79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sarnia
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,435
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYR Sting View Post
LOL. Yes, I think most fans hope that their team manages to brutally swindle another team. Let's say that the likelihood of such a deal is none. Not slim to none. None.

Eriksson isn't getting traded, and certainly not for Gaborik.
did I say I wish/hope

I just dont want them to give Gabby away, he could all of a sudden start sniping.

Cap wise it makes sense for them to move him in the offseason atleast, get a back in the draft with a 1st plus a good winger and prospect

What would San Jose give up? I assume Pavelski is in the same category as Eriksson.............I dont mind Boyle but they need Clowe back as well. Just worried that helps the D a ton but leaves the Forward group waaaaay worse

Vitto79 is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 11:42 AM
  #927
Punxrocknyc19*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,233
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ailurophile View Post
Eriksson will not be traded. It was a mistake to trade Neal. They have Benn and Eriksson left. I can't see them trading either.
if Morrow gets dealt, Eriksson should be their next captain...

Punxrocknyc19* is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 11:59 AM
  #928
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
 
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 29,824
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vitto79 View Post
sooooo did anyone see Glencross score a hat trick last night? I still think Tanguay, Glencross Plus for Gabby is not terrible
Of course you don't. That's because you refuse to consider why the Flames would want Gaborik.

__________________
SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 11:59 AM
  #929
RGY
(Jagr68NYR94Leetch)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 8,120
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vitto79 View Post
did I say I wish/hope

I just dont want them to give Gabby away, he could all of a sudden start sniping.

Cap wise it makes sense for them to move him in the offseason atleast, get a back in the draft with a 1st plus a good winger and prospect

What would San Jose give up? I assume Pavelski is in the same category as Eriksson.............I dont mind Boyle but they need Clowe back as well. Just worried that helps the D a ton but leaves the Forward group waaaaay worse
I hope you're not suggesting a package centered around gaborik for clowe....

RGY is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 12:01 PM
  #930
Vitto79
Registered User
 
Vitto79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sarnia
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,435
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RGY View Post
I hope you're not suggesting a package centered around gaborik for clowe....
nah Dan Boyle on D but even then its not enough, they need a Forward back to replace Gaborik and Clowe has well no goals last time i looked

the Wings are a team that have been kind of stale for a while...........would they move Franzen since he has as long contract? that would be ideal

if not do the Rangers take something like Filpula, White both UFA, Abdeklader and ideally a top prospect like Nyquist( i wish but doubt/likely another or 1st) for Gaborik, Boyle, Gilroy , Bickel?..............that's obviously alot of bodies


Last edited by Vitto79: 03-16-2013 at 01:30 PM.
Vitto79 is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 02:43 PM
  #931
BrooklynRangersFan
Change is good.
 
BrooklynRangersFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn of course
Country: United States
Posts: 10,196
vCash: 500
I feel like there are a number of guys who quite simply don't fit this team and should be moved for that reason as much as lack of performance. In fact, I think the lack of performance has more to do with the poor fit than lack of talent or even effort.

Getting rid of guys like Gaborik and Boyle (regardless of how much he's "loved" in the locker room) would be additions, not just in terms of what they might bring back, but also by subtraction - because their removal would eliminate burdens to this team playing more cohesively.

BrooklynRangersFan is online now  
Old
03-16-2013, 02:49 PM
  #932
ImIdaho
Choo-Choo-Choose me!
 
ImIdaho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,151
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrooklynRangersFan View Post
I feel like there are a number of guys who quite simply don't fit this team and should be moved for that reason as much as lack of performance. In fact, I think the lack of performance has more to do with the poor fit than lack of talent or even effort.

Getting rid of guys like Gaborik and Boyle (regardless of how much he's "loved" in the locker room) would be additions, not just in terms of what they might bring back, but also by subtraction - because their removal would eliminate burdens to this team playing more cohesively.
I still say can Torts. Let's face it, the man is a one trick pony who doesn't have a clue what to do with this except for shifting players all over the place.

Get a new coach and if Gabby and others are playing like **** (Which would mean getting into the postseason is less than zero), I'd start trading away players.

ImIdaho is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 02:53 PM
  #933
Horvat2Virtanen
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Horvat2Virtanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,888
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Punxrocknyc19 View Post
Boyle will be gone by the deadline. if not i will be shocked.
Vancouver seems like a logical bet for Boyle.

Horvat2Virtanen is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 02:57 PM
  #934
Punxrocknyc19*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,233
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Canuck View Post
Vancouver seems like a logical bet for Boyle.
Boyle and 3rd for Raymond??

Punxrocknyc19* is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 03:05 PM
  #935
Horvat2Virtanen
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Horvat2Virtanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,888
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Punxrocknyc19 View Post
Boyle and 3rd for Raymond??
Sorry not interested in that. Raymond has been lights out for us this year, even though he's a FA at years end he's still a valuable piece to us. Anything else of interest? Maybe Higgins? Futures?

Horvat2Virtanen is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 03:08 PM
  #936
Rangers Fail
4 8 15 16 23 42
 
Rangers Fail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 17,487
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Canuck View Post
Sorry not interested in that. Raymond has been lights out for us this year, even though he's a FA at years end he's still a valuable piece to us. Anything else of interest? Maybe Higgins? Futures?
We already had Higgins fail here in NY. And I guess futures could help us. This season is being flushed down the toilet anyway.

Rangers Fail is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 03:13 PM
  #937
EuroFlair
Nash 40g in 2014-15
 
EuroFlair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: west coast
Country: Sweden
Posts: 2,039
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Punxrocknyc19 View Post
Rangers Yotes trade proposal

Rangers trade Brian Boyle and Ryan Bourque
Yotes trade Raffi Torres and Phil Lane


Rangers need more offense from the bottom lines. Yes Torres is wreckless at times but when he is not, he does have some talent..
Even if he's reckless and stupid at times he'd bring some intensity to the games, something that just don't exist on this team atm.

EuroFlair is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 03:14 PM
  #938
Horvat2Virtanen
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Horvat2Virtanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,888
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grind Jam Grind View Post
We already had Higgins fail here in NY. And I guess futures could help us. This season is being flushed down the toilet anyway.
What type of futures would be of interest? I still think you guys could turn the ship around, so it would make the futures thing moot. But just for conversation sake what would be of interest?

Horvat2Virtanen is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 03:30 PM
  #939
Lion Hound
@JoeTucc26
 
Lion Hound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 3,701
vCash: 500
I was really excited for the trade deadline a month ago. Thinking some big name rental players may be available. Never really thought they would be on the outside looking in during the third quarter of this season. I'm not so sure making a big move is in the plans anymore. Not so sure if they are buyers or sellers at this point?


Last edited by Lion Hound: 03-16-2013 at 03:42 PM.
Lion Hound is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 03:32 PM
  #940
Blueshirt Believer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,398
vCash: 500
Honestly, I don't see any trade line moves that are going to help this team significantly.

They may move some people to open some cap or get draft picks.

But nothing would help all that much at this point imo..

Ranger have systemic problems..

Blueshirt Believer is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 03:34 PM
  #941
Rangers Fail
4 8 15 16 23 42
 
Rangers Fail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 17,487
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Canuck View Post
What type of futures would be of interest? I still think you guys could turn the ship around, so it would make the futures thing moot. But just for conversation sake what would be of interest?
Not gonna lie, I'm not too familiar with Canucks prospects, and there's no point in going to HF and picking guys out of a hat.

Rangers Fail is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 03:58 PM
  #942
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
 
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 29,824
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrooklynRangersFan View Post
I feel like there are a number of guys who quite simply don't fit this team and should be moved for that reason as much as lack of performance. In fact, I think the lack of performance has more to do with the poor fit than lack of talent or even effort.

Getting rid of guys like Gaborik and Boyle (regardless of how much he's "loved" in the locker room) would be additions, not just in terms of what they might bring back, but also by subtraction - because their removal would eliminate burdens to this team playing more cohesively.
Both players had their best seasons here with this coach and this system and now they don't fit?

SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 04:18 PM
  #943
Trident
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 71
vCash: 500
He disappears in the playoffs so if he can't do it in the regular season any longer, get rid of him while you can get something decent in return, before he completely falls of the cliff.

Trident is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 04:50 PM
  #944
BrooklynRangersFan
Change is good.
 
BrooklynRangersFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn of course
Country: United States
Posts: 10,196
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SingnBluesOnBroadway View Post
Both players had their best seasons here with this coach and this system and now they don't fit?
I think so. Those squads were slower and more built to work the zone. For better or for worse, this team is more north/south, fast and physical. They're a lot more Callahan/Hagelin and a lot less Gabby/Anisimov, if you follow me.

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe both those players - if they were having good seasons - would be able to fit as well with this squad as they did with the previous years' squads. But, don't you see their play (not their quality of play, but their style of play) not fitting in with the current squad? That's what I see.

Richards, on the other hand, seems to be playing closer to the same style as the rest of the team - he's just doing it terribly, terribly badly.

BrooklynRangersFan is online now  
Old
03-16-2013, 04:52 PM
  #945
Bleed Ranger Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,811
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrooklynRangersFan View Post
I think so. Those squads were slower and more built to work the zone. For better or for worse, this team is more north/south, fast and physical. They're a lot more Callahan/Hagelin and a lot less Gabby/Anisimov, if you follow me.

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe both those players - if they were having good seasons - would be able to fit as well with this squad as they did with the previous years' squads. But, don't you see their play (not their quality of play, but their style of play) not fitting in with the current squad? That's what I see.

Richards, on the other hand, seems to be playing closer to the same style as the rest of the team - he's just doing it terribly, terribly badly.
This team is more physical than last years team? I certainly disagree with that.

Bleed Ranger Blue is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 05:02 PM
  #946
Nikita4
Registered User
 
Nikita4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tri-state
Country: United States
Posts: 111
vCash: 500
Leve Gaborik on RW where he belongs and he's comfortable.

Get rid of Torts.

Nikita4 is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 05:02 PM
  #947
Dorado*
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brooklyn ,USA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,819
vCash: 500
Blow it up

Dorado* is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 05:04 PM
  #948
Drewbackatu*
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,048
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SingnBluesOnBroadway View Post
Both players had their best seasons here with this coach and this system and now they don't fit?
That's right pal, they don't fit here anymore because one of them has zero offensive ability and the other one is a lazy pos who only plays when he's in the mood!

Drewbackatu* is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 05:07 PM
  #949
NikC
Registered User
 
NikC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 3,590
vCash: 500
maybe we can call up one of the Ferraro brothers?

NikC is offline  
Old
03-16-2013, 05:09 PM
  #950
Dorado*
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brooklyn ,USA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,819
vCash: 500
Buy out Brad
Get best available package for Gaborik
Boyle
PYatt
ASHAM
Girardi .
Play all your kids including the swedes
It's over this team is t pulling a LAk there's no Drew Doughty on this team face it

Dorado* is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.