Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The History of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie

The History of Hockey Relive great moments in hockey history and discuss how the game has changed over time.

Proposed "free shot" rule for 1974-1975 NHL season

Thread Tools
03-16-2013, 10:10 PM
Registered User
Habsfan18's Avatar
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 25,256
vCash: 500
Proposed "free shot" rule for 1974-1975 NHL season

From the September, 1974 issue of The Hockey News:

Free shots on goal will be awarded by NHL referees this coming season when defending players hold the puck in their own zone. While the free shot must still be approved by the NHL rules committee, President Clarence Campbell and Referee-in-chief Scotty Morrison said they expected no problem in having he rule introduced. The idea is to remove one of hockey's most boring spectacles, that of a defender wedging the puck against he boards to force a faceoff and replace it with an exciting scoring possibility. Basically, a player will take the free shot from either of the two faceoff circles to either side of the goal. Players will line up as usual, except the defending center will not be allowed in the faceoff circle. The referee places the puck on the dot, rather than dropping it.
Now, unless I'm having a massive brain fart here, I don't believe this was ever introduced - even for a short period. Does anyone have more info on this?

Interested in checking out 50+ years worth of covers from "The Hockey News?" Check out my collection here: http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1382901
Habsfan18 is offline   Reply With Quote
03-16-2013, 10:18 PM
Registered User
Canadiens1958's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 15,121
vCash: 500
Never Introduced

Free shot was never introduced.

Canadiens1958 is offline   Reply With Quote
03-17-2013, 11:45 AM
DJ Man
Registered User
DJ Man's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: East Central Florida
Country: United States
Posts: 457
vCash: 500
I vaguely remember something called a "free faceoff" being mooted at some point long ago. You might do a search on that term. I thought this involved an uncontested faceoff by a player whose teammates could be in motion towards the goal.

DJ Man is offline   Reply With Quote
03-17-2013, 03:14 PM
Fish on The Sand
Fish on The Sand's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nanaimo
Country: Canada
Posts: 60,213
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Habsfan18 View Post
From the September, 1974 issue of The Hockey News:

Now, unless I'm having a massive brain fart here, I don't believe this was ever introduced - even for a short period. Does anyone have more info on this?
They countered this by simply not blowing the play dead.

Fish on The Sand is offline   Reply With Quote
03-17-2013, 11:00 PM
doug hamilton
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 81
vCash: 500
It was tried during the exhibition season. The Penguins used to hold their training camp in Brantford during the 70s and held exhibition games at Brantford Arena. I actually saw this happen during a game between the Penguins and the Seals. It was a pretty lame idea and totally interrupted the flow of the game.
I believe there was at least one game where the team being given the shot didn't have any players on the ice who shot from the appropriate side because their feet had to be behind the face-off dot.

doug hamilton is offline   Reply With Quote
03-18-2013, 04:10 AM
Registered User
alko's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Slovakia
Country: Slovakia
Posts: 3,337
vCash: 500
My english is very poor to understand it. Please, give some pictures.

alko is offline   Reply With Quote
03-18-2013, 06:44 AM
Theokritos's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,262
vCash: 500
[Scotty] Bowman was against the "free shot" proposal when he first confronted it, saying it presented too many problems. Now he likes it.
The "free" shot is just that: If the defending team freezes the puck unnecessarily - in any way - the opposition is given a free shot on goal from the face-off circle at the side of the net.
"I think it's had the desired effect," said Bowman. "It will help the game. It cuts out that needless stalling. Of course," he added with a grin, "that was all right when I was at St. Louis, when we had guys like Al Arbour and Glenn Hall."
Bowman doesn't think the "free shot" trial-rule has much chance of making it, but [Clarence] Campbell says he's in favour of both* and that referee-in-chief Scotty Morrison has recommended strongly to all governors that both be adopted.
"I'm optimistic both will pass," said Campbell. "But if they don't, historically, some of our greatest progress took more than one year anyway. Replacing the penalized player after being scored upon, catching the puck - all those things took a while to adopt."
"Some people," added Campbell of the resistance the new rules are likely to meet, "don't even know what's good for them, anyway."
*Note: "Both refers to the free shot and a proposal against substitutions during play stoppages, except after goals or penalty calls. Both proposals were rejected by a majority of the NHL governors in a October 1st, 1974 vote.

Source: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id...g=948%2C303609

Theokritos is offline   Reply With Quote

Forum Jump


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. @2017 All Rights Reserved.