HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumours Thread Part V: Gaborik "available"; LeBrun: NYR interested in D. Boyle

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-19-2013, 09:16 PM
  #726
Trxjw
Retired.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Land of no calls..
Country: United States
Posts: 16,992
vCash: 500
Ugh. Boyle scares me. He's another guy who seems to be turning downhill rather quickly.

Of course Sharks fans will think that means we're sending Hagelin to them.

Trxjw is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:16 PM
  #727
Kershaw
 
Kershaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country:
Posts: 25,519
vCash: 500
Dan Boyle is amazing still. He'd look insane with Staal covering up for him instead of him covering up for Murray and the other plugs he's covering up for. This is a guy I'm okay with dealing one of our higher end prospects for, provided SJ may absorb his salary.

Kershaw is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:18 PM
  #728
Ail
UH82CIT
 
Ail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Mysidia
Country: United States
Posts: 18,764
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kershaw View Post
Dan Boyle is amazing still. He'd look insane with Staal covering up for him instead of him covering up for Murray and the other plugs he's covering up for. This is a guy I'm okay with dealing one of our higher end prospects for, provided SJ may absorb his salary.
Yeah old declining dudes are always worth sending high end prospects for. That's great asset management.

Ail is online now  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:19 PM
  #729
Bob Richards
Global Moderator
Mr. Mojo Risin'
 
Bob Richards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 49,024
vCash: 50
The surname Boyle has already been tainted around here.

__________________
"New day, new hope. Richards Buyout 2014". -Ail
Bob Richards is online now  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:26 PM
  #730
Kershaw
 
Kershaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country:
Posts: 25,519
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ailurophile View Post
Yeah old declining dudes are always worth sending high end prospects for. That's great asset management.
Wow, I had no idea he deteriorated this much. He isn't even a 25 MPG defenseman anymore. I thought he was at his usual 25 MPG pace while providing offense.

Kershaw is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:27 PM
  #731
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,542
vCash: 500
Boyle would make our D incredible, but I'm not sure the offense will improve.

Lundsanity30 is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:27 PM
  #732
M0rbid
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cave
Country: United States
Posts: 8,723
vCash: 500
We have another old man on this team, beaver.......... Lets not revert back to the dark days plz, slat.

M0rbid is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:30 PM
  #733
Barbara Underhill
Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuke
 
Barbara Underhill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Montana
Country: United States
Posts: 13,259
vCash: 500
Why don't we just trade our team for the SC Champion Tampa Bay team?

Barbara Underhill is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:30 PM
  #734
Heyoooo*
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 987
vCash: 500
Maybe we can land St Louis too and become the 2004 Lightning 2.0.

Heyoooo* is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:35 PM
  #735
HatTrick Swayze
Tomato Potato
 
HatTrick Swayze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 9,840
vCash: 500
Yea would not be over the moon if Boyle was brought in.

Especially not for Gabby. And Gabby is by no means my favorite Ranger.

__________________
"Here we can see the agression of american people. They love fighting and guns. when they wont win they try to kill us all." -HalfOfFame
HatTrick Swayze is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:35 PM
  #736
Heyoooo*
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 987
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malarowski View Post
What happened to buying out Richards?

No idea.

I just find it really odd how quickly everyone clamors for turnover around here.

Kicking out two players with a longer track record here in favor of a guy whos been here 25 games is crazy to me. I like Nash, but I cant say ive ever seen anything like this happen where two players fall out of favor so quickly (Richards/Gaborik) in favor of another player that has so much to prove (Nash).


Part of me hopes we suck afterwards just to prove a point. It happened with the Nash trade. I was very skeptical of changing the chemistry of the team shipping out depth. It was a very legit concern, and thus far, has proven to be true, and now because we traded depth (Sather thinking we would take the hit and make a run) we are now scrambling for a playoff spot dangling our 2x 40 goal scorer to get that depth back.

Its ****ing crazy.


Last edited by Heyoooo*: 03-19-2013 at 09:41 PM.
Heyoooo* is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:36 PM
  #737
BrooklynRangersFan
Change is good.
 
BrooklynRangersFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn of course
Country: United States
Posts: 10,828
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 17futurecap View Post
Multiple teams have expressed some level of interest in Gabby according to Dreger. Top 4 dman, gritty top 9 forward is what they are looking for.
Great, meaningless statement from Dreger. I would hope that Gabby could fetch more than a run of the mill 2nd pairing dman and a grinder.

If I should take this to mean that they're pursuing two young guys that are on the upswing who currently occupy those roles for their current team, then maaaybe - depending on who we're talking about.

If on the other hand, we're simply talking about two steady soldiers and role players - the kind you sign on the second day of free agency for $2-3MM AAV contracts - then **** no, keep him. That's a major downgrade.

BrooklynRangersFan is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:39 PM
  #738
nyrpassion
Vetted.
 
nyrpassion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Washington DC
Country: United States
Posts: 4,545
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by I Eat Crow View Post
Would the Blues be interested? I'd doubt it due to Hitch's system, but they'd make excellent trading partners.

I'd love to pry, say, Shattenkirk and Steen from them.

Also, Dan Boyle would be a good acquisition....in 2010. The guy's done, do not want.
Yep, it would be Redden 2.0

nyrpassion is online now  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:41 PM
  #739
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,542
vCash: 500
Yeah, Boyle is still signed for next year too. Thats a bad idea at the cap hit he has.. That would surely kill any chance of bringing any kind of depth in here.

Lundsanity30 is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:46 PM
  #740
Thirty One
portnor, pls
 
Thirty One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Victoria, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,093
vCash: 420
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
Yeah, Boyle is still signed for next year too. Thats a bad idea at the cap hit he has.. That would surely kill any chance of bringing any kind of depth in here.
Have to imagine if we get Boyle, Gaborik is on his way out.

Hamrlik killed any chance of adding a player with a 5M+ cap hit.

Thirty One is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:46 PM
  #741
RangerBoy
#freejtmiller
 
RangerBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 32,259
vCash: 500
If you watch the TSN segment with McKenzie,LeBrun and Dreger,LeBrun asked if there was a fit between the Rangers and SJ for Boyle after he reported they was interest. Survey says NO. The Sharks want young assets and Boyle has a $6,666,667 cap hit. You look at what the Rangers want for Gaborik,they will be taking back salary in the deal. The acquiring team won't be assuming the entire $7.5M. Top 4 D plus a top 9 forward. Which are the multiple teams?

RangerBoy is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:47 PM
  #742
SJsharks
Registered User
 
SJsharks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dont worry about it
Country: United States
Posts: 368
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyrpassion View Post
Yep, it would be Redden 2.0
Sharks fan just coming in here to say that Boyle would be far from a mistake. Even at 36 he hasn't slowed much, if at all. When he's been out this year the sharks have been even more hopeless moving the puck. I think everyone realizes that a Boyle-hagelin swap is not going to happen at all. But my point is, you could do far worse than getting Boyle, in fact I think he would be a damn good pickup depending on the price. Just my 2 cents

But just remember that with the new CBA teams can keep some salary. Something to keep in mind.

SJsharks is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:47 PM
  #743
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,542
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RangerBoy View Post
If you watch the TSN segment with McKenzie,LeBrun and Dreger,LeBrun asked if there was a fit between the Rangers and SJ for Boyle after he reported they was interest. Survey says NO. The Sharks want young assets and Boyle has a $6,666,667 cap hit. You look at what the Rangers want for Gaborik,they will be taking back salary in the deal. The acquiring team won't be assuming the entire $7.5M. Top 4 D plus a top 9 forward. Which are the multiple teams?
Top 4 d, and a gritty bottom 6 player AND we take on salary? WHAT?

Lundsanity30 is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:49 PM
  #744
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,542
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SJsharks View Post
Sharks can just coming in here to say that Boyle would be far from a mistake. Even at 36 he hasn't slowed much, if at all. When he's been out this year the sharks have been even more hopeless moving the puck. I think everyone realizes that a Boyle-hagelin swap is not going to happen at all. But my point is, you could do far worse than getting Boyle, in fact I think he would be a damn good pickup depending on the price. Just my 2 cents

But just remember that with the new CBA teams can keep some salary. Something to keep in mind.
but i'm sure you guys wants young assets (IE Kreider, Hagelin, Miller) and the Rangers need those guys going forward, so there's no match.

Lundsanity30 is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:49 PM
  #745
Oak
Hockey Connoisseur
 
Oak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 2,310
vCash: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heyoooo View Post
I like Nash, but I cant say ive ever seen anything like this happen where two players fall out of favor so quickly (Richards/Gaborik) in favor of another player that has so much to prove (Nash).
Nash is playing at PPG pace right now. Who else on the team is? He also got injured and came back just as hot if not better.

He proved enough for me. He is consistent. He is not Cally but he puts in work on both ends. He hustles.

Gaborik is a lazy turd and I really can't say what happened to Richards. I dislike both but would be willing to give Richards another chance if he gets his **** back together soon. Gabby on the other hand needs a serious beating. He is just down right lazy and disrespectful to the entire team playing the way he is.

Oak is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:52 PM
  #746
broadwayblue
Registered User
 
broadwayblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 15,874
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by M0rbid View Post
We have another old man on this team, beaver.......... Lets not revert back to the dark days plz, slat.
No kidding.

OT...no such thing as revert back.

broadwayblue is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:52 PM
  #747
SJsharks
Registered User
 
SJsharks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dont worry about it
Country: United States
Posts: 368
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
but i'm sure you guys wants young assets (IE Kreider, Hagelin, Miller) and the Rangers need those guys going forward, so there's no match.
True, you're right about that. I was talking more about Boyle as an acquisition. I can understand that from new yorks side. As good as Boyle is, I wouldn't give up a player like hagelin or kreider either for a little over a year of Boyle

SJsharks is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:55 PM
  #748
Heyoooo*
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 987
vCash: 500
Any deal has to involve a 1st rounder and a top six forward with grit.

Sather is a trade master so I have confidence he will get a good return, but still, the whole thing im very disappointed in.

I really dont think its going to make us better either way.

Heyoooo* is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:56 PM
  #749
I Eat Crow
Fear The Mullet
 
I Eat Crow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 6,375
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RangerBoy View Post
If you watch the TSN segment with McKenzie,LeBrun and Dreger,LeBrun asked if there was a fit between the Rangers and SJ for Boyle after he reported they was interest. Survey says NO. The Sharks want young assets and Boyle has a $6,666,667 cap hit. You look at what the Rangers want for Gaborik,they will be taking back salary in the deal. The acquiring team won't be assuming the entire $7.5M. Top 4 D plus a top 9 forward. Which are the multiple teams?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
Top 4 d, and a gritty bottom 6 player AND we take on salary? WHAT?
St. Louis as I mentioned would make sense.

I could also see Winnipeg, LA, and Nashville making sense. Question is, are these teams on Gaborik's no move list?

I think Rangerboy is trying to point out that with the return Gaborik would fetch, i.e. the Rangers won't be getting back just picks and prospects. They'd take back a top 4 D and top 9 forward with a salary.

I Eat Crow is offline  
Old
03-19-2013, 09:58 PM
  #750
Rangers Fail
4 8 15 16 23 42
 
Rangers Fail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 21,283
vCash: 500
Vancouver would make some sense. But outside of Kassian, I don't know what I want. Maybe one of their defensemen? Don't want Raymond. And hell no to Booth.

Rangers Fail is online now  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.