HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Hagelin-Stepan-Nash

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-27-2013, 11:56 AM
  #26
SouthJerseyRanger
Registered User
 
SouthJerseyRanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 1,113
vCash: 500
When Zuccarello gets his visas all checked out, this is what I want to see rolling out there.

Hagelin - Stepan - Nash

Kreider - Richards - Callahan

Zuccarello - Miller - Gaborik

Asham - Newbury - Powe

Brian Boyle and Taylor Pyatt... please get the fudge to the press box.

SouthJerseyRanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 12:01 PM
  #27
Bleed Ranger Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,111
vCash: 500
I really hate the need to name a good line. I always have and always will.

Bleed Ranger Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 12:01 PM
  #28
Slenke
Registered User
 
Slenke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Country: Sweden
Posts: 282
vCash: 500
Nashstegelin.

Slenke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 12:03 PM
  #29
gump116
Registered User
 
gump116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 78
vCash: 500
Not a popular point of view, but I would break up this line to get the rest of the team going. Right now, Stepan, Nash, and Hagelin are probably our three best forwards (Callahan is in the mix), and putting them all on one line hurts the scoring depth. Especially once MZA joins the team, it's going to be hard to spread out the lines if these three are playing together. The way Nash and Stepan are playing, pretty much anyone could be the third player on that line (even Boyle) and it would be fine. I think they should reunite Hagelin with Richards and Gaborik and see if that line can get going from last year. For now, something like:

Hagelin-Richards-Gaborik
Kreider-Stepan-Nash
Pyatt-Miller-Callahan
Boyle-Newbury-Asham

When MZA is ready:

Hagelin-Richards-Gaborik
MZA-Stepan-Nash
Kreider-Miller-Callahan
Pyatt-Boyle-Asham

gump116 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 12:04 PM
  #30
Bleed Ranger Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,111
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gump116 View Post
Not a popular point of view, but I would break up this line to get the rest of the team going. Right now, Stepan, Nash, and Hagelin are probably our three best forwards (Callahan is in the mix), and putting them all on one line hurts the scoring depth. Especially once MZA joins the team, it's going to be hard to spread out the lines if these three are playing together. The way Nash and Stepan are playing, pretty much anyone could be the third player on that line (even Boyle) and it would be fine. I think they should reunite Hagelin with Richards and Gaborik and see if that line can get going from last year. For now, something like:

Hagelin-Richards-Gaborik
Kreider-Stepan-Nash
Pyatt-Miller-Callahan
Boyle-Newbury-Asham

When MZA is ready:

Hagelin-Richards-Gaborik
MZA-Stepan-Nash
Kreider-Miller-Callahan
Pyatt-Boyle-Asham
They literally just tried to break up that line to get the rest of the team going and it ended poorly.

Lets just stick with what works for now, shall we?

Bleed Ranger Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 12:08 PM
  #31
jas
Unsatisfied
 
jas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 13,219
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleed Ranger Blue View Post
They literally just tried to break up that line to get the rest of the team going and it ended poorly.

Lets just stick with what works for now, shall we?
8-0-1 with that line intact...I would say that line is getting the rest of the team going.

jas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 12:10 PM
  #32
ecemleafs
Registered User
 
ecemleafs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 10,787
vCash: 500
the GOATLINE

ecemleafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 12:22 PM
  #33
16 To Stanley*
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,468
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gump116 View Post
Not a popular point of view, but I would break up this line to get the rest of the team going. Right now, Stepan, Nash, and Hagelin are probably our three best forwards (Callahan is in the mix), and putting them all on one line hurts the scoring depth. Especially once MZA joins the team, it's going to be hard to spread out the lines if these three are playing together. The way Nash and Stepan are playing, pretty much anyone could be the third player on that line (even Boyle) and it would be fine. I think they should reunite Hagelin with Richards and Gaborik and see if that line can get going from last year. For now, something like:

Hagelin-Richards-Gaborik
Kreider-Stepan-Nash
Pyatt-Miller-Callahan
Boyle-Newbury-Asham

When MZA is ready:

Hagelin-Richards-Gaborik
MZA-Stepan-Nash
Kreider-Miller-Callahan
Pyatt-Boyle-Asham
No offense, but this is ****ing idiotic.

16 To Stanley* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 12:42 PM
  #34
Crazed Beaver
Registered User
 
Crazed Beaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Swamp
Country: United States
Posts: 742
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthJerseyRanger View Post
When Zuccarello gets his visas all checked out, this is what I want to see rolling out there.

Hagelin - Stepan - Nash

Kreider - Richards - Callahan

Zuccarello - Miller - Gaborik

Asham - Newbury - Powe

Brian Boyle and Taylor Pyatt... please get the fudge to the press box.

I like this but think if we could fit Boyle with noobs and ashem would give torts more flexibility with key def and faceoff situations. Also a good playmaker like zuccs with gabby might work. Beaver and gabby shouldn't be on ice together and GABA needs to play rw. Get er done torts you stubborn ****!

Crazed Beaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 01:06 PM
  #35
JD123
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 474
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthJerseyRanger View Post
When Zuccarello gets his visas all checked out, this is what I want to see rolling out there.

Hagelin - Stepan - Nash

Kreider - Richards - Callahan

Zuccarello - Miller - Gaborik

Asham - Newbury - Powe

Brian Boyle and Taylor Pyatt... please get the fudge to the press box.
I like! Cally could possibly get Richards going and if that ever happened he would be a great combo with Kreider. Leave the first line together no matter what. That third line looks good enough to be a decent third line. 4th line looks good too. I wouldn't totally give up on Boyle as a 4th liner and only a 4th liner. He does kill penalties and I believe he is a good locker room guy for whatever thats worth.

JD123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 02:53 PM
  #36
GarretJoseph*
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 7,604
vCash: 500
This line should never be broken up and if it is Torts should get an ear full from management/fans/media.

GarretJoseph* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 06:03 PM
  #37
Heyoooo*
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 987
vCash: 500
This line is clearly the top line and should be kept together. Period.

Worry about the other three lines.

Tortorella loves to turn **** into more of a headache even when lines are going.

Heyoooo* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 06:07 PM
  #38
ajdj10
Registered User
 
ajdj10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Country: Australia
Posts: 845
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gump116 View Post
Not a popular point of view, but I would break up this line to get the rest of the team going. Right now, Stepan, Nash, and Hagelin are probably our three best forwards (Callahan is in the mix), and putting them all on one line hurts the scoring depth. Especially once MZA joins the team, it's going to be hard to spread out the lines if these three are playing together. The way Nash and Stepan are playing, pretty much anyone could be the third player on that line (even Boyle) and it would be fine. I think they should reunite Hagelin with Richards and Gaborik and see if that line can get going from last year. For now, something like:

Hagelin-Richards-Gaborik
Kreider-Stepan-Nash
Pyatt-Miller-Callahan
Boyle-Newbury-Asham

When MZA is ready:

Hagelin-Richards-Gaborik
MZA-Stepan-Nash
Kreider-Miller-Callahan
Pyatt-Boyle-Asham
Hi John! Nice to see you on HFBoards too!

ajdj10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 07:22 PM
  #39
CM PUNK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,313
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleed Ranger Blue View Post
I really hate the need to name a good line. I always have and always will.
if the name comes naturally cause the initials just fit its one thing, but when you need to force it the suggestions are normally cringe worthy

CM PUNK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 07:24 PM
  #40
CM PUNK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,313
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jas View Post
8-0-1 with that line intact...I would say that line is getting the rest of the team going.
but on the flip side that only means that we only tried splitting them up to get other guys going 24 or 25 times. might need to try that a few more times to be sure

CM PUNK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 07:24 PM
  #41
JeffMangum
~anger~
 
JeffMangum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Listening to music
Country: United States
Posts: 58,015
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by CM PUNK View Post
if the name comes naturally cause the initials just fit its one thing, but when you need to force it the suggestions are normally cringe worthy
Yeah, agreed.

I just call it an awesome 1st line.

__________________
Soon.
JeffMangum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 07:56 PM
  #42
jas
Unsatisfied
 
jas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 13,219
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CM PUNK View Post
but on the flip side that only means that we only tried splitting them up to get other guys going 24 or 25 times. might need to try that a few more times to be sure
If it was an 82 game schedule, we might still be searching.

jas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 07:57 PM
  #43
Rangers Fail
4 8 15 16 23 42
 
Rangers Fail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 18,297
vCash: 500
The Home Shopping Network line?


Rangers Fail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-27-2013, 11:12 PM
  #44
Callagraves
Block shots
 
Callagraves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,372
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grind Jam Grind View Post
The Home Shopping Network line?

Because they're the only line that can even buy a goal

Callagraves is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.