HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > San Jose Sharks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Targets (Part II)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-31-2013, 12:36 AM
  #451
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 32,142
vCash: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjshark91 View Post
So umm. Keep Clowe for this playoffs run we're gonna have?
We're gonna have a playoff run? Are the last four games good enough to erase what was done prior to that?

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 12:44 AM
  #452
Sharksfan83
Registered User
 
Sharksfan83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,631
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
We're gonna have a playoff run? Are the last four games good enough to erase what was done prior to that?
If they finally work out that we need Pavelski on his own line, then yeah as good a chance as any in the West apart from the Hawks. Probably one scoring winger away.

Sharksfan83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 12:45 AM
  #453
Fistfullofbeer
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Fistfullofbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Whidbey Island, WA
Country: India
Posts: 7,997
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
We're gonna have a playoff run? Are the last four games good enough to erase what was done prior to that?
Only time will tell that. But as a fan I am going to keep a positive frame of mind and hope that it does. If we do keep this play up, there is no way we do not have a playoff run.

At the same time, I am not sure trading Clowe will impact us as much because we were starting to play better without Clowe before he returned. I am ok trading him contingent on the quality of the return.

__________________
What?! Look, he thinks he's people!
Fistfullofbeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 12:46 AM
  #454
sjshark91
Registered User
 
sjshark91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country:
Posts: 23,716
vCash: 2810
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
We're gonna have a playoff run? Are the last four games good enough to erase what was done prior to that?
6th place yo

sjshark91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 12:50 AM
  #455
Negatively Positive
Save us Tomas!
 
Negatively Positive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5,827
vCash: 628
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjshark91 View Post
6th place yo
Dude it'd be great if the playoff matchups stay the way it is now. The Hawks vs. Blues, Ducks vs. Wings, Sharks vs. Wild, and Canucks vs. Kings. There's a chance of an upset in every matchup.

Negatively Positive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 12:52 AM
  #456
SonomaShark
The sidebar is suck
 
SonomaShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,133
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shark Fin Soup View Post
Dude it'd be great if the playoff matchups stay the way it is now. The Hawks vs. Blues, Ducks vs. Wings, Sharks vs. Wild, and Canucks vs. Kings. There's a chance of an upset in every matchup.
No way, I want no part of the Wild.

SonomaShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 12:52 AM
  #457
TheJuxtaposer
#Shorks
 
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 26,387
vCash: 567
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonomaShark View Post
No way, I want no part of the Wild.
You just know Seto would score the OT winner in game 7.

TheJuxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 12:52 AM
  #458
sjshark91
Registered User
 
sjshark91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country:
Posts: 23,716
vCash: 2810
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonomaShark View Post
No way, I want no part of the Wild.
Why? Run backstrom

Profit.

sjshark91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 12:54 AM
  #459
Inub0i
I will Q
 
Inub0i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UC Irvine, Irvine
Country: United States
Posts: 8,615
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Inub0i Send a message via MSN to Inub0i Send a message via Skype™ to Inub0i
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonomaShark View Post
No way, I want no part of the Wild.
I think we have a chance against the Wild.

Inub0i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 12:57 AM
  #460
SonomaShark
The sidebar is suck
 
SonomaShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,133
vCash: 50
The Sharks haven't matched up well with the Wild for a while now. I want Detroit, STL, Anaslime, or LA.

SonomaShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 12:57 AM
  #461
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 32,142
vCash: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjshark91 View Post
6th place yo
The important question to ask is whether this team has what it takes to make a legitimate run. Making it is one thing. Doing something when you get there is another. This team can't get the job done on the road. We've beaten Anaheim and St. Louis on the road this year that is a playoff team. They're going to have a mountain to climb to beat Chicago in a 7 game series. I don't think this team is good enough in terms of the depth to get past the second round even with the three line split that gives them their best shot.

If we keep Burns up front, we're relying on Demers, Braun, and Irwin as half of our D for this run and that's a lot of inexperience and concern when it comes to playoff style hockey. I'm not worried so much about Demers as I am Braun and Irwin.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 12:58 AM
  #462
Negatively Positive
Save us Tomas!
 
Negatively Positive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5,827
vCash: 628
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonomaShark View Post
The Sharks haven't matched up well with the Wild for a while now. I want Detroit, STL, Anaslime, or LA.
Wait, we match up well against St. Louis? We'd get killed by the Hawks, I want no part of RPG, we have all sorts of bad luck against Vancouver, and LA would be tough as hell.

Negatively Positive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 12:59 AM
  #463
SonomaShark
The sidebar is suck
 
SonomaShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,133
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shark Fin Soup View Post
Wait, we match up well against St. Louis?
This year, I think so, last year not so much

SonomaShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 01:00 AM
  #464
Mafoofoo
:facepalm:
 
Mafoofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 12,970
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shark Fin Soup View Post
Wait, we match up well against St. Louis? We'd get killed by the Hawks, I want no part of RPG, we have all sorts of bad luck against Vancouver, and LA would be tough as hell.
With James Sheppard now we do. They have no one to counter him!

Mafoofoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 01:00 AM
  #465
SonomaShark
The sidebar is suck
 
SonomaShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,133
vCash: 50
We'll have a much better idea by Wednesday.

SonomaShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 01:02 AM
  #466
Negatively Positive
Save us Tomas!
 
Negatively Positive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5,827
vCash: 628
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonomaShark View Post
We'll have a much better idea by Wednesday.
Ya, Canucks and Wild coming up. We actually have a chance to sweep the Canucks but that ****ing stanchion gives me nightmares still. Although without Murray maybe we won't score so many own goals against Vancouver.

Negatively Positive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 01:04 AM
  #467
Gene Parmesan
Ice up, son.
 
Gene Parmesan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 31,434
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonomaShark View Post
No way, I want no part of the Wild.
The Sharks would. Wild are a decent team but definetly a notch below Anaheim, L.A. and Chicago.

Gene Parmesan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 01:10 AM
  #468
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 32,142
vCash: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shark Fin Soup View Post
Ya, Canucks and Wild coming up. We actually have a chance to sweep the Canucks but that ****ing stanchion gives me nightmares still. Although without Murray maybe we won't score so many own goals against Vancouver.
The team will be set by the time the Wild come into town. Everything this team and its tradeable players have to prove will be done at the end of the Vancouver game. I'm sure the team can push either team in a post-season series but I don't think they can beat them in a seven game series when their road play is woeful.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gene Parmesan View Post
The Sharks would. Wild are a decent team but definetly a notch below Anaheim, L.A. and Chicago.
The only team the Sharks don't have a chance against is Chicago. They match up well against the Ducks and Kings. They'll be underdogs against the Canucks or Wild but they'll have a decent chance. I just don't see them getting past the second round and a lot of it is how they play on the road. They're just not good and that's not a good omen for a team that isn't going to be the higher seed after the first round most likely.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 01:14 AM
  #469
Mafoofoo
:facepalm:
 
Mafoofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 12,970
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
The only team the Sharks don't have a chance against is Chicago. They match up well against the Ducks and Kings. They'll be underdogs against the Canucks or Wild but they'll have a decent chance. I just don't see them getting past the second round and a lot of it is how they play on the road. They're just not good and that's not a good omen for a team that isn't going to be the higher seed after the first round most likely.
The ideal situation would be the Ducks killing the Hawks before they got to the Sharks and then the Sharks killing Anaheim.

Mafoofoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 01:15 AM
  #470
SonomaShark
The sidebar is suck
 
SonomaShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,133
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mafoofoo View Post
The ideal situation would be the Ducks killing the Hawks before they got to the Sharks and then the Sharks killing Anaheim.
That works for me!

SonomaShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 01:15 AM
  #471
Negatively Positive
Save us Tomas!
 
Negatively Positive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5,827
vCash: 628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mafoofoo View Post
The ideal situation would be the Ducks killing the Hawks before they got to the Sharks and then the Sharks killing Anaheim.
That can't happen if they're the top 2 seeds... only way they'd meet is in the WCF.

Negatively Positive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 01:18 AM
  #472
NWShark*
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,714
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
We're gonna have a playoff run? Are the last four games good enough to erase what was done prior to that?
So who do we bring up for a depth player as a forward? Kearns...? I don't even know who's playing well down in the AHL...

If we get this Koko kid is a player in the NHL right now?

NWShark* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 01:23 AM
  #473
Gene Parmesan
Ice up, son.
 
Gene Parmesan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 31,434
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NWShark View Post
So who do we bring up for a depth player as a forward? Kearns...? I don't even know who's playing well down in the AHL...

If we get this Koko kid is a player in the NHL right now?
No hes in junior and I don't think hes NHL ready.

Gene Parmesan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 01:23 AM
  #474
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 32,142
vCash: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by NWShark View Post
So who do we bring up for a depth player as a forward? Kearns...? I don't even know who's playing well down in the AHL...
Well, trading Clowe doesn't mean that the Sharks can't go out and trade for another forward if they want. If I had to guess, they'd just play Handzus or Burish on the fourth line and just not let them play. lol

I can live with Handzus on the ice winning draws and killing penalties then being taken off then just rotate the fourth line guys with having spot shifts with other players.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2013, 01:29 AM
  #475
ChompChomp
SACK T-MAC
 
ChompChomp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas, TX (Ugh)
Country: United States
Posts: 8,935
vCash: 500
As far as targets go, if the team is going to be the Rangers to get Clowe, any chance we can pry Chris Kreider? Would you guys want him?

ChompChomp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.