HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > San Jose Sharks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

[SJS/NSH] Sharks acquire Scott Hannan for a 7th (Could turn into 6th)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-03-2013, 12:15 PM
  #26
sjshrky27
Registered User
 
sjshrky27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Country: United States
Posts: 3,730
vCash: 500
I would play Tennyson over Hannan every night.
Thats how bad he is.

sjshrky27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:15 PM
  #27
TealManV
A man has said
 
TealManV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 661
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kawaii View Post
any reason to the madness?

we just lost the future Pavs
We have two 7ths (ours and the Ducks). So we can still draft future Pavs. All is well.

TealManV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:15 PM
  #28
Arkansas Shark
0/
 
Arkansas Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Little Rock
Country: United States
Posts: 3,412
vCash: 500

Hannan has stunk for the past 4 seasons. He's worse than Murray and its not close.

Arkansas Shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:15 PM
  #29
TealManV
A man has said
 
TealManV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 661
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjshrky27 View Post
I would play Tennyson over Hannan every night.
Thats how bad he is.
Awesome. That's what the plan is anyway.

TealManV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:16 PM
  #30
Juxtaposer
Window: Closed
 
Juxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bay Area
Country: United States
Posts: 33,476
vCash: 50
Damphousse, please.

Juxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:16 PM
  #31
sjshrky27
Registered User
 
sjshrky27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Country: United States
Posts: 3,730
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TealManV View Post
Awesome. That's what the plan is anyway.
Then why waste a pick? Thats what im getting at. Im stumped

sjshrky27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:16 PM
  #32
Chairman Mallard
GO DUCKS
 
Chairman Mallard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pacifica / Sec 202
Country: United States
Posts: 16,562
vCash: 500
Ricci is getting the call today to lace em up again.

We all wanted to know who the scapegoat was gonna be now. DW gave you your man.

Chairman Mallard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:17 PM
  #33
sr228
Registered User
 
sr228's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,113
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkansas Shark View Post

Hannan has stunk for the past 4 seasons. He's worse than Murray and its not close.
Everything about Hannan, including all of his underlying stats, say he's better then Murray - and it's not close.

This is a good depth move.

sr228 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:19 PM
  #34
justinboo*
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 298
vCash: 500
at least we have depth so burns can remain a forward, and this is a message to the plyers that DW still wants them to shoot for the cup!

justinboo* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:19 PM
  #35
Juxtaposer
Window: Closed
 
Juxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bay Area
Country: United States
Posts: 33,476
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by stalockrox View Post
Everything about Hannan, including all of his underlying stats, say he's better then Murray - and it's not close.

This is a good depth move.
Okay, I'll agree that Hannan is better than Murray, but I'd rather forgo that sort of defenseman altogether. I'm not mad about giving up the pick, I'm mad that DW just gave TMac another defenseman to play over Demers.

Juxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:19 PM
  #36
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 20,459
vCash: 1040
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjshrky27 View Post
Then why waste a pick? Thats what im getting at. Im stumped
Exactly, it's easy to say "it's just a 7th", and it is, but why? I haven't heard one good explanation of how Scott Hannan is a better option in any situation. We have other, better, options that don't cost us a thing to ice.

It's just a 6th (i'm betting he see's the ice in the playoffs) but it's a 6th for absolutely nothing.

hockeyball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:20 PM
  #37
SactoShark
Registered User
 
SactoShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 11,174
vCash: 3000

SactoShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:20 PM
  #38
TealManV
A man has said
 
TealManV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 661
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjshrky27 View Post
Then why waste a pick? Thats what im getting at. Im stumped
Incase Demers is out longer and we have another injury on or two on the backend. Sounds like Burns is staying at forward for the foreseeable future. Also to show the guys in the locker room that dw believes in the players we have. But also to show them that he thinks they can make a run. And he adds a guy that is well liked and respected in the room as to not mess with the current chemistry. It's a very low risk move. Seeing as we already had 2 7ths.

TealManV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:20 PM
  #39
Juxtaposer
Window: Closed
 
Juxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bay Area
Country: United States
Posts: 33,476
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
Exactly, it's easy to say "it's just a 7th", and it is, but why? I haven't heard one good explanation of how Scott Hannan is a better option in any situation. We have other, better, options that don't cost us a thing to ice.

It's just a 6th (i'm betting he see's the ice in the playoffs) but it's a 6th for absolutely nothing.
It's a sixth for a negative asset, just like Murray. However, this move doesn't make me turn on DW, it just makes me extremely concerned about Demers.

Juxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:21 PM
  #40
magic school bus
***********
 
magic school bus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 18,814
vCash: 141
DW should know better than to trade for an injured player. I'm willing to give Hannan time to heal before I give my final judgment on this, but this is a brutal trade if we give away a 7th for a pylon to play 2 or 3 games.

magic school bus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:21 PM
  #41
sr228
Registered User
 
sr228's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,113
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
Okay, I'll agree that Hannan is better than Murray, but I'd rather forgo that sort of defenseman altogether. I'm not mad about giving up the pick, I'm mad that DW just gave TMac another defenseman to play over Demers.
And I would argue that Hannan is insurance against injuries...the Sharks now have 8 d-men on the roster and one of them is currently hurt.

sr228 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:22 PM
  #42
ChompChomp
My avi is gospel
 
ChompChomp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas, TX (Ugh)
Country: United States
Posts: 9,284
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TealManV View Post
Awesome. That's what the plan is anyway.
Are you sure about that? Don't forget our coach is Todd "12 years can outcoach me on Xbox live" McLellan. He played Murray over Demers, he could very well play Hannan over Tennyson (or even over Demers if he's back).

ChompChomp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:22 PM
  #43
Gilligans Island
Registered User
 
Gilligans Island's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF/Bay Area
Posts: 10,083
vCash: 500
it's called insurance. demers is out

what's so hard to understand

yes huskins would have been better but Demers got injured afterwards

Gilligans Island is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:22 PM
  #44
Timo Time
73-9
 
Timo Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 10,489
vCash: 297050
What we didn't know was that Hannan is the secret missing piece.

Timo Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:22 PM
  #45
SharksFan1
Registered User
 
SharksFan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Orange County, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 3,345
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
Okay, I'll agree that Hannan is better than Murray, but I'd rather forgo that sort of defenseman altogether. I'm not mad about giving up the pick, I'm mad that DW just gave TMac another defenseman to play over Demers.
Oh god NO!!!

SharksFan1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:23 PM
  #46
DuckEatinShark
GET ALL THE PPs!!!!
 
DuckEatinShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Jose
Posts: 6,060
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjshrky27 View Post
Then why waste a pick? Thats what im getting at. Im stumped
It's called insurance. We don't know enough about Demers' injury and Hannan also has playoff experience that Braun, Irwin and Tennyson do not.

DuckEatinShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:23 PM
  #47
sjshrky27
Registered User
 
sjshrky27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Country: United States
Posts: 3,730
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chairman Mallard View Post
Ricci is getting the call today to lace em up again.

We all wanted to know who the scapegoat was gonna be now. DW gave you your man.
DW will make a trade offer for Alexander Korolyuk next

sjshrky27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:24 PM
  #48
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 20,459
vCash: 1040
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
Okay, I'll agree that Hannan is better than Murray, but I'd rather forgo that sort of defenseman altogether. I'm not mad about giving up the pick, I'm mad that DW just gave TMac another defenseman to play over Demers.
I agree that he will likely ice him over Demers, and thats dumb. I don't agree than he's better than Murray. You can't directly compare defensive stats from different teams, you have to compare that player against their own team, take the differential, and then compare the differentials. Even that is flawed.

They both suck, but at least Murray had his physical play.

hockeyball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:24 PM
  #49
BaileyMacTavish
I cast Magic Missile
 
BaileyMacTavish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,634
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to BaileyMacTavish Send a message via MSN to BaileyMacTavish Send a message via Skype™ to BaileyMacTavish
Might as well give Jeff Friesen a call

BaileyMacTavish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 12:25 PM
  #50
Juxtaposer
Window: Closed
 
Juxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bay Area
Country: United States
Posts: 33,476
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
I agree that he will likely ice him over Demers, and thats dumb. I don't agree than he's better than Murray. You can't directly compare defensive stats from different teams, you have to compare that player against their own team, take the differential, and then compare the differentials. Even that is flawed.

They both suck, but at least Murray had his physical play.
Hannan's usage chart looks awfully similar to Weber's.

Juxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.