HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Dallas Stars
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

2013 Trade Deadline II

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-03-2013, 05:07 PM
  #76
Cin
Eurosnob.
 
Cin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Country: Thailand
Posts: 8,097
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by txomisc View Post
looks like one of the dumbest trades ive ever seen
Definitely.

Cin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 05:11 PM
  #77
txomisc
Registered User
 
txomisc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 8,637
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cin View Post
Definitely.
I wonder how many teams were aware that Forsberg was on the table. Hopefully his name never came up in any conversations with GMJN.

txomisc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 05:14 PM
  #78
Cin
Eurosnob.
 
Cin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Country: Thailand
Posts: 8,097
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by txomisc View Post
I wonder how many teams were aware that Forsberg was on the table. Hopefully his name never came up in any conversations with GMJN.
Seems like a move GMJN would do (the trading of Forsberg) GMGM is about to get ****canned, so he made a horrible trade in order to attempt playoff success. Doubt anybody but Nashville knew.

Cin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 05:18 PM
  #79
LatvianTwist
Global Moderator
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas A&M
Country: Latvia
Posts: 22,467
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cin View Post
That Forsberg to Nashville deal is going to sting for a lot of upcoming seasons.
I thought it was a joke

Brown's tweet about the trade was pretty good though.

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 05:47 PM
  #80
________
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 4,665
vCash: 0
Send a message via AIM to ________ Send a message via MSN to ________
Quote:
David Pagnotta @TheFourthPeriod
Lots of inquiries/tire kicking league-wide. Plenty of interest in likes of Yandle, Sarich, Stempniak, Stafford, Robidas, Kulikov but no dice
Another one on Robidas

________ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 06:48 PM
  #81
HatchtrickBateman
Registered User
 
HatchtrickBateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lincoln, NE
Country: United States
Posts: 466
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetalGodAOD View Post
Agreed. He's the one constant to our horrible defense, and he had value. Dumb.
Maybe you should clarify for me. You think he's the constant bad player on our d? He's nowhere near the worst, if that's what you're saying

HatchtrickBateman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 06:52 PM
  #82
LatvianTwist
Global Moderator
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas A&M
Country: Latvia
Posts: 22,467
vCash: 500
What he means is that pretty much everything around Robidas has changed, and yet it's still as awful as ever.

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 06:58 PM
  #83
glovesave_35
Name
 
glovesave_35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Korea
Country: United States
Posts: 16,499
vCash: 500
From the previous thread...

Quote:
I think Joe is married to Goligoski for the simple fact that if he trades him for futures it basically forever acknowledges that the Neal trade was a bust. He can't self correct. I would be in favor of it depending on the return but I also would be in favor of moving Robidas. At least one of the small defensemen needs to go and it might as well be the old guy who's never going to contribute to a winning team here because of his age.
I disagree. It takes balls to admit a mistake and move on. As long as Goligoski is playing poorly here it will always make people think of that trade. If you get rid of him Neal turns into a collection of assets or another player. It becomes more palatable to everyone.

glovesave_35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 06:58 PM
  #84
HatchtrickBateman
Registered User
 
HatchtrickBateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lincoln, NE
Country: United States
Posts: 466
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
What he means is that pretty much everything around Robidas has changed, and yet it's still as awful as ever.
Was wondering if that's what he meant. Thanks. I guess I just don't have a problem with his play, especially since the second half of the season. I get wanting to get value, but he hasn't been as bad as people make him out to be.

HatchtrickBateman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2013, 06:59 PM
  #85
LatvianTwist
Global Moderator
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas A&M
Country: Latvia
Posts: 22,467
vCash: 500
Goligoski + Glennie for Kulikov

Fixes the two glaring mistakes on his resume.

Sucks that that isn't realistic at all.

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.