HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

[NYR/CBJ] Gaborik, Delisle, Parlett to Columbus for Brassard, Dorsett, J. Moore, 6th

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-04-2013, 11:31 AM
  #776
SnS
Mod Supervisor
 
SnS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 11,825
vCash: 50
Keep the personal debates out of this. It is about the trade. Not the posters here. Use the report function.

__________________
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v200/nemesis15/SnS-Sig.gif

Props to Nemesis for the signature and avatar.
SnS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 11:40 AM
  #777
Ola
Registered User
 
Ola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 17,531
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 417 View Post
when you look at this trade and take it back to the Nash deal...the Rangers and Blue Jackets have essentially swapped top 9 players and prospects for each other

Talk about re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic

Yawn
???

I thought NYR had more pts than any other team in the EC last season.

Ola is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 11:40 AM
  #778
5 4 Fighting
Big member
 
5 4 Fighting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bk all day
Country: United States
Posts: 4,284
vCash: 400
There are some well-known Ranger haters who use the derogatory name "rags" to get a rise out of people. I wouldn't feel so cocky after tanking in the mid 200s to get 2 generational players and a very shaky goalie who just so happened to win a cup with 3 overall picks. The Rangers NEVER tank, that's why it's damn near impossible for us (or anyone outside of Detroit for that matter) to draft our own franchise forwards or defensemen because we never finish low enough in the standings. We drafted our franchise goalie and our franchise defenseman (Staal in 06) and add to the team through free agency or trades. That's what you do when you want to win. Haters like that gonna keep hating, and quite frankly, it's all good because when we put a beat down like last nights on the Pens it feels that much better knowing we didn't have to tank for 3 years to score some goals.

5 4 Fighting is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 11:45 AM
  #779
TheRightWay
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,524
vCash: 505
Quote:
Originally Posted by 417 View Post
Take the players swapped in the Nash trade and the players just swapped in the Gaborik deal...seems just like a really, really big blockbuster trade that took months to complete

all both teams have done is re-arrange the deck chairs on the titanic...

Not a big fan of Rick Nash who I've always thought was one of the league's most overrated players (doesn't mean he's useless) and Gaborik is a bit of a flake as far as i'm concerned. They're basically the same version of themselves except Nash gets less flak because he's canadian

Sorry...it's a wash for me
You could not be more wrong. Rick Nash has been far and away the team's best forward and has carried the team on his back in stretches. Marian Gaborik has been completely invisible for majority of this season. Not even close to comparable at this point.

TheRightWay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 11:46 AM
  #780
Synergy27
Registered User
 
Synergy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Country: United States
Posts: 4,544
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 417 View Post
Take the players swapped in the Nash trade and the players just swapped in the Gaborik deal...seems just like a really, really big blockbuster trade that took months to complete

all both teams have done is re-arrange the deck chairs on the titanic...

Not a big fan of Rick Nash who I've always thought was one of the league's most overrated players (doesn't mean he's useless) and Gaborik is a bit of a flake as far as i'm concerned. They're basically the same version of themselves except Nash gets less flak because he's canadian

Sorry...it's a wash for me
I think you're misunderstanding the meaning of the phrase "rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic". The Rangers traded for Nash after having gone to the conference finals. You're implying that the move(s) was desperate and ineffectual.

I agree that the deals in totality represent some major churn. If it could have been simplified to Gaborik + pick for Nash, I would have preferred that. But, sometimes a change of scenery is what's needed to get guys going. Maybe all of Anisimov, Dubinsky, Brassard and Moore take the next step in their careers.

All I know is that I like today's Ranger team better than last week's team, and to a certain extent last year's team. Gaborik is a wonderful regular season goal scorer, but he is not the type of player that can be relied on to carry a team deep into the playoffs. The Rangers got by in spite of his poor play in last year's playoffs (injured? Maybe). I like their chances better this year, assuming they make it, with Nash and Clowe. The rest of the guys are likely a wash.

Synergy27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 11:46 AM
  #781
Ola
Registered User
 
Ola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 17,531
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BPD View Post
Good god, am I the only poster here who thinks this was a good hockey trade? Seriously?

The Jackets had expendable depth and needed a scorer. The Rangers had an expendable scorer and needed depth. Both got what they wanted. End.

The ONLY way this trade goes lopsided is if Brassard or Moore realize their draft potential or Gaborik suddenly becomes Sidney Crosby.
The level at this board is pretty ridiculous.

A couple of things.

-Has anyone, who trash the trade, even mentioned one thing about what CBJ should have done -- instead -- of this trade?

Its just reality, but its not easy for a team like CBJ to attract UFA's. They have to develop/trade for any player they are going to get basically. And kids tends to develop a helluva lot better on good teams instead of below avg temas.

For CBJ this process of getting over that 8th spot bump has more or less been ongoing for ever now. I've not heard that they turned down a deal for a better player than Gabby.

-I like the deal from NYR's point of view -- if -- Brassard basically exceeds everyone's expectations. I think there were enough teams in the NHL -- in the CBJ-mold, who have to "overpay" to just get established experienced players who can take on certain goto roles on their teams and take pressure of the kids, or teams like say Vancouver who possibly might look for 2nd line precense -- for Slats to get one priced assed in return. Somewhere along the lines of a Brayden Schenn maybe. Or a high pick.

If Brassard "just" becomes like Matt Cullen II, I am not a big fan of the trade.

No matter what I definitely like the concept of the trade. I just don't believe in Gabby on a strong team.

Ola is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 11:54 AM
  #782
DEVILS ALL THE WAY*
Yes, I'm a hypocrite
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,477
vCash: 500
I hate to admit this... but this trade will make the Rangers a tougher team to play against.

They lost their identidy when they moved a bunch of players for Nash and didn't resign Prust. Now, with Clowe and the 3 players they landed from Columbus, they got most of that identity back and will make them a much harder team to play against.

You don't win cups with a bunch of All-Stars on your 1st line and average players threwout your entire lineup. If there's one thing the Rangers organisation should know by now, is that building a team of "big names", doesn't get you anywhere. They've been gathering "big names" for years and the result has been the same year after year.

Good move for the Rangers... unfortunatly for this Devils fan.

DEVILS ALL THE WAY* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 12:45 PM
  #783
Xoggz22
Registered User
 
Xoggz22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Country: United States
Posts: 4,275
vCash: 500
The bigger move for the Rangers was picking up Clowe. If Dorsett were healthy and could play I think he would really help in the lockerroom, however, he's not due back until the playoffs which could potentially be too late. Clowe is a good addition and will pay the bigger dividends this year than any of the players from Columbus (last night not withstanding).

It's a good trade overall for both teams as they both addressed needs. question marks on both sides so we'll have to wait to see what happens.

Xoggz22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 01:00 PM
  #784
RangerBlue62
Smoothies! Who's in?
 
RangerBlue62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 3,867
vCash: 500
What opposing fans fail to realize is that this move from a Rangers perspective was highly cap influenced. Gaborik has another year at $7.5 and the cap goes down 6 million next season. The Rangers will have to re-sign Stepan, McDonagh and Hagelin who are all coming off their ELC's. They can now do that with ease and still give Clowe a long term contract upwards of $5 million.

Perhaps the current state of the team expedited the decision, but Gaborik was gone either way before next season. This is no knee-jerk reaction. It was inevitable.

RangerBlue62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 01:05 PM
  #785
UnderPSI
Formerly YMMV
 
UnderPSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Morris Co, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 799
vCash: 500
Way too early to say who won but this move made sense for both teams. Columbus Rangers needed a scorer and happens to have chemistry with Prospal, Dubi, and Anisimov. New York Blue Jackets addressed needing depth, and guys with more JAM. Also Gaborik was going sooner or later with the cap going down next year. Obviously Torts would rather have his boy Richards then Gabby.

And no one should expect these guys to keep racking up as much points as they did last night. I would say alot of it has to do more with adrenaline then anything else.

UnderPSI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 01:06 PM
  #786
Crede777
Deputized
 
Crede777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 7,267
vCash: 500
A lot of this has to do with Tortorella and Richards. If the coaches can use the players they got effectively and not stifle them, then it should be an exciting trade for both teams.

Crede777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 01:55 PM
  #787
ikeane
Registered User
 
ikeane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 519
vCash: 500
having not read all 32 pages, I am not sure if anyone saw the one player that has already moved between these two teams in this deal. Delisle was part of the Nash trade, now goes back to CBJ. he seems to be an escort for high priced scorers as a throw in player in deals between these 2 teams

ikeane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 01:57 PM
  #788
coldsteelonice84
Registered User
 
coldsteelonice84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 25,561
vCash: 10592
This move gives the Rangers their identity back. Obviously Clowe plays a big part in that too. For that, these moves were smart. For CBJ, they get a big time goal scorer, which they definitely needed badly. Like it a lot for both sides.

coldsteelonice84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 02:01 PM
  #789
WhatThePuck
"Shoots Wide" !!!
 
WhatThePuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Location: Location
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,097
vCash: 500
Gabby needed a change of scenery and I hope he does well in Columbus.....As a Ranger fan, I like the trade(added much needed depth) and hope it pays off for both teams.

WhatThePuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 02:08 PM
  #790
Xoggz22
Registered User
 
Xoggz22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Country: United States
Posts: 4,275
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oh Thats Nashty View Post
What opposing fans fail to realize is that this move from a Rangers perspective was highly cap influenced. Gaborik has another year at $7.5 and the cap goes down 6 million next season. The Rangers will have to re-sign Stepan, McDonagh and Hagelin who are all coming off their ELC's. They can now do that with ease and still give Clowe a long term contract upwards of $5 million.

Perhaps the current state of the team expedited the decision, but Gaborik was gone either way before next season. This is no knee-jerk reaction. It was inevitable.
However, this move only saved $1.7MM in cap space from this deal. Maybe that's enough? That's probably a 3rd line addition to the Rangers value wise (or Clowe at $5MM with no additions). The bigger advantage likely comes from Redden and Drury dropping off the cap figure. If they want to sign Clowe, Stepan, McDonagh, Hagelin and Zuccarello next year (don't know if they qualify Sauer) they still probably need some creativity. The year after that is another big year with Callahan, Lundquist, Brassard, Moore (probably not an issue), MDZ and Girardi needing to be signed.

I think this was the year for them to move Gaborik not necessarily for cap reasons but maybe they felt they wouldn't get the return next year if teams thought their cap problems would severe. Maybe Gaborik was similar to the Luongo situation in Vancouver (don't see Vancouver getting fair return for Lou). The cap is definitely an impact but I don't think it opened up a lot of space with this move.

Xoggz22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 03:17 PM
  #791
Trxjw
Retired.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Land of no calls..
Country: United States
Posts: 16,471
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xoggz22 View Post
However, this move only saved $1.7MM in cap space from this deal. Maybe that's enough? That's probably a 3rd line addition to the Rangers value wise (or Clowe at $5MM with no additions). The bigger advantage likely comes from Redden and Drury dropping off the cap figure. If they want to sign Clowe, Stepan, McDonagh, Hagelin and Zuccarello next year (don't know if they qualify Sauer) they still probably need some creativity. The year after that is another big year with Callahan, Lundquist, Brassard, Moore (probably not an issue), MDZ and Girardi needing to be signed.

I think this was the year for them to move Gaborik not necessarily for cap reasons but maybe they felt they wouldn't get the return next year if teams thought their cap problems would severe. Maybe Gaborik was similar to the Luongo situation in Vancouver (don't see Vancouver getting fair return for Lou). The cap is definitely an impact but I don't think it opened up a lot of space with this move.
It's a bit more fluid because these guys, along with probable contributions from guys like Lindberg and Fast allow us to free up some spots in the summer. Guys like Boyle, Pyatt, Powe, etc, could all be dealt for assets that do not effect the cap. So, in the short term, it didn't do too much to the cap, but it gives us options that we were lacking with so much money tied up in only a handful of players.

I don't think Clowe will get $5M, and the team is notoriously stingy when it comes to bridge deals, so we should be able to work it all out. How well Zucc plays over the next couple weeks will really determine his future with the team. Plus, hopefully Kreider and Miller will be able to challenge for a spot again next fall. Barring injuries, I think they'll be in CT for the remainder of the Whale's season.

Trxjw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 05:04 PM
  #792
Captain Hook
Olli Määttä
 
Captain Hook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 13,458
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by First Man In View Post
There are some well-known Ranger haters who use the derogatory name "rags" to get a rise out of people. I wouldn't feel so cocky after tanking in the mid 200s to get 2 generational players and a very shaky goalie who just so happened to win a cup with 3 overall picks. The Rangers NEVER tank, that's why it's damn near impossible for us (or anyone outside of Detroit for that matter) to draft our own franchise forwards or defensemen because we never finish low enough in the standings. We drafted our franchise goalie and our franchise defenseman (Staal in 06) and add to the team through free agency or trades. That's what you do when you want to win. Haters like that gonna keep hating, and quite frankly, it's all good because when we put a beat down like last nights on the Pens it feels that much better knowing we didn't have to tank for 3 years to score some goals.
Do we really have to hear this tanking nonsense all the time? The Pens were 12-5-3-0 in their final 20 games of the 2003-04 season which got them Malkin. I'd hardly call that tanking to get Malkin. There was no season in 2004-05 that got them Crosby. How do you tank in a season that never happened?

It also goes without saying that the Rangers never had to tank during the mid 2000's or earlier since they were in a huge market in a pre salary cap league. They were a team that could try to fix a lot of their problems in UFA instead of the draft. What's hilarious is spending lots of money in UFA didn't seem to work in the 2000's for them. It wasn't until they started building from within that they turned things around again.

Anyway, I like the trade for the Rangers. I've always loved Dorsett. He's one of my favorites grinders in the league. Brassard has lots of skill and you saw flashes last night of what he's capable of. He just hasn't put it all together yet. Maybe he will in NY.

Captain Hook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 05:25 PM
  #793
Championship*
#Joel&Ellie
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,503
vCash: 500
This Ranger fan wishes Gaborik nothing but the best, miss the guy already but it is what it is.

Championship* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 08:07 PM
  #794
Aela*
#MeatisMurder
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,437
vCash: 50
Send a message via Skype™ to Aela*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Balls McGinty View Post
As a CBJ fan, Derek Dorsett is not a top 6 player. He is exactly what he is. A 3rd liner with a ton of heart and grit and will be good for maybe 10 goals a year. He had 12 last season.

Brassard has the potential to be a good top 6 player but it never really materialized consistently but I thought he played pretty well this year. He can be a solid #2 Center but he isn't physical enough to be a 3rd liner C.

The highest upside is probably actually John Moore. I'm still pretty high on him to have a long career in the NHL but the CBJ's D depth really made him expendable.

I do agree both teams got what they want. CBJ desperately need someone to score some goals and the Rangers get some much needed depth back that was lost when they sent Anisimov and Dubinsky to Columbus last summer.
I think if Dorsett develops his offense a bit, or something just clicks with him, he could have decent 2nd line capability, he's already steadily hitting 20 points and if he does develop that offensive talent i could see 30-40 point seasons in the future.

brassard is easily a 2nd liner right now, and if he develops like he should he'll be first line someday, guarantee it.

Aela* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 09:49 PM
  #795
Crede777
Deputized
 
Crede777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 7,267
vCash: 500
Gabby 1G 1A 2 Pts. against a tough, tough Nashville team. He looked a little shaky but hey the trade looks real good for both teams 1 game in.

Crede777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 09:56 PM
  #796
Ludicrous Speed
Registered User
 
Ludicrous Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Killumbus
Country: Micronesia
Posts: 11,011
vCash: 500
With so many fan favorite players involved, I feel like this trade is like that scene in Step Brothers.

"Did we (Jackets and Rangers fans) just become best friends?!"

Ludicrous Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 09:58 PM
  #797
candyman82
Registered User
 
candyman82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 2,420
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaelanstorm View Post
I think if Dorsett develops his offense a bit, or something just clicks with him, he could have decent 2nd line capability, he's already steadily hitting 20 points and if he does develop that offensive talent i could see 30-40 point seasons in the future.

brassard is easily a 2nd liner right now, and if he develops like he should he'll be first line someday, guarantee it.
Dorsett has one 20 point season and he's 26 years old. He is a heart and soul guy but he simply doesn't have the talent to do much more.

Brassard, if he ever puts it all together, could be a first line center. But Jackets fans have been saying that for years and it has yet to happen. He's 25 years old and really has yet to show why he was a 6th overall pick. The talent is there, but he has yet to really break through.

Your estimates are very optimistic.

candyman82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 10:28 PM
  #798
Machinehead
★★★★
 
Machinehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New York New York
Country: United States
Posts: 34,071
vCash: 500
Get Gaborik away from Torts and he starts going to the net again. Who's not surprised? I'm not surprised.

__________________


DEUTSCHLANDWELTMEISTER2014
Machinehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2013, 10:39 PM
  #799
CHLLL Penguin
Registered User
 
CHLLL Penguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 334
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Hook View Post
Do we really have to hear this tanking nonsense all the time? The Pens were 12-5-3-0 in their final 20 games of the 2003-04 season which got them Malkin. I'd hardly call that tanking to get Malkin. There was no season in 2004-05 that got them Crosby. How do you tank in a season that never happened?

It also goes without saying that the Rangers never had to tank during the mid 2000's or earlier since they were in a huge market in a pre salary cap league. They were a team that could try to fix a lot of their problems in UFA instead of the draft. What's hilarious is spending lots of money in UFA didn't seem to work in the 2000's for them. It wasn't until they started building from within that they turned things around again.
Thank you for answering that in a civilized manner. You did it better than I could.


Last edited by CHLLL Penguin: 04-04-2013 at 10:44 PM.
CHLLL Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2013, 06:22 AM
  #800
abev
HFBoards Sponsor
 
abev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 3,582
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machinehead View Post
Get Gaborik away from Torts and he starts going to the net again. Who's not surprised? I'm not surprised.
All this says is what everyone knows: Gaborik plays hard when he wants to. Gook luck with him.

abev is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.