HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > San Jose Sharks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Burns, future forward for life?

View Poll Results: Will burns spend more time on the ice as a forward or as a defenseman next season?
More time on the ice as a forward 30 41.10%
More time on the ice as a defenseman 43 58.90%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-13-2013, 12:44 AM
  #1
landshark
Beat L. A.!
 
landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outer richmond dist
Posts: 1,054
vCash: 500
Burns, future forward for life?

So? there's a hole or two in the Shark's top six, thinking of next season more than this one. this season Burns is putting up the numbers, i'd like to see him stay at forward. Sharks seemingly have enough D, with Hannan and a healthy Demers for the remainder of the season. (Who knew we got Sergei Federov's big, hairy, younger-but-bigger brother from another mother in that trade from Minnesota? Strictly a bonus his name is "Burns" in my book.) Anyway, I see him in the top-six for good this season and beyond,

for the Sharks.

I'm more interested in whether or not folks here think he's gone forward for good. This year i'm pretty sure he's in the top six for good baring a need for him on D due to injuries, which is why i'm glad they picked up Hannan. But beyond that i assume Hannan is gone in the offseason and that allows more time for some prospects (Acolatse, Tennyson, Petrecki etc) to fill in for cheap on that 7th D knowing Burns is that Ace in the hole. There's plenty of guys we could double-shift as forwards, but when a Dman gets dinged and can't play during a game, having Burns lined up as a forward must be a coach's dream.

You guys think, given D not being injured, the Sharks will be able to continue to ice Burnsie as a forward next year?

Havlat - Cooch - Burns
Shep/Gali/Nieto/Wingels/Hertl?-Thornton-Marleau
Shep/Gali/Nieto?/Wingels/Hertl?-Pavs-Torres (yes, resign him, duh. scary scoring punch on the third line/PK)
Shep/Gali/Nieto??/Wingels/Hertl???-Desi-Burish (**** that, if Neito and Hertl are ready buy Burish out!)
Shep/Gali/Nieto??/Wingels/Hertl???/Desi/Burish in the pressbox

Vlasic-Boyle
Stuart-Demers/Braun
Irwin-Demers/Braun
Acolatse? (hopin' for this guy with Murray gone)/Petrecki?/Tennyson/Doherty?/Pelech/Konrad?!?

Niemi
someone not named Niemi

i think that gets them in the playoff w/o a lot of player turnover. Let the new TMac try his hand at adapting his game w/ help from Big Bird and Jimmy Johnson with Burns at forward all year; hopefully at forward all year. Might be scary if he practices as forward? or would that ruin it? ?

landshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 12:47 AM
  #2
MarleauApologist
#FireDougWilson
 
MarleauApologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,553
vCash: 500
No

Number 1 defenseman>>>>>>>>>>>>Top Line Winger

Right now the current team needs a guy like Burns, but long term, if he can play at that all star 45 point level, we need to keep him.

MarleauApologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 12:49 AM
  #3
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 20,499
vCash: 1040
As long as he's playing at a ppg+ pace, you don't have a choice.

But he won't, he'll come back to earth, and they'll move him back to defense when he goes on a drought for awhile.

hockeyball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 12:50 AM
  #4
landshark
Beat L. A.!
 
landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outer richmond dist
Posts: 1,054
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Great 88 View Post
No

Number 1 defenseman>>>>>>>>>>>>Top Line Winger

Right now the current team needs a guy like Burns, but long term, if he can play at that all star 45 point level, we need to keep him.
Hmm, I think Boyle has another year in him playing at a level high enough to allow the Sharks to not need Burns as a Dman. I hadn't thought about Boyle's potential age-related deterioration. thanks.

landshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 12:52 AM
  #5
Gene Parmesan
B.Y.O.G.
 
Gene Parmesan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 68,550
vCash: 500
What if Burns prefers to play forward?

Gene Parmesan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 12:52 AM
  #6
landshark
Beat L. A.!
 
landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outer richmond dist
Posts: 1,054
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
As long as he's playing at a ppg+ pace, you don't have a choice.

But he won't, he'll come back to earth, and they'll move him back to defense when he goes on a drought for awhile.
Dang it, what if he's just that good? i only really think that might be the case because he came up as a forward. Provides something the Sharks don't have. Might not have next season, depending on prospects...

landshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 12:53 AM
  #7
landshark
Beat L. A.!
 
landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outer richmond dist
Posts: 1,054
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gene Parmesan View Post
What if Burns prefers to play forward?
Thought about that... free from all those defensive responsibilies again... but aware of them now that he's played as a dman. Which i think only adds to his value as a top six forward.


Last edited by landshark: 04-13-2013 at 12:54 AM. Reason: Burns for Selke?
landshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 12:54 AM
  #8
Gene Parmesan
B.Y.O.G.
 
Gene Parmesan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 68,550
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
As long as he's playing at a ppg+ pace, you don't have a choice.

But he won't, he'll come back to earth, and they'll move him back to defense when he goes on a drought for awhile.
And then who replaces him up front?

Gene Parmesan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 12:57 AM
  #9
Gene Parmesan
B.Y.O.G.
 
Gene Parmesan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 68,550
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by landshark View Post
Thought about that... free from all those defensive responsibilies again... but aware of them now that he's played as a dman. Which i think only adds to his value as a top six forward.
His defense positioning is still hit or miss..he makes up for it in raw physical ability. Its an interesting situation.

Gene Parmesan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 01:02 AM
  #10
landshark
Beat L. A.!
 
landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outer richmond dist
Posts: 1,054
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gene Parmesan View Post
His defense positioning is still hit or miss..he makes up for it in raw physical ability. Its an interesting situation.
Practice/riding the bike again at forward with a newly found defensive awareness might rectify that situation? or not enough pure hockey-smarts?

landshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 01:09 AM
  #11
magic school bus
***********
 
magic school bus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 18,814
vCash: 141
If you want Burns to keep playing forward, you're probably going to have to keep McLellan. Just something to think about.

magic school bus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 01:15 AM
  #12
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 47,690
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by landshark View Post
Hmm, I think Boyle has another year in him playing at a level high enough to allow the Sharks to not need Burns as a Dman. I hadn't thought about Boyle's potential age-related deterioration. thanks.
Really, it's Burns' defensive play that they will miss if they keep him at forward. They don't have a pairing capable of playing legitimate shutdown minutes while being an offensive threat. Burns is capable of top level two-way play from a d-man. Boyle is not.

The current blue line with Burns has certain matchup issues that may cost them down the line if other things don't bite them in the rear first.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 01:22 AM
  #13
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 20,499
vCash: 1040
Quote:
Originally Posted by landshark View Post
Dang it, what if he's just that good? i only really think that might be the case because he came up as a forward. Provides something the Sharks don't have. Might not have next season, depending on prospects...
You know what, I hope your right because if he keeps this pace up he is without a doubt the best winger in the game today. Seriously, a PPG+ winger basically does not exist at the moment. I think that's pretty high expectations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gene Parmesan View Post
And then who replaces him up front?
Who replaces him on defense? The gap in skill of those replacing him on defense right now is about equal to the gap in skill that will replace him as a forward.

hockeyball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 01:23 AM
  #14
SactoShark
Registered User
 
SactoShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 11,248
vCash: 3000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gene Parmesan View Post
What if Burns prefers to play forward?
He doesn't. He said he feels more comfortable playing defense.

No I don't have a link. And I have no idea where I saw / heard that stated. You're just gonna have to trust me. I'm a good guy, so that shouldn't be a problem. I wouldn't lie to you. Honest.

SactoShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 01:30 AM
  #15
Mafoofoo
Jawesome
 
Mafoofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 14,806
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
Who replaces him on defense? The gap in skill of those replacing him on defense right now is about equal to the gap in skill that will replace him as a forward.
Weber.

Mafoofoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 01:32 AM
  #16
Evincar
I have found the way
 
Evincar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,415
vCash: 500
Im pretty sure we acquired him because he was a defenseman so I hope this is temporary.

Evincar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 01:36 AM
  #17
sjshark91
Registered User
 
sjshark91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 31,097
vCash: 500
Play him were we win with him playing there.

sjshark91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 01:37 AM
  #18
DuckEatinShark
GET ALL THE PPs!!!!
 
DuckEatinShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Jose
Posts: 6,067
vCash: 500
I think it's much easier to acquire a top line forward than a top pairing defenseman through free agency. That's why I prefer Burns to go back to defense after this season, and try to get Thornton a goal-scoring winger.

However, our defense is fine as is, so I don't care where Burns plays. But when Stuart/Boyle get older, Burns is definitely needed back on defense, since Vlasic does not have nearly enough offense to be a #2. I don't see Demers as a top-pairing defenseman in his future and Braun/Irwin are not reliable defensively.

DuckEatinShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 02:04 AM
  #19
WTFetus
Moderator
Marlov
 
WTFetus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 13,240
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
Seriously, a PPG+ winger basically does not exist at the moment. I think that's pretty high expectations.
There are a ton of PPG+ wingers this season. Kunitz, Ovechkin, Kane, Hall, Kessel. Players like St. Louis, Patrick Kane, and Ovechkin were PPG+ in previous seasons as well.

WTFetus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 02:14 AM
  #20
Gene Parmesan
B.Y.O.G.
 
Gene Parmesan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 68,550
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckEatinShark View Post
I think it's much easier to acquire a top line forward than a top pairing defenseman through free agency. That's why I prefer Burns to go back to defense after this season, and try to get Thornton a goal-scoring winger.

However, our defense is fine as is, so I don't care where Burns plays. But when Stuart/Boyle get older, Burns is definitely needed back on defense, since Vlasic does not have nearly enough offense to be a #2. I don't see Demers as a top-pairing defenseman in his future and Braun/Irwin are not reliable defensively.
Its not easy to find a top line winger or #1 defenseman. Who knows if Burns is even a true #1..he has the tools to be. Burns will most likely be back to defense next year but until then hes a winger and pretty damn good one.

Gene Parmesan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 03:40 AM
  #21
StalockSuperfan
Registered User
 
StalockSuperfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,152
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTFetus View Post
There are a ton of PPG+ wingers this season. Kunitz, Ovechkin, Kane, Hall, Kessel. Players like St. Louis, Patrick Kane, and Ovechkin were PPG+ in previous seasons as well.
As of tonight: St. Louis, Kunitz, Kane, Ovechkin, Hall, Kessel. That's six. Not "a ton." Six. Out of 30 teams with about 8 wingers on each team. Burns can't keep this up.

StalockSuperfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 03:41 AM
  #22
landshark
Beat L. A.!
 
landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outer richmond dist
Posts: 1,054
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
You know what, I hope your right because if he keeps this pace up he is without a doubt the best winger in the game today. Seriously, a PPG+ winger basically does not exist at the moment. I think that's pretty high expectations.
Thanks. he just looks so... so... happy, and absolutely all over the ice. maybe Patty can catch that, cooch caught that bug.

landshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 03:45 AM
  #23
landshark
Beat L. A.!
 
landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outer richmond dist
Posts: 1,054
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
Really, it's Burns' defensive play that they will miss if they keep him at forward. They don't have a pairing capable of playing legitimate shutdown minutes while being an offensive threat. Burns is capable of top level two-way play from a d-man. Boyle is not.

The current blue line with Burns has certain matchup issues that may cost them down the line if other things don't bite them in the rear first.
but if a little time spent with game experience and practice and he can put the defensive side together as a forward, with his wheels, skills, i think it might be better overall because of the propensity to play power vs. power for forward lines. it's not like the Sharks have fielded a 3rd line as a shutdown against the other team's first or second line in awhile... ricci, korky, scott thornton?


Last edited by landshark: 04-13-2013 at 03:53 AM. Reason: haha, korky...
landshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 03:49 AM
  #24
landshark
Beat L. A.!
 
landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outer richmond dist
Posts: 1,054
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTFetus View Post
There are a ton of PPG+ wingers this season. Kunitz, Ovechkin, Kane, Hall, Kessel. Players like St. Louis, Patrick Kane, and Ovechkin were PPG+ in previous seasons as well.
So which one should the Sharks acquire to compensate for Burns' production as a forward? seems like the Sharks are more likely to get over the 2/3 goal hump w/ Burns at forward unless the Sharks acquire someone for next year to replace his presence in the top six, he is a presence, more so than Patty or JT often times.

preferred experience as an F1 please


Last edited by landshark: 04-13-2013 at 03:55 AM. Reason: i'm triple dippin'. i rhyme like a skool teacher...
landshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2013, 03:54 AM
  #25
landshark
Beat L. A.!
 
landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outer richmond dist
Posts: 1,054
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckEatinShark View Post
I think it's much easier to acquire a top line forward than a top pairing defenseman through free agency. That's why I prefer Burns to go back to defense after this season, and try to get Thornton a goal-scoring winger.

However, our defense is fine as is, so I don't care where Burns plays. But when Stuart/Boyle get older, Burns is definitely needed back on defense, since Vlasic does not have nearly enough offense to be a #2. I don't see Demers as a top-pairing defenseman in his future and Braun/Irwin are not reliable defensively.
Does Burns, as a forward, "need" Thornton?


Last edited by landshark: 04-13-2013 at 04:02 AM. Reason: clarification of my question
landshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.