HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Carolina Hurricanes
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

2013 D-Core Overhaul

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-26-2013, 03:37 PM
  #1
echlfreak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 933
vCash: 500
2013 D-Core Overhaul

Keep:

Faulk
Gleason
Harrison

Get rid of:

Corvo
McBain
Pitkanen
Sanguinetti
MAB


Work around:

Faulk-Gleason
BLANK-BLANK
Harrison-BLANK





I wouldn't mind seeing a blockbuster trade with STL


Carolina trades:

5th Overall pick, McBain and Welsh to STL for two RFA's Berglund and Pietrangelo

Faulk-Gleason
Murray-Pietrangelo
Harrison-Babchuk or Ference


Top 6 FWD

Tlusty-Staal-Semin
Ruutuu-Staal-Berglund

echlfreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 03:42 PM
  #2
halleJOKEL
strong as brickwall
 
halleJOKEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NC
Country: United States
Posts: 5,065
vCash: 500
In before ridiculously unrealistic suggestions and trade propos..

Nevermind.

halleJOKEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 03:50 PM
  #3
What the Faulk
The Real Swede Shady
 
What the Faulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Carolina
Country: United States
Posts: 26,989
vCash: 500
There is literally no reason to get rid of Pitkanen.

What the Faulk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 03:51 PM
  #4
DaveG
Mod Supervisor
How's the thesis?
 
DaveG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Durham NC
Country: United States
Posts: 31,700
vCash: 500
There's also no legitimate return that could be had for Pitkanen at this point, with that injury his value is at an all time low. Keep him.

Realistically this is where I'd start:

Gleason - Faulk
Pitkanen - ?????
Harrison - ?????

bring back one of Sangs or MAB on the cheap. Bellemore is worth keeping around full time next season, though give him a two-way just in case it doesn't work out. Murphy will likely be a factor in there.

Gleason - Faulk
Pitkanen - Murphy
Harrison - Sangs/MAB/Bellemore

in other words, probably as ****** as this past year, just 4 million cheaper since we're dropping Corvo, McBain, and whoever else.

DaveG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 03:54 PM
  #5
SMLennon
Registered User
 
SMLennon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Alexandria, VA
Country: United States
Posts: 5
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to SMLennon
LOL. Yeah- let's move our Norris caliber defenseman who isn't even eligible to be a UFA for three more years and our second line center for an unproven d-man, a c-prospect and a lottery pick.

SMLennon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 03:56 PM
  #6
BanginLikeaBiscuit
Dobby
 
BanginLikeaBiscuit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Country: United States
Posts: 1,904
vCash: 500
I wouldn't have wanted/expected this at all earlier, but I wouldn't be surprised to see MAB back on a cheap 1 year deal as our 7th defenseman. Keep Bellemore and Sangs on as first call-ups, and that'll provide some good depth for the inevitable injuries. I think most agree this is what we're looking at now:

Gleason-Faulk
Pitkanen-xxxx
Harrison-Murphy

If we can acquire a legitimate top-4 defender to eat up minutes next to Pitkanen, then I'll be happy.

BanginLikeaBiscuit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 03:57 PM
  #7
garnetpalmetto
HFBoards Sponsor
 
garnetpalmetto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Durham, NC
Country: United States
Posts: 4,465
vCash: 500
1) I think you mean corps, not core. A core is the nucleus of something that's built around. By keeping Gleason and Faulk you're keeping the core, not overhauling it. A corps is grouping of troops (ie the Marine Corps, or in II Corps). That's what you're wanting to overhaul.

2) It's more likely that I sprout wings and save on airfare by flying everywhere I go than it is for the Blues to give up Pietrangelo and Berglund. It may work in NHL '13, but not in the reality based universe that the rest of us live in. Beyond that, Pietrangelo isn't what we need on D. Rutherford basically insinuated we need the type of crease-clearing skullcracker that we've all wanted here. Pietrangelo ain't it. A Coburn/Alzner/Orpik type guy is who we need to lay our hands on.

3) As previously mentioned, why, for the love of all that's good and holy, would you discard Pitkanen, especially after we've seen how effective he is when healthy this season and when his value is so low coming off his heel injury? Corvo and MAB? Sure, knock yourself out. Sangs has come along a ways and at the end of the season I didn't instantly cringe every time he stepped on the ice.

__________________
garnetpalmetto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 04:07 PM
  #8
TheBigKahuna
Registered User
 
TheBigKahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Canes Country
Posts: 2,846
vCash: 500
They need great matches for the ones they have to keep/can't unload. A great partner can make an average d-man seem great. See last several years of Bruins roster for examples, like Aaron Ward, etc.

TheBigKahuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 04:27 PM
  #9
What the Faulk
The Real Swede Shady
 
What the Faulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Carolina
Country: United States
Posts: 26,989
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMLennon View Post
LOL. Yeah- let's move our Norris caliber defenseman who isn't even eligible to be a UFA for three more years and our second line center for an unproven d-man, a c-prospect and a lottery pick.
You waited 2 and a half years to make your first post on a board of an opposite-conference team about a trade proposal everyone pretty much shot down anyway?

I mean, you're not wrong, but it's just...why now?

What the Faulk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 04:41 PM
  #10
BanginLikeaBiscuit
Dobby
 
BanginLikeaBiscuit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Country: United States
Posts: 1,904
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by What the Faulk View Post
You waited 2 and a half years to make your first post on a board of an opposite-conference team about a trade proposal everyone pretty much shot down anyway?

I mean, you're not wrong, but it's just...why now?
Anyone remember The Big Lebowski?

BanginLikeaBiscuit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 04:41 PM
  #11
Roboturner913
Registered User
 
Roboturner913's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,931
vCash: 500
Pitkanen's trade value is nil and even entertaining the thought of getting Pietrangelo is ridiculous. I bet we could get Jackman though - he is not quite what he used to be but he would still be the best stay-at-home guy on our roster. We don't need another player like Berglund, have plenty of those already. Trade McBain for whatever draft pick you can get. Joe Corvo gets the gas face, no need to even give him a lowball offer.

Once Joni gets back:

Faulk-Gleason
Pitkanen-Jackman
Harrison-Sanguinetti

Murphy or MAB as the 7th d-man to run the PP

That's not a bad lineup at all. Harrison and Sanguinetti have shown they can be serviceable as long as you managed their minutes and the first two pairings would chew up 50 minutes per game, if not more.

The only problem is we have no idea how long it will take Joni to get back, and even once he is back what lingering effects there are and god knows what other injuries he'll manage to get. But we're stuck with him for now. Until he gets back, you juggle things to keep a "good" player on each pair: Faulk and Harrison, Gleason and Murphy/MAB, Jackman and Sangs.

As much as I would love a major overhaul, we just ain't getting Girardi or Marc Staal, anybody like that. But a good second-pair guy could do a world of good.


Last edited by Roboturner913: 04-26-2013 at 04:49 PM.
Roboturner913 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 06:37 PM
  #12
wallym
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,090
vCash: 500
Bergeron as a #7 isn't bad. Until someone gets hurt, and he turns into a #6, and feeds the other teams wingers one-timers with his 'outlet' passes.

wallym is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 06:47 PM
  #13
Jussijuice
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 1,012
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallym View Post
Bergeron as a #7 isn't bad. Until someone gets hurt, and he turns into a #6, and feeds the other teams wingers one-timers with his 'outlet' passes.
If JR spends the Canes limited funds so MAB can sit in the press box for a year + (when he's not being a turnover machine) I might just cry.

I would trade McBain + picks for a young pure defensive D like Duncan Siemens and try like hell to sign Ron Hainsey. Trade Sanguinetti for whatever you can get.

Gleason - Faulk
Pitkanen - Hainsey
Murphy - Harrison
Siemens/Defensive D

Jussijuice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 06:53 PM
  #14
Roboturner913
Registered User
 
Roboturner913's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,931
vCash: 500
Scuderi would be another good option. He's 34....but a three year deal at 3.5 million would be reasonable.

Roboturner913 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 07:11 PM
  #15
AD Skinner
Registered User
 
AD Skinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 1,155
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BanginLikeaBiscuit View Post
Anyone remember The Big Lebowski?
That's just, like, your opinion, man

AD Skinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 07:13 PM
  #16
Metro Misfits
Misfits of the Metro
 
Metro Misfits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Isle of Misfit Toys
Country: Somalia
Posts: 8,120
vCash: 500
If we don't win the lotto, maybe JR will just take the GM with the first pick hostage, and trade McBain and the 5th pick for the 1st pick and take Nurse.

Metro Misfits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 07:14 PM
  #17
Metro Misfits
Misfits of the Metro
 
Metro Misfits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Isle of Misfit Toys
Country: Somalia
Posts: 8,120
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mint Babchuk Crunch View Post
That's just, like, your opinion, man

Metro Misfits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 07:52 PM
  #18
McLirium
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: DC by way of Raleigh
Country: United States
Posts: 11
vCash: 500
Gleason - Faulk
Pitkanen - ???
Harrison - Murphy/Bergeron

With Murphy being 20, he'll finally be up one way or the other, right? I think him or MA Bergeron would round out the bottom pairing nicely. If we could sign Bergeron for $1m or below, we could start Murphy in Charlotte for a bit, then bring him up and carry 7 d-men as needed.

Just for the love of god, get rid of McBain and Sanguinetti. It should go without saying that Corvo won't be back. With those two, though, I can only hope JR has come to his senses.

McLirium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 07:57 PM
  #19
Jussijuice
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 1,012
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by McLirium View Post
Gleason - Faulk
Pitkanen - ???
Harrison - Murphy/Bergeron

With Murphy being 20, he'll finally be up one way or the other, right? I think him or MA Bergeron would round out the bottom pairing nicely. If we could sign Bergeron for $1m or below, we could start Murphy in Charlotte for a bit, then bring him up and carry 7 d-men as needed.

Just for the love of god, get rid of McBain and Sanguinetti. It should go without saying that Corvo won't be back. With those two, though, I can only hope JR has come to his senses.
Murphy led the defense in TOI when he was up (iirc, he was at least top-3). For better or for worse, I don't see them starting him in the AHL.

Can you really complain about Corvo, McBain, and Sangs and then turn around and call MAB a nice bottom pairing D? That's insanity, or you just haven't see him play long enough.

There is a reason he has averaged about 30 games a season for the past 3 years. He is awful, his upside on the pp is immediately trumped by his guaranteed 1 goal against per game due to a stupid turnover.

Jussijuice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 08:28 PM
  #20
McLirium
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: DC by way of Raleigh
Country: United States
Posts: 11
vCash: 500
When Murphy came up, the D were:

Faulk
Corvo
Harrison
Jordan
Sanguinetti
Murphy

For a prospect as good as him, it's not mind blowing to think we put him out there for ~23 minutes for 2 games, particularly when the plan was to use him on the PP. His other two games, he played 16 and 19 minutes, and that's with guys like Gragnani out there. He led in TOI in his second game, but was outdone in the 1st by Faulk who had 29 minutes(!!!)...

My point with Bergeron was that he'd be an adequate 7th man to rotate in and out with Murphy early on, or someone else who might be slumping/injured. I feel fine with a guy like him on the third pairing for a million or less if we can move McBain ($1.8) and shed Corvo ($2) for a competent right-handed stay at home d-man to play with Pitkanen.

McLirium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 04:04 PM
  #21
wallym
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,090
vCash: 500
Corvo was passable as a 2nd pairing guy with Harrison at the end of the year. And was an asset as a 3rd pairing guy with Harrison.

Bergeron is a liability as a 3rd pairing guy.

Will be interesting to see where JR goes with the pieces he has. It will definitely be tricky to navigate.

Faulk-Gleason
Pitkanen-???
Harrison-Murphy
Bellemore

But the ??? next to Pitkanen is the real issue. It has to be someone good enough to play with Harrison as a 2nd pair.

Maybe they could get by with Joni-Sanguinetti for example, but Harrison Sanguinetti wouldn't cut it in the event Faulk/Gleason/Pitkanen went down.

wallym is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 06:51 PM
  #22
jayhamm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South Florida
Country: United States
Posts: 174
vCash: 500
Washington is in cap trouble and we could really be a thorn in their side if we offer sheet Alzner if he makes it to RFA (which McPhee would be a fool to allow). I was hoping we would offersheet him the last time he was an RFA.

jayhamm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 06:57 PM
  #23
Blueline Bomber
Expectations - high
 
Blueline Bomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 22,218
vCash: 500
The fact of the matter is, our PP has been somewhat competent since MAB arrived. It might just be a mental thing (ala the team apparently being more comfortable with Westgarth in the lineup, despite him not doing ****), but MAB has also contributed to the PP.

He's certainly worth considering for next year.

Blueline Bomber is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-28-2013, 12:21 AM
  #24
Roboturner913
Registered User
 
Roboturner913's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,931
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueline Bomber View Post
The fact of the matter is, our PP has been somewhat competent since MAB arrived. It might just be a mental thing (ala the team apparently being more comfortable with Westgarth in the lineup, despite him not doing ****), but MAB has also contributed to the PP.

He's certainly worth considering for next year.
No, you're right. The thing MAB has is his unpredictability. He has a great shot and the great pass, and the willingness to use both in equal measure. It keeps the other PK off-balance.

Against Tampa (I think?) he showed shot, then pulled it back and did a quick no-look pass to the half wall. It was a slick-looking play, but more importantly it caught all four guys on the other team leaning the wrong way and opened up a whole bunch of space on that side of the ice.

If he is willing to take another two-way deal in the $1 million range it's a no-brainer to sign him. Murphy is too much of an unknown.

Roboturner913 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-28-2013, 12:44 AM
  #25
Hornswaggle
Registered User
 
Hornswaggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Raleigh
Country: United States
Posts: 157
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboturner913 View Post
No, you're right. The thing MAB has is his unpredictability. He has a great shot and the great pass, and the willingness to use both in equal measure. It keeps the other PK off-balance.

Against Tampa (I think?) he showed shot, then pulled it back and did a quick no-look pass to the half wall. It was a slick-looking play, but more importantly it caught all four guys on the other team leaning the wrong way and opened up a whole bunch of space on that side of the ice.

If he is willing to take another two-way deal in the $1 million range it's a no-brainer to sign him. Murphy is too much of an unknown.
and if Ellis doesn't resign he can be our backup goalie

Hornswaggle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.