HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Dallas - Tampa Bay

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-02-2013, 10:26 AM
  #51
Sony Eriksson*
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: N. Dallas/NYC
Country: Faroe Islands
Posts: 13,449
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Misty View Post
To move up 7 spots to get the #1C this team desperately needs? 3 assets that aren't current NHLers and 1 defenseman that had a brutal season is too much for Barkov?

So you are saying Dallas giving up 2 first round picks, a roster player and a good prospect for the 3rd pick overall is justified? Not i!

I would rather keep the 10th pick and somehow package up Boston's 1st (if the make the ECF) and a D prospect (Not Nemeth) to move down a few spots.

Sony Eriksson* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-02-2013, 11:04 AM
  #52
usefulfiction
Registered User
 
usefulfiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: McKinney, TX
Country: United States
Posts: 610
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Primetimey View Post
I think 10th and Daley gets you 5,6,7 not 3.
I would be happy with 5, 6 or 7 for 10th and Daley.

usefulfiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-02-2013, 12:27 PM
  #53
Mr Misty
The Irons Are Back!
 
Mr Misty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,259
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tattoo View Post
So you are saying Dallas giving up 2 first round picks, a roster player and a good prospect for the 3rd pick overall is justified? Not i!

I would rather keep the 10th pick and somehow package up Boston's 1st (if the make the ECF) and a D prospect (Not Nemeth) to move down a few spots.
This is very confusing. Why do we add a D prospect to move down?



It should be clear that trading up to 3 will require significant assets, including some that Tampa actually might want. I think it would certainly be worth it to get a top talent, but if you don't then agree to disagree I guess.

Mr Misty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-02-2013, 09:04 PM
  #54
glovesave_35
Name
 
glovesave_35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 16,661
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Misty View Post
This is very confusing. Why do we add a D prospect to move down?



It should be clear that trading up to 3 will require significant assets, including some that Tampa actually might want. I think it would certainly be worth it to get a top talent, but if you don't then agree to disagree I guess.
People do this sometimes. I think he means move up but used "down" because the numbers are technically lower, i.e. 6 is lower than 10.

glovesave_35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.