HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Buffalo Sabres
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

2013 Draft Thread (Part 2) #8, 16, 38, 55, 69, (94), 129, 130, (155), 159, 189

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-02-2013, 09:30 PM
  #901
thefifagod
I'm The Survivor
 
thefifagod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,136
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhinogol View Post
IF Nichushkin is there at 8, and we DON'T take him i will flip ****, if his name was Kyle Murphy and he was born in rochester, he would be up there with the top prospects in the draft, the guy will be a stud. Just because a couple money grabbing idiots bolted to the KHL doesn't mean that ALL Russian players automatically will do so.With Nichushkin I haven't read one article that talks about his work ethic (lack there of) attitude, he does have a contract for two more years in the KHL, just think about it for 2 years instead of playing against other 17-20 year olds he will be playing consistently in the 2nd best league in the world.
I actually love the kid, if darcy skips on him due to the "Russian factor" i might actually stop supporting buffalo (obviously not).
This article just reinforces my opinion http://futureconsiderations.ca/nhl-o...or-nichushkin/
He's been debated throughout this thread and jfb argues it better than me, but I wouldn't take him, not because of the Russian factor but the fact that he only has one move and it probably won't work on the smaller ice in the NHL (and with better defensemen). He doesn't play a team game and often disappears. The fact that he won't be over for at least two years is also discouraging.

thefifagod is offline  
Old
05-02-2013, 10:40 PM
  #902
ZeroPT*
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,473
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefifagod View Post
He's been debated throughout this thread and jfb argues it better than me, but I wouldn't take him, not because of the Russian factor but the fact that he only has one move and it probably won't work on the smaller ice in the NHL (and with better defensemen). He doesn't play a team game and often disappears. The fact that he won't be over for at least two years is also discouraging.
Similarly to how ovechkin was? His only move was cutting in from the left and shooting on net, gradually defenders figured out his game and shot that down, it took a couple years and he adjusted, he's a more versatile scorer now, I'm not saying that nichushkin is ovechkin but they are very similar situations, if one guy can adjust his game why can't the other?

ZeroPT* is offline  
Old
05-02-2013, 10:41 PM
  #903
Paxon
Moderator
⚔Z E M G U S⚔
 
Paxon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Laurel, MD
Country: United States
Posts: 24,788
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhinogol View Post
IF Nichushkin is there at 8, and we DON'T take him i will flip ****, if his name was Kyle Murphy and he was born in rochester, he would be up there with the top prospects in the draft, the guy will be a stud. Just because a couple money grabbing idiots bolted to the KHL doesn't mean that ALL Russian players automatically will do so.With Nichushkin I haven't read one article that talks about his work ethic (lack there of) attitude, he does have a contract for two more years in the KHL, just think about it for 2 years instead of playing against other 17-20 year olds he will be playing consistently in the 2nd best league in the world.
I actually love the kid, if darcy skips on him due to the "Russian factor" i might actually stop supporting buffalo (obviously not).
This article just reinforces my opinion http://futureconsiderations.ca/nhl-o...or-nichushkin/
There are reasons not to take him besides being Russian. It'd be pretty silly to think that's the main reason he wasn't taken if Darcy skips him, considering he just took Grigorenko.

What if Monahan is also sitting there? Perhaps you would prefer Nichushkin, but can you really argue that it'd be crazy and anti-Russian to pick Monahan instead. Lindholm? Nurse? There are plenty of possibilities -- some remote -- for arguably superior prospects being available at that spot.

Paxon is offline  
Old
05-02-2013, 10:58 PM
  #904
dotcommunism
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,464
vCash: 500
It's also worth noting that if Nicushkin were named "Kyle Murphy" from Rochester, his game would be completely different because he'd be playing on a different sized ice surface

dotcommunism is online now  
Old
05-03-2013, 12:43 AM
  #905
thefifagod
I'm The Survivor
 
thefifagod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,136
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhinogol View Post
Similarly to how ovechkin was? His only move was cutting in from the left and shooting on net, gradually defenders figured out his game and shot that down, it took a couple years and he adjusted, he's a more versatile scorer now, I'm not saying that nichushkin is ovechkin but they are very similar situations, if one guy can adjust his game why can't the other?
No, not at all. Ovechkin was worlds ahead of where Nichushkin was when he was 18.

thefifagod is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 07:42 AM
  #906
ZeroPT*
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,473
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefifagod View Post
No, not at all. Ovechkin was worlds ahead of where Nichushkin was when he was 18.
In no way am I comparing there skill levels, I'm comparing both of there situations, Nichushkin has one move where he shields the puck and drives the net like a mad man, ovechkin would cut in from the left boards, and fire a shot on net, gradually defensmen adjusted and so did he, he is a more versatile scorer, I think Nichushkin can do the same. I'm not saying Nichushkin is Ovechkin.

ZeroPT* is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 07:50 AM
  #907
ZeroPT*
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,473
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Paxon View Post
There are reasons not to take him besides being Russian. It'd be pretty silly to think that's the main reason he wasn't taken if Darcy skips him, considering he just took Grigorenko.

What if Monahan is also sitting there? Perhaps you would prefer Nichushkin, but can you really argue that it'd be crazy and anti-Russian to pick Monahan instead. Lindholm? Nurse? There are plenty of possibilities -- some remote -- for arguably superior prospects being available at that spot.
Id be shocked if Monahan and Linholm were available, If they are then no question you take them, I just don't believe they will be available.As for Nurse I feel as if our prospect pool' main strength is defense also Nurse is a bit of a project and needs to refine his game, I wouldn't be opposed to taking a d-man but if we did I would prefer Ristolainen (Or the BDA at 16). As for Shinkaruk I feel as if he has a very very bright future ahead of him, just not with the sabres, we already have players with similar styles (almost a spitting image of ennis just bigger).

ZeroPT* is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 09:24 AM
  #908
stokes84
Registered User
 
stokes84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charleston, SC
Country: United States
Posts: 13,611
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to stokes84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prishpreed View Post
What does HS's game have in common with DR's? They seem completely different to me, in terms of style of play at least. HS is much more of a leader, much bigger, faster, has a better shot. He's been compared to Duchene and a few others of that ilk by people who have followed him closely. I've only seen highlight videos online, so I'm only going by scouting reports from others, mind you.

I definitely share your skepticism about 80 points. But any sane person would with Roy too: Roy is an 80 pt player like Stafford is a 30 goal scorer. They're both not either of those, those were fluke years.

Anyway, I'm probably just trying to pump myself up about him because there are several scenarios where he could be the best forward available, not counting Nichushkin.
That's pretty unfair to the player Roy was in juniors. Nobody was questioning Roy's leadership abilities when he was captaining his team to the memorial cup.

If we end up with Hunter Shinkaruk, ugh.

stokes84 is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 10:49 AM
  #909
hizzoner
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,469
vCash: 500
Hockey News has Shinkaruk listed as 5'11" weighing in at 175 pounds. He turns 19 on October 13. After a breakout year 2 years ago with 49 goals he tailed off to a still respectable but not awe inspiring 37. While he might merit some consideration at 16, his size, late birthday, lack of progress in his draft year and his defensive deficiencies do not do enough for me to want him at number 8.
As far as Nicushkin is concerned I think he is a gamble we should not take. Yes he is a huge player with a great drive to the net. I have seen him only a few times on tv and on high light film. But with no expressed desire I have seen to come to the NHL and only 15 goals and 13 assists in the 77 games he has played in the last 2 years leading up to this April we are talking only possible potential--he has not dominated. Yes some of his time was in the KHL-18 games-and yes he might be a star-but it is a higher risk adventure than I would wish to embark on.

hizzoner is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 10:53 AM
  #910
Mit Yarrum
HoF Turd Shiner
 
Mit Yarrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 5,679
vCash: 1663
I'd take Kyle Murphy at 8. Kid will be a fan favorite being from Rochester and all.

Mit Yarrum is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 10:59 AM
  #911
RazielMoshman
Ever hopeful
 
RazielMoshman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Kent, England
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 857
vCash: 500
Quick question(s), who do you guys see as being a wildcard? or maybe falling off the bottom, The guy that has the skills but teams don't want to take a risk on? Anyone to keep an eye on?

RazielMoshman is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 10:59 AM
  #912
TehDoak
Forgot About Z
 
TehDoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 22,940
vCash: 903
Any chance Nurse drops to us? Seems to fit a pretty big need organizationally.

TehDoak is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 11:08 AM
  #913
tsujimoto74
Moderator
 
tsujimoto74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Rochester
Country: United States
Posts: 14,668
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TehDoak View Post
Any chance Nurse drops to us? Seems to fit a pretty big need organizationally.
From Button's top 14 mock thread in the prospects forum:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Edwards View Post
As I mentioned in another thread, Craig and I sat together for quite a few games in Sochi. We always have fun talking about a few of the prospects because we see a some of them very differently. I'm not nearly as high on Morin as him and I have not spoken to a single scout who has Morin in that range. Conversely, Craig is not as high on Bowey as me.

As for Nurse, he has improved but I still have not spoken to a scout who sees him as a top 10. He is not a top 10 for me. I know a few guys are not fans at all and don't even see him as a first rounder. "Dumb" is the most common word used to describe him by the scouts who are not big fans. Note: I'm not saying that there are not some scouts who might like him as a top 10, just saying I haven't spoken to any who do.

A wide range of opinions on Many players in this years draft. It's going to be an interesting one to watch unfold.
Of course, it depends on which scouts do not see him as a top 10 prospect, but it looks like he could be a draft day faller.

tsujimoto74 is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 11:10 AM
  #914
RazielMoshman
Ever hopeful
 
RazielMoshman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Kent, England
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 857
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsujimoto74 View Post
From Button's top 14 mock thread in the prospects forum:



Of course, it depends on which scouts do not see him as a top 10 prospect, but it looks like he could be a draft day faller.
Wow, thats harsh. Am I right in saying his best case is Campbell but worst case is Brennan?

RazielMoshman is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 11:38 AM
  #915
jBuds
pretty damn valuable
 
jBuds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Country: Lord Howe Island
Posts: 28,933
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RazielMoshman View Post
Wow, thats harsh. Am I right in saying his best case is Campbell but worst case is Brennan?
Brian Campbell?? For a ceiling comparison to Nurse? Not at all.

jBuds is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 11:59 AM
  #916
RazielMoshman
Ever hopeful
 
RazielMoshman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Kent, England
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 857
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jBuds View Post
Brian Campbell?? For a ceiling comparison to Nurse? Not at all.
I know nothing about him, just looking for an idea.

RazielMoshman is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 12:01 PM
  #917
FearTheBeard
Formerly LGB24
 
FearTheBeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,880
vCash: 500
Sabres are looking to move up, small piece here from Vogl:
http://blogs.buffalonews.com/sabres/...-worth-it.html

FearTheBeard is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 12:03 PM
  #918
Vito_81
Registered User
 
Vito_81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,405
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slangston View Post
Here's a question no one has seemed to have asked.

If Nichushkin is available with the Minnesota pick, would you consider taking him? Not that I foresee him dropping that far, but it's certainly possible when you consider the uncertainty surrounding him.
.

It's a no-brainer in your scenario to take Valeri at 16. However, like you mentioned he won't be there in time for our second selection.

I think because of the Minny pick, we can afford to take Nichushkin with the 8th.

Best case scenario, he comes over to the NHL and he's the player he's projected to be. Hell, as long as he becomes a solid NHL'er its a good pick.

Worst case, he doesn't come over and/or is a bust.

Either way Buffalo still has another first rounder in their system from the draft.

So when you look back at it and Nichushkin is a bust, things don't look as bad as the Zagrapan, Kryukov and Persson drafts when you get nothing for a 1st.

I think it's the perfect time for Buffalo to get a bit ballsy and go for a risk in Nichushkin at 8.

Vito_81 is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 12:08 PM
  #919
aceface33
Registered User
 
aceface33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Herkimer, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 8,224
vCash: 500
I wonder with Nich if we will see a similar scenario to Grigs where he slides down past 10...the question is do we trade up to ~11-12 from 16 to grab him there?

aceface33 is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 12:11 PM
  #920
Myllz
#justbogothings
 
Myllz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle
Country: United States
Posts: 17,562
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LGB24 View Post
Sabres are looking to move up, small piece here from Vogl:
http://blogs.buffalonews.com/sabres/...-worth-it.html
I'd send a second round pick to move up 3-4 spots like that all day long. It'll more than likely take more than a second round pick to move up in this draft, though.

Myllz is online now  
Old
05-03-2013, 12:13 PM
  #921
Myllz
#justbogothings
 
Myllz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle
Country: United States
Posts: 17,562
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vito_81 View Post
It's a no-brainer in your scenario to take Valeri at 16. However, like you mentioned he won't be there in time for our second selection.

I think because of the Minny pick, we can afford to take Nichushkin with the 8th.

Best case scenario, he comes over to the NHL and he's the player he's projected to be. Hell, as long as he becomes a solid NHL'er its a good pick.

Worst case, he doesn't come over and/or is a bust.

Either way Buffalo still has another first rounder in their system from the draft.

So when you look back at it and Nichushkin is a bust, things don't look as bad as the Zagrapan, Kryukov and Persson drafts when you get nothing for a 1st.

I think it's the perfect time for Buffalo to get a bit ballsy and go for a risk in Nichushkin at 8.
Kind of like how Grig wouldn't be there at 12 last year. Players ALWAYS fall, it's just a matter of who and how far. Happens every single year.

Myllz is online now  
Old
05-03-2013, 12:13 PM
  #922
start winnin
NO MORE TANK BOYS
 
start winnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 9,163
vCash: 50
Nichushkin is such a peculiar case, I wouldn't be disappointed if we picked him at 8, but you just don't know how he will turn out. I love his skating ability, speed, his shot and he's already a beast on the boards.

It all depends on how he matures I suppose, his decision making was a lot like Armia's 1 to 2 years ago where he would try to do too much instead of making the simple plays. He also has serious tunnel vision, but is capable of making setting up nice passes which is frustrating.

It's not an awful pick and if he's the best forward on the board, I think you have to take him. I'm just hoping we don't have to make that choice and Lindholm drops to us instead.

start winnin is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 12:33 PM
  #923
TheCerebral1
Zero F***s Given
 
TheCerebral1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,585
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stop Winnin View Post
Nichushkin is such a peculiar case, I wouldn't be disappointed if we picked him at 8, but you just don't know how he will turn out. I love his skating ability, speed, his shot and he's already a beast on the boards.

It all depends on how he matures I suppose, his decision making was a lot like Armia's 1 to 2 years ago where he would try to do too much instead of making the simple plays. He also has serious tunnel vision, but is capable of making setting up nice passes which is frustrating.

It's not an awful pick and if he's the best forward on the board, I think you have to take him. I'm just hoping we don't have to make that choice and Lindholm drops to us instead.
It would be a great value pick at 8. I find him to be one of the better pure talents that is not MacKinnon, Jones and Druin. I like him as much as Barkov and Lindholm. If he's there I don't see Darcy passing. Especially with the last few years European explosion within the teams drafting patterns.

TheCerebral1 is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 01:08 PM
  #924
ZeroPT*
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,473
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mogilny 89 View Post
I'd take Kyle Murphy at 8. Kid will be a fan favorite being from Rochester and all.
HAHA

ZeroPT* is offline  
Old
05-03-2013, 01:18 PM
  #925
Jacob582
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,795
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myllz View Post
I'd send a second round pick to move up 3-4 spots like that all day long. It'll more than likely take more than a second round pick to move up in this draft, though.
I agree on both your points.
***

I was shocked to read that it only took a 2nd round pick and the 8th two times in the past to move up to 4th. Thought it would be more.

For that I would try to make a deal with Florida for the 2nd pick. What would that take?

Florida 2nd and Upshall (contract buyout- for $4.67 million and dependent on his mod. NTC).
to
Buffalo for 8th, and what? (another 1st or three 2nd's?)


I think DR/Pegula want what I want: MacKinnon or Barkov

Jacob582 is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.