HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

NHL Draft:Oilers Canes

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-07-2013, 06:10 PM
  #1
oilersfan11
Registered User
 
oilersfan11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 12,539
vCash: 50
NHL Draft:Oilers Canes

What would it take for the Oilers to trade up, and acquire the 5th overall pick?

oilersfan11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2013, 06:18 PM
  #2
Dr Quincy
Registered User
 
Dr Quincy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Country: United States
Posts: 18,865
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilersfan11 View Post
What would it take for the Oilers to trade up, and acquire the 5th overall pick?
It's not a matter of value, it's a matter of interest. So your question really can't be answered unless we knew who the Canes' rankings. If there was a guy they really liked, and they didn't think he'd be there at 7 I doubt they'd trade down without a total overpayment. If they had 2 or 3 guys rated fairly equally, or if they thought the guy they wanted might still be there at 7, they'd be more open to it.

But basically, as I keep saying in these "My team wants to trade up" threads: There are far more threads being made about teams wanting to trade up than trade down, so I'm thinking the interest in trading down just isn't there.

Dr Quincy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2013, 07:49 PM
  #3
Roboturner913
Bros Before Ahos
 
Roboturner913's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,034
vCash: 500
Would pretty much have to involve Smid, assuming Schultz is off the table. I do believe the Canes would be happy at #7 with one of Monahan, Nichushkin or Lindholm available.




Smid + #7 overall



#5 overall + Jay Harrison.

Roboturner913 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2013, 08:14 PM
  #4
JSC
Registered Sniper
 
JSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,158
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboturner913 View Post
Would pretty much have to involve Smid, assuming Schultz is off the table. I do believe the Canes would be happy at #7 with one of Monahan, Nichushkin or Lindholm available.




Smid + #7 overall



#5 overall + Jay Harrison.
Lol doubt the Oilers are going to give away Smid to move up 2 spots.

JSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2013, 08:16 PM
  #5
Lord J T Shark
McDavid Headquarters
 
Lord J T Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lord of HFBOARDS
Country: United Nations
Posts: 68,365
vCash: 95
if the oilers move up it will be into the top 3-- to move up 2 spots is not worth it

__________________
**Avatar approved by the powers that be***
Lord J T Shark is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2013, 08:16 PM
  #6
lakai17
Registered User
 
lakai17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,556
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboturner913 View Post
Would pretty much have to involve Smid, assuming Schultz is off the table. I do believe the Canes would be happy at #7 with one of Monahan, Nichushkin or Lindholm available.




Smid + #7 overall



#5 overall + Jay Harrison.
Ryan Whitney or Nick Schultz maybe, not Ladislav Smid.

lakai17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2013, 08:19 PM
  #7
Lord J T Shark
McDavid Headquarters
 
Lord J T Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lord of HFBOARDS
Country: United Nations
Posts: 68,365
vCash: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by lakai17 View Post
Ryan Whitney or Nick Schultz maybe, not Ladislav Smid.
I do not think a soon to be UFA gets the oilers up two spots

Lord J T Shark is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2013, 08:26 PM
  #8
Joey McMoss
5-14-6-1
 
Joey McMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: McDavid
Posts: 26,265
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboturner913 View Post
Would pretty much have to involve Smid, assuming Schultz is off the table. I do believe the Canes would be happy at #7 with one of Monahan, Nichushkin or Lindholm available.




Smid + #7 overall



#5 overall + Jay Harrison.
You can't be serious..

Joey McMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2013, 09:05 PM
  #9
Soli
Moderator
Supervision Required
 
Soli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,102
vCash: 500
Brief recent history of trading Top-10 picks...

- TOR traded 7th OV + 2nd and 3rd for 5th OV in 2008.
- NSH traded 9th OV + 2nd for 7th OV in 2008.
- SJS traded 13th OV + 2nd and 3rd for 9th OV in 2007.
- CAR traded 8th OV + 2nd for 4th OV in 2004.

Definitely takes two to tango. It has to be worth it for Carolina to make the deal. From what I gather from Caniacs, Rutherfords looking for immediate help to bolster the lineup for next season. So essentially, we'd need the make up the value of a 2nd round pick in roster personnel.

Based off this, I'd say 5th OV + Ales Hemsky/Nick Schultz + EDM 5th '13 is a respectable offer to get it done.


Last edited by Soli: 05-07-2013 at 09:10 PM.
Soli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2013, 09:14 PM
  #10
Roboturner913
Bros Before Ahos
 
Roboturner913's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,034
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey Moss View Post
You can't be serious..
Carolina has no reason to make the deal otherwise. They're very happy staying at 5.

Roboturner913 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2013, 09:23 PM
  #11
Djp
Registered User
 
Djp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle,WA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,875
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboturner913 View Post
Carolina has no reason to make the deal otherwise. They're very happy staying at 5.

If Carolina has interest n one of the Dmen or a forward not in the top 8 they will make a deal to add something. It's too much PR flack if they felt player X was better than the others but many had X going at 11. So them picking him at 5 would be considered a reach.

Since this team wants to compete for something next season..if they can get a veteran who could help them all the more better.

Djp is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2013, 09:26 PM
  #12
Roboturner913
Bros Before Ahos
 
Roboturner913's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,034
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djp View Post
If Carolina has interest n one of the Dmen or a forward not in the top 8 they will make a deal to add something. It's too much PR flack if they felt player X was better than the others but many had X going at 11. So them picking him at 5 would be considered a reach.

Since this team wants to compete for something next season..if they can get a veteran who could help them all the more better.
The pick is either 5 or 7, where they would take either Monahan, Lindholm, or Nichushkin either way. I think they would be very happy with any of those guys. Just depends on who falls there. FWIW, I don't think it makes any sense for the Oilers to trade up unless they are going top 3.

I wouldn't be shocked if Carolina traded the pick away entirely if the right player with the right cap hit was offered, but teams aren't looking to give away talented players on sweetheart deals. Especially not this year when so many teams will be scrambling to get under the cap.

Roboturner913 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2013, 09:29 PM
  #13
TylerSVT*
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,372
vCash: 500
Its not the draft unless the Oilers have a top 5 pick.

TylerSVT* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-08-2013, 01:33 AM
  #14
Aceonfire*
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,288
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soli View Post
Brief recent history of trading Top-10 picks...

- TOR traded 7th OV + 2nd and 3rd for 5th OV in 2008.
- NSH traded 9th OV + 2nd for 7th OV in 2008.
- SJS traded 13th OV + 2nd and 3rd for 9th OV in 2007.
- CAR traded 8th OV + 2nd for 4th OV in 2004.

Definitely takes two to tango. It has to be worth it for Carolina to make the deal. From what I gather from Caniacs, Rutherfords looking for immediate help to bolster the lineup for next season. So essentially, we'd need the make up the value of a 2nd round pick in roster personnel.

Based off this, I'd say 5th OV + Ales Hemsky/Nick Schultz + EDM 5th '13 is a respectable offer to get it done.
I agree completely.

Carolina needs a LHD in a stay at home role. With Mcbain, Faulk etc.. always jumping into the rush.

Carolina is also very top heavy with Skinner, the Staals, Semin and Ruutu.

They can trade back for N.Schultz + a pick and draft Nurse who could be a franchise D in a few years.

Calgary is 100% on taking a center. So there is little risk for them to do this.

Aceonfire* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-08-2013, 06:45 AM
  #15
internetdotcom
11 + 15 + 19 = 666
 
internetdotcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Capital O
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,005
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to internetdotcom Send a message via Yahoo to internetdotcom
There is a noted dropoff after the top 3 and the top 5, so to trade into the top 5 would require a large payment, regardless of where you are trading up from.

Remember how Oilers fans said this every year when they were picking first overall? Well, it applies when you are trying to trade up too, Oilers fans.

internetdotcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-08-2013, 08:20 AM
  #16
McDoused
Registered User
 
McDoused's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Katy <3
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,374
vCash: 500
If the canes want to draft Nurse or Nuchuskin I don't see why they wouldn't trade down 2 spots while picking up a second rounder or something. If they want Lindholm or Monahan, I don't see them moving.

It all comes down to who they like.

McDoused is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-08-2013, 08:51 AM
  #17
Draiskull
Registered User
 
Draiskull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 17,247
vCash: 777
Quote:
Originally Posted by jumptheshark View Post
if the oilers move up it will be into the top 3-- to move up 2 spots is not worth it
moving up spots guarantees them a C.. If CAR prefers Nurse over the C prospects they might consider moving down a couple spots.

N.Schultz or a 2nd rounder is what I would offer if I was EDM GM.

Draiskull is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-08-2013, 09:27 AM
  #18
Lethargic
Cthulhu 2016
 
Lethargic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Isle of Misfit Toys
Country: Somalia
Posts: 14,875
vCash: 500
Carolina is not taking a D in the 1st unless its Seth Jones.

JR said he is looking for 1 or 2 Veteran Defenseman.

So our draft pick will be one of Barkov if he is there at 5, Monahan, Nichushkin, or Lindholm.

Lethargic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-08-2013, 09:30 AM
  #19
Draiskull
Registered User
 
Draiskull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 17,247
vCash: 777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Misfit Semin View Post
Carolina is not taking a D in the 1st unless its Seth Jones.

JR said he is looking for 1 or 2 Veteran Defenseman.

So our draft pick will be one of Barkov if he is there at 5, Monahan, Nichushkin, or Lindholm.
one of them will be available at 7
Nick Schultz is a vet Dman ..

my above proposal still makes sense

Draiskull is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-08-2013, 10:07 AM
  #20
Lethargic
Cthulhu 2016
 
Lethargic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Isle of Misfit Toys
Country: Somalia
Posts: 14,875
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petro Points View Post
one of them will be available at 7
Nick Schultz is a vet Dman ..

my above proposal still makes sense
Just the Nurse thing.

I'm not opposed to Shultz +7th for 5th.

But I don't know who the Canes want. I just know JR is shy about taking D in the first round. I think Nichushkin is a stretch for him even. The only saving grace is Semin and Nichushkin have the same agent.

Lethargic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-08-2013, 10:14 AM
  #21
Boom Boom Aho
Sooo Good
 
Boom Boom Aho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,597
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petro Points View Post
one of them will be available at 7
Nick Schultz is a vet Dman ..

my above proposal still makes sense
It makes sense only if you assume that the Canes value each of those 4 equally (which none of us know). If they really want either Barkov or Monahan but aren't as enamored with Nichushkin or Lindholm, then it doesn't make sense.

Boom Boom Aho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-08-2013, 10:56 AM
  #22
zeus3007*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 13,226
vCash: 500
Moving to 5 makes little sense. Barkov is almost certainly going to go 4th, and after that, the players are ranked pretty closely from 5 - 9. No need for either team to really consider this.

zeus3007* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-08-2013, 11:15 AM
  #23
tarheelhockey
Global Moderator
 
tarheelhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 44,297
vCash: 1020
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeus3007 View Post
Moving to 5 makes little sense. Barkov is almost certainly going to go 4th, and after that, the players are ranked pretty closely from 5 - 9. No need for either team to really consider this.
Exactly. Both the Oilers and the Canes would be exposing themselves to an unnecessary level of risk that this blows up in their faces.

tarheelhockey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-08-2013, 11:26 AM
  #24
roboninja
EYG
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,305
vCash: 1152
Quote:
Originally Posted by internetdotcom View Post
There is a noted dropoff after the top 3 and the top 5, so to trade into the top 5 would require a large payment, regardless of where you are trading up from.

Remember how Oilers fans said this every year when they were picking first overall? Well, it applies when you are trying to trade up too, Oilers fans.
If we were trying to acquire the #1 pick you would have a point, But we are not, so you don't.

roboninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-08-2013, 11:27 AM
  #25
BowDangles
Registered User
 
BowDangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,734
vCash: 500
Hmm I like the Nick Schultz and 7OV for 5OV but it is a risky move from Edmonton's side in respect to their blue line for next year.
If Edmonton can not trade for another D man or sign a couple come UFA time than they are royally screwed..

Smid-Petry (both not top two D man...yet..)
J.Schultz-???
Potter-???

The thing that worries me is the Oilers will get either Nich/Monahon/Lindholm at 7th anyway so is losing a veteran Dman worth the upgrade to choose from Lindholm/Monahon when Bobby Mac has Nich rated at #5 anyway??

I don't think any of these players have an immediate impact on next year so I can't see Edmonton doing it unless it was Nick Schultz+ for the 4th overall pick...

It would be sweet to pick in front of Calgary though.

BowDangles is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.