HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

ATL/VAN Proposal

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
01-02-2004, 01:38 PM
  #1
Kovalchuk Army
Registered User
 
Kovalchuk Army's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,335
vCash: 500
ATL/VAN Proposal

To ATL: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin, 3rd Round Pick
To VAN: 1st Round Pick, Patrik Stefan, Kamil Piros

Kovalchuk Army is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 01:42 PM
  #2
Phaze
Registered User
 
Phaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 979
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Sidorkiewicz
To ATL: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin, 3rd Round Pick
To VAN: 1st Round Pick, Patrik Stefan, Kamil Piros
Why would the Nucks do that? It makes them a worse team now. There is no room for Piros on the Canucks and trading away both Sedins for one roster player who is about as good makes no sense.

Phaze is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 01:44 PM
  #3
LaVal
Registered User
 
LaVal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kelowna
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,695
vCash: 500
it's not a bad proposal, however this includes Vancouver giving up 2/3rd's of their second line. and for a team in the hunt for the cup it doesn't make much sense to rebuild.

LaVal is online now  
Old
01-02-2004, 01:46 PM
  #4
Hi-wayman
Registered User
 
Hi-wayman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,194
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Sidorkiewicz
To ATL: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin, 3rd Round Pick
To VAN: 1st Round Pick, Patrik Stefan, Kamil Piros
Good enough to at least look at from a Vancouver point of view. Depends on how it would affect our playoff run this year.

Hi-wayman is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 01:49 PM
  #5
Peter Griffin
Registered User
 
Peter Griffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 25,777
vCash: 500
Makes zero sense from a Canucks' perspective. They're trying to win now, trading the Sedins for a pick and one similar player in Stefan makes them a worse team now.

Peter Griffin is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 01:51 PM
  #6
BruinFan42
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 561
vCash: 500
All the Sedins need is a sniper to play on a line with them. Has Crawford ever thought about putting Naslund or Morrisson on their line for a game and see what happens?

I'll bet you a lot of money both Danny and Henry have a multiple-point night if they play with Naslund for one game. If that doesn't work, the Nucks are so deep defensivley, they could afford to trade a defensmen like Sopel, Salo or Allen and a draft pick for a sniper like Anson Carter or Glen Murray..

BruinFan42 is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 01:52 PM
  #7
Burke's Evil Spirit
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 14,493
vCash: 500
Solid value-wise, but not the kind of move Vancouver needs to make.

Burke's Evil Spirit is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 01:53 PM
  #8
Ajacied
Remember #9
 
Ajacied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Netherlands
Country: Netherlands
Posts: 23,102
vCash: 500
The deal isn't bad, not even from a Nuck POV. They replace one of the Sedins with Stefan, which is a pretty lateral move itself, gain a quality depth player in Piros for a 3rd, but the difference in value lays between the first and the other Sedin. The Nucks could easily afford to play without them considering the fact they've been a huge dissapointment, yet again. Time's running out on the two and everyone related to Nucks hockey seems to agree. And I'm sure Stefan could provide the same, if not a greater value for one of them, the minimal value the other provided could be missed, especially for a potential top 10 pick. Could get the Nucks a much needed quality prospect.

The deal is solid, its only a bad deal if Vancouver fans would think that either one of the Sedins is the difference between a Stanley Cup and an early playoff exit. I'd do it from a Vancouver POV, not sure from Atlanta's perspective since I kinda view the pick as the most valueble asset.

Ajacied is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 01:53 PM
  #9
Phaze
Registered User
 
Phaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 979
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Griffin
Makes zero sense from a Canucks' perspective. They're trying to win now, trading the Sedins for a pick and one similar player in Stefan makes them a worse team now.
Thanks for saying exactly what I said.

Even if this trade is fair "value" it is a terrible idea for the Canucks. The Sedins could easily be 50-60 point 2nd line players. Stefan could as well, but Piros IMO is a minor leaguer. Yes we would get a first, but if the first turned out to be a 50 point player we would be very lucky. Based on potential, this is a very bad idea. Good thinking by an Atlanta fan though.

Phaze is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 01:54 PM
  #10
Hi-wayman
Registered User
 
Hi-wayman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,194
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaVal575
it's not a bad proposal, however this includes Vancouver giving up 2/3rd's of their second line. and for a team in the hunt for the cup it doesn't make much sense to rebuild.
Yes, but we do have some players in the minors & or other lines that we could use to rebuild a new 2nd line.

Cooke - Stephen - King
Arvedson - Chubarov - Linden

would make fairly good 2nd & 3rd lines plus we still have Kesler, Reid or Kavanagh we could bring up from the Moose.

Sorry, Freudian slip


Last edited by Hi-wayman: 01-02-2004 at 02:01 PM.
Hi-wayman is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 01:58 PM
  #11
Burke's Evil Spirit
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 14,493
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hi-wayman
Yes, but we do have some players in the minors & or other lines that we could use to rebuild a new 2nd line.

Sopel - Stephen - King
Alfredson - Chubarov - Linden

would make fairly good 2nd & 3rd lines plus we still have Kesler, Reid or Kavanagh we could bring up from the Moose.
Um...Alfredson? I wish. I think you meant Arvedson. Sopel is a defenceman. We could promote Cooke to the second line...

Burke's Evil Spirit is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 01:58 PM
  #12
Phaze
Registered User
 
Phaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 979
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Modano = God
The deal isn't bad, not even from a Nuck POV. They replace one of the Sedins with Stefan, which is a pretty lateral move itself, gain a quality depth player in Piros for a 3rd, but the difference in value lays between the first and the other Sedin. The Nucks could easily afford to play without them considering the fact they've been a huge dissapointment, yet again. Time's running out on the two and everyone related to Nucks hockey seems to agree. And I'm sure Stefan could provide the same, if not a greater value for one of them, the minimal value the other provided could be missed, especially for a potential top 10 pick. Could get the Nucks a much needed quality prospect.

The deal is solid, its only a bad deal if Vancouver fans would think that either one of the Sedins is the difference between a Stanley Cup and an early playoff exit. I'd do it from a Vancouver POV, not sure from Atlanta's perspective since I kinda view the pick as the most valueble asset.
Good post. The pick probably is "worth" the most, you are right. But the picks "worth" to the Canucks who are going for it now, is not as high as a Sedin who can contribute now. In my opinion.
If I deal the twins, I look for a deal where we get one player who is better than them, a 2 for 1. Might not be there, but getting Stefan for a Sedin is pointless IMO.

Phaze is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 01:58 PM
  #13
nucks2001
Guest
 
Country:
Posts: n/a
vCash:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hi-wayman
Yes, but we do have some players in the minors & or other lines that we could use to rebuild a new 2nd line.

Sopel - Stephen - King
Alfredson - Chubarov - Linden

would make fairly good 2nd & 3rd lines plus we still have Kesler, Reid or Kavanagh we could bring up from the Moose.
???

 
Old
01-02-2004, 01:59 PM
  #14
Peter Griffin
Registered User
 
Peter Griffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 25,777
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hi-wayman
Yes, but we do have some players in the minors & or other lines that we could use to rebuild a new 2nd line.

Sopel - Stephen - King
Alfredson - Chubarov - Linden

would make fairly good 2nd & 3rd lines plus we still have Kesler, Reid or Kavanagh we could bring up from the Moose.
Are you suggesting that the Canucks put Sopel on the 2nd line and acquire Daniel Alfredsson?

Peter Griffin is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 02:01 PM
  #15
Ajacied
Remember #9
 
Ajacied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Netherlands
Country: Netherlands
Posts: 23,102
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vee-Dub
The Sedins could easily be 50-60 point 2nd line players.
So easily, that they still haven't maintained themselves as steady 30 point producers after 4/5 years in the NHL. Time's running out and I find it rather funny when someone labels the word "easy" and "60 points" to the Sedins after their continues dissapointing seasons.

Ajacied is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 02:04 PM
  #16
Ajacied
Remember #9
 
Ajacied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Netherlands
Country: Netherlands
Posts: 23,102
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vee-Dub
Good post. The pick probably is "worth" the most, you are right. But the picks "worth" to the Canucks who are going for it now, is not as high as a Sedin who can contribute now. In my opinion.
If I deal the twins, I look for a deal where we get one player who is better than them, a 2 for 1. Might not be there, but getting Stefan for a Sedin is pointless IMO.
I agree. Though I'd like to see Stefan and the Sedins switch places. A chance of scenery might just help their careers. Stefan between Nas and Bert, while the Sedins line up with either Ilya or Heatley. I think both GM's would seriously consider this deal if it came accross.

Ajacied is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 02:06 PM
  #17
Peter Griffin
Registered User
 
Peter Griffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 25,777
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Modano = God
So easily, that they still haven't maintained themselves as steady 30 point producers after 4/5 years in the NHL.
How's that? They are 30-40 point two-way forwards right now. Take a look at their stats. Going on 5 straight years of at least 30 points, how much more consistency is needed to be legite 30 point producers?

Quote:
Time's running out and I find it rather funny when someone labels the word "easy" and "60 points" to the Sedins after their continues dissapointing seasons.
Agreed. But they have the talent to be 50-60 point two-way forwards. More ice-time and a decent linemate, someone who is a proven offensive talent would only help them. So far, they haven't received either.

Peter Griffin is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 02:07 PM
  #18
Mizral
Registered User
 
Mizral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Earth, MW
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,038
vCash: 500
I wouldn't even consider this from a Canuck perspective. Every deal the Canucks make (within reason) must have the questioned tagged to it, 'Does this make the team immediatly better?'. This does not.

I would much rather the Canucks trade their picks off for players, rather than attain.

Mizral is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 02:08 PM
  #19
Peter Griffin
Registered User
 
Peter Griffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 25,777
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Modano = God
I agree. Though I'd like to see Stefan and the Sedins switch places. A chance of scenery might just help their careers. Stefan between Nas and Bert, while the Sedins line up with either Ilya or Heatley. I think both GM's would seriously consider this deal if it came accross.
If the Sedins were traded, I bet Burke would look to trade both for one more established player, otherwise, doesn't make much sense.

Peter Griffin is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 02:10 PM
  #20
Phaze
Registered User
 
Phaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 979
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Modano = God
So easily, that they still haven't maintained themselves as steady 30 point producers after 4/5 years in the NHL. Time's running out and I find it rather funny when someone labels the word "easy" and "60 points" to the Sedins after their continues dissapointing seasons.
Both of them have had at least 30 points in every NHL season, except Henrik who had 29 as a rookie. They have established themselves as 30 point players with 12 or 13 minutes of ice time. Henrik had 39 points last year and his totals have only increased every season. I'd like more out of them, but at 23 years old they have established themselves as 30 point players with limited minutes, and have been improving. 60 points may be their absolute peak season, but I don't think 50 points is out of the question given their progress and age to date.

Phaze is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 02:19 PM
  #21
LaVal
Registered User
 
LaVal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kelowna
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,695
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Modano = God
I agree. Though I'd like to see Stefan and the Sedins switch places. A chance of scenery might just help their careers. Stefan between Nas and Bert, while the Sedins line up with either Ilya or Heatley. I think both GM's would seriously consider this deal if it came accross.
it's obvious the deal is fair valuewise... but what you don't seem to understand is that the Canucks are trying to win the cup this year. a 1st round pick next season, a player that doesn't fit with the team, and a player that's struggling similarily to the players we are giving up for basically our 2nd line is not a good way to increase our cup chances... especially adding to the fact that the twins have been great playoff performers thusfar.

not to mention Stefan recieves 4 minutes more icetime per game than the Sedins, and produces at a similar level.

Stefan would not be put with Naslund and Bertuzzi as he is not a good fit, and would disrupt the chemistry that the 3 have.

LaVal is online now  
Old
01-02-2004, 02:48 PM
  #22
Epsilon
#TeamHolland
 
Epsilon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Florence, SC
Posts: 31,909
vCash: 500
I think it's a stupid deal, but that's because partly I personally expect Atlanta to make the playoffs, which makes the pick worth a lot less particularly in a top heavy draft such as the 2004 edition. If you think Atlanta won't make the playoffs, then it becomes a better proposal.

Epsilon is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 04:15 PM
  #23
Arastiroth
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manhattan
Country: United States
Posts: 1,401
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Epsilon
I think it's a stupid deal, but that's because partly I personally expect Atlanta to make the playoffs, which makes the pick worth a lot less particularly in a top heavy draft such as the 2004 edition. If you think Atlanta won't make the playoffs, then it becomes a better proposal.
I think if Atlanta picked up both Sedin's they would make the playoffs. They may not light the net up a ton, but they don't let the other team, either. Plus, I think they could potentially mesh well with one of Atlanta's talented wingers.

Arastiroth is offline  
Old
01-02-2004, 08:03 PM
  #24
Epsilon
#TeamHolland
 
Epsilon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Florence, SC
Posts: 31,909
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanguay40
I think if Atlanta picked up both Sedin's they would make the playoffs. They may not light the net up a ton, but they don't let the other team, either. Plus, I think they could potentially mesh well with one of Atlanta's talented wingers.
I think they are making the playoffs regardless. I also think that would be a great deal for Atlanta. Stefan has shown little chemistry with any of the players on the team from an offensive standpoint, and while the Sedins don't put up numbers that are any better, if they do have some chemistry with someone (cough*Kovalchuk*cough) then it would work out really well for Atlanta. If they don't, they are still doing the same thing Stefan was: some point production and solid two-way hockey.

Epsilon is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.