Both of those goals were on him. If you want to give him the Chara one, fine. But, the second one definitely was stoppable. I'm one of the last people to bash Hank. Also I'm not saying we lost because of him. I'm saying that those goals were stoppable.
You'd think we just got blown out 10-0 reading this garbage. Gives me a freaking migraine even trying to read though this drivel.
It's even worse reading through the GDT trying to figure out WTF is going on since I can't see the game. Granted, it at least shows me who I can trust to give an honest breakdown of what is going on.
"Of course giving Sather cap space is like giving teenagers whiskey and car keys." - SBOB "Watching Sather build a team is like watching a blind man with no fingers trying to put together an elaborate puzzle." - Shadowtron
Sestito still on the make a wish tour. - rholt168 "Okay, Joel. You've had your fun. Give your brother his pads back." - Trxjw
If both teams played neck and neck, there wouldn't be much fuss about it. However, our PP pales in comparison to theirs, they created more offensive pressure than we did, and they know how to attempt shots unlike us.
Their pp was way better than ours, but going into OT the shots were pretty much even. Not sure whatyyou're looking for....other than a brand new PP of. Ourse
Wow! I have never understood how bad this board gets after losses until tonight. Don't get me wrong, I have contributed my fair share of negativity to this board. But people are literally complaining about everything about this team.
Rangers didn't play that bad. They can beat this team.
Again, only reason for that was because Hank still played.
But the shots were 32-30 in the game. According to the radio, the game seemed fairly close yet Hank was poor on two goals.
So I don't see how you can really claim that. The Bruins got 1/3 of their shots in OT. So you may as well completely get rid of OT when we are talking about this since the game should've been over in regulation.