HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Chicago Blackhawks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Detroit wins Game 3 3-1

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-20-2013, 10:08 PM
  #51
reiks12
Rookie User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 144
vCash: 500


refs missed an obvious offsides during Detroits third goal. Add it to the list.

reiks12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:09 PM
  #52
clydesdale line
Registered User
 
clydesdale line's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 1,459
vCash: 500
Disallowed goal changed momentum of the game and Babcock outcoaching Q. Not gonna use three post as an excuse, that's hockey. Still confident in Hawks in 6, but game 4 is by far a must win.

clydesdale line is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:10 PM
  #53
Chris Hansen
VERSTEEG REDEMPTION
 
Chris Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,191
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by reiks12 View Post


refs missed an obvious offsides during Detroits third goal. Add it to the list.
Franzen had control of the puck throughout - it was correctly called an onside play.

Chris Hansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:11 PM
  #54
Chris Hansen
VERSTEEG REDEMPTION
 
Chris Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,191
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by clydesdale line View Post
Disallowed goal changed momentum of the game and Babcock outcoaching Q. Not gonna use three post as an excuse, that's hockey. Still confident in Hawks in 6, but game 4 is by far a must win.
It's not an excuse as much as it is simply an indication that a team had seriously tough luck in a game.

Chris Hansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:12 PM
  #55
HawksFan74
Tread Lightly
 
HawksFan74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 15,303
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Hansen View Post
Franzen had control of the puck throughout - it was correctly called an onside play.
What?

HawksFan74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:12 PM
  #56
reiks12
Rookie User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 144
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Hansen View Post
Franzen had control of the puck throughout - it was correctly called an onside play.
My bad then.

reiks12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:13 PM
  #57
DisgruntledHawkFan
Moderator
 
DisgruntledHawkFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 21,908
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to DisgruntledHawkFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawksFan74 View Post
What?
You can be in the zone before the puck if you're deemed in control of the puck.

DisgruntledHawkFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:17 PM
  #58
damacles1156
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 12,269
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BronYrAur View Post
Anze Kopitar must be pretty bad too because he went something like 19 games without a goal this year.

Fact is, sometimes the goals don't go in. Toews is contributing and working harder than anyone out there and is taking a beating for it. And yet he still goes out there and continues to go to the places where he is getting pummeled.
Kings fan here,

Want to know even a more bizarre stat ? Kopitar has had only one PP goal dating back to last season... Last one was March 20 of 2012.

That is some twilight zone stuff going on there. The Puck doesn't bounce for you sometimes indeed!!!

damacles1156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:18 PM
  #59
ItsMyFault
Fan of Losing Teams
 
ItsMyFault's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Country: United States
Posts: 1,993
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Hansen View Post
I was worried after the performance in Game 2, because it was a complete lack of effort. They played pretty well tonight, hit 3 posts and had a good goal (that would have tied the game) disallowed. Pretty awful luck all around. These games are going to happen. They'll be desperate for the win in Game 4 and I'm confident they'll get it. They were the better team tonight and win that game probably 75 to 80 percent of the time. Bounces and some luck just didn't go their way... it's not the end of the world.

Oh, and I predicted Hawks in 5. Didn't expect Detroit to play this well, so kudos to that team.. but I still think the Hawks are better by a somewhat significant margin and will right the ship on Thursday.

Well said.

ItsMyFault is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:18 PM
  #60
featherhawk
Registered User
 
featherhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,393
vCash: 500
saad-towes-kane
smith-sharp-hossa
stalberg-shaw-bickell
frolik-bolland-kruger

NOW

featherhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:19 PM
  #61
newfy
Registered User
 
newfy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,689
vCash: 500
Just wondering what some of the thoughts are for that hit on Franzen that also eventually led to Kanes goal? Not a troll post just curious if fans of both teams thought that should have been a call or not

newfy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:21 PM
  #62
Chris Hansen
VERSTEEG REDEMPTION
 
Chris Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,191
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by newfy View Post
Just wondering what some of the thoughts are for that hit on Franzen that also eventually led to Kanes goal? Not a troll post just curious if fans of both teams thought that should have been a call or not
Thought Franzen turned right into it and calling it boarding would have been a stretch - had Franzen not turned at the last second it would have effectively just been a pinning move.

Chris Hansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:25 PM
  #63
The Red Line
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,290
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Hansen View Post
Thought Franzen turned right into it and calling it boarding would have been a stretch - had Franzen not turned at the last second it would have effectively just been a pinning move.
I hate to be yet another Wings fan in here, and know you already have a disdain for me - I think it should have been 2 minutes, but wasn't completely shocked that it wasn't after watching the replay multiple times. The Hawks got absolutely robbed on the non-goal, and I think make up calls are one of the worst aspects of hockey. Why cover up a possible mistake with an even more blatant one?

More responding to your post a few posts above where you said the Hawks were clearly the better team. Maybe I'm just a blind homer... well we know I'm that already... but I really thought the Wings were the better team for 60 minutes tonight, despite the bad officiating both ways. I'm really not trying to troll, but what did you see that makes you think the Hawks were better?

The Red Line is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:30 PM
  #64
Atomic Punk
Mean Streets
 
Atomic Punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Panama
Country: United States
Posts: 8,878
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Red Line View Post
I hate to be yet another Wings fan in here, and know you already have a disdain for me - I think it should have been 2 minutes, but wasn't completely shocked that it wasn't after watching the replay multiple times. The Hawks got absolutely robbed on the non-goal, and I think make up calls are one of the worst aspects of hockey. Why cover up a possible mistake with an even more blatant one?

More responding to your post a few posts above where you said the Hawks were clearly the better team. Maybe I'm just a blind homer... well we know I'm that already... but I really thought the Wings were the better team for 60 minutes tonight, despite the bad officiating both ways. I'm really not trying to troll, but what did you see that makes you think the Hawks were better?
When someone says they are not trolling that is usually a preface for the fact they are indeed trolling. FYI.

Atomic Punk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:33 PM
  #65
Blue Liner
Registered User
 
Blue Liner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 4,398
vCash: 500
I got questioned for saying Detroit is still Detroit and they'd put up a good fight in this series. I honestly take no pride in being right, I'd have rather been wrong. Still can take the series but they're facing basically a must-win next game, on the road, against a team many didn't give much chance to.

Blue Liner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:34 PM
  #66
Chris Hansen
VERSTEEG REDEMPTION
 
Chris Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,191
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Red Line View Post
I hate to be yet another Wings fan in here, and know you already have a disdain for me - I think it should have been 2 minutes, but wasn't completely shocked that it wasn't after watching the replay multiple times. The Hawks got absolutely robbed on the non-goal, and I think make up calls are one of the worst aspects of hockey. Why cover up a possible mistake with an even more blatant one?

More responding to your post a few posts above where you said the Hawks were clearly the better team. Maybe I'm just a blind homer... well we know I'm that already... but I really thought the Wings were the better team for 60 minutes tonight, despite the bad officiating both ways. I'm really not trying to troll, but what did you see that makes you think the Hawks were better?
I would have understood if Hjalmarsson had been given 2 in the heat of the moment, given refs don't have the benefit of replays, Franzen was (or seemed, anyway) hurt. But after seeing the play again I really don't think it warranted a penalty and I thought the refs got it right.

I thought the Wings had a terrific 10 minute stretch in the 2nd period that was enough to get them the game. They didn't have a shot during the 2nd until about 12 minute to go in the period, if memory serves.. right around then was the time was when they really took over for a stretch. I thought the Hawks generally had the better of the scoring chances and the play throughout the rest of the ~50 minutes of the game. Hit three posts, had a goal disallowed... just didn't have the breaks go their way tonight - it happens. Detroit cashed in on their opportunities and that deserves praise, but while I do think Chicago can play better hockey than they did, I thought they were a bit better than the Wings tonight. Howard was very good too, I shouldn't forget to mention that.

Chris Hansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:36 PM
  #67
IU Hawks fan
They call me 'IU'
 
IU Hawks fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: No longer IU
Country: United States
Posts: 18,798
vCash: 772
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Red Line View Post

More responding to your post a few posts above where you said the Hawks were clearly the better team. Maybe I'm just a blind homer... well we know I'm that already... but I really thought the Wings were the better team for 60 minutes tonight, despite the bad officiating both ways. I'm really not trying to troll, but what did you see that makes you think the Hawks were better?
Well, let's start with having a quarter more shots, and that doesn't count 4 posts and the disallowed goal.

IU Hawks fan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:37 PM
  #68
Cullksinikers
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: 'Merica
Country: United States
Posts: 14,525
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by featherhawk View Post
saad-towes-kane
smith-sharp-hossa
stalberg-shaw-bickell
frolik-bolland-kruger

NOW
I'm not sure who "towes" is, but he only has three less goals than Toews does in his last 32 playoff games.

OK, I'm messing around.

Cullksinikers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:39 PM
  #69
coldsteelonice84
Registered User
 
coldsteelonice84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 25,684
vCash: 10592
Clearly lacking talent, team played great, time for Benny.

coldsteelonice84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:39 PM
  #70
Cullksinikers
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: 'Merica
Country: United States
Posts: 14,525
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by IU Hawks fan View Post
Well, let's start with having a quarter more shots, and that doesn't count 4 posts and the disallowed goal.
This is absolutely correct, and fans should keep this in mind if they are panicky or stopping to believe.

Cullksinikers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:40 PM
  #71
The Red Line
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,290
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by swanny View Post
When someone says they are not trolling that is usually a preface for the fact they are indeed trolling. FYI.
I get that its annoying when other fans come in and post, especially after a win, really wasn't trying to rile anyone up. I'll stick to the main board GDT, it was just a little dead right after the game.

The Red Line is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:45 PM
  #72
CertainAffinity*
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,403
vCash: 500
Red Wings in 5

Breaks my heart to say it, but this team doesn't have the character or the pride to elevate when it matters most.

It's gonna suck watching Detroit give their personal cat-toy one last kick in the ass before heading out East.

CertainAffinity* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 10:58 PM
  #73
hawksfan50
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,849
vCash: 500
Det 3rd goal was Crawford's usual softie you can count on to occur...plus Seabrook vetting skated past onthe Det 1st goal is a recuuring problem as be and Leddy go minus AGAIN...now -3 and -5 respectively for the plahlffs for our vaunted 2nd Paifjng..faceoffs...ugh..refs ugh..puck luck/posts ugh..Q outcoached...ugh...and the Toews legend gegting tarnished as he has delivered gournish..in other words we got problems galore...the bloom is off the rose and there is only one solutkon...SHAVE off that facial hair...the refsno longdr recognize us as the vaunted powerhouse team that draws penaties from opponets AND we do not recognize ourselves as the vaunted scoring and possession team we sefe...so cut that face hair off so thatnormal recognition returns to both the refs and to our own team! Yep, that's the ticket!

hawksfan50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 11:11 PM
  #74
Marina
#freemorin
 
Marina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Florida
Country: United States
Posts: 17,473
vCash: 1200
Is this the main board? It's been overtaken by trolls. Anyone saying the Wings are gonna win in five is a joke.

However I have an Oreo McFlurry now so I don't care.

Marina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2013, 11:13 PM
  #75
Chris Hansen
VERSTEEG REDEMPTION
 
Chris Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,191
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marina View Post
Is this the main board? It's been overtaken by trolls. Anyone saying the Wings are gonna win in five is a joke.

However I have an Oreo McFlurry now so I don't care.
Tried to ruin your day by looking up the nutrition facts (I'm a bad person), but... what? A McDonald's item not loaded with fat? I'm actually quite genuinely shocked.

Relatively speaking, anyway.

Chris Hansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.