Because I have no idea how to competently judge a goaltender's positioning and technique, and how this will translate into future play. But there are people who have this knowledge and understanding, and some seem to say he will continue to be very good, and some say that his lateral weakness has been exposed and that it started showing late in the season.
I think I don't like the fact huet is changing his equipment. He looked more confortable in his old pads and all. Usually for good goalies, equipment change has no importance (my opinion)......but take Theo as an example, his pads sucked like hell...
Theres an article on huet on canadiens.com saying how hes posted consistant numbers for most of his career. I dont how he can go from one of the best in the second half to a very ordinary goalie. Huet is the type thats going to work hard to make adjustment if he has to. Hes not here to have a good time. Hes calm and he did not let the presure take the best of him last year so why would it be diferent this year. Theres allways a concern on him screwing up but I think hes going to be fine.
The only team in the east that dosent have question mark in net are the devils with brodeur. I dont get it why every one is saying how we are the ones with question marks and every one else are fine.
Tim tomas - same amount of experience as huet
Mark Denis-never made the playoffs
Ryan miller- 2nd full season this year
Cam Ward - same amount of experience as huet
Gerber- 2nd full season this year
Lundqvist- 2nd full season
Nittymaki-2nd full season
7 teams whios goalies pretty much have the same amount of experience as huet and yet the book is out on huet .