HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The Business of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
The Business of Hockey Discuss the financial and business aspects of the NHL. Topics may include the CBA, work stoppages, broadcast contracts, franchise sales, and NHL revenues.

Nassau County arena reno bid promises Islanders return (for 6 games)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-15-2013, 12:40 PM
  #1
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,804
vCash: 500
Nassau County arena reno bid promises Islanders return (for 6 games)

Steve55 posted this.

Ratner's group and a group from MSG, are 2 of 4 groups bidding to develop Coliseum land. Part of Ratner's bid is having the Isles and Brooklyn Nets, play some regular season games at the new 13,000 seat Nassau County arena. Isles would play 6 games.

But, Ratner looks to have included that 6 game proposal, without clearing it with the NHL or Rangers. No way would the Rangers want to help Ratner's bid and I don't see the NHL wanting the isles playing in a 13,000 seat arena.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/busines...bzapoJpjb0k0aL

By JOSH KOSMAN
Last Updated: 3:59 AM, May 15, 2013
Posted: 11:35 PM, May 14, 2013


The battle to renovate and operate a downsized Nassau Coliseum may be about to get nasty.

Bruce Ratner, one of four who is vying for the job and who is wooing Nassau County executives by promising to play six Islanders games at the 41-year-old arena even after they move to Barclays Center, may not be able to deliver on that promise, The Post has learned.

Madison Square Garden, which owns the NHL’s Rangers and is also bidding on the job, has to approve such a move — and that OK is not guaranteed, sources said.

Ratner took a full-page ad in a local newspaper yesterday touting the six-game slate, calling it “Nassau Like Never Before.”

“You can’t run around playing games wherever you want to,” a sports owner not directly involved in the battle said...

I thought Ratner is trying to bite more than he can chew here anyway. Also it may not make financial sense to play 6 games at the renovated Coliseum since that's not going to make up the loss from 6 less games at Barclays.

CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2013, 11:44 PM
  #2
LadyStanley
Elasmobranchology-go
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Country: United States
Posts: 55,908
vCash: 500
http://espn.go.com/new-york/nhl/stor...ording-sources

ESPN NY story from Strang with a couple more points:

Quote:
According to NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly, via a league spokesperson, the issue is an "internal matter upon which we are not commenting."

Although at least one league source doubted the capacity issues would be a deterrent -- "I don't think that would be a determining factor," the source told ESPNNewYork.com -- another person briefed on the situation believes otherwise.

That source said sacrificing revenue on those six games at Nassau, which is expected to hold a capacity of 13,000 fans after renovations, is a major concern.

LadyStanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 10:23 AM
  #3
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,804
vCash: 500
One of our posters bought up the point, that the Isles paid the NYR $4.5m for a territory fee and amended the agreement in the 1980s, allowing the Isles to play anywhere in Suffolk, Nassau, Queens or Brooklyn.

I expect Ratner would argue the NYR should have no say. A bigger issue could be, the league not wanting the isles playing 6 games in a 13,000 seat arena.

CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 10:42 AM
  #4
cheswick
Non-registered User
 
cheswick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peg City
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,989
vCash: 574
I'm missing something. What do the Rangers have to do with this?

cheswick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 10:57 AM
  #5
tarheelhockey
Global Moderator
 
tarheelhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 32,417
vCash: 500
Wait, have the Islanders actually agreed to this?

That seems like a somewhat significant hurdle...

tarheelhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 11:05 AM
  #6
LadyStanley
Elasmobranchology-go
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Country: United States
Posts: 55,908
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarheelhockey View Post
Wait, have the Islanders actually agreed to this?

That seems like a somewhat significant hurdle...
Nope. Putting the cart before the horse.

LadyStanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 11:10 AM
  #7
Brodie
watcher on the walls
 
Brodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Michigan
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 12,163
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyStanley View Post
Nope. Putting the cart before the horse.
Wang has agreed.

Brodie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 11:13 AM
  #8
cutchemist42
Registered User
 
cutchemist42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,931
vCash: 500
I really don't see how this involves the Rangers???

cutchemist42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 11:59 AM
  #9
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,804
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheswick View Post
I'm missing something. What do the Rangers have to do with this?
MSG(Rangers group) and Ratner's group, are 2 of 4 groups bidding to develop the land.

It sounds like the Rangers, want to move their AHL team into the Coliseum, while Ratner's group is saying they also have a minor league team to move in.

CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 12:03 PM
  #10
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,804
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyStanley View Post
Nope. Putting the cart before the horse.
I think Wang probably has agreed to Ratner's plan.
Wang has turned the business side of running the isles, over to the Ratner group. Wang/Snow continue to run the team.




http://islanderspointblank.com/islan...ns/#more-40845
Earlier this month, the Barclays Center unveiled its bid for a revamped Nassau Coliseum, spearheaded by developer Bruce Ratner and CEO Brett Yormark. The plan includes six Islanders games in a new, scaled down 13,000 seat arena back in Nassau County — with owner Charles Wang’s blessing — with the hope that the team should stay connected with its Long Island fanbase.


Finally, Yormark told SBJ that the has an agreement in place with an AHL franchise to move into the Coliseum if his group wins the bid, but would not reveal which team he has partnered with.


Last edited by CREW99AW: 05-16-2013 at 12:08 PM.
CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 12:22 PM
  #11
The Korean*
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York
Country: South Korea
Posts: 7,635
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to The Korean* Send a message via Yahoo to The Korean*
I dont think NHL like this move.

The Korean* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 01:39 PM
  #12
madhi19
Registered User
 
madhi19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cold and Dark place!
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,205
vCash: 500
The Islanders got out of that dump it hard to believe they want to return any time soon.

madhi19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 02:28 PM
  #13
Acesolid
The Illusive Bettman
 
Acesolid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Québec
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,768
vCash: 500
Why in the world would they want to play there? That's so weird...

The money is in the modern (and smaller) Brooklyn arena where the prices will be higher and there'll be no empty seats!

Acesolid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 03:26 PM
  #14
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,804
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acesolid View Post
Why in the world would they want to play there? That's so weird...

The money is in the modern (and smaller) Brooklyn arena where the prices will be higher and there'll be no empty seats!
I doubt the isles want to really play in a 13,000 seat arena. But, offering to have the Isles play 6 games and possibly the Nets play 1-2 games, is a key part of Ratner's bid.


It sure got my attention when I read, Wang had turned the running of the business side of the team, over to the Ratner group. Makes me wonder if they won't be the new owners.

CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 03:32 PM
  #15
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,804
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by madhi19 View Post
The Islanders got out of that dump it hard to believe they want to return any time soon.
It won't be a dump once it's renovated.




CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 04:25 PM
  #16
gordie
Registered User
 
gordie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,981
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CREW99AW View Post
It won't be a dump once it's renovated.



Looks like the Alien ship from Close Encounters.

gordie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-16-2013, 04:31 PM
  #17
HabsByTheBay
Registered User
 
HabsByTheBay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Country: United States
Posts: 1,178
vCash: 500
Why should the NHL care how big an arena is? If I think I can make the most money with a 9,000 seat arena then the NHL should go and pound sand.

It's not like 13,000 is some ridiculous number, it's only 1500 fewer people than the Frankenstein half-rink the Isles are actually going to be playing their other 35 home games at. The Isles on The Island makes a lot of marketing sense for them and if the Ratner people turn the Coliseum into a half decent arena then they could make just as much money from those games (since they'll be events they can charge premium prices for) as from their games in Brooklyn.

HabsByTheBay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-17-2013, 12:25 AM
  #18
The Korean*
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York
Country: South Korea
Posts: 7,635
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to The Korean* Send a message via Yahoo to The Korean*
Actually Barclays will be able to hold 15000 allegedly. A bit more according to Ratner actually.

The Korean* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-17-2013, 08:49 AM
  #19
tony d
The franchise
 
tony d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind A Tree
Country: Canada
Posts: 35,214
vCash: 500
I think it's a decent idea. Let the fans on Long Island who have supported the Islanders in the past be able to see a few live games a year at their old arena.

__________________
tony d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-17-2013, 02:09 PM
  #20
Jax1166
Registered User
 
Jax1166's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: I-95
Country: United States
Posts: 1,390
vCash: 500
I don't understand, if they are going to renovate the arena, then why couldn't the Islanders just stay?
Why renovate after the main tenant leaves?

Jax1166 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-18-2013, 04:46 AM
  #21
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,804
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doakes View Post
I don't understand, if they are going to renovate the arena, then why couldn't the Islanders just stay?
Why renovate after the main tenant leaves?
Wang's 1st attempt was the $3 billion Lighthouse project. It was going to be a huge privately funded project. Partisan pols and the nimby crowd blocked this project.

Wang's 2nd attempt was the 2011 bond vote, that would have the public pay $400m for a NYI arena and I think a minor league baseball stadium. Voters rejected this plan. Some voters and pols, seemed to think Wang should pay for an arena he wouldn't own, on land he was leasing.

With about 2 1/2 yrs left on the Coliseum lease, Wang gave up and signed the Brooklyn lease. This finally got County pols off their ***** and now they look ready to get the land developed. A day late and a dollar short.

CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-21-2013, 06:34 PM
  #22
nyrmetros
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,349
vCash: 500
Incredible. A renovation AFTER the team is leaving......

nyrmetros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-21-2013, 11:12 PM
  #23
danishh
Dat Stache
 
danishh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: mtl/ott/somewhere
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,654
vCash: 50
the PA will raise a stink unless ratner guarantees the same revenue as an average barclays game.

__________________
RIP Kev.
danishh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-21-2013, 11:48 PM
  #24
Hugh Mann*
Hey! Hey! You! You!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Westminster, BC
Country: Greenland
Posts: 17,514
vCash: 50
The Sabres have played regular-season games in the 11,200 seat Rochester arena, including one where only 8,552 were in attendance. Given that, I don't see why the still-reduced capacity of a renovated Nassau Coliseum over the Islanders new arena would be an issue.

Hugh Mann* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2013, 12:18 AM
  #25
Killion
Global Moderator
 
Killion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Morocco
Country: Morocco
Posts: 22,041
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh Mann View Post
Given that, I don't see why the still-reduced capacity of a renovated Nassau Coliseum over the Islanders new arena would be an issue.
Shhhhh. Mr.Wang doesnt need to be told the truth. Despite the rich local broadcast contract, give it a few years, he loses his shirt.

Killion is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.