HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Nashville/Buffalo

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-01-2013, 10:34 PM
  #26
lifeisruff
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: wny
Posts: 970
vCash: 500
On behalf of Sabres fans everywhere, I apologize

lifeisruff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-02-2013, 03:57 AM
  #27
Rowley Birkin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Country: England
Posts: 3,187
vCash: 500
No way Nashville touches this deal.

But put me down for Myers/Grigorenko for 4th (assuming its Barkov) and then taking Horvat/Monahan/Lindholm or D at 8th.

Would Nashville do this one though ?

Rowley Birkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-02-2013, 10:10 AM
  #28
McTank
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,852
vCash: 500
Extended vanek for 4th sounds good to me

McTank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-02-2013, 01:12 PM
  #29
Gabrielor
Registered User
 
Gabrielor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,058
vCash: 500
1-8,2-38,Hodgson,Stafford for 1-4 ??

Flame away.

Gabrielor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-02-2013, 01:48 PM
  #30
TMI
Mod Supervisor
 
TMI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 46,355
vCash: 500
No thanks. I don't see Hodgson being a top line center. We have our second, third and fourth line pivot position covered. We don't need wingers, so Stafford isn't all that appealing in terms of plugging existing holes, though I do like Stafford. Moving down in the draft from 4th to 8th when we have a shot at Barkov isn't worth it, even for two players and a second rounder.

Besides, I doubt Buffalo covets the 4th overall enough to even offer that package.

__________________
You come at the King, you best not miss.
TMI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-02-2013, 02:15 PM
  #31
Gabrielor
Registered User
 
Gabrielor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,058
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThirdManIn View Post
No thanks. I don't see Hodgson being a top line center. We have our second, third and fourth line pivot position covered. We don't need wingers, so Stafford isn't all that appealing in terms of plugging existing holes, though I do like Stafford. Moving down in the draft from 4th to 8th when we have a shot at Barkov isn't worth it, even for two players and a second rounder.

Besides, I doubt Buffalo covets the 4th overall enough to even offer that package.
1-4 isn't the end game. It's using 1-4 to get to 1-1.

Gabrielor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-02-2013, 02:45 PM
  #32
Filip Forceberg
Registered User
 
Filip Forceberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 2,644
vCash: 500
This is so, so bad.

Filip Forceberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.