HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Montreal Canadiens
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Rivet and Souray are too slow

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
10-13-2006, 09:05 AM
  #1
Catch-22
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 955
vCash: 500
Rivet and Souray are too slow

I guess I am stating the obvious but our defense is very average and since Ribeiro is gone, this area is now our biggest positional weakness.

To start off, I should say that I do not hate either of these players. I still actually think they're both decent players. I like what Souray brings in terms of toughness and his shot. I used to like Rivet more (in the old NHL) and he certainly isn't a bad player worthy of the crap treatment he's had from Ribeiro fans in Montreal. However...

My observation is that Souray and Rivet are too slow to be playing on the same pairing and probably even the same team. Rivet is too slow. Souray is both slow and unreliable. There is little room for slow and unreliable players anymore. IMO, Komisarek is clearly capable of taking Rivet's stay-at-home spot and Cote will eventually be the same type of d-man, too. Niinimaa functions well in this role as well. Many of you may have noticed but in addition to losing 5lbs [he actually didn't lose 5lbs] Komisarek has also picked up an extra gear. He's obviously worked on his skating alot and IMO Rivet will very soon become a redundant and expensive liability.

Souray is a different kettle of fish. Defensively he is more unreliable than Rivet but his shot makes him a decent PP QB. I'm not certain we have a player ready to replace him in that position. The common sentiment that many of us harbour is that Souray should go. It's based on what is in my opionion the very correct philosophy that a defenseman's number one job is defense. But since our biggest statisitcal quandry is goal scoring, perhaps we should look at replacing Rivet and keeping Souray for the time being? When the coaching staff is convinced that replacements are found/ready I will not be disappointed to see one or both of these guys replaced.

Why we have these two guys on the same pairing, I'm not sure. Maybe the philosophy is that their combined experience will make up for their inadequacies. However, looking at good teams like Anaheim, SJ, Buffalo, Calgary (none provide good examples last night except Calgary...it was one hell of a weird night in the NHL), I cannot help but think that these guys should first be split up and then replaced ASAP or in the medium term...meaning when replacements are ready (just so that I don't get 100 replies about why we shouldn't get rid of them right now). Again, let me reiterat. I generally like these players. But I do not think they will be able to contribute to our success against the quick skilled teams that we will encounter if we climb up the playoff pyramid.

I make these comments thinking primarily back to the Buffalo game (but many games against fast teams last season can also be referred to), because Buffalo I think is probably the best team in the eastern conference and that's where we want to be. These guys looked like pylons out there against Buffalo's speedy, gritty forwards. Flashback to Rivet in the corner on Buffalo's tying goal.

Thoughts, comments?


Last edited by Catch-22: 10-13-2006 at 09:24 AM.
Catch-22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 09:11 AM
  #2
waffledave
waffledave, from hf
 
waffledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,663
vCash: 500
I agree they should not be on the same pairing, but both of them are excellent defenders. Rivet with Markov and Souray with Komo...That's how it was last year.

We have a strong defence top to bottom. Replacing any of these guys is a mistake, they mean too much in the locker room. Along with Saku, Souray and Rivet are some of the most respected vets in the league.

Komisreak didn't lose 5 lbs, he gained like 10.

__________________
Yours in Christ,

waffledave
waffledave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 09:14 AM
  #3
Catch-22
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 955
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by waffledave View Post
I agree they should not be on the same pairing, but both of them are excellent defenders. Rivet with Markov and Souray with Komo...That's how it was last year.

We have a strong defence top to bottom. Replacing any of these guys is a mistake, they mean too much in the locker room. Along with Saku, Souray and Rivet are some of the most respected vets in the league.

Komisreak didn't lose 5 lbs, he gained like 10.

You're right, he did gain a few lbs. I stand corrected. But he also gained a gear and that is invaluable today.

I am stuck a little on the leadership issue. However, I think a leader must lead where the game is played, which is on the ice. If Rivet is deemd to slow to be effective, (again, I'm not saying he's terrible but just slow), then I don't know how much better off we are because of his locker room leadership. But it is a problem, I agree.


Last edited by Catch-22: 10-13-2006 at 09:28 AM.
Catch-22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 10:04 AM
  #4
mcphee
Registered User
 
mcphee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,105
vCash: 500
When we call a player slow, it could mean a few things, skating, reaction, recognition, but it adds up to the same result.

I don't believe Rivet is slow in terms of mobility. He's an average skater, and average laterally imo. His reads are alos average. I've always liked the guy but feared he'd struggle in a league that didn't allow the hack and whack as a defensive tactic. I was wrong and thought he had his best year in 05-06. I've always thought that Rivet doesn't have one exceptional skill though, that would make him the lead guy on his pairing. I think his coach trusts him, and that may be his best quality. As the support guy for a more talented partner, he's very valuable.

Souray's different. He doesn't have quick feet and turns become an issue. I don't think he reads the play very quickly and gets caught flat footed too often. He has a great shot, seems to have a knack for making key plays, and is tougher'n'hell. So, if this makes sense, he isn't as complete as Rivet but does have some exceptional qualities that Rivet doesn't.

I wasn't fond of the pairing from the outset but I don't have a problem with them staying together to see if they hit their stride. Niinimaa might give them some flexibility, we'll see.

I think the pairing is fine in set situations, pp, faceoff play in their zone, it's during the flow 5 on 5 where they get in trouble at times. The staff has to see what we do, I imagine things get worked on. Both are coachable players. Continuity is a huge part of defensive play, along with the forward/defense gaps. I think we see what we'll have all year, change isn't always necessary.

mcphee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 10:13 AM
  #5
AD
Registered User
 
AD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bigassofficetower
Country: Lebanon
Posts: 14,576
vCash: 500
I like both players for the toughness they bring. The intensity etc.

i do agree that we have to split them up though.

Markov-Rivet
Souray-Komisarek
Niinima-Dandenault

AD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 10:19 AM
  #6
Kafka
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal
Country: Martinique
Posts: 5,114
vCash: 500
It's time to start a thread on a possible trade between Nashville and Montreal!!! It might sound unbelievable, but they have big defense problems while they have talented young offensive Dmen (Zidlicky, Hamnuis, Weber, Suter, Timonen). To me its an Ecklund situation: each team could win.

Kafka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 10:34 AM
  #7
oli500
Registered User
 
oli500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 4,610
vCash: 500
People should leave souray alone in my opinion. We all now about his brain cramps and how people can just skate urond him most of the time. At the end of all of this the guy brings some much needid toughness to are blue line. Vs Phillie everytime a player would go near abeisher souray would be the first one there to direct trafic and protect the crease and it happen more than once. Its important you have players that can protect your goalie because peopple are going to try to crash the net pretty often. I can live with souray or rivet brain cramp as long as they make thinks tough for the other team when things get nasty urond the net. Souray will allways be there for a teamate. I am a huge markov fan and im not trying to say anything negative on him but its not dandenault or markov who will stop players when things get nasty and be ready to trow theire gloves down when things get dirty.

oli500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 10:53 AM
  #8
Marksman
Registered User
 
Marksman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Country: Finland
Posts: 3,628
vCash: 500
Rivet Komisarek and Bouillon are tough defencemen too and Niinimaa isnt shrinking violet either. In dont see big problems in that department even if we lost Souray.

Marksman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 11:38 AM
  #9
Fozz
Registered User
 
Fozz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,466
vCash: 500
I'm one of the many that though Rivet would become a liability in the new NHL. However, I was pleasantly surprised with his play last year. He really did have a solid season. Having said that, I'm not as impressed with his play this year. However, IMO, the biggest liability on that pairing is Souray, and by far! He's so unpredictable and just makes bad decisions at times. Also, he should be much more physical in his own zone. He seems to avoid laying out the big hit when he's in a perfect position to dish it out... I wonder if he isn't slightly injured. However, I agree that his canon on the PP is quite valuable. I wouldn't call him a PP QB (that's Markov's job) but a PP trigger man.

Fozz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 11:43 AM
  #10
White Snake*
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 267
vCash: 500
Souray is one of the most important peices to our team. If we lost him I would seriously smack all hab fans who chased him outta town. Rivet on the other hand is average but brings nothing special. WE could afford to lose him

White Snake* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 11:56 AM
  #11
Habsy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 230
vCash: 500
I loathe watching the pairing of Souray-Rivet but I do not see how we can break them up at this point because Markov-Komisarek and Niinimaa-Dandenault are playing well. I think it would be a greater detriment breaking up those other two pairings. Carbo will need to reduce the icetime of the twin toddlers making them our third pairing and use Souray on PP.

Habsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 12:03 PM
  #12
Shabutie
Registered User
 
Shabutie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ottawa
Country: Portugal
Posts: 15,640
vCash: 500
Both seem to me like average skaters...Maybe you mean reaction time? As they both seemed to be behind the play quite often (in terms of coverage). I definitely agree that both of them need to be split. I'd go with;

Rivet - Markov
Komi - Souray
Niinima - Dandenault


Last edited by Shabutie: 10-13-2006 at 01:32 PM.
Shabutie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 12:07 PM
  #13
Catch-22
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 955
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shabutie View Post
Both seem to me like average skaters...Maybe you mean reaction time? As they both seemed to be behind the play quite often (in terms of coverage). I definitely agree that both of them need to be split. I'd go with;

Sourray - Markov
Komi - Rivet
Niinima - Dandenault
I meant both quickness and speed. I don't think anybody has ever accused either of these guys of being light on their feet.

Catch-22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 12:09 PM
  #14
waffledave
waffledave, from hf
 
waffledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,663
vCash: 500
The main problem with these guys (Souray in particular) is not their speed. They are decent skaters with good speed for guys as big as they are.

The problem is that they play too far back. Ever notice how far back Souray is from the play? Eventually he can't go back any further and has to stop. But when he stops, the opposing forward is coming at him a ton of steam and blows by him, so then he has to turn around and chase. That's why he always looks slow.

waffledave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 12:10 PM
  #15
Shabutie
Registered User
 
Shabutie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ottawa
Country: Portugal
Posts: 15,640
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Snake View Post
Souray is one of the most important peices to our team. If we lost him I would seriously smack all hab fans who chased him outta town. Rivet on the other hand is average but brings nothing special. WE could afford to lose him
I agree and disagree at the same time. Rivet really does bleed bleu blanc rouge...We've seen him finish his shift and do everything he could to clear the puck when he was in serious pain multiple times...which is something you won't get from Markov, Komi, Souray (well maybe) or Niinima (I'd put dandy on the maybe list). To me though, he should be nothing more than a 6th and really shouldn't be on the PP (We have Niinima and Dandenault afterall who are both much more capable at playing that role). His leadership is also unquestionable...he's just given a bigger role than he deserves imo.

Sourray on the other hand, probably has the hardest shot in the NHL, which as we've seen on the PP is invaluable. He and Markov are what make the PP what it is imo...He's not as bad on D as some people credit him, but he does often get caught out of position and is sometimes one step behind the play...

Shabutie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 12:13 PM
  #16
Shabutie
Registered User
 
Shabutie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ottawa
Country: Portugal
Posts: 15,640
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catch-22 View Post
I meant both quickness and speed. I don't think anybody has ever accused either of these guys of being light on their feet.
Compared to most D's I think they're quite average. However I do believe that you can't have them both on the same line. It'll be interesting to see what Carbs does. I remember reading that the D pairings for this season were supposed to be;

Rivet - Markov
Komi - Souray
Niinima - Dandy

...never happened

Shabutie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 12:39 PM
  #17
Duster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 682
vCash: 500
I think it's way too early to make any kind of judgment on the D. The existing combo of Rivet and Souray can and should work.

Personally, I would like to see Rivet play with Niinimaa, and Souray partnered with Dandy. I'm not saying those pairings would work but I'd be curious to see how well they would handle the Sabres and Senators of this world. On paper, they would be an interesting match i.e a stay at home physical defenseman paired with a fast, mobile defenseman just like we are seeing with Markov-Komisarek. However, it seems Carbo wants a pairing that can move up with speed - Western Conference style, and a rugged defensive pairing.

Duster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 12:45 PM
  #18
mcphee
Registered User
 
mcphee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,105
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duster View Post
I think it's way too early to make any kind of judgment on the D. The existing combo of Rivet and Souray can and should work.

Personally, I would like to see Rivet play with Niinimaa, and Souray partnered with Dandy. I'm not saying those pairings would work but I'd be curious to see how well they would handle the Sabres and Senators of this world. On paper, they would be an interesting match i.e a stay at home physical defenseman paired with a fast, mobile defenseman just like we are seeing with Markov-Komisarek. However, it seems Carbo wants a pairing that can move up with speed - Western Conference style, and a rugged defensive pairing.
I think that if Carbo recruited me, I'd suggest your pairings. I have no problem letting things come together,but I think yours are probably the best.

mcphee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 12:50 PM
  #19
SOLR
Registered User
 
SOLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto / North York
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,794
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catch-22 View Post
Souray is a different kettle of fish. Defensively he is more unreliable than Rivet but his shot makes him a decent PP QB. I'm not certain we have a player ready to replace him in that position. The common sentiment that many of us harbour is that Souray should go. It's based on what is in my opionion the very correct philosophy that a defenseman's number one job is defense. But since our biggest statisitcal quandry is goal scoring, perhaps we should look at replacing Rivet and keeping Souray for the time being? When the coaching staff is convinced that replacements are found/ready I will not be disappointed to see one or both of these guys replaced.
Andrei Kostitsyn, simple, better than Sourray already. The kid needs to get the same opportunities Lats is getting asap. Problem is...no spots upfront. Make Kost play D?! rofl

Good post, I think Rivet can be better than he is now, for me the "rogue" D have been Sourray for a pretty long time. The guy just isnt a stable "make it happen" kind of D. I would deal him in march with another asset to get a real 2nd pairing D. And like I said, if we really need a PP QB, we'll need to do something with either Perezhogin or Samsonov to make a place for Kost. Ive stated it often, I didnt liked the Samsonov move one bit, Kost would already be better on that line since hes a shooter. Samsonov is only hurting the progress of Kost in a very habs way.

I wont say I wish samsonov gets hurt because its sad to think like that as a human being, but If he does he will be beaten by a guy that is better physically, defensively, got a much better shot, can dangle like him and is as fast as him. Ok Kost wouldnt be as good as Sergei in the first 40 games, but would be clearly superior(by a lot) after. Without talking about Kost anymore, if Sergei doesnt explode soon, Perezhogin should get a shot on the 2nd line, we know how well he plays with Pleckanec. I like what I see of Perez in the first 3 games.

As for our D, I would prefer a solid stay at home D without a real 2nd PP QB. Anyway. What are we waiting to try Streit?!!! Put sourray in the stands and give some ice to Streit, a proven PP QB, less in the NHL ok, but he was getting much better near the end of last year.

SOLR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 01:06 PM
  #20
Kafka
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal
Country: Martinique
Posts: 5,114
vCash: 500
Am I the only one here who thinks Komisarek should be tryed on the first PP unit instead of Rivet? I have to admit I don't know you has the best shot, but Komisarek now drives at the net at 5-5... He knows how fast the game is and one day will play on the PP... why not now?

Kafka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 01:16 PM
  #21
waffledave
waffledave, from hf
 
waffledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,663
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kafka View Post
Am I the only one here who thinks Komisarek should be tryed on the first PP unit instead of Rivet? I have to admit I don't know you has the best shot, but Komisarek now drives at the net at 5-5... He knows how fast the game is and one day will play on the PP... why not now?
Komisarek has an excellent shot. He actually was more of an offensive guy in college but in the NHL he's spent his entire career focusing on defense, which has stunted his offensive development a little bit.

Rivet has an underrated shot though. The guy has a real laser, I think he could have been a decent forward.

waffledave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 01:20 PM
  #22
Shabutie
Registered User
 
Shabutie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ottawa
Country: Portugal
Posts: 15,640
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kafka View Post
Am I the only one here who thinks Komisarek should be tryed on the first PP unit instead of Rivet? I have to admit I don't know you has the best shot, but Komisarek now drives at the net at 5-5... He knows how fast the game is and one day will play on the PP... why not now?
Rivet is on the second PP unit...and Imo Dandy or Niinima should replace him.

Shabutie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 01:26 PM
  #23
Duff88
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,029
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shabutie View Post
Both seem to me like average skaters...Maybe you mean reaction time? As they both seemed to be behind the play quite often (in terms of coverage). I definitely agree that both of them need to be split. I'd go with;

Sourray - Markov
Komi - Rivet
Niinima - Dandenault
Souray, Markov and Niinimaa are our LDs while Komi, Rivet and Dandenault are the RDs. You've got to keep that in mind when making the pairings cause it'd be a bad idea to play either Komi or Rivet on the left side.

Duff88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 01:29 PM
  #24
Teufelsdreck
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 14,771
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shabutie View Post
Both seem to me like average skaters...Maybe you mean reaction time? As they both seemed to be behind the play quite often (in terms of coverage). I definitely agree that both of them need to be split. I'd go with;

Sourray - Markov
Komi - Rivet
Niinima - Dandenault
You have noticed that both Souray and Markov shoot left while both Komisarek and Rivet shoot right, or have you? Perhaps that doesn't make any difference to you, but I think it does to Carbonneau.

Teufelsdreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-13-2006, 01:31 PM
  #25
Shabutie
Registered User
 
Shabutie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ottawa
Country: Portugal
Posts: 15,640
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teufelsdreck View Post
You have noticed that both Souray and Markov shoot left while both Komisarek and Rivet shoot right, or have you? Perhaps that doesn't make any difference to you, but I think it does to Carbonneau.
Check the 2nd one I posted...I made an error.

Shabutie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.