HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Notices

Brad Richards NOT being bought out

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-28-2013, 03:56 PM
  #76
Zil
Registered User
 
Zil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 2,550
vCash: 500
Oh goodie. We get to watch another year of him getting spoonfed premium icetime he doesn't deserve while constantly making costly turnovers and getting beaten to and knocked off pucks. Plus, we have the added bonus that he probably keeps Lindberg from getting a legit shot out of camp this year.

Zil is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 03:57 PM
  #77
NikC
Registered User
 
NikC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 3,305
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kershaw View Post
Gomez played better as a Ranger than Richards has. The point totals reflect that.

I miss Gomez relative to Richards.
you just said in a recent post, you cant just look at stats...

oh wait, that doesn't support your latest asinine argument.

i'm sorry. resume.

NikC is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 03:57 PM
  #78
Kershaw
 
Kershaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country:
Posts: 25,519
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan. View Post
lolwut

I was unaware that point totals were everything.
What does Richards bring besides point totals? At least Gomez was a good PKer with Callahan.

Gomez > Richards.

Kershaw is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 03:57 PM
  #79
Callagraves
Block shots
 
Callagraves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,123
vCash: 500
I'm a fan of it. Give him another season with a new coach.

The folks shaking their heads will suddenly "always been in favor of keeping him" if he even remotely produces

Callagraves is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 03:58 PM
  #80
Kershaw
 
Kershaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country:
Posts: 25,519
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by NikC View Post
you just said in a recent post, you can just look at stats...

oh wait, that doesn't support your latest asinine argument.

i'm sorry. resume.
You can look at whatever stat out there you want. Gomez was a better player than Richards. Which is saying quite something on behalf of Brad Richards.

Kershaw is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 03:58 PM
  #81
Bardof425
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,024
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by azrok22 View Post
Moronic. Where does he even fit on the roster? Brassard to LW, I guess?
Right now down the middle

Richie
Step
Brass
Boyle

After trades

Richie
Brass
Step
Miller/lindberg


What's the problem?

Bardof425 is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 03:58 PM
  #82
Rangers79
Registered User
 
Rangers79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 158
vCash: 500
With cap going up after this season things should be fine anyhow. Plus, who knows, maybe he's getting traded, maybe some team can take the cap and years. If we can speculate injury, i'll speculate trade just to throw a hat into the ring.

Rangers79 is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 03:58 PM
  #83
Fire Sather
Play Like a Pug
 
Fire Sather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Connecticut
Country: United States
Posts: 17,859
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to Fire Sather
The problem is that if he scores 100 points, he should still be bought out after next season.

Fire Sather is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 03:59 PM
  #84
nsvoyageurs
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 306
vCash: 500
Why am I not surprised? This is like Sather is sticking it to everyone who said the team had to/should buy Richards out. Unless there is something going on no one knows about, this is not the thing to do. Sather is probably snickering at everyone now, saying "go bleep yourselves".

nsvoyageurs is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 03:59 PM
  #85
nyranger61494
YNWA
 
nyranger61494's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 3,875
vCash: 500
Lecavalier would undoubtedly be aware that Richards is only going to be here for 1 more year right?

I just think the odds are stacked against Richards re-discovering his game. The fact that some are happy that this prevents Sather from making a terrible UFA signing says alot.

nyranger61494 is online now  
Old
06-28-2013, 03:59 PM
  #86
stan the caddy
Registered User
 
stan the caddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,390
vCash: 500
Not a good move for Brassard. Brassard is a playmaker. Who's he going to pass it to on the third line?

stan the caddy is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 03:59 PM
  #87
nevesis
#30
 
nevesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 6,407
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inferno View Post
Ive watched hockey my entire life.

I play hockey.

Brad Richards looked more or less exactly the same last year as he has in all the years prior.

Did he ever skate like pavel bure?

did he ever have a shot like Al Macinnis?

B.R. always was a cerebral player. He's a damn good player when hes on. he had a horrendous start to the year which probably WAS a result of being out of shape and everything spiraled out of control.

most ppl believe BR will go back to being a 70+ point player. if he does, hes worth every bit of his contract. if he doesnt, then you can buy him out after the season is over. If he is injured, well, thats the gamble you take.


has it ever occured to anyone that they are also using this to try to get Vinny L to come over for a few years on the cheap?
Check out this video.



Compare the player in this video, with the player we had last year. Its night and day.

CLEAR AS DAY.

Brad Richards is on the decline, and his legs were complete mush last season. That, and his mental weakness that caused him to make so many costly, dumb mistakes. I don't understand why more people don't see how bad he really was.

nevesis is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 04:00 PM
  #88
ColonialsHockey10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 9,040
vCash: 500
I despise Richards likely more then any Ranger in recent memory.

But I'd rather have him around this season and buy him out next summer. Yes there is a risk of injury, but I think we'll be fine.

Wait, I forgot this organization is cursed and nothing ever goes right for us. Damnit Sather.

ColonialsHockey10 is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 04:00 PM
  #89
Off Sides
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 663
vCash: 120
Sather can talk all he wants about puck possession and the like, he either was lying or has mistaken Richards as a player who will help in that capacity. Puck possession teams have players who can skate with the puck, players who can break up ice and into the zone. Players who can win a board battle.

The only puck possession ability Richards had was making good reads when he had the puck, that ended last season, so unless that comes back he has no puck possession abilities.

This is a bad gamble.

Off Sides is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 04:01 PM
  #90
NikC
Registered User
 
NikC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 3,305
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kershaw View Post
You can look at whatever stat out there you want. Gomez was a better player than Richards. Which is saying quite something on behalf of Brad Richards.
lol, that's horsesh#t and you know it.

haha you're funny guy. 31 has nothing on you

NikC is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 04:01 PM
  #91
Kershaw
 
Kershaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country:
Posts: 25,519
vCash: 50
Yikes, looks like Stepan's going to be the team's checking center according to AV's 2 line scoring, 2 line checking system. Both Brassard and Richards are terrible defensive centerman. Poor Stepan.

Kershaw is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 04:01 PM
  #92
Jabroni
Moderator
The Corporate Mod
 
Jabroni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 6,250
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan. View Post
Who gives a ****? I'd much rather win 1 Cup than have (however many years of his contract that we'd be stuck with) chances at maybe a Cup.
Of course, but it would suck in the long term if we're carrying a bunch of dead cap space and we have trouble re-signing players we want, no?

__________________
Jabroni is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 04:01 PM
  #93
-31-
portnor, pls
 
-31-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,738
vCash: 50
This would NEVER HAVE HAPPENED IF MESSIER WAS STILL HERE!!!!!!

__________________
Rangers Unlimited
-31- is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 04:02 PM
  #94
Trxjw
Moderator
Bored.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Land of no calls..
Country: United States
Posts: 15,782
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inferno View Post
has it ever occured to anyone that they are also using this to try to get Vinny L to come over for a few years on the cheap?
With what money? You're talking 3rd liner money if you're going to fit him and still maintain any sort of cap flexibility.

Retaining Richards to add VL4 is a typical short-sighted Glen Sather move.

Trxjw is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 04:02 PM
  #95
Kershaw
 
Kershaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country:
Posts: 25,519
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by NikC View Post
lol, that's horsesh#t and you know it.

haha you're funny guy. 31 has nothing on you
I'm quite unaware.

Kershaw is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 04:02 PM
  #96
Bleed Ranger Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,243
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bardof425 View Post
Right now down the middle

Richie
Step
Brass
Boyle

After trades

Richie
Brass
Step
Miller/lindberg


What's the problem?
The problem is you have no recognition whatsoever of a bigger picture, or potential financial impacts down the line.

Bleed Ranger Blue is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 04:02 PM
  #97
Rangers79
Registered User
 
Rangers79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 158
vCash: 500
I kind of like the chaos after 1 little announcement. This is gonna be a fun offseason to follow on here.

Rangers79 is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 04:02 PM
  #98
n8
WAAAAAAA!!!
 
n8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: san francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 6,999
vCash: 500
I'm guessing no buyout mean no Lecavalier for those who were interested.

I'm also guessing AV will be able to get more out of Richards.

I'm also guessing Sather will surprise us all again one day and pull a crazy Scott Gomez trade with Richards on someone Probably Calgary the way their GM is performing.

n8 is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 04:02 PM
  #99
Fire Sather
Play Like a Pug
 
Fire Sather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Connecticut
Country: United States
Posts: 17,859
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to Fire Sather
I wouldn't take one cup to have the franchise ruined by 6 more years of a likely washed up player.

Fire Sather is offline  
Old
06-28-2013, 04:03 PM
  #100
Bird Law
Daisy's back.
 
Bird Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NoVA / NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 67,165
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Bird Law
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jabroni1994 View Post
Of course, but it would suck in the long term if we're carrying a bunch of dead cap space and we have trouble re-signing players we want, no?
I wouldn't care if the entire team walked the next day after we won a Cup.

__________________
"Of course giving Sather cap space is like giving teenagers whiskey and car keys." - SBOB
"Watching Sather build a team is like watching a blind man with no fingers trying to put together an elaborate puzzle." - Shadowtron
Sestito still on the make a wish tour. - rholt168
"Okay, Joel. You've had your fun. Give your brother his pads back." - Trxjw
Bird Law is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.