HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Tyler Myers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-30-2013, 04:30 PM
  #1
Nuke
Registered User
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 306
vCash: 500
Tyler Myers

After taking two huge D-Men in the top 16, I would imagine that Buffalo will try to move to Myers now.

What are you willing to give for him?

Nuke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 04:39 PM
  #2
Flyerss
Registered User
 
Flyerss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,614
vCash: 136
just build around those 3 guys, all are young will turn into a great D

Flyerss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 04:42 PM
  #3
nazembiggs*
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Vaughan, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 939
vCash: 500
Who?

nazembiggs* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 04:58 PM
  #4
Selanne00008
Registered User
 
Selanne00008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYC - UES
Posts: 3,185
vCash: 500
How about MyErs and E. Kane as the base of a deal?

Selanne00008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 04:59 PM
  #5
1972
Registered User
 
1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,013
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuke View Post
After taking two huge D-Men in the top 16, I would imagine that Buffalo will try to move to Myers now.

What are you willing to give for him?
Not being moved for 500th time

1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 05:04 PM
  #6
hatterson
Global Moderator
 
hatterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: North Tonawanda, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 11,416
vCash: 874
Send a message via Skype™ to hatterson
Given his struggles recently (mostly this year) teams aren't going to be willing to pay what Buffalo needs in order to get rid of him.

I'd be extremely shocked to see him moved.

__________________
Come join us on the By The Numbers forum. Take a look at our introduction post if you're new. If you have any questions, feel free to PM me.
hatterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 05:08 PM
  #7
tsujimoto74
Registered User
 
tsujimoto74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia
Country: United States
Posts: 8,922
vCash: 500
Yes, 2 18-year-olds are obviously going to step into the NHL this year and take away all his minutes. We should definitely trade him now while his value is at its lowest rather than giving him a year or 2 with Rolston to see if he bounces back.

Besides, defensive depth is a for suckers, am I right?

tsujimoto74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 05:11 PM
  #8
Eternal Leaf
Registered User
 
Eternal Leaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mississauga
Country: Canada
Posts: 653
vCash: 500
Why trade him?

Build around all three, it could become one of the most fearsome trio of defencemen in a while.

Eternal Leaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 05:50 PM
  #9
tucker3434
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,836
vCash: 500
Two defensive prospects certainly don't mean you trade NHL defensemen. Myers may be on the market, but the draft has nothing to do with it.

tucker3434 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 05:55 PM
  #10
pyroxen
Registered User
 
pyroxen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 318
vCash: 500
With Sekera gone there is no way Buf can afford to loose Myers

pyroxen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 06:11 PM
  #11
Nuke
Registered User
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 306
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsujimoto74 View Post
Yes, 2 18-year-olds are obviously going to step into the NHL this year and take away all his minutes. We should definitely trade him now while his value is at its lowest rather than giving him a year or 2 with Rolston to see if he bounces back.

Besides, defensive depth is a for suckers, am I right?
How are they gonna fit all these D-Men under the cap in a few years? And nobody said anything about these guys playing next year. Why are you obsessed with fielding a team next year? The best thing that can realistically happen next year is we bottom out, win the lottery and pick 1st.

Would sure love to have been picking in the top 3 today. If only we had lost 3-4 more games.

Nuke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 06:20 PM
  #12
tsujimoto74
Registered User
 
tsujimoto74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia
Country: United States
Posts: 8,922
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuke View Post
How are they gonna fit all these D-Men under the cap in a few years? And nobody said anything about these guys playing next year. Why are you obsessed with fielding a team next year? The best thing that can realistically happen next year is we bottom out, win the lottery and pick 1st.

Would sure love to have been picking in the top 3 today. If only we had lost 3-4 more games.
Why on earth do you want to give up a 23yo who's shown the ability to be near dominant because of some drafts picks that aren't even on ELCs yet and whose prime money-making years (assuming they pan out) are still 5-7 years away? If Myers bounces back, he's far more valuable than anything anyone is going to offer for him right now. Plain and simple.

tsujimoto74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 06:29 PM
  #13
Nuke
Registered User
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 306
vCash: 500
I'm not giving up on him. I've moving him for a young top forward. D is a position of strength now with young players.

Nuke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 07:10 PM
  #14
Armond White
Go Sabres!
 
Armond White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oakland Zoo
Country: United States
Posts: 10,292
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuke View Post
How are they gonna fit all these D-Men under the cap in a few years?
Pretty easily, I'd say.

Armond White is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 07:15 PM
  #15
Clock
Moderator
 
Clock's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Buffalo
Country: United States
Posts: 19,957
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuke View Post
I'm not giving up on him. I've moving him for a young top forward. D is a position of strength now with young players.
Eh. Our D sucks until it proves otherwise. Those picks don't guarantee us anything.

Clock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 08:21 PM
  #16
ZeroPT
Beast
 
ZeroPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,394
vCash: 500
Give rolston a chance to fix him, let him play to his strengths, hey I would even be on board with moving Stafford for Tallinder+. Myers was great alongside Tallinder and maybe having his D partner for his most successful season will help him bounce back.

ZeroPT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 09:30 PM
  #17
HooliganX2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,140
vCash: 772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selanne00008 View Post
How about MyErs and E. Kane as the base of a deal?
Don't see why the jets want myers with the young rh defensemen they have.

HooliganX2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 10:07 PM
  #18
Viqsi
carrying the flag
 
Viqsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Scary Internet
Country: United States
Posts: 20,385
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Viqsi
How in the world does today's drafting of two defensemen make Myers expendable?

I don't get this logic.

__________________
Remember - when you're a hockey fan, it's not "reckless driving", it's "good forechecking".
"Viqsi, you are our sweet humanist..." --mt-svk on the CBJ boards

Thanks, Howson, for cleaning up MacLean's toxic waste. Welcome, Kekalainen; let's get good things built!
Viqsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 10:09 PM
  #19
Cleatus
Registered User
 
Cleatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London, ON, CAN.
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,731
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Cleatus
Jake Gardiner!

Cleatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 10:15 PM
  #20
Layne Staley
The Future
 
Layne Staley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,442
vCash: 500
Myers is untouchable. He has performed as a #1 dman for pretty much 3 out of his 4 career seasons. People give up on players too easily around here, one bad year wipes out several good ones. I mean prior to this year Myers had a higher career ppg then Subban but the consensus is right Myers has no talent and is useless

Layne Staley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 10:15 PM
  #21
Chainshot
Global Moderator
Give 'em Enough Rope
 
Chainshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Costa Rica
Country: Costa Rica
Posts: 56,595
vCash: 500
Awards:
They're not trading Myers right now.

__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. - Aristotle
Chainshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 10:15 PM
  #22
Chainshot
Global Moderator
Give 'em Enough Rope
 
Chainshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Costa Rica
Country: Costa Rica
Posts: 56,595
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viqsi View Post
How in the world does today's drafting of two defensemen make Myers expendable?

I don't get this logic.
Exactly. Down the road? Sure. But not today.

Chainshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 12:02 AM
  #23
Flyerss
Registered User
 
Flyerss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,614
vCash: 136
Sabres should have picked Fucale with the 2nd round pick

Flyerss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 12:12 AM
  #24
McTank
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,820
vCash: 500
I didnt realize there was a limit on good young defenseman we can have. We are rebuilding, why would we trade someone with as much potential as Myers just because we have other players with high potential. Our contender can consist of myers, zadarov, risto, pysyk, mccabe and mcnabb

McTank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 12:48 AM
  #25
DJN21
Registered User
 
DJN21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Rochester
Posts: 1,785
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyerss View Post
Sabres should have picked Fucale with the 2nd round pick
lol-no.

DJN21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.