HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The History of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
The History of Hockey Relive great moments in hockey history and discuss how the game has changed over time.

Is Chris Pronger's career a disappointment to you?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-01-2013, 12:58 PM
  #1
DisgruntledGoat
Registered User
 
DisgruntledGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,318
vCash: 500
Is Chris Pronger's career a disappointment to you?

I off-handedly mentioned to a friend yesterday that I considered Pronger's career a bit of a disappointment, and he told me I was crazy.

His argument was bascially: Hall-of-Famer, second best D of his generation, won a Hart, had several all-world playoff runs. . . how could he possibly have been a disappointment?

My feeling is, though, he could have done more. Hear me out:

With the exception of Bobby Orr, I feel that Pronger is in the discussion as the most physically gifted defenseman of all-time. I mean, its kind of ridiculous when you start to break it down: huge, could skate, tremendous hockey IQ, best first pass of his era, 100 mph slapshot, poised with the puck, hits, blocks shots, shuts down top forwards, quarterbacks powerplays, mean as hell, insanely competitive. I don't if you could build a more complete defenseman if you tried.

And yet, he only won one Norris. He was clearly and substantially outpaced by Lidstrom, his contemporary. And all-time, he's not in the conversation with a Robinson or a Bourque or a Potvin.

I would take Pronger, in the best game of his career, over Lidstrom. I think he was the best defenseman I've ever seen in his own zone, and I think he made an impact all over the ice in a way that Lidstrom didn't. But he didn't do that in a consistent manner, the way Lidstrom did (who was one of the best of all-time at always being at or near top form).

That's where, IMO, Pronger is a bit of disappointment. Injuries, playoff meltdowns early in his career, and then taking it easy in regular seasons later in his career seem to have kept him from putting together an all-time type 15-to-20 year run. For all he did do, I feel its a disappointment that he did not have four or five Norrises, and is not in the conversation as fourth-to-tenth best D of all-time.

Thoughts?

DisgruntledGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 01:29 PM
  #2
struckbyaparkedcar
Zemgus Da Gawd
 
struckbyaparkedcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Country: Cote DIvoire
Posts: 11,216
vCash: 500
There's a wider gap in his peak/career value than you'd obviously like, but his peak is so freaking good that you'd have to be an absolute stickler for longevity to use the word disappointment and really mean it.

struckbyaparkedcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 01:49 PM
  #3
MS
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 14,636
vCash: 500
2 things :

1) keep in mind that Pronger was routinely screwed over in award/All-Star voting because the media didn't like him. In particular the 2006 and 2007 Conn Smythe trophies, but also the 2007 Norris and various All-Star voting.

2) like Denis Potvin, injuries limited the amount of Norris trophies he won as well. He would have won in 2001, but missed 30 games. Likewise in 2007 he missed 16 (but IMO should have won anyway). And of course he lost the entire 2002-03 season through injury.

MS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 01:54 PM
  #4
quoipourquoi
Moderator
Goaltender
 
quoipourquoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 4,174
vCash: 500
Largely agree.

There is a lot to say about consistency, and for that reason, healthy Pronger or not, Nicklas Lidstrom was going to go down as the best defenseman of the era. But healthy Pronger wins the 2000, 2001, and 2007 Norris Trophies in a walk, and probably finishes top-three in Hart voting each season. He was such a difference maker those three years when he had his team in striking distance of the President's Trophy (both the 2001 Blues and 2007 Ducks were the #1 teams prior to Pronger's injuries).

And such strange injuries in 2001: first having his knee wrecked by his own teammate, and then having his arm broken by another teammate as soon as he returned. Even the 2007 injury came from a simple blocked shot - not the types of injuries we would expect to specifically come from being a physically aggressive defenseman.

But outside of the 2006, 2007, and 2010 playoffs, he was never really at or near that same level. Quite good in the years leading up to his peak, but he never recaptured the magic for a full healthy season.

I don't think he was as bad in his early playoffs as people often say; the Blues were rarely the favorites in their series. In his entire career, he lost only two series to a team with fewer points: the 2000 San Jose Sharks and the 2008 Dallas Stars.

I posted the chart a million times, but still:

Series in which the Blues had more points
1998 Blues (98 pts): 4 Games vs. Los Angeles (78 pts)
2000 Blues (114 pts): 7 Games vs. San Jose (87 pts)
2001 Blues (103 pts): 6 Games vs. San Jose (95 pts)
2002 Blues (98 pts): 5 Games vs. Chicago (96 pts)

Series in which the Blues had fewer points
1996 Blues (80 pts): 6 Games vs. Toronto (80 pts)
1996 Blues (80 pts): 7 Games vs. Detroit (131 pts)
1997 Blues (83 pts): 6 Games vs. Detroit (94 pts)
1998 Blues (98 pts): 6 Games vs. Detroit (103 pts)
1999 Blues (87 pts): 7 Games vs. Phoenix (90 pts)
1999 Blues (87 pts): 6 Games vs. Dallas (114 pts)
2001 Blues (103 pts): 4 Games vs. Dallas (106 pts)
2001 Blues (103 pts): 5 Games vs. Colorado (118 pts)
2002 Blues (98 pts): 5 Games vs. Detroit (116 pts)
2003 Blues (99 pts): 7 Games vs. Vancouver (104 pts)
2004 Blues (91 pts): 5 Games vs. San Jose (104 pts)


Series in which Pronger's team had more points
2007 Ducks (110 pts): 5 Games vs. Minnesota (104 pts)
2007 Ducks (110 pts): 5 Games vs. Vancouver (105 pts)
2007 Ducks (110 pts): 5 Games vs. Ottawa (105 pts)

2008 Ducks (102 pts): 6 Games vs. Dallas (97 pts)
2010 Flyers (88 pts): 5 Games vs. Montreal (88 pts)

Series in which Pronger's team had fewer points
2006 Oilers (95 pts): 6 Games vs. Detroit (124 pts)
2006 Oilers (95 pts): 6 Games vs. San Jose (99 pts)
2006 Oilers (95 pts): 5 Games vs. Anaheim (98 pts)

2006 Oilers (95 pts): 7 Games vs. Carolina (112 pts)
2007 Ducks (110 pts): 6 Games vs. Detroit (113 pts)
2009 Ducks (91 pts): 6 Games vs. San Jose (117 pts)

2009 Ducks (91 pts): 7 Games vs. Detroit (112 pts)
2010 Flyers (88 pts): 5 Games vs. New Jersey (103 pts)
2010 Flyers (88 pts): 7 Games vs. Boston (91 pts)

2010 Flyers (88 pts): 6 Games vs. Chicago (112 pts)



The Blues pretty much lived up to expectations, and Pronger has the warts that tend to accompany a perpetual second-round loser - sometimes deserved but often inflated because a 27-36 minute defenseman on the losing team rarely smells like roses when it's over.

Based on his highest levels of play, he should have been more. Some of it isn't his fault, but a lot of it is. I can't recall having seen a player with his amount of talent put on such a year-to-year roller coaster of highs and lows. But his best years were so infrequent that we can only put so much stock in his career value, which probably sits a little below MacInnis when the potential seemed to be closer to Potvin-level.

But at his best... he showed what a Hart-level defenseman truly was, and we haven't seen that since Bourque.

quoipourquoi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 02:04 PM
  #5
revolverjgw
Registered User
 
revolverjgw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,331
vCash: 500
Injuries were a big factor in his career. He's better than his numbers and honors suggest, so in that sense his career is less than what it could have been. But we saw him at his best quite a lot, can't say he was a disappointment. He delivered.

revolverjgw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 02:33 PM
  #6
TheDevilMadeMe
Global Moderator
 
TheDevilMadeMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 42,588
vCash: 500
He was a disappointment to the extent that he never ended up the next Larry Robinson, which is what he looked like early in his career. Injuries and inconsistency (which was not all due to injuries) really cut him back.

TheDevilMadeMe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 02:35 PM
  #7
Hobnobs
Pinko
 
Hobnobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Country: Sweden
Posts: 4,012
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS View Post
2 things :

1) keep in mind that Pronger was routinely screwed over in award/All-Star voting because the media didn't like him. In particular the 2006 and 2007 Conn Smythe trophies, but also the 2007 Norris and various All-Star voting.

2) like Denis Potvin, injuries limited the amount of Norris trophies he won as well. He would have won in 2001, but missed 30 games. Likewise in 2007 he missed 16 (but IMO should have won anyway). And of course he lost the entire 2002-03 season through injury.
'07? When he was suspended twice for stupid elbows and his team won anyways?

Hobnobs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 02:48 PM
  #8
Metalcommand
Registered User
 
Metalcommand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Country:
Posts: 782
vCash: 500
At his peak and prime Pronger is the best modern defenseman, better than Lidström. No-one i'd rather take as my 1D for a playoff run. Beastly physical, total ******* mean streak, magnificent puck mover, imposing all over the ice. Ruthless winner. No mercy. Mind games.

All hail Pronger! My favourite player all time.

Metalcommand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 02:51 PM
  #9
quoipourquoi
Moderator
Goaltender
 
quoipourquoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 4,174
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hobnobs View Post
'07? When he was suspended twice for stupid elbows and his team won anyways?
You say that as if you've never heard someone advocate for Chris Pronger winning the 2007 Conn Smythe.

quoipourquoi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 03:01 PM
  #10
Hobnobs
Pinko
 
Hobnobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Country: Sweden
Posts: 4,012
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by quoipourquoi View Post
You say that as if you've never heard someone advocate for Chris Pronger winning the 2007 Conn Smythe.
Dont think I ever seen on HoH boards tho, he might have been a smyther up until those events tho.

Hobnobs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 03:13 PM
  #11
the edler
Inimitable
 
the edler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,812
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DisgruntledGoat View Post
I mean, its kind of ridiculous when you start to break it down: huge, could skate, tremendous hockey IQ, best first pass of his era, 100 mph slapshot, poised with the puck, hits, blocks shots, shuts down top forwards, quarterbacks powerplays, mean as hell, insanely competitive. I don't if you could build a more complete defenseman if you tried.
What does this even mean? Of course he could skate, he was a hockey player. I don't think he was great skater though, if that's what you mean.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metalcommand View Post
At his peak and prime Pronger is the best modern defenseman, better than Lidström. No-one i'd rather take as my 1D for a playoff run. Beastly physical, total ******* mean streak, magnificent puck mover, imposing all over the ice. Ruthless winner. No mercy. Mind games.
Oh yeah, ruthless winner, is that why he lost two thirds of the SCF he was in? And about those mind games, if you mean those silly puck stealing incidents against the Hawks it didn't help his team anywhere, sorry.

the edler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 03:19 PM
  #12
quoipourquoi
Moderator
Goaltender
 
quoipourquoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 4,174
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by the edler View Post
Oh yeah, ruthless winner, is that why he lost two thirds of the SCF he was in?
I think his teams lost those because they were 17-point and 24-point underdogs who qualified for the playoffs in Games 81 and 82.

But maybe I'm wrong.

quoipourquoi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 03:26 PM
  #13
Metalcommand
Registered User
 
Metalcommand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Country:
Posts: 782
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by the edler View Post
What does this even mean? Of course he could skate, he was a hockey player. I don't think he was great skater though, if that's what you mean.



Oh yeah, ruthless winner, is that why he lost two thirds of the SCF he was in? And about those mind games, if you mean those silly puck stealing incidents against the Hawks it didn't help his team anywhere, sorry.
Haters gonna hate. Pronger is god.

Metalcommand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 03:37 PM
  #14
the edler
Inimitable
 
the edler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,812
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metalcommand View Post
Haters gonna hate. Pronger is god.
Pronger is good, yes I know. Actually he reminds me a bit of Moose Johnson, kind of the same playing style, same kind of funny looks.


Last edited by the edler: 07-02-2013 at 02:47 AM.
the edler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 03:46 PM
  #15
tarheelhockey
Global Moderator
 
tarheelhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 36,303
vCash: 500
I'd say he it was very slightly disappointing -- but then, you have to consider that he was being held up to an extremely high standard. "The next Robinson/Potvin" isn't exactly leaving a young player a lot of margin for error.

If not for some unfortunate, fluke injuries he would have really been a giant of the game. As it is, he was still pretty damn big.

tarheelhockey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 05:57 PM
  #16
Wrath
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,526
vCash: 500
Disappointing seems like a strong word for someone who has done as much as Pronger (and peaked as high especially).

But no doubt, at the turn of the millennium we all thought that Chris Pronger was gonna be the absolute bees knees. So I do think that a lot of us (at least I personally) look back on his career and think "he could have been even better". I think he could have been a top 10 defenseman all time (if he could keep his prime years with consistency for lidstrom/bourque like longevity, he would be in the discussion for top 5 all time, but with pronger's playstyle, I doubt that would happen), instead he's on the edge of top 20 it seems.

Wrath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 06:03 PM
  #17
Cloned
Dial M for Michelle
 
Cloned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 22,918
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by the edler View Post
What does this even mean? Of course he could skate, he was a hockey player. I don't think he was great skater though, if that's what you mean.
Most guys who are 6'6 aren't tremendously mobile. Pronger was. It was part of the reason why his gap control was superb. The guy knew how to conserve energy so he wouldn't be skating miles and miles like a Niedermeyer would (not saying Scott didn't know how to conserve energy) but he knew when to accelerate and when to glide.

__________________

Sig AND X-mas avatar courtesy of The Nemesis

"Pull yourself together!" - Solid Snake to Otacon, multiple times in the series
Cloned is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 06:08 PM
  #18
billybudd
5 Mike Rupps
 
billybudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 14,191
vCash: 500
I don't know if I'd call Pronger mobile, but he had a lot of ways to work around his average mobility.

I wouldn't call him a disappointment (I mean, the guy won...no earned a hart trophy as a defenseman, which is unheard of). But he could have comfortably been, imo, the best defenseman of his era every year had a few more things gone right for him, instead of "merely" being in the top 3 or 4 mix for a very long time.

billybudd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 06:15 PM
  #19
Cloned
Dial M for Michelle
 
Cloned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 22,918
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by billybudd View Post
I don't know if I'd call Pronger mobile, but he had a lot of ways to work around his average mobility.

I wouldn't call him a disappointment (I mean, the guy won...no earned a hart trophy as a defenseman, which is unheard of). But he could have comfortably been, imo, the best defenseman of his era every year had a few more things gone right for him, instead of "merely" being in the top 3 or 4 mix for a very long time.
I dunno, if you want to watch a 6'6 guy with average mobility you could watch Andy Sutton, who wasn't actually slow for his size, just average. Pronger was better. He wasn't as mobile as guys who are considered to be great skaters (Niedermeyer being the contemporary that jumps to mind right away), but he wasn't Andy Sutton either.

Cloned is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 06:27 PM
  #20
Guardian452
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 718
vCash: 500
To call someone who was an elite player for over 10 NHL seasons a disappointment is like calling New York city a small town. Other than Lidstrom & Neidermeyer, can you list another defenseman with better credentials or who was a dominant as Pronger over the past 20 years?

Guardian452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 06:50 PM
  #21
ted1971
History Of Hockey
 
ted1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: south jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 2,008
vCash: 500
The Guy is a 1st ballot HOF. How is that a disappointment?

ted1971 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 06:51 PM
  #22
Jtown
Registered User
 
Jtown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Posts: 15,504
vCash: 500
I think what will really hurt pronger is being in the same era as lidstrom.

I like lidstrom and recognize his incredible ability as a defender, but he was put on a team that suited his skills perfectly. Skilled, mobile, gifted offensive players were in abundance in lidstroms time. IN the wide open west detroit regularly led the league in goals and were always near the top.

This is very similar to paul coffey imo, as great as he was the team he was on and the style they played on magnified his skills tremendously.

Lidstrom was a perfect storm for detroit, and because of his 20 plus years of dominance is unprecedented , no other player in that era compares favorably.

IMO pronger was the finest all around defenseman i've ever seen. He could play any style , and against anyone. He could hang with the selanne's and kariya's. He could also pound the leclair's and Tkachuk's of his era. Lidstrom was much less effective against larger guys.

Jtown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 07:27 PM
  #23
Fish on The Sand
Untouchable
 
Fish on The Sand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nanaimo
Country: Canada
Posts: 51,518
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hobnobs View Post
'07? When he was suspended twice for stupid elbows and his team won anyways?
The guy who won it was invisible for the middle two rounds, so yeah, I'd say he should have.

Fish on The Sand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 07:39 PM
  #24
TheDevilMadeMe
Global Moderator
 
TheDevilMadeMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 42,588
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jtown View Post
I think what will really hurt pronger is being in the same era as lidstrom.

I like lidstrom and recognize his incredible ability as a defender, but he was put on a team that suited his skills perfectly. Skilled, mobile, gifted offensive players were in abundance in lidstroms time. IN the wide open west detroit regularly led the league in goals and were always near the top.

This is very similar to paul coffey imo, as great as he was the team he was on and the style they played on magnified his skills tremendously.

Lidstrom was a perfect storm for detroit, and because of his 20 plus years of dominance is unprecedented , no other player in that era compares favorably.

IMO pronger was the finest all around defenseman i've ever seen. He could play any style , and against anyone. He could hang with the selanne's and kariya's. He could also pound the leclair's and Tkachuk's of his era. Lidstrom was much less effective against larger guys.
I think Lidstrom was better against larger guys than Pronger was against smaller faster guys. Pronger really got torn apart by the Blackhawks top line in 2010 after they went all-speed. I also thought Pronger looked out of his element at times in the 2010 Olympics. The only guy i remember consistently giving Lidstrom trouble was Forsberg.

Lidstrom could sometimes be outmuscled in front of the net, but it wasnt often a problem for him

TheDevilMadeMe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 07:51 PM
  #25
quoipourquoi
Moderator
Goaltender
 
quoipourquoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 4,174
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jtown View Post
IMO pronger was the finest all around defenseman i've ever seen. He could play any style , and against anyone. He could hang with the selanne's and kariya's. He could also pound the leclair's and Tkachuk's of his era. Lidstrom was much less effective against larger guys.
I agree with a lot of what you said - particularly Pronger on Selanne, which in 2006, looked like some Olympic retribution on Pronger's part when he really abused the guy in the Conference Finals - but I think Lidstrom was just fine against larger players. Once Lidstrom matured a little and stopped trying to force the offense (which was probably just him trying to emulate Coffey), the only player that I can recall ever really having his number was Peter Forsberg. But when your teammates are collecting seven Selkes and a Norris in addition to your own large collection, the system helps cover for any mistakes or weaknesses.

If either of them had an Achilles' heel, it was faster players going wide on Pronger, which really limited him on larger ice surfaces. He was getting a lot of criticism going into the Gold Medal game in 2010 (though he was rather good in that game).


In the era, Niedermayer probably had the best tools. Disappointment may be too strong of a word for him and Pronger, given the amount of team success that followed them, but I can't say that I ever saw that same 2003 playoff Niedermayer before or after that Spring. You know, the quality Niedermayer that people falsely like to project across his entire career.

quoipourquoi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2015 All Rights Reserved.