HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Building a Cup contender

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-01-2013, 12:41 PM
  #1
Pantokrator
Who's the clown?
 
Pantokrator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Semmes, Alabama
Country: Guatemala
Posts: 4,319
vCash: 500
Building a Cup contender

I have been thinking about how to build a Stanley Cup contender and it seems like there are two prominent models. I put the Penguins in the anomaly camp, because they would contend with Malkin, Crosby, and a bunch of monkeys, so other than getting the first or 2nd pick in 4 consecutive drafts which have high end top talent, these two models seems to me to be way to build a Cup contender:

1) Several top end talents: I see the Blackhawks in this camp, and maybe the Redwings from 2008. They have serious top end talent on offense and defense Kane, Toews, Hossa and Sharp, and then Keith and Seabrooke. They put depth players around them that all seem replaceable. Players like Bickell, Bolland, Hjarmalsson (Im not going to bother with the spelling) and an adequate goalie who is not a superstar. In this camp, you can use up cap space on your top end players and just fill in the rest with replaceable parts.

2) Super forward depth, no superstar forwards, top end defender, good overall team defense. I put the Bruins and Kings and Ducks and Hurricanes in this camp, although in place of one superstar defenseman, the Canes had 6 #2-4 guys. Here they have lots of forward depth with no real superstars. Each team has solid forwards LA with Kopitar, Carter, Richards, Brown, Williams none of which are superstars. They have Doughty as their main d-man and solid goaltending for a team that plays solid defense.
The Bruins had 4 lines that can score and Chara. In this case you spend big on your main defender(s) and then use the rest on the forward depth.

So my question is, how are the Flyers planning on building a Cup winning team? It seems that they should go with the second model, since we really dont have the top end talent like the Blackhawks. Does it require a new coaching style? I worry about cap management, because it is crucial in this. If they go the second route, they can't be throwing money at players like Lecavalier, but instead need to spread the money around 4 lines of forwards and one main defender.

Obviously this is subjective and I appreciate any feedback or modifications, but it is summer and I think about dumb things like this.

Pantokrator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 12:51 PM
  #2
FLYERSFAN18
Registered User
 
FLYERSFAN18's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Florida
Country: United States
Posts: 1,882
vCash: 500
Either way we need a #1 defender. I think Carolina is more of anomaly. It is nearly impossible to win a cup without a #1 d-man

FLYERSFAN18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 12:58 PM
  #3
Beef Invictus
Global Moderator
Beefitor
 
Beef Invictus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Centreville
Country: Lord Howe Island
Posts: 37,457
vCash: 156
I think you need a clear #1 C, a #1 dman who can play really good defense, solid goaltending, and a really good defensive center, generally Selke-nominee caliber. These are the things Cup winning teams of the last 8 years tend to have in common, for the most part. I think that's the best foundation you can have.

From there, you need to fill out the roster and get it clicking so you can get production for 3 lines. Teams that rely on one or two lines for all their offense never seem to make it all the way; teams with 3 dangerous forward lines tend to do better.

Right now the Flyers are missing the goaltender, and they need to get production from Lines 2 and 3; that didn't really happen last season. The #1 dman...depends on if Timonen can keep up his high-level play past January, or through a deep run. Obviously after this year that will be a new hole on the roster. It's questionable already.

__________________
Down in the basement, I've got a Craftsman lathe. Show it to the children when they misbehave.
Beef Invictus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 01:24 PM
  #4
sobrien
RAFFLCOPTER
 
sobrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Jersey/Memphis
Country: United States
Posts: 6,577
vCash: 500
When the Flyers made their Cup run, their model was/is very similar to the Bruins'. 4 very good lines, all capable of scoring, most capable of shutting down opposing lines; good/great defense headed by a bonafide #1 (Chara, Pronger) who can play in all situations. Obviously the Bruins had an elite goalie and the Flyers did not...and that may have been the deciding factor of the Flyers losing and the Bruins winning

sobrien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 01:40 PM
  #5
zarley zelepukin
Registered User
 
zarley zelepukin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Norristown, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,606
vCash: 500
I think the Flyers ought to follow their own model from 2010, which is basically option #2 described above. Except, have a real goalie instead of Leighton.

The best chance to get there, I think, is to develop Schenn and Couturier. Then, either they lead the charge with Giroux, or one of them gets moved to upgrade the defense. If one of them gets traded, management has proven that they're good at identifying and bringing in forward talent.

The next thing is to get a #1 D-man, which is obviously not an easy task. It's gonna be awhile before Morin could be that guy, if it's in his future at all. They might have to work a deal similar to the Pronger trade to make it happen. And on top of that, we'll need another big time d-man, like Kimmo in 2010.

zarley zelepukin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 01:43 PM
  #6
Beef Invictus
Global Moderator
Beefitor
 
Beef Invictus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Centreville
Country: Lord Howe Island
Posts: 37,457
vCash: 156
We have defensive depth outside of our top 4 now (unlike 2010), which is an improvement. The troublesome bit is that almost all of it is overpaid. In an ideal world all these Dmen drafted recently can start stepping into those roles for cheaper.

Beef Invictus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 01:46 PM
  #7
dbr2
Lockout Beard
 
dbr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 9,340
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to dbr2
It all starts with drafting. The teams that have won recently have all drafted and developed their players well. To me, I still believe we are trying to "buy" a cup. It doesn't work any longer in my option.

dbr2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 02:01 PM
  #8
Beef Invictus
Global Moderator
Beefitor
 
Beef Invictus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Centreville
Country: Lord Howe Island
Posts: 37,457
vCash: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbr2 View Post
It all starts with drafting. The teams that have won recently have all drafted and developed their players well. To me, I still believe we are trying to "buy" a cup. It doesn't work any longer in my option.
That's why I'm not sure how I feel about picking up Lecavalier. One the one hand, hell yes! On the other, we already have lots of centers, and we need to be developing them...it's not like this team should be considered a true contender this year and very likely next. Unless he wants to spend a lot of time on the wing to let our youth get playing time at C, I don't know if it's the best move for this team. Picking him up feels like a win-now move in my gut, and that doesn't make sense.

Edit: Though if the org decides Schenn will become a full-time winger/hybrid sorta guy, that should make a fit.

Beef Invictus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 02:15 PM
  #9
Phillyfan28
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 216
vCash: 500
I think you are undervaluing LA's forwards and overvaluing CHI's forwards.

Our young core of forwards, with moderate progression, can most certainly compete with the likes of CHI's forwards. Although we didnt draft brayden, jake, or wayne with that nucleus of guys growing together along with G and Coots that is as solid a young forward group as anyone. As cliche as it is, we need a#1 D to anchor our defense like Pronger did. Can you imagine if he didnt get hurt...

Phillyfan28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 05:02 PM
  #10
funghoul
retardo montalbon
 
funghoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: upper drugs
Country: United States
Posts: 1,671
vCash: 500
What are we? sum it up. I see us as a team that plays an emotional offensive game not conducive with discipline. we also have to have a goalie who can handle pressure. we don't have much cap space factoring in our upcoming signings and not much depth in the system to fill in the NHL blanks. I used to feel like we had a really good team but outside of giroux theres so many questions. were really in limbo right now. at best were in the mid range mix with san jose and nashville. Maybe tho we clipped some cancer and the team stability over the last two years will factor in this season.

funghoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 05:23 PM
  #11
BrimFullofAsham45
Registered User
 
BrimFullofAsham45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 1,464
vCash: 500
If we want to be a top contender, Brayden Schenn needs to have the breakout we all have been waiting for. We desperately need a second line that can be both offensively and defensively dynamic. If Schenn can be the guy to lead that attack, now is the time to do it or he better learn how to play wing (or perhaps how to play for another team).

I think overall, our transition game will be much better this year... And it starts with Mason and his excellent puckmoving skills. I'm hoping Streit will be helpful with this cause and I'm expecting a big year out of Gustafsson, too.

All in all, we need a lot of pieces to come together to be anything more than an underdog this season. And this is all contingent on Giroux and Voracek continuing their success, and Hartnell coming back from the dead, and Timonen retaining his wheels all year long.

BrimFullofAsham45 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 05:48 PM
  #12
BillDineen
Registered User
 
BillDineen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,672
vCash: 500
I think whatever you have, if your goaltender goes on a cold streak, you lose and vice versa, you can be an average team that gets an incredible hot streak by the goalie and has a shot. LA is nothing without Quick IMO.

BillDineen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 06:21 PM
  #13
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 109,916
vCash: 5792
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillDineen View Post
I think whatever you have, if your goaltender goes on a cold streak, you lose and vice versa, you can be an average team that gets an incredible hot streak by the goalie and has a shot. LA is nothing without Quick IMO.
They got to the 5th seed with Quick putting up replacement-level numbers, so that's actually quite false. They're a dominant puck-possession team, and they lost to a team that just scored better than they did.

GKJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2013, 06:23 PM
  #14
Coppy
Good Luck Richie!
 
Coppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 928
vCash: 500
Sorry, but I don't think its really that clear cut. You could easily put some of your examples in the opposite camp

The Blackhawks had/have great depth for both of their Cup teams. It wasn't all about superstar talent. Mike Richards even said the reason the Flyers lost the series was because they only had 3 legit forward lines while the Blackhawks had 4.

Plus, both the Kings and Bruins had superstar players. Chara is arguably the top defensemen in the game. Tim Thomas was a superstar goalie. Bergeron is one of the best 2-way players in the game. For the Kings, Doughty is easily on the level of Keith. Kopitar is a borderline superstar. Quick was the best goalie in the league last season.

Coppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.