HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Vancouver Canucks
Notices

Who is the Canucks #6 prospect?

View Poll Results: Who is the Canucks #6 prospect?
Jordan Schroeder 111 53.11%
Joacim Ericsson 3 1.44%
Eddie Lack 82 39.23%
Alexandre Mallet 5 2.39%
Ben Hutton 0 0%
Ludwig Blomstrand 0 0%
Cole Cassels 2 0.96%
Darren Archibald 1 0.48%
Kellan Lain 0 0%
Joe Cannata 1 0.48%
Joseph LaBate 0 0%
Jordan Subban 2 0.96%
Henrik Tommernes 2 0.96%
Peter Andersson 0 0%
Other (please specify) 0 0%
Voters: 209. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-17-2013, 01:02 AM
  #1
SonicY
Ad hominem
 
SonicY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edinburgh
Country: Scotland
Posts: 2,795
vCash: 500
Who is the Canucks #6 prospect?

1. Bo Horvat - 64.13% (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1467231)
2. Hunter Shinkaruk - 32.45% (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1468095)
3. Frank Corrado - 48.00% (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1468681)
4. Nicklas Jensen - 56.07% (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1469419)
5. Brendan Gaunce - 59.52% (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1469969)

Now with 150% MORE Jordan FREAKING Schroeder and Eddie FREAKING Lack!! So vote for them!!!

Continue, discuss.

SonicY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:06 AM
  #2
PG Canuck
Global Moderator
 
PG Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,499
vCash: 1512
Went with Lack.

PG Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:07 AM
  #3
Horvat2Virtanen
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Horvat2Virtanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,566
vCash: 50
Had to go with Schroeder.

__________________


Clear Eyes. Full Hearts. Can't Lose!
Horvat2Virtanen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:09 AM
  #4
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,798
vCash: 5555
Neither Lack nor Schroeder are prospects imo

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:09 AM
  #5
Reverend Mayhem
Freeway's closed man
 
Reverend Mayhem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,811
vCash: 940
Send a message via Skype™ to Reverend Mayhem
Lack, I fail to recognize Schroeder as a prospect anymore though I'd see why some might.

Reverend Mayhem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:11 AM
  #6
SonicY
Ad hominem
 
SonicY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edinburgh
Country: Scotland
Posts: 2,795
vCash: 500
It's the non-prosepct grudge match of the century! No shiny new toys here!

SonicY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:11 AM
  #7
CanucksRollin
Tweet@CanucksOnARoll
 
CanucksRollin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,825
vCash: 462
I guess it was posted earlier then I expected. Anyways I went with Eddie Lack.

CanucksRollin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:17 AM
  #8
Slapshot_11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,614
vCash: 500
Lack

Slapshot_11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:24 AM
  #9
SonicY
Ad hominem
 
SonicY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edinburgh
Country: Scotland
Posts: 2,795
vCash: 500
I just want to see some kind of surprise again, or at least a close match. The last one we ha was Shinkaruk/Corrado for #2, where we were all a little surprised to see Hunter win.

I want to see, like, Ludwig Blomstrand get a groundswell of support and win 7 or something.

SonicY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:28 AM
  #10
JumpierPegasus
Mhm...
 
JumpierPegasus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Abbotsford, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,737
vCash: 500
Schroeder... Lack isn't a prospect to me

JumpierPegasus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:48 AM
  #11
LPH
[hello] :)
 
LPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Granduland
Country: United States
Posts: 38,047
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend Mayhem View Post
Lack, I fail to recognize Schroeder as a prospect anymore though I'd see why some might.
Funny, because on HF Lack is no longer considered a prospect and JS is

LPH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:49 AM
  #12
Sergei Shirokov
Registered User
 
Sergei Shirokov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: British Columbia
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,930
vCash: 500
Schroeder

Sergei Shirokov is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 02:18 AM
  #13
Nucker101
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,232
vCash: 500
Schroeder, as much as I like Lack, plenty of AHL goalies have looked promising but have failed to establish themselves as solid number one goalies. IMO Schroeder already showed that he had the ability to be a regular top 9 NHL forward last year(especially when he was playing with some decent players). His AHL numbers are pretty decent. His two-way game has improved after it was once considered a weakness, sure he's small but I thought he showed a willingness to play a two-way game and also battle along the boards. I still would not totally be against a speed third line, while Kesler's line handled as other teams top lines. I think Schroeder could take a nice step forward this season in that type of a role. This season is huge for him to say the least.

Nucker101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 02:39 AM
  #14
Bgav
We Stylin'
 
Bgav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,099
vCash: 1752
Jordan for sure, honestly think he will put up so good numbers next season

Bgav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 02:58 AM
  #15
StringerBell
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10,000
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonicY View Post
It's the non-prosepct grudge match of the century! No shiny new toys here!
Try and stop me from voting for Subban

StringerBell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 03:02 AM
  #16
DJOpus
Registered User
 
DJOpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,732
vCash: 500
Didn't even realize Schroeder was on the list...picked him and he should be a few spots higher IMO.

DJOpus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 03:13 AM
  #17
Burrows19
Registered User
 
Burrows19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 511
vCash: 1000
Went with Schroeder

Burrows19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 03:17 AM
  #18
John Swartzwelder
MOAR TUFFNESS!!!1
 
John Swartzwelder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Victoria, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,358
vCash: 50
I love Mallet please vote for alex

John Swartzwelder is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 03:22 AM
  #19
Hammer79
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kelowna
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,938
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JumpierPegasus View Post
Schroeder... Lack isn't a prospect to me
This, but without the sarcasm. Lack shouldn't be on this list anymore according to Hockey's Future criteria. He's graduated to AHL veteran goaltender. He's a bit of a victim of circumstance though, having the Schneider/Luongo logjam ahead of him in the depth chart. If this had been dealt with earlier, and he hadn't gotten injured, he should have been in the Canucks line-up the last couple of seasons.

I went with Schroeder because I think he still has tonnes of skill, he just needs to put it all together and compete hard. To stick in this line-up long-term, he has to earn a top 6 spot, either by taking 2C and moving Kesler to the wing, or by moving to the wing himself.

Hammer79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 03:32 AM
  #20
turkulad
Registered User
 
turkulad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Turku
Country: Finland
Posts: 824
vCash: 500
Schroeder for me, since I think he still has one more year to prove himself thanks to Gillis' inability to get us a 3C from the UFA market.

turkulad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 05:27 AM
  #21
LiveeviL
No unique points
 
LiveeviL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jämtland, Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 5,367
vCash: 50
Send a message via ICQ to LiveeviL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer79 View Post
This, but without the sarcasm. Lack shouldn't be on this list anymore according to Hockey's Future criteria. He's graduated to AHL veteran goaltender. He's a bit of a victim of circumstance though, having the Schneider/Luongo logjam ahead of him in the depth chart. If this had been dealt with earlier, and he hadn't gotten injured, he should have been in the Canucks line-up the last couple of seasons.

I went with Schroeder because I think he still has tonnes of skill, he just needs to put it all together and compete hard. To stick in this line-up long-term, he has to earn a top 6 spot, either by taking 2C and moving Kesler to the wing, or by moving to the wing himself.
I Agree about Lack and went with him the 25 year old prospect.

LiveeviL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 09:12 AM
  #22
y2kcanucks
Cult of Personality
 
y2kcanucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 46,226
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to y2kcanucks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend Mayhem View Post
Lack, I fail to recognize Schroeder as a prospect anymore though I'd see why some might.
This.

Schroeder played over 50% of our season last year...he's graduated. Lack is still a prospect because he has never played even a single NHL regular season game.

__________________
http://www.vancitynitetours.com
y2kcanucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 09:24 AM
  #23
arsmaster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 16,128
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by y2kcanucks View Post
This.

Schroeder played over 50% of our season last year...he's graduated. Lack is still a prospect because he has never played even a single NHL regular season game.
That is the stupidest reasoning, especially when we have HF standards to g0 by.

If you believe this, why do "rookies" need to be under 160 games in your fantasy league?

Seem to counter oppose yourself.


Last edited by arsmaster: 07-17-2013 at 09:33 AM.
arsmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 09:37 AM
  #24
dave babych returns
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,233
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonicY View Post
Now with 150% MORE Jordan FREAKING Schroeder and Eddie FREAKING Lack!! So vote for them!!!


Went with Schroeder. He has the highest upside of the players left and looks all but assured to play in the NHL in some capacity or another.

I'm guessing the next poll goes to Lack and then things start to get interesting.

(I have my doubts about whether Lack belongs here or not, nevermind his quality as a prospect, but I'm going to be a big boy and shut the hell up about it - hopefully he gets up on the board after Schroeder and we can begin the healing process.)

dave babych returns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 09:46 AM
  #25
VC
Registered User
 
VC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vancouver Island
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,925
vCash: 500
Schroeder...... Lack is too old to be considered a 'prospect'

VC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.