HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Vancouver Canucks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Who is the Canucks #6 prospect?

View Poll Results: Who is the Canucks #6 prospect?
Jordan Schroeder 111 53.11%
Joacim Ericsson 3 1.44%
Eddie Lack 82 39.23%
Alexandre Mallet 5 2.39%
Ben Hutton 0 0%
Ludwig Blomstrand 0 0%
Cole Cassels 2 0.96%
Darren Archibald 1 0.48%
Kellan Lain 0 0%
Joe Cannata 1 0.48%
Joseph LaBate 0 0%
Jordan Subban 2 0.96%
Henrik Tommernes 2 0.96%
Peter Andersson 0 0%
Other (please specify) 0 0%
Voters: 209. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-17-2013, 01:02 AM
  #1
SonicY
Daydream Nation
 
SonicY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver/Edinburgh
Posts: 3,699
vCash: 500
Who is the Canucks #6 prospect?

1. Bo Horvat - 64.13% (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1467231)
2. Hunter Shinkaruk - 32.45% (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1468095)
3. Frank Corrado - 48.00% (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1468681)
4. Nicklas Jensen - 56.07% (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1469419)
5. Brendan Gaunce - 59.52% (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1469969)

Now with 150% MORE Jordan FREAKING Schroeder and Eddie FREAKING Lack!! So vote for them!!!

Continue, discuss.

SonicY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:06 AM
  #2
PG Canuck
Moderator
 
PG Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 43,039
vCash: 53
Went with Lack.

PG Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:07 AM
  #3
dim jim
K2B
 
dim jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver
Country: United States
Posts: 49,922
vCash: 50
Had to go with Schroeder.

dim jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:09 AM
  #4
Vankiller Whale
Fire Benning
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,229
vCash: 1800
Neither Lack nor Schroeder are prospects imo

Vankiller Whale is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:09 AM
  #5
Reverend Mayhem
Fire this man
 
Reverend Mayhem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,989
vCash: 500
Send a message via Skype™ to Reverend Mayhem
Lack, I fail to recognize Schroeder as a prospect anymore though I'd see why some might.

Reverend Mayhem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:11 AM
  #6
SonicY
Daydream Nation
 
SonicY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver/Edinburgh
Posts: 3,699
vCash: 500
It's the non-prosepct grudge match of the century! No shiny new toys here!

SonicY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:11 AM
  #7
Virtanen2Horvat
BoHorvat53
 
Virtanen2Horvat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,287
vCash: 589
I guess it was posted earlier then I expected. Anyways I went with Eddie Lack.

Virtanen2Horvat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:17 AM
  #8
Slapshot_11
Registered User
 
Slapshot_11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,115
vCash: 500
Lack

Slapshot_11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:24 AM
  #9
SonicY
Daydream Nation
 
SonicY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver/Edinburgh
Posts: 3,699
vCash: 500
I just want to see some kind of surprise again, or at least a close match. The last one we ha was Shinkaruk/Corrado for #2, where we were all a little surprised to see Hunter win.

I want to see, like, Ludwig Blomstrand get a groundswell of support and win 7 or something.

SonicY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:28 AM
  #10
JumpierPegasus
GRANlunD LARSENy
 
JumpierPegasus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Abbotsford, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,181
vCash: 500
Schroeder... Lack isn't a prospect to me

JumpierPegasus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:48 AM
  #11
Pip
Registered User
 
Pip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Granduland
Country: United States
Posts: 63,119
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend Mayhem View Post
Lack, I fail to recognize Schroeder as a prospect anymore though I'd see why some might.
Funny, because on HF Lack is no longer considered a prospect and JS is

Pip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 01:49 AM
  #12
Sergei Shirokov
Registered User
 
Sergei Shirokov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: British Columbia
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,706
vCash: 500
Schroeder

Sergei Shirokov is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 02:18 AM
  #13
Nucker101
Sharks Bandwagon
 
Nucker101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,149
vCash: 500
Schroeder, as much as I like Lack, plenty of AHL goalies have looked promising but have failed to establish themselves as solid number one goalies. IMO Schroeder already showed that he had the ability to be a regular top 9 NHL forward last year(especially when he was playing with some decent players). His AHL numbers are pretty decent. His two-way game has improved after it was once considered a weakness, sure he's small but I thought he showed a willingness to play a two-way game and also battle along the boards. I still would not totally be against a speed third line, while Kesler's line handled as other teams top lines. I think Schroeder could take a nice step forward this season in that type of a role. This season is huge for him to say the least.

Nucker101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 02:39 AM
  #14
Bgav
We Stylin'
 
Bgav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,606
vCash: 566
Jordan for sure, honestly think he will put up so good numbers next season

Bgav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 02:58 AM
  #15
StringerBell
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,985
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonicY View Post
It's the non-prosepct grudge match of the century! No shiny new toys here!
Try and stop me from voting for Subban

StringerBell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 03:02 AM
  #16
604
Registered User
 
604's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,556
vCash: 50
Didn't even realize Schroeder was on the list...picked him and he should be a few spots higher IMO.

604 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 03:13 AM
  #17
Burrows19
Registered User
 
Burrows19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 510
vCash: 500
Went with Schroeder

Burrows19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 03:17 AM
  #18
thejanitor
he does it for free
 
thejanitor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Victoria, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,929
vCash: 50
I love Mallet please vote for alex

thejanitor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 03:22 AM
  #19
Hammer79
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kelowna
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,859
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JumpierPegasus View Post
Schroeder... Lack isn't a prospect to me
This, but without the sarcasm. Lack shouldn't be on this list anymore according to Hockey's Future criteria. He's graduated to AHL veteran goaltender. He's a bit of a victim of circumstance though, having the Schneider/Luongo logjam ahead of him in the depth chart. If this had been dealt with earlier, and he hadn't gotten injured, he should have been in the Canucks line-up the last couple of seasons.

I went with Schroeder because I think he still has tonnes of skill, he just needs to put it all together and compete hard. To stick in this line-up long-term, he has to earn a top 6 spot, either by taking 2C and moving Kesler to the wing, or by moving to the wing himself.

Hammer79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 03:32 AM
  #20
turkulad
Registered User
 
turkulad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Turku, Finland
Country: Finland
Posts: 1,564
vCash: 500
Schroeder for me, since I think he still has one more year to prove himself thanks to Gillis' inability to get us a 3C from the UFA market.

turkulad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 05:27 AM
  #21
LiveeviL
No unique points
 
LiveeviL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 6,698
vCash: 50
Send a message via ICQ to LiveeviL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer79 View Post
This, but without the sarcasm. Lack shouldn't be on this list anymore according to Hockey's Future criteria. He's graduated to AHL veteran goaltender. He's a bit of a victim of circumstance though, having the Schneider/Luongo logjam ahead of him in the depth chart. If this had been dealt with earlier, and he hadn't gotten injured, he should have been in the Canucks line-up the last couple of seasons.

I went with Schroeder because I think he still has tonnes of skill, he just needs to put it all together and compete hard. To stick in this line-up long-term, he has to earn a top 6 spot, either by taking 2C and moving Kesler to the wing, or by moving to the wing himself.
I Agree about Lack and went with him the 25 year old prospect.

LiveeviL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 09:12 AM
  #22
y2kcanucks
Cult of Personality
 
y2kcanucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 63,236
vCash: 696
Send a message via AIM to y2kcanucks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend Mayhem View Post
Lack, I fail to recognize Schroeder as a prospect anymore though I'd see why some might.
This.

Schroeder played over 50% of our season last year...he's graduated. Lack is still a prospect because he has never played even a single NHL regular season game.

__________________
The Canucks will continue to suck until the day Benning, Weisbrod, Linden, and Desjardins are all fired.
y2kcanucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 09:24 AM
  #23
arsmaster*
semantic romantic
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 25,746
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by y2kcanucks View Post
This.

Schroeder played over 50% of our season last year...he's graduated. Lack is still a prospect because he has never played even a single NHL regular season game.
That is the stupidest reasoning, especially when we have HF standards to g0 by.

If you believe this, why do "rookies" need to be under 160 games in your fantasy league?

Seem to counter oppose yourself.


Last edited by arsmaster*: 07-17-2013 at 09:33 AM.
arsmaster* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 09:37 AM
  #24
dave babych returns
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,977
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonicY View Post
Now with 150% MORE Jordan FREAKING Schroeder and Eddie FREAKING Lack!! So vote for them!!!


Went with Schroeder. He has the highest upside of the players left and looks all but assured to play in the NHL in some capacity or another.

I'm guessing the next poll goes to Lack and then things start to get interesting.

(I have my doubts about whether Lack belongs here or not, nevermind his quality as a prospect, but I'm going to be a big boy and shut the hell up about it - hopefully he gets up on the board after Schroeder and we can begin the healing process.)

dave babych returns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2013, 09:46 AM
  #25
VC
Registered User
 
VC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vancouver Island
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,021
vCash: 500
Schroeder...... Lack is too old to be considered a 'prospect'

VC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. @2017 All Rights Reserved.