HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Toronto Maple Leafs
Notices

3rd Line With Bolland And Kulemin

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-21-2013, 06:21 PM
  #76
Volcanologist
Habitual User
 
Volcanologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kessel Apocalypse
Country: Germany
Posts: 20,277
vCash: 500
Should be Clarkson but will probably be McClement or Colborne.

Volcanologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-21-2013, 11:09 PM
  #77
The_Chosen_One
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,619
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyCrazed101 View Post
You're laughing at him yet I'm sure most Blackhawks fans would agree with Eb.
Yet their coach decided to throw skilled guys around him. He was most effective with Havlet and Ladd. To have him grinding in the defensive zone - especially for >10 minutes - is probably going to get him injured as well.

Quote:
If Bolland is easy top 6 quality, then why would the Blackhawks trade for Handzus and give him Bolland's spot and drop Bolland down to the third line?
He didn't work out. Much like Lupul didn't work out. We moved a large number of pieces to acquire him. There are a good number of draft picks who can develop into checking line centres who grind top guys in our zone. Heck, Bolland doesn't even play that kind of game.

You're not going to be spending $3.375 million on a checking forward. Unless we've won cups multiple times in a decade, our bottom six should be shed. That's what Chicago did, and that's what Boston is going to be doing with Kelly ( as was done with Peverley). I can see us trying him out with Havlet/Ladd/ Kane-esque skilled guys to see if he can produce under tougher minutes.

JVR - Bolland - Kulemin for instance wouldn't be an unusual line combination. During the playoffs, we saw JVR spending more time with Grabovski ( on the shut down line) than McClement. Randy wasn't trying to sabotage McClement's career, but instead replaced him with someone more productive in that role. Besides Bolland GWG had Frolik on the line and he's certainly not a working class bruiser forward.

The_Chosen_One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-21-2013, 11:17 PM
  #78
The Apologist
Kessel Supporter
 
The Apologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Soviet Kanukistan
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,858
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyCrazed101 View Post
You're laughing at him yet I'm sure most Blackhawks fans would agree with Eb. In fact, a lot of them have said as much. They haven't discredited what Bolland brought to their team but acknowledged that he was a much better fit playing bottom 6 than top 6. Some considered that it might have been injuries that slowed him down and made him less effective in the top 6. If Bolland is easy top 6 quality, then why would the Blackhawks trade for Handzus and give him Bolland's spot and drop Bolland down to the third line?

I think expecting Bolland to be a legitimate top 6 is placing lofty expectations on him. Similar to the expectations of Versteeg when he was acquired. Many would argue (and perhaps you should consider), that Bolland's top 6 role on the Blackhawks was a matter of convenience than it was of desire - which is why they acquired Handzus. It's a similar situation with Bozak. He isn't an ideal 1C but he's the best option we have...doesn't mean he'd be a 1C on most teams.
Was Bolland not playing top 6 minutes before his injury?

The Apologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2013, 09:33 AM
  #79
Mess
Global Moderator
 
Mess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 59,367
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystifo View Post
May I remind you that Kulemin was one of our more productive 5v5 players last year. Pretty effective "Black hole".
Kulemin and Bolland will form 2/3rds of a solid checking shutdown line next year, used by Carlyle effectively to help reduce the goals against .. Offense will not be their prime objective, but I expect they will chip in occasionally.

Carlyle also loves McClement and he would be the most logical 3rd member at this time to complete the trio.

It will be the closest thing to a former Ducks trio of Moen -- Phalsson -- Niedermeyer checking unit when Carlyle won the Cup.

__________________
Signature: There is no greater demonstration of Fan patience then to suggest to "Play the Kids " and be willing to accept the consequences of those actions..
Mess is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.