HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Toronto - Pittsburgh

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-24-2013, 07:16 PM
  #1
SnizzboneMatthews34
Registered User
 
SnizzboneMatthews34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 198
vCash: 500
Toronto - Pittsburgh

Doubt something like this would ever happen considering how deep the Leafs are with wingers, but what would Penguins fans think of this?

To Toronto:

LW - James Neal
D - Matt Niskanen

To Pittsburgh:

LW - Nikolai Kulemin
D - Jake Gardiner
D - John-Michael Liles
LW/RW - Tyler Biggs
1st Round Pick in 2014

Again, this is just for value purposes, I know it doesn't really address either team's needs and I know it may not make sense in terms of cap space. This is just a proposal for discussion of fair or unfair value.

SnizzboneMatthews34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 07:17 PM
  #2
Drennan57*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kingston
Country: Canada
Posts: 943
vCash: 500
Enough with the Toronto proposals. At least wait until tomorrow.

Drennan57* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 07:20 PM
  #3
Roo Mad Bro
U havin a giggle m8?
 
Roo Mad Bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,498
vCash: 500
Terrible for the Leafs.

Leafs don't have a Dallas Brad Richards or a Malkin to center a line with Neal on it so he can do nothing except fire shots all game dished by elite centers.

Roo Mad Bro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 07:20 PM
  #4
Mo Wanchuk
Embrace the Hate
 
Mo Wanchuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Palm Isle
Country: United States
Posts: 1,943
vCash: 500
James Neal is a non-starter. He is attached to Malkin's hip for the foreseeable future. He's on a great contract and has amazing chemistry with Geno. Easy no from the Pen's perspective.

Mo Wanchuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 07:22 PM
  #5
mr sidney crosby
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 984
vCash: 500
No keep up the Toronto proposals. We have to put up with 50 Edmonton proposals a day. Also, I like the value going back to the penguins. Leafs get a 40 goal scorer and a guy that can give them minutes. The penguins get a lot of pieces meaning that can add some depth to the penguins roster.

mr sidney crosby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 07:23 PM
  #6
officialmark7*
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,184
vCash: 500
Leafs fan saying no thanks.

officialmark7* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 07:24 PM
  #7
FishManSam
Bobs Yummy Burgers!
 
FishManSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: I Bet You Hate T.O
Country: Croatia
Posts: 6,181
vCash: 500
Please stop, awful for Toronto.

FishManSam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 07:25 PM
  #8
416Leafer
Registered User
 
416Leafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,789
vCash: 500
If we're trading a package that includes Gardiner, Kulemin, 1st round pick, and 1st round prospect (Biggs)... We better be getting a young(ish) #1 C back. And a pretty good one, that package is decently better value than what either Richards or Carter got given the value of Simmonds/Voracek at the time of the trade.

Leafs have NO reason to trade for a winger. We probably have top 5 winger depth in the league. Its considered the least important position in hockey. We DONT need to give up valuable pieces to add a winger.

416Leafer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 07:34 PM
  #9
orby
Registered User
 
orby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 3,060
vCash: 500
This benefits neither team. Leafs aren't looking for a top-6 winger, Pens aren't looking for even more defensemen. Easy pass from both sides.

As far as value goes, I would have to say Toronto is giving up much more in this proposal. This would be brutal for the Leafs.

orby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 07:37 PM
  #10
SnizzboneMatthews34
Registered User
 
SnizzboneMatthews34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 198
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by orby View Post
This benefits neither team. Leafs aren't looking for a top-6 winger, Pens aren't looking for even more defensemen. Easy pass from both sides.
I don't think I asked if it benefits either team or not, I asked purely for fair value.

SnizzboneMatthews34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 07:41 PM
  #11
Jaromir Jagrbombs
Registered User
 
Jaromir Jagrbombs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ottawa, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 568
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by orby View Post
This benefits neither team. Leafs aren't looking for a top-6 winger, Pens aren't looking for even more defensemen. Easy pass from both sides.

As far as value goes, I would have to say Toronto is giving up much more in this proposal. This would be brutal for the Leafs.
This is my thinking also. Pittsburgh literally has 0 reason to move Neal for fair value, he's a perfect fit playing on Malkin's wing. And as others have said, Toronto doesn't need more wingers. Doesn't really make sense for either team. But purely looking at the value without addressing needs or anything, I would say Toronto is giving up a bit too much, although it's not like JML has any value at all.

Jaromir Jagrbombs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 07:50 PM
  #12
WilliamNylander
Matthews goes legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 9,370
vCash: 523
Would do this for malkin


Not Neal though

WilliamNylander is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 07:59 PM
  #13
TorstenFrings
lebenslang grünweiss
 
TorstenFrings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bremen
Country: Germany
Posts: 6,439
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMammoliti81 View Post
I don't think I asked if it benefits either team or not, I asked purely for fair value.
It's a bit of a weird question though, because it isn't some money transfer where you have an objective value printed on it. Gardiner has less value to Pittburgh than he may have to another team and Liles and his bad contract have negative value to them. You are trying to sell French spring water to a drowning man and get fair value.

Besides, we don't know where the 1st will even fall, so I wouldn't even be sure that Gardiner + late 1st + Biggs (the other three basically cancelling out) is that good an offer for Neal to begin with.

TorstenFrings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 08:00 PM
  #14
Zirakzigil
Registered User
 
Zirakzigil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 9,693
vCash: 494
Gardiner and Liles are worthless for the Penguins. They wont trade Neal ever. Hes on a solid contract and a perfect fit for Malkin.

Zirakzigil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 08:04 PM
  #15
Warm Cookies
Til Death Do Us Part
 
Warm Cookies's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 55,248
vCash: 500
The rare proposal that's terrible for both teams.

Warm Cookies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 08:06 PM
  #16
Man Bear Pig
Registered User
 
Man Bear Pig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 16,615
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zirakzigil View Post
Gardiner and Liles are worthless for the Penguins. They wont trade Neal ever. Hes on a solid contract and a perfect fit for Malkin.
Malkin and Kulemin have ridiculous chemistry in all fairness. And Gardiner is far from worthless to the Pens. Having Letang and Gardiner on your first and second pairing would be filthy.

Man Bear Pig is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 08:26 PM
  #17
LeafsNation149
Registered User
 
LeafsNation149's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,528
vCash: 268
Toronto does this why? they already have a locked top 6 they don't need another goalscorer especially when giving up one of our best players being gardiner

LeafsNation149 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 08:28 PM
  #18
3074326
Registered User
 
3074326's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Columbus
Country: United States
Posts: 4,818
vCash: 500
Pens get worse on the wing and add more defenders. Absolutely not. Dealing from an organizational weakness to get an organizational strength is bad.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CMammoliti81 View Post
I don't think I asked if it benefits either team or not, I asked purely for fair value.
Value and team benefit might as well be the same thing.

3074326 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 08:28 PM
  #19
BigBenSF*
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bay area
Country: United States
Posts: 3,876
vCash: 500
Pens would win this trade hands down but Neal is locked down on a good contract and has insane chemistry with Malkin, so it's a nogo.

BigBenSF* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 08:29 PM
  #20
orby
Registered User
 
orby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 3,060
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMammoliti81 View Post
I don't think I asked if it benefits either team or not, I asked purely for fair value.
Why is value important if you know the proposal is absurd? There's not really any way to gauge the value of pieces of a trade that neither team would do.

orby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 09:03 PM
  #21
Quares27
Registered User
 
Quares27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,716
vCash: 500
Why sacrifice all that depth for James Neal when we already have some good scoring wingers? makes no sense

Quares27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 09:16 PM
  #22
Waffle Fries
Registered User
 
Waffle Fries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,085
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Man Bear Pig View Post
Malkin and Kulemin have ridiculous chemistry in all fairness. And Gardiner is far from worthless to the Pens. Having Letang and Gardiner on your first and second pairing would be filthy.
Gardiner is a great player, but he'd be redundant on the Penguins. We have a plethora of PMDs both on the current roster and in the pipeline.

The chemistry Kulemin has with Malkin does not compare to the chemistry Malkin has with Neal. (Which is more proven over a bigger sample size)

As for the rest of the deal, the Pens would be moving Niskanen for cap space and because we currently have 8 dmen on the big league roster, and some other defensive prospects who could be fighting for NHL time but are waiting in the minors. So why would they trade Niskanen for a more expensive, arguably worse version of him who's signed for three years?

I know the OP keeps saying he's asking about value, but value is relative to team need and this doesn't help either team.

Waffle Fries is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 09:20 PM
  #23
EscapeGoat
We The North
 
EscapeGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: The Hockey Mecca
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,206
vCash: 500
James Neal isn't great without Malkin. Pass.

EscapeGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 09:59 PM
  #24
BeerMe
Registered User
 
BeerMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: #lumbus
Posts: 809
vCash: 500
They say that you know a trade is good when both fan bases hate it. I believe this is the exception to that rule.

BeerMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2013, 10:04 PM
  #25
JVRIELLYKADRI
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Country: Canada
Posts: 122
vCash: 500
What an awful trade for the Leafs, another top 6 winger would be redundant, I wouldn't trade Gardiner straight up for Neal, let alone add all those pieces.

JVRIELLYKADRI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2017 All Rights Reserved.