HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Cgy - edm

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-29-2013, 12:09 PM
  #1
OnTheBrink
Registered User
 
OnTheBrink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 1,553
vCash: 352
Cgy - edm

Just pretend they are not division rivals, would help both teams EDM trying to make the next step and the flames stockpile more solid pieces for rebuild.

To EDM

Glencross
Bouma

To CGY

2014 1st rounder
Lander
Musil


I think EDM would be the only place Glencross would waive to go to, he gets to still stay close to the ranch in AB. He is exactly the player Edmonton needs in their middle 6, Bouma could develop into a solid 4th line center. Calgary gets a top 20 pick that is likely a lottery pick, a center who better fits with CGY future needs and is NHL ready, and a D-prospect who would be one of their top 3 D prospects for sure.

OnTheBrink is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 12:10 PM
  #2
InfinityIggy
Inflammatory Poster
 
InfinityIggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,097
vCash: 133
Glencross won't waive but its an interesting offer.

InfinityIggy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 12:31 PM
  #3
herashak
Registered User
 
herashak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,733
vCash: 50
take out bouma/ lander and its good

herashak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 12:36 PM
  #4
Kulleroinen
Oilers!
 
Kulleroinen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Country: Finland
Posts: 2,619
vCash: 500
Glencross is something we could use, but the price is too steep.

Kulleroinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 12:36 PM
  #5
OnTheBrink
Registered User
 
OnTheBrink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 1,553
vCash: 352
I would still do that.

OnTheBrink is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 12:38 PM
  #6
OnTheBrink
Registered User
 
OnTheBrink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 1,553
vCash: 352
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulleroinen View Post
Glencross is something we could use, but the price is too steep.
A top 9 of;

Hall - RNH - Eberle
Perron - Gags - Yak
Glencross -Gordon - Hemsky

would look pretty damn strong.

Plus Glencross can easily be substituted into the top 6 as needed.

OnTheBrink is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 12:39 PM
  #7
SaintAnton
Registered User
 
SaintAnton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,610
vCash: 101
I was under the impression Glencross left Edmonton because he saw no chance to gain top 6 ice time (they made it clear his role was bottom 6).

Now with Hall, Eberle, Hemsky, Yakupov, Perron playing Wing where does he fit in?
If Perron is playing 3rd line minutes and Hemsky is gone you might have a spot until then I doubt MacT can talk Glencross into considering a move back.

That said hard to ignore giving a division rival you're best forward of the last 2 years I wouldn't do it.

SaintAnton is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 12:49 PM
  #8
Signature
Disreputable User
 
Signature's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Country: Hong Kong
Posts: 4,468
vCash: 50
I think Edmonton would still have to truly overpay due to the divisional rivalry and owing to the fact that Glencross is a versatile winger on a fantastic contract.

Edmonton would probably have to take Glencross as-is, no Bouma, with the 1st, Musil, and Lander all together.

Alternatively:

Glencross
Jackman

for

2014 1st round pick
Anton Lander
David Musil

Mainly because Jackman has no value to Calgary but he might have value to the Oilers and it helps make the trade more balanced even though in these circumstances it's not needed to be.

Signature is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 12:52 PM
  #9
OnTheBrink
Registered User
 
OnTheBrink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 1,553
vCash: 352
2014 1st + Musil + 4th rounder would be about max offer.

OnTheBrink is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 12:53 PM
  #10
Perro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,114
vCash: 500
I kinda like this deal.

Perro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 12:55 PM
  #11
Turrican*
Not a homer
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Stabmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,960
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Autograph View Post
I think Edmonton would still have to truly overpay due to the divisional rivalry and owing to the fact that Glencross is a versatile winger on a fantastic contract.

Edmonton would probably have to take Glencross as-is, no Bouma, with the 1st, Musil, and Lander all together.

Alternatively:

Glencross
Jackman

for

2014 1st round pick
Anton Lander
David Musil

Mainly because Jackman has no value to Calgary but he might have value to the Oilers and it helps make the trade more balanced even though in these circumstances it's not needed to be.
CP would have a field day with this!

"HOHOHOHO FEASTER GOT A TOP 5 PICK FOR GLENCROSS!! HOHOHOHO"

Turrican* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 12:58 PM
  #12
SmellOfVictory
Registered User
 
SmellOfVictory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,703
vCash: 114
Value-wise, I like it. And if there was a team he'd waive to go to, it would be Edmonton (still not sure if he would, though).

SmellOfVictory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 01:06 PM
  #13
Noori
Registered User
 
Noori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,691
vCash: 50
Interesting. I'm confused as to how I feel about it so it's probably fair value. And I'm pretty sure Glencross would waive to go to Edmonton.

Noori is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 01:08 PM
  #14
InfinityIggy
Inflammatory Poster
 
InfinityIggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,097
vCash: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheBrink View Post
2014 1st + Musil + 4th rounder would be about max offer.
If we traded Glenx* id be happy with that return. Having said that I just can't see him getting moved unless something changes and he wants out.

InfinityIggy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 01:10 PM
  #15
OnTheBrink
Registered User
 
OnTheBrink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 1,553
vCash: 352
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turrican View Post
CP would have a field day with this!

"HOHOHOHO FEASTER GOT A TOP 5 PICK FOR GLENCROSS!! HOHOHOHO"
I am wagering with Glencross on the Oilers the pick would be more in the 10-20 range. still more then they got for Iggy or Bou.

Jackman doesn't do much for me, not much for hockey sense or puck skills, sure will drop the gloves but getting face punched in doesn't help team much.

will give mid round pick instead of Lander, if Bouma is not coming back. EDM needs a center coming if one is going.

OnTheBrink is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 01:14 PM
  #16
Flamesarmstrong22
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,406
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by herashak View Post
take out bouma/ lander and its good
This

Flamesarmstrong22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 01:14 PM
  #17
blue_n_copper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 229
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintAnton View Post
I was under the impression Glencross left Edmonton because he saw no chance to gain top 6 ice time (they made it clear his role was bottom 6).

Now with Hall, Eberle, Hemsky, Yakupov, Perron playing Wing where does he fit in?
If Perron is playing 3rd line minutes and Hemsky is gone you might have a spot until then I doubt MacT can talk Glencross into considering a move back.

That said hard to ignore giving a division rival you're best forward of the last 2 years I wouldn't do it.
The Oilers did not even offer him a contract after his great half-season there because they were saving the cap space to take a run at Hossa, which they did but not successfully. Worst decision Kevin Lowe ever made in my humble opinion.

blue_n_copper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 01:23 PM
  #18
stayinalive
Registered User
 
stayinalive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Bielefeld
Country: Germany
Posts: 1,323
vCash: 1078
Overpayment by Edmonton. I am suprised an Oilers Fan made this proposal

stayinalive is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 01:31 PM
  #19
ComixZone
Registered User
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,640
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by stayinalive View Post
Overpayment by Edmonton. I am suprised an Oilers Fan made this proposal
It's Edmonton gearing up to make a push for some deep playoff success. Glencross would fits a need for the Oilers and has an amazing contract that includes a NMC - and Edmonton is likely one of the only, if not THE only place he would waive to go to.

Glencross + his contract is worth a pick in the 15-25 range - especially given what happened in free agency this summer with Clarkson, and Glencross is significantly better than Clarkson and makes a lot less per year.

ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 01:40 PM
  #20
OnTheBrink
Registered User
 
OnTheBrink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 1,553
vCash: 352
Agree with above. well said.

OnTheBrink is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 01:43 PM
  #21
InfinityIggy
Inflammatory Poster
 
InfinityIggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,097
vCash: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
It's Edmonton gearing up to make a push for some deep playoff success. Glencross would fits a need for the Oilers and has an amazing contract that includes a NMC - and Edmonton is likely one of the only, if not THE only place he would waive to go to.

Glencross + his contract is worth a pick in the 15-25 range - especially given what happened in free agency this summer with Clarkson, and Glencross is significantly better than Clarkson and makes a lot less per year.
Very true, add in the fact we are divisional rivals who have NEVER made a substantial trade, and OP and a couple other proposals in this thread actually seem spot on.

InfinityIggy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 01:53 PM
  #22
belair
Registered User
 
belair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,891
vCash: 500
Feasterize this deal and I could get on board...


Curtis Glencross


Nick Schultzowski
2014 3rd Round Pick

belair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 01:58 PM
  #23
topchowda
Registered User
 
topchowda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,025
vCash: 500
I would do the 2014 1st + Musil.

Oilers need the depth on forward right now. And with the depth of D prospects, Musil is expendable.

For the Flames, it opens up a spot for a younger guy, they get another 1st to help the rebuild and a good prospect. However losing a proven NHL forward would likely ensure a spot in the bottom 3, which is either good or bad depending on how you look at it. (Bad for the present, better for the future to get an Eklbad type player)

Musil- Brodie D pairing in 3 years would be good

topchowda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 02:04 PM
  #24
Trafalgar Law
Waive Ryan Smyth
 
Trafalgar Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,240
vCash: 500
I'd prefer to give the 2015 1st instead. The Oilers could very well be picking top 10 again this season, and that's too much a price for Glencross.

Trafalgar Law is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-29-2013, 02:13 PM
  #25
dss97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 596
vCash: 500
I'd do this trade. I still facepalm every once in a while when I think about letting Glencross walk.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheBrink View Post
A top 9 of;

Hall - RNH - Eberle
Perron - Gags - Yak
Glencross -Gordon - Hemsky

would look pretty damn strong.

Plus Glencross can easily be substituted into the top 6 as needed.
That's a hell of a top 9.

dss97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.