HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Top 20 Flyers Prospects(#14)

View Poll Results: 14th best Flyers prospect?
MA Bourdon 13 24.07%
Brandon Manning 17 31.48%
Kyle Flanagan 10 18.52%
Matt Konan 0 0%
Valeri Vasiliev 6 11.11%
Frederic Larsson 2 3.70%
Tyrell Goulbourne 4 7.41%
Maxim Lamarche 0 0%
Merrick Madsen 0 0%
Terrence Amorosa 0 0%
Andrew Johnston 0 0%
Cal Heeter 0 0%
Reece Willcox 1 1.85%
Michael Parks 0 0%
Derek Mathers 1 1.85%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-10-2013, 06:12 PM
  #1
BillyShoe1721
Terriers
 
BillyShoe1721's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 16,818
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to BillyShoe1721
Top 20 Flyers Prospects(#14)

1. C Scott Laughton(77.36%)
2. D Samuel Morin(59.70%)
3. D Robert Hagg(69.74%)
4. D Shayne Gostisbehere(66.30%)
5. G Anthony Stolarz(48.15%)
6. C Nick Cousins(77.22%)
7. RW Petr Straka(39.17%)
8. LW Tye McGinn(63.33%)
9. C/RW Jason Akeson(28.28%)
10. D Mark Alt(36.36%)
11. LW Marcel Noebels(45.31%)
12. D Oliver Lauridsen(40.38%)
13. LW Taylor Leier(36.84%)
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.

BillyShoe1721 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2013, 06:36 PM
  #2
sobrien
RAFFLCOPTER
 
sobrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 7,039
vCash: 555
No clue at this point, but threw a bone to MAB, because we know he can be a 6-7 guy in the NHL if healthy.


After him, it'll be some conglomeration of Larsson, Wilcox, Konan, Parks, and Goulbourne for me. And maybe Johnston because I'm rooting for the kid.

sobrien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2013, 07:08 PM
  #3
JVR21
G
 
JVR21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 7,910
vCash: 500
Sad to see how quickly Manning dropped.

JVR21 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2013, 08:13 PM
  #4
FlyersFan61290
Registered User
 
FlyersFan61290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 9,084
vCash: 500
Manning, IMO MAB shouldn't be on the list.

FlyersFan61290 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2013, 08:16 PM
  #5
4thline4life
The Mased God
 
4thline4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: n philly
Posts: 2,389
vCash: 500
Voted vasiliev. He's 19 and I think is playing in the khl. I think he has the skill but its a matter if he comes over.

4thline4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2013, 11:04 PM
  #6
Hockeypete49
How you like me now!
 
Hockeypete49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Jersey
Country: Isle of Man
Posts: 4,580
vCash: 500
I went with Mathers. The kid really wants to be a pro. I saw a interview he did and I was really impressed with him when he captained the Petes. Good Luck kid.

Hockeypete49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2013, 11:14 PM
  #7
LegionOfDoom91
Registered User
 
LegionOfDoom91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 15,878
vCash: 500
I went with Manning he's the only one left that I think might make something out of himself at the next level.

It's pretty much a dart board from here on out although Mathers & Goulbourne have better chances to make the NHL from the remaining guys but that has more to with their pugilistic skills than their actual talents.

LegionOfDoom91 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 12:43 AM
  #8
BernieParent
Registered User
 
BernieParent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,489
vCash: 500
You must all love Flanagan more than you do!!! I'm ordering you to!

Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan

BernieParent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 01:54 AM
  #9
GoneFullHextall
Fire Berube
 
GoneFullHextall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somewhere in NH
Country: United States
Posts: 32,551
vCash: 50
voted for Flanagan to make BP happy


GoneFullHextall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 03:32 AM
  #10
kelmitchell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 544
vCash: 500
Honestly does anyone here think Manning will ever really be a pro?? IMO I think he's pretty bad lol

kelmitchell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 05:00 AM
  #11
CS
Bryzgalov's Blueline
 
CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lumberton, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 14,005
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kelmitchell View Post
Honestly does anyone here think Manning will ever really be a pro?? IMO I think he's pretty bad lol
He's better than Lauridsen.

CS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 06:12 AM
  #12
OzFlyer
Registered Boozer
 
OzFlyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 784
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BernieParent View Post
You must all love Flanagan more than you do!!!
Agreed. I think (hope) Kyle Flanagan could surprise all of us like Reader! I think he could jump them all and get a place on the third-fourth line after a couple of injuries.


Last edited by OzFlyer: 08-11-2013 at 06:23 AM.
OzFlyer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 10:23 AM
  #13
Jray42
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 3,423
vCash: 300
Manning >>> Lauridsen

Jray42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 12:43 PM
  #14
poneill27
Registered User
 
poneill27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Casterly Rock
Country: United States
Posts: 800
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyersFan61290 View Post
Manning, IMO MAB shouldn't be on the list.
I agree with this. I voted MAB just so I can get his name off of the list of choices.

BTW We have some good players in our system!!

poneill27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 03:18 PM
  #15
sobrien
RAFFLCOPTER
 
sobrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 7,039
vCash: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by poneill27 View Post
I agree with this. I voted MAB just so I can get his name off of the list of choices.

BTW We have some good players in our system!!
wut?


the top 3?

sobrien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 03:32 PM
  #16
DrinkFightFlyers
Grave Before Shave
 
DrinkFightFlyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 12,976
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to DrinkFightFlyers
Quote:
Originally Posted by poneill27 View Post
BTW We have some good players in our system!!
Outside of Laughton, Haag, and Morin (and Ghost depending on who you talk to), most of the Flyers prospects are pretty low-end. Mostly bottom-line, bottom-pair, fringe NHLers.

DrinkFightFlyers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 03:46 PM
  #17
sa cyred
Yea....the Flyers...
 
sa cyred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Traveling...
Country: Cuba
Posts: 15,775
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrinkFightFlyers View Post
Outside of Laughton, Haag, and Morin (and Ghost depending on who you talk to), most of the Flyers prospects are pretty low-end. Mostly bottom-line, bottom-pair, fringe NHLers.
Honestly though, overall, compared to other teams, we arent that bad. I think there is a HUGE misconception where our pipline sucks and everyone else has great ones. Other then a few teams that have sucked constently the past few years and built it up, most teams have 3-4 real good prospects, a few projects, a few raw players, and a few low ceiling/AHL guys.

Not saying we are the top prospect team, but I also dont think we are the worse.

sa cyred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 03:55 PM
  #18
Broad Street Elite
Registered User
 
Broad Street Elite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,416
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa cyred View Post
Honestly though, overall, compared to other teams, we arent that bad. I think there is a HUGE misconception where our pipline sucks and everyone else has great ones. Other then a few teams that have sucked constently the past few years and built it up, most teams have 3-4 real good prospects, a few projects, a few raw players, and a few low ceiling/AHL guys.

Not saying we are the top prospect team, but I also dont think we are the worse.
Not to mention the number of players already in the NHL under the age of 25. Prospect pool is definitely impacted by guys like Couturier/B.Schenn already being in the NHL and no longer being considered prospects.

The "low quality" of our system is certainly impacted by a decade of trading too many picks, but the situation is rapidly improving.

Broad Street Elite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 04:59 PM
  #19
Hockeypete49
How you like me now!
 
Hockeypete49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Jersey
Country: Isle of Man
Posts: 4,580
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa cyred View Post
Honestly though, overall, compared to other teams, we arent that bad. I think there is a HUGE misconception where our pipline sucks and everyone else has great ones. Other then a few teams that have sucked constently the past few years and built it up, most teams have 3-4 real good prospects, a few projects, a few raw players, and a few low ceiling/AHL guys.

Not saying we are the top prospect team, but I also dont think we are the worse.


I agree. This organization is starting to stockpile some talent and hopefully some of these kids pan out and make the big club one day.

Hockeypete49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 06:02 PM
  #20
BillyShoe1721
Terriers
 
BillyShoe1721's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 16,818
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to BillyShoe1721
There are still only one or two prospect pools that I wouldn't trade ours for, New Jersey and maybe Vancouver.

BillyShoe1721 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 06:36 PM
  #21
sa cyred
Yea....the Flyers...
 
sa cyred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Traveling...
Country: Cuba
Posts: 15,775
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyShoe1721 View Post
There are still only one or two prospect pools that I wouldn't trade ours for, New Jersey and maybe Vancouver.
Sharks? Avs have MacKinnon but after that really nothing. Canes? The Rangers also arent basking in prospect greatness.

I do think the Flyers having a "****** prospect line" is as overblown as the RedWings get credit for drafting. Well maybe not as bad but still pretty bad.

sa cyred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 07:18 PM
  #22
CS
Bryzgalov's Blueline
 
CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lumberton, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 14,005
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyShoe1721 View Post
There are still only one or two prospect pools that I wouldn't trade ours for, New Jersey and maybe Vancouver.
Prospect pools are as overrated as the pseudo-mythical "elite" goaltender. It's all BS.

Truth is that you'd be hard-pressed to find many 25 & under teams that you would move the Flyers' 25 & under roster for.

CS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 09:10 PM
  #23
jd2210
Registered Non User
 
jd2210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Great White North
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,542
vCash: 500
Still MAB. If we are only going to 20 I'd say you'd be safe to stop adding players now.

jd2210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 10:14 PM
  #24
BillyShoe1721
Terriers
 
BillyShoe1721's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 16,818
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to BillyShoe1721
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa cyred View Post
Sharks? Avs have MacKinnon but after that really nothing. Canes? The Rangers also arent basking in prospect greatness.

I do think the Flyers having a "****** prospect line" is as overblown as the RedWings get credit for drafting. Well maybe not as bad but still pretty bad.
I'd trade our entire prospect pool for MacKinnon. As for the Sharks, I'd take Hertl over Laughton, Mueller is about the same as Morin, Nieto is better than Cousins, then there's O'Regan, Tennyson, Abeltshauser...

Canes: Lindholm>Laughton, Murphy>Morin. Rangers have Kreider, Miller, Kristo, Fasth which is way better than our forwards, and McIlrath and Skjei on D. I'd definitely take them over ours.

BillyShoe1721 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-11-2013, 10:33 PM
  #25
The Dream
User Registered
 
The Dream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Country: United States
Posts: 3,976
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyShoe1721 View Post
I'd trade our entire prospect pool for MacKinnon.
Easily, easily. Lets see what we got. Laughton who projects to be at best a good second line two-way center. And potential top 4 d-man. And a raw 6-7 defensemen. Then all we have is some wildcards and some fringe NHLers.

Hell, I'd probably trade our entire prospect pool for Drouin or maybe Seth Jones and a young winger.

The Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.