Conacher's performed admirably so far in his career. I don't understand why this guy get's so much crap..
He was our leading scorer last season; outscoring Turris, Alfredsson, Zibanejad and Silfverberg over the 48 game schedule... And he did this despite only averaging about 13 minutes a game and having to adapt to a completely different style of play over the last dozen games in the reg. season.(And he still put up 5 points and was a +6 over those 12 games.) He was also the only player on our team projected for 50 points or more in a full season this year.
The kids a fast, agile, gritty player that has a nose for the net and doesn't mind taking a couple shots to get to the blue paint.
Why wouldn't he deserve a top-6 spot? IMO anything else would be detrimental to his development.
He scored the majority of his points playing for a different team.
Looks like he's going back to Anaheim so the answer is no here for me.
People got to learn how to use punctuation. On our radio ads the other day a black man's wallet was reported as missing. Instead of a man's wallet black in colour missing a black man's wallet is missing.
Ryan wasn't on the roster at any point during the 2012-2013 season. With Conacher it's a different story.
If it makes everybody feel better I didn't mean he was 'the Ottawa Senators' leading scorer' in the sense that he scored the most points for Ottawa this season, I just meant he was the player with the most points on the Ottawa Senators roster at the end of the season.