HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

2013-2014 NFL Thread (Week 1!)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-08-2013, 10:51 PM
  #876
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 12,112
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverfish View Post
McGahee? Turner?
I'm for either one of them. both are upgrades over what we have.

Lundsanity30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 10:52 PM
  #877
BroadwayBlues
oxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxo
 
BroadwayBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York City
Country: United States
Posts: 9,143
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machinehead View Post
And linebackers. And defensive backs. And an offensive line. And a a tight end. And a kicker.
'All that matters is getting to the QB with DEs' - Jerry Reese


BroadwayBlues is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 10:55 PM
  #878
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 12,112
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwayBlues View Post
'All that matters is getting to the QB with DEs' - Jerry Reese

Jerry Reese won 2 SBs in 4 years with exactly that approach.

Lundsanity30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 10:56 PM
  #879
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 12,112
vCash: 500
On a positive note... T2 looked good.

Lundsanity30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:00 PM
  #880
ImIdaho
Choo-Choo-Choose me!
 
ImIdaho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,722
vCash: 500
I can't really fault the defense in this game. I thought they played stellar, at first. Sure, there were a few wide open Dallas receivers, missed tackles, but all in all, take into account that the O coughed up the ball on 3 consecutive drives, I believe the offense was on the field for close to 6 minutes..in the first half!

The D did what they had to do. The offense..

*Sigh*

Bring on Denver.

ImIdaho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:00 PM
  #881
BroadwayBlues
oxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxo
 
BroadwayBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York City
Country: United States
Posts: 9,143
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
Jerry Reese won 2 SBs in 4 years with exactly that approach.
I know. but the defense is the reason why they never dominant during the regular season. You can't ignore the other levels of the defense. Teams like the 49ers are dominate (by today's NFL) because they have impact players at all levels of the D. Seahawks too.

Yes. 2 SBs but things would be a lot easier if they had better regular season defense.

Put this O with a good D, 11-13 wins just about every year.

BroadwayBlues is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:04 PM
  #882
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 12,112
vCash: 500
The Giants offense is coming alive at least.. thats a good sign.. If the defense is even decent we will win alot of games.. We have a great offense.

The biggest problem lies with not having a RB who can hold onto the ball.

Lundsanity30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:04 PM
  #883
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 12,112
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwayBlues View Post
I know. but the defense is the reason why they never dominant during the regular season. You can't ignore the other levels of the defense. Teams like the 49ers are dominate (by today's NFL) because they have impact players at all levels of the D. Seahawks too.

Yes. 2 SBs but things would be a lot easier if they had better regular season defense.

Put this O with a good D, 11-13 wins just about every year.
I dont disagree.. the Giants LBs have been crap for how many years now?

Lundsanity30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:06 PM
  #884
DudMan28
Registered User
 
DudMan28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,555
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
On a positive note... T2 looked good.
Only going to get better. He'll be a big playmaker for us

DudMan28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:06 PM
  #885
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 12,112
vCash: 500
If we don't pick up a RB before next Sunday, 1. that's stupid. and 2.. I would try Cox.

Lundsanity30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:08 PM
  #886
BroadwayBlues
oxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxo
 
BroadwayBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York City
Country: United States
Posts: 9,143
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
I dont disagree.. the Giants LBs have been crap for how many years now?
At some point it becomes obvious that Reese doesn't value LBs. O-line is second....

BroadwayBlues is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:08 PM
  #887
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 12,112
vCash: 500
The defense gave us more than enough to win that game today. 14 points were on Wilson's fumble for a TD and Scott's missed catch for a TD..

Lundsanity30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:09 PM
  #888
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 12,112
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwayBlues View Post
At some point it becomes obvious that Reese doesn't value LBs. O-line is second....
I know, but you can't just put **** there.. They don't have to be studs, but we need SOMEONE there who is at least somewhat good..

Lundsanity30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:11 PM
  #889
ImIdaho
Choo-Choo-Choose me!
 
ImIdaho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,722
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
If we don't pick up a RB before next Sunday, 1. that's stupid. and 2.. I would try Cox.
This is going to sound stupid to ask but did Coughlin put in two RBs out there? It felt like it was all Wilson then all Scott.

ImIdaho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:13 PM
  #890
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 12,112
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImIdaho View Post
This is going to sound stupid to ask but did Coughlin put in two RBs out there? It felt like it was all Wilson then all Scott.
other than those 2 the other guy is Cox and I assume Coughlin doesn't trust him yet, but Wilson is clearly on his **** list now so we might see him get some touches.

Lundsanity30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:14 PM
  #891
PurpleHayes
Da **** is that?
 
PurpleHayes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Dallas , Texas
Country: Italy
Posts: 7,946
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
The defense gave us more than enough to win that game today. 14 points were on Wilson's fumble for a TD and Scott's missed catch for a TD..
I hated scott from the start.. he was supposed to be cut but brown got hurt... I live in Oklahoma and now ima hear about how the cowboys are the better team ugh!!!!... even tho its the first game im very happy hockey season is right around the corner because the people down here are to uneducated to understand hockey

PurpleHayes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:16 PM
  #892
ImIdaho
Choo-Choo-Choose me!
 
ImIdaho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,722
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
other than those 2 the other guy is Cox and I assume Coughlin doesn't trust him yet, but Wilson is clearly on his **** list now so we might see him get some touches.
No, I know those are the 3 RBs the Giants have. My question is when the offense was on the field, did Coughlin only have one RB out there? Because I don't recall seeing Scott alongside Wilson, and I didn't see Scott alongside Cox. It seemed like only Wilson was out there, followed by Scott being alone.

ImIdaho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:20 PM
  #893
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 12,112
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImIdaho View Post
No, I know those are the 3 RBs the Giants have. My question is when the offense was on the field, did Coughlin only have one RB out there? Because I don't recall seeing Scott alongside Wilson, and I didn't see Scott alongside Cox. It seemed like only Wilson was out there, followed by Scott being alone.
oh, then yeah.. it was never changed up.. it was either all wilson or all scott.

Lundsanity30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:30 PM
  #894
ImIdaho
Choo-Choo-Choose me!
 
ImIdaho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,722
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
oh, then yeah.. it was never changed up.. it was either all wilson or all scott.
Well, that was ****ing stupid of Coughlin. I hope he got his senior moment out of the way.

ImIdaho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2013, 11:47 PM
  #895
NYSportsfan87
Thank You Eli
 
NYSportsfan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 2,869
vCash: 500
God dammit

NYSportsfan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2013, 12:14 AM
  #896
Miller Time NYR
Registered User
 
Miller Time NYR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 5,836
vCash: 500
If we had a running back that could do the absolute bare minimum of get a few yards per carry, hold onto the damn ball and catch a screen pass while stepping backwards that's a win. Thought the defense looked good a little shakey to start as I expected and you can't fault them for giving up those plays to Austin and witten you cant cover everybody every play, if the offense could have sustained some TOP on the possessions they turned the ball over on on fumbles and even came away with all of 3 points on the 3 drives that's a completly different game but you can't hand a team the ball in the red zone 3 times and expect to win.

Also didn't notice Webster royally **** anything up tonight which is always a plus...

Miller Time NYR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2013, 12:18 AM
  #897
Groot
I am Groot.
 
Groot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ridge, New York
Country: United States
Posts: 5,663
vCash: 500
The way I see it, Wilson has only fumbled against the Cowboys, so he should be good for a while.

Groot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2013, 12:25 AM
  #898
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 12,112
vCash: 500
on the plus side, clean up the TO's and we should be really tough to beat.

Lundsanity30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2013, 06:09 AM
  #899
jas
Unsatisfied
 
jas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 14,772
vCash: 500
The Giants handed the Cowboys 24 points off TOs, while the first Wilson fumble killed a drive in the red zone. That's at least a 27 point swing. It's mind-boggling that the game was as close as it was. Just shows the explosiveness of the Giant offense and the awfulness of the Cowboy secondary. Looked like the same ol' Cowboys to me.

jas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2013, 06:18 AM
  #900
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
 
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 31,273
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jas View Post
The Giants handed the Cowboys 24 points off TOs, while the first Wilson fumble killed a drive in the red zone. That's at least a 27 point swing. It's mind-boggling that the game was as close as it was. Just shows the explosiveness of the Giant offense and the awfulness of the Cowboy secondary. Looked like the same ol' Cowboys to me.
Thank you. And basically without a running game. That seems to be lost amongst the...er...noise. The Giants couldn't have played worse and still had a chance to win. Whether that says more about the Giants or the Cowboys remains to be seen.

__________________

Last edited by SingnBluesOnBroadway: 09-09-2013 at 06:23 AM.
SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.